Global warming 'undeniable,' scientis...

Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

There are 34463 comments on the TwinCities.com story from Jul 29, 2010, titled Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say. In it, TwinCities.com reports that:

Scientists from around the world are providing even more evidence of global warming, one day after President Barack Obama renewed his call for climate legislation.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at TwinCities.com.

Since: Jul 12

Chester, VA

#22673 Nov 26, 2012
Philliproy wrote:
Thanks goodness the United States House of Representatives has a mandate in 2012 to oppose such an empty headed and totally clueless President!
There are 224 Republicans and only 178 clueless and mindless Democraps in the United States House of Representatives. And, there are going to be 234 Republicans and only clueless and mindless 195 Democraps in the House of Represenatives in January. That is, obviously, a mandate for the overwhelmingly Republican House to continue opposing the Illegitimate Obama Regime "by any means necessary." How else can you interpret the results?
What they have a "mandate" to do is provide legitimate and honest questioning of Presidential policy and regulation passed by the Senate and when necessary provide viable alternatives incorporating Republican ideology (as opposed to conservative which they are not.)

The Senate owes us the same thing.

The fact is, Congress as a whole owes it to the American people to solve our problems and get us onto a sustainable foundation of growth. For the last 4 years the Republicans have not wanted to do so.
PHD

Oak Park, MI

#22674 Nov 26, 2012
And the Dems allowed it. Anyway neither party are held accountable for their non actions. The only global warming that is going on is the warmth when they line their pockets with our money.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#22675 Nov 26, 2012
responder wrote:
<quoted text>
You've never once, to my observation, pointed out and supported a single "flaw" in global warming theory or AGW. All you do is run your yap, pretending to have "disproven" something.
You're really an enormous joke...
Then you need to be more observant. I have pointed out several. Of course the issue may be that to open your eyes and see those points would require you to admit that the one who has been the butt of an enormous joke is you.

Also, have you not noticed that the term AGW has since disappeared from the airwaves and many web sites.

Oh, to help "point out" the facts to you I included a few links I am sure you will find upsetting.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists...

http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-h...
PHD

Oak Park, MI

#22676 Nov 26, 2012
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you need to be more observant. I have pointed out several. Of course the issue may be that to open your eyes and see those points would require you to admit that the one who has been the butt of an enormous joke is you.
Also, have you not noticed that the term AGW has since disappeared from the airwaves and many web sites.
Oh, to help "point out" the facts to you I included a few links I am sure you will find upsetting.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists...
http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-h...
You need to find that like that may entitle you to a refund from that higher education institute you attended for a refund. Actually they need to seek funds from you for wasting their and the other students time. You have taken valuable space from the class room or web site you attended. It didn't work you are Less than a Box of Rocks. Now do the right thing and give them their money you owe them.

Since: Jul 12

Chester, VA

#22677 Nov 26, 2012
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you need to be more observant. I have pointed out several. Of course the issue may be that to open your eyes and see those points would require you to admit that the one who has been the butt of an enormous joke is you.
Also, have you not noticed that the term AGW has since disappeared from the airwaves and many web sites.
Oh, to help "point out" the facts to you I included a few links I am sure you will find upsetting.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists...
http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-h...
I think he meant your failure to point out a "real" flaw as opposed to the ones we regularly dispose of as being non-science thouggts.
PHD

Oak Park, MI

#22678 Nov 26, 2012
However you post it the Less than a Box of Rocks AKA "tina" will always be Less than a Box of Rocks. Save time thinking seems to confuse the Less than a Box of Rocks AKA "tina"

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#22679 Nov 26, 2012
okb2 wrote:
<quoted text>
I think he meant your failure to point out a "real" flaw as opposed to the ones we regularly dispose of as being non-science thouggts.
With non-science meaning anything that isn't in line with your faith.

