Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1404296 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Yeah

San Jose, CA

#970545 Aug 25, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll try watching it tomorrow.
I'm going for a ride in a Spaceship tonight:>
Well you already have the space between your ears!
Yeah

San Jose, CA

#970546 Aug 25, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
Congress is just sitting on its butt through all of this. Right now, there is only one branch of government and it is tyrrsanical.
There are no checks and balances.
lol! The House really makes it obvious.... particularly the to idiots!
Yeah

San Jose, CA

#970547 Aug 26, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again, let me remind you:
Iraq MOVED the WMD's to Syria where they recently used them, confirming that Liberal Democrat idiots were and still are 100% WRONG!
Bush was right therefore Liberals are wrong. It is not that complicated.
lol! Sucker! In fact, you're a willing sucker!
Yeah

San Jose, CA

#970548 Aug 26, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
So? Are you that stupid that never wrote notes on your hands?
She is too smart for idiots like you!
Time managers wrote notes in hands, sticky notes, notebooks, letters and even napkins. Great ideas were done in napkins, you idiot, in moments of inspirations. Harry potter was designed in napkins, Stephen Hawking black hole theory in napkins.
You are a woman hater because you are an idiot Liberal, besides a baby killer, and an immoral anti-Christians.
Sarah Palin wrote 10,000 email and paid Liberals could not find a single bad thing on her. However, Obama's college transcripts are still being protected by Lawyers at a tune of one million dollars a year!!!
Had you seen your man-child's college transcripts?
lol! She's an idiot son. And since you're a follower of hers, that makes you a bigger idiot!

I love this comedy channel!
Yeah

San Jose, CA

#970549 Aug 26, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
Democrats want to cheat, that's all.
lol! Hop were caught cheating!
Yeah

San Jose, CA

#970550 Aug 26, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
The Liberals war against Sarah Palin (a women) continues!
And her family!
lol! I hope she runs for president! I sure don't see cons saying that.

Cons must REALLY hate her!
Yeah

San Jose, CA

#970551 Aug 26, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
You hate Bush so much that you are acting stupidly like Dan Rather!
lol! You love bushie boy so much you've BECOME stupid... by choice!

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#970552 Aug 26, 2013
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>
All the frisco phags have moved from the bathhouses to the forest rest stops, one too many bouts of pole-smking, and "kaboom".....
More curiosity about the gay lifestyle from the "Im not gay, I'm just curious" moron.
Those internal demons are begging to come out of the closet.
PDUPONT

Chicopee, MA

#970553 Aug 26, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
Not going quite yet. Just read this on an email.
Don't know if anyone wants to take the time to verify the following provisions in Obamacare, but let's hope these aren't some of the surprises Pelosi warned us about.
Page 50/section 152:
The bill will provide insurance to all non-U.S. residents, even if they are here illegally.
Page 58 and 59:
The government will have real-time access to an individual's bank account and will have the authority to make electronic fund transfers from those accounts.

Can anyone disprove any or all of the above? I hope.
Sure Carol, everything you get in emails is God's honest truth. The fact is that these emails have been floating around since 2009. Let's take these one at a time;
All non-US citizens, illegal or not, will be provided with free healthcare services.
False. That’s simply not what the bill says at all. This page includes "SEC. 152. PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION IN HEALTH CARE," which says that "except as otherwise explicitly permitted by this Act and by subsequent regulations consistent with this Act, all health care and related services (including insurance coverage and public health activities) covered by this Act shall be provided without regard to personal characteristics extraneous to the provision of high quality health care or related services." However, the bill does explicitly say that illegal immigrants can’t get any government money to pay for health care. Page 143 states: "Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States." Current law prohibits illegal immigrants from participating in government health care programs.
The federal government will have direct, real-time access to all individual bank accounts for electronic funds transfer.
False. This section aims to simplify electronic payments for health services, the same sort of electronic payments that already are common for such things as utility bills or mortgage payments. The bill calls for the secretary of Health and Human Services to set standards for electronic administrative transactions that would "enable electronic funds transfers, in order to allow automated reconciliation with the related health care payment and remittance advice." There is no mention of "individual bank accounts" nor of any new government authority over them. Also, the section does not say that electronic payments from consumers is required.
PDUPONT

Chicopee, MA

#970554 Aug 26, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
Not going quite yet. Just read this on an email.

Page 65/section 164:
The plan will be subsidized (by the government) for all union members, union retirees and for community organizations (such as the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now - ACORN).
Page 241 and 253:
Doctors will all be paid the same regardless of specialty, and the government will set all doctors' fees.
Page 65: Taxpayers will subsidize all union retiree and community organizer health plans (read: SEIU, UAW and ACORN)
Misleading. Page 65 is the start of a section (SEC. 164. REINSURANCE PROGRAM FOR RETIREES) that would set up a new federal reinsurance plan to benefit retirees and spouses covered by any employer plan, not just those run by labor unions or nonprofit groups. Specifically, it covers “retirees and ... spouses, surviving spouses and dependents of such retirees” who are covered by “employment-based plans” that provide health benefits. It’s open to any “group health benefits plan that ... is maintained by one or more employers, former employers or employee associations,” as well as voluntary employees’ beneficiary associations (page 66). Furthermore, the aim of the fund is to cut premiums, copays and deductibles for the retirees. Payment “shall not be used to reduce the costs of an employer.”
Doctors will all be paid the same regardless of specialty, and the government will set all doctors' fees.
Misleading. It’s true that page 253 refers to “relative value units” to be used when determining payment rates for doctor’s services, and that such RVUs would weigh factors “such as time, mental effort and professional judgment, technical skill and physical effort, and stress due to risk.” But this is nothing new; the government already uses RVUs when setting rates it will pay under Medicare. For example, the RVUs assigned to a colonoscopy are currently double the RVUs assigned to an intermediate office visit. In fact, page 253 is part of a section (Sec. 1122) that sets up a process for correcting existing but “potentially misvalued” rates.
PDUPONT

Chicopee, MA

#970555 Aug 26, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
Cancer hospital will ration care according to the patient's age.
Page 317 and 321:
The government will impose a prohibition on hospital expansion; however, communities may petition for an exception.
Page 425, line 4-12:
The government mandates advance-care planning consultations. Those on Social Security will be required to attend an "end-of-life planning" seminar every five years.
Page 429, line 13-25:
The government will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order.
Can anyone disprove any or all of the above? I hope.
Page 272/section 1145:
Cancer hospital will ration care according to the patient's age.
False. This page merely calls for a study of whether a certain class of hospitals incur higher costs than some others for the cancer care they deliver. It also says the secretary of HHS “shall provide for an appropriate adjustment” in payments “to reflect those higher costs.” It’s hardly “rationing” to pay hospitals more to compensate for higher costs.
Page 317 and 321:
The government will impose a prohibition on hospital expansion; however, communities may petition for an exception.
False. Expansion is forbidden only for rural, doctor-owned hospitals that have been given a waiver from the general prohibition on self-referral. It does not apply to hospitals in general. The bill provides for exceptions to even this limited expansion ban (page 321).
Page 425, line 4-12:
The government mandates advance-care planning consultations. Those on Social Security will be required to attend an "end-of-life planning" seminar every five years.
Page 429, line 13-25:
The government will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order.
False. These claims are a twisted interpretation of a provision in the bill that says Medicare will cover voluntary counseling sessions between seniors and their doctors to discuss end-of-life care. Medicare doesn’t pay for such sessions now; it would under the bill. End-of-life care discussions include talking about a living will, hospice care, designating a health care proxy and making decisions on what care you want to receive at the end of your life. Doctors do the consulting, not the "government" or a "bureaucracy." The e-mail author’s assertion that the bill calls for "an ORDER from the GOVERNMENT" for end-of-life plans rests on language about a patient drawing up such an order stipulating their wishes, and having that order signed by a physician. There’s nothing about "an order from the government." The bill defines an order for life-sustaining treatment as a document that "is signed and dated by a physician …[and] effectively communicates the individual’s preferences regarding life sustaining treatment." See our article "False Euthanasia Claims" for more on such assertions.
So as you see Carol all of these assertions are either false or misleading.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#970556 Aug 26, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
The idea that recent mass shooters are mostly registered Democrats is a myth
1. Nidal Hasan (the Ft. Hood shooter) lived in either Virginia (his state of residence prior to being sent to Ft. Hood) or Texas, neither of which has partisan registration. Therefore the claim that he was a "registered Democrat" is false. I do not know if he voted or how he voted, but I do know that unless he was registered in a state in which he did not reside, that the claim that he is a registered Democrat is FALSE.
2. Since Virginia does not have partisan registration there is also no way to tell whether Seung-Hui Cho was a Democrat, but again because there is no partisan registration in the state we can say that the claim that he is a registered Democrat is FALSE.(Update: A more obvious point is that Cho was a resident alien, not a US citizen, so he was not eligible to vote in the US)
3. The allegation that James Holmes was registered Democrat was based on a Breitbart blogger Joel B. Pollack, who found voter registration records for a DIFFERENT James Holmes who was about the same age. Alex Jones’ Infowars and other right-wing websites then dutifully repeated the lie without verifying it. It was later determined that the Colorado Theater Shooter James Holmes was NOT registered to vote, as evidenced by this retraction:{Newly-released information on the suspect’s birthdate (which, as indicated in our initial report, was a slight mismatch), combined with new details Breitbart News has obtained about the suspect’s likely addresses, together suggest that the suspect may, in fact, not have been registered to vote.}. However, most of right-wing media continued to promote the lie without printing Breitbart sites retraction. The claim that James Holmes was a registered Democrat is FALSE.
http://www.examiner.com/article/the-idea-that...
Hasan was a registered Democrat.
Hui Cho sent hate mail to the Bush administration multiple times.
James Holmes worked on Obama's campaign.

so much for your denial....
So, why are mass murderers attracted to the Democratic Party?