The fact is that science has already buried the failed theory that was AGW.
PHD

Oak Park, MI

#22680 Nov 26, 2012
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
With non-science meaning anything that isn't in line with your faith.
The fact is that science has already buried the failed theory that was AGW.
There you have it again folks the Less than a Box of Rocks has spoken Hay they are now venture vultures. They only thing that piles higher and deeper is your Less than a Box of Rocks answers. Now get back to the moon shine brewing.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#22681 Nov 26, 2012
Tina,

When you cannot seem to capitalize your own moniker, your credibility is weak, just like your arguments, intellect, and perspective.... Do you need this in single syllable words ??? LMAOROTFU~!
PHD

Oak Park, MI

#22682 Nov 26, 2012
Amused Slew wrote:
Tina,
When you cannot seem to capitalize your own moniker, your credibility is weak, just like your arguments, intellect, and perspective.... Do you need this in single syllable words ??? LMAOROTFU~!
Nice try but that wouldn't help. The Less than a Box of Rocks AKA "tina" is a product of the one child left behind program.

Since: Jul 12

Catonsville, MD

#22684 Nov 26, 2012
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
With non-science meaning anything that isn't in line with your faith.
The fact is that science has already buried the failed theory that was AGW.
Now you are getting CRS. We had that conversation over a year ago.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#22685 Nov 26, 2012
PHD wrote:
.....neither party are held accountable for their non actions.......
The tea party germinated to self-righteously dig their heels in & spread non-action.

Since: Jul 12

Catonsville, MD

#22686 Nov 26, 2012
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
The tea party germinated to self-righteously dig their heels in & spread non-action.
When Clinton was President the Republican Party would still work with the Democrats. But when bush became President they became an "Our way or the highway" type party. Despite no longer having the majority, they have not changed that attitude.
PHD

Oak Park, MI

#22687 Nov 26, 2012
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
The tea party germinated to self-righteously dig their heels in & spread non-action.
So what ever you call them they know over the years they conditioned a bunch of sheepelbots.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#22688 Nov 26, 2012
okb2 wrote:
..... they became an "Our way or the highway" type party. Despite no longer having the majority.....
Self-righteousness keeps them looking down their noses at everyone else. They can't see their minority position as kings & queens, doesn't work in the U.S. That's why romneyhood, romesia, & romney who(?) told everyone else they were lowly peons, & was surprised when he lost.
PHD

Oak Park, MI

#22689 Nov 27, 2012
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
Self-righteousness keeps them looking down their noses at everyone else. They can't see their minority position as kings & queens, doesn't work in the U.S. That's why romneyhood, romesia, & romney who(?) told everyone else they were lowly peons, & was surprised when he lost.
There you go again with that told thing you do well.Again calm down Obama care will cover it.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#22690 Nov 28, 2012
Amused Slew wrote:
Tina,
When you cannot seem to capitalize your own moniker, your credibility is weak, just like your arguments, intellect, and perspective.... Do you need this in single syllable words ??? LMAOROTFU~!
Or it can be a sign that I do not have an ego issue.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#22691 Nov 28, 2012
okb2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Now you are getting CRS. We had that conversation over a year ago.
I am use to alarmist cycling back to old topics when they think it has slipped everyone's minds. So when they bring up the same old dry material I just bring out the same points that killed it the time before.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#22692 Nov 28, 2012
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Or it can be a sign that I do not have an ego issue.
Or It could be a sign, you missed grade school, when they taught to capitalize proper names ?? Poor Tina, not smart and really NOT educated. LMAOROTFU~!

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#22693 Nov 28, 2012
Amused Slew wrote:
<quoted text>Or It could be a sign, you missed grade school, when they taught to capitalize proper names ?? Poor Tina, not smart and really NOT educated. LMAOROTFU~!
Funny but twelve years worth of teachers would remember that I did not miss more than a few days. Not to mention the professors who's classes I attended seem to think I knew enought to grant me a degree and are about ready to add a second one to that.

So, the real question is why are you so interested in attacking how I spelled my name a half dozen years ago. Could it be that you have nothing else left?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

2012 Presidential Election Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 5 min loose cannon 196,944
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 8 min Grey Ghost 1,275,089
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 2 hr LeDuped 193,554
News Carol Shea-Porter Files to Run Again in New Ham... Wed zenduane 1
News Ted Cruz: If the government shuts down over my ... Aug 26 By a vote 1
News Debbie Wasserman Schultz declares 'anchor babie... Aug 25 Andrew 29
News Supreme Court hands President Obama a major vic... (Jun '12) Aug 25 swedenforever 3,699
More from around the web