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#970558 Aug 26, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Page 272/section 1145:
Cancer hospital will ration care according to the patient's age.
False. This page merely calls for a study of whether a certain class of hospitals incur higher costs than some others for the cancer care they deliver. It also says the secretary of HHS “shall provide for an appropriate adjustment” in payments “to reflect those higher costs.” It’s hardly “rationing” to pay hospitals more to compensate for higher costs.
Page 317 and 321:
The government will impose a prohibition on hospital expansion; however, communities may petition for an exception.
False. Expansion is forbidden only for rural, doctor-owned hospitals that have been given a waiver from the general prohibition on self-referral. It does not apply to hospitals in general. The bill provides for exceptions to even this limited expansion ban (page 321).
Page 425, line 4-12:
The government mandates advance-care planning consultations. Those on Social Security will be required to attend an "end-of-life planning" seminar every five years.
Page 429, line 13-25:
The government will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order.
False. These claims are a twisted interpretation of a provision in the bill that says Medicare will cover voluntary counseling sessions between seniors and their doctors to discuss end-of-life care. Medicare doesn’t pay for such sessions now; it would under the bill. End-of-life care discussions include talking about a living will, hospice care, designating a health care proxy and making decisions on what care you want to receive at the end of your life. Doctors do the consulting, not the "government" or a "bureaucracy." The e-mail author’s assertion that the bill calls for "an ORDER from the GOVERNMENT" for end-of-life plans rests on language about a patient drawing up such an order stipulating their wishes, and having that order signed by a physician. There’s nothing about "an order from the government." The bill defines an order for life-sustaining treatment as a document that "is signed and dated by a physician …[and] effectively communicates the individual’s preferences regarding life sustaining treatment." See our article "False Euthanasia Claims" for more on such assertions.
So as you see Carol all of these assertions are either false or misleading.
There you go again confusing the right wing whiners with the facts.

Since: May 11

Aspers, PA

#970559 Aug 26, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> Ran a few large ones. Owned a few small-midsize ones. You know crap about me. Employees are hired to do the work required. Nothing more, nothing less. If you or the owner/manager decide some may be worth more than that then that is your choice.
I know you from your posts.

Only a GD idiot would invest millions in new buildings & spend tens of thousands on advertising only to put their customers in front of a minimum wage employee with no benefits.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#970560 Aug 26, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I know you from your posts.
Only a GD idiot would invest millions in new buildings & spend tens of thousands on advertising only to put their customers in front of a minimum wage employee with no benefits.
You obviously have no concept of what something like a "business plan" is.
But, business plans aren't relly important to communists, are they?
TheIndependentMa jority

Brodhead, KY

#970561 Aug 26, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I know you from your posts.
Only a GD idiot would invest millions in new buildings & spend tens of thousands on advertising only to put their customers in front of a minimum wage employee with no benefits.
Yeah, the smart ones pay decent according to apptitude levels and would offer AFFORDABLE optional plans-NOT free rides.
TheIndependentMa jority

Brodhead, KY

#970562 Aug 26, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You obviously have no concept of what something like a "business plan" is.
But, business plans aren't relly important to communists, are they?
Hiel z'ozombietics-Gulag camps, fwee cell phones and gruel fer ever one.
lol

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#970563 Aug 26, 2013
Syria...
What is happening in Syria is not civil war. It is Suni Wahhabist trying to take control of the government and replace the Iranian Shi'ite influence. It's nothing more than the usual Suni-Shi'ite bullshit.
Who are the "rebels" in Syria?
Al Qaeda.
Who are the "extablishment" in Syria?
Iranian dupes.

Russia will send their most advanced anti ship missiles to Syria.

This will be just one more time the Russians prove Obama is Putin's bitch.

Now, why would Obama get sailors killed backing Al Qaeda in their attempt to take control of Syria?

It's a no-win situation. Any way it turns out, the government of Syria will be an enemy of the United States.
Besides, why the fuck are we helping Al Qaeda? We should be helping the Syrian government kill them.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#970564 Aug 26, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I know you from your posts.
Only a GD idiot would invest millions in new buildings & spend tens of thousands on advertising only to put their customers in front of a minimum wage employee with no benefits.
McDonald's comes to mind. Burger King? Let's see, Olive Garden just built a new restaurant around here. Waiters and waitresses don't even get minimum wage without tips! You were saying?

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#970565 Aug 26, 2013
Actually two of the businesses I owned the employees got paid piece work. No work, no pay. Best way to do it in my opinion.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

2012 Presidential Election Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 3 min Injudgement 233,040
News Emanuel Cleaver: Hillary Clinton faces a irrati... 8 min Ronald 10
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 29 min Coffee Party 219,484
News KKK Endorsement (Mar '08) 5 hr Divorce Attorney 132
News Gray Matters: Be healthy, avoid geezer jokes (Feb '09) 7 hr Divorce Lawyer 43
News A female presidential candidate offers encourag... Mon R WELCH 1
News Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) Mon Into The Night 35,558
More from around the web