Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1601100 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870495 Mar 8, 2013
Waxturd drunk early in the day - again!!
Dem idiots wrote:
<quoted text>You're still a racist RealDave..

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870496 Mar 8, 2013
Waxturd drunk early in the day - again!!
Dem idiots wrote:
<quoted text>Don't worry about walking a mile in Jane's shoes. Try a day of thinking in your own deranged head sonicfiller. LOL..Loops and shit....
sonicfilter

United States

#870497 Mar 8, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
MLK risked his life fighting injustices and racism perpetrated by Democrats in the South. You may not like that part of your party's history, but if MLK were a Democrat in the Deep South in the 1960s, it wouldn't make sense.
According to his own words, he was neither a Democrat or a Republican as he "did not want to be inextricably bound to either party."
So I agree with you that he was not a Republican.
It was Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy (D), however, who gave the FBI authroization to wiretap his phones. He and President John F. Kennedy were both wary of King's association to a New York lawyer involved with the Communist Party USA.
Then again, MLK also happened to like JFK.
So there you go.
Another indication that progress is being made was found in the recent presidential election in the United States. The American people revealed great maturity by overwhelmingly rejecting a presidential candidate who had become identified with extremism, racism, and retrogression. The voters of our nation rendered a telling blow to the radical right. They defeated those elements in our society which seek to pit white against Negro and lead the nation down a dangerous Fascist path.

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/...

so was LBJ part of the radical right?

and the democrats in the South that you of speak were conservatives.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870498 Mar 8, 2013
Waxturd drunk early in the day - again!!
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>Stock Market up, Republicans getting rich, Corporate America at it's best. Who needs a bunch occupy wall street retards?

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870499 Mar 8, 2013
Waxturd drunk early in the day - again!!
Jimmy wrote:
<quoted text>
Louisiana representative Democrat William J. Jefferson's refrigerator or course!
carol

Orlando, FL

#870500 Mar 8, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
"OMG OMG OMG"
"Drones! Drones! Drones!"
You do realize that a sniper could take you out just as easy or a missile from a helicopter or a scud.
My God you right whiners are so ridiculous.
We weren't even supposed to know the drone program existed according to Robert Gibbs.

That doesn't raise an eyebrow as to the secrecy behind this administration and what other secrets they might be trying to hide.

It raises both of mine.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870501 Mar 8, 2013
Waxturd drunk early in the day - again!!
NUT surpriZed wrote:
<quoted text> Obama can't swim?
THE POPE

Zagreb, Croatia

#870502 Mar 8, 2013
YOU KNOW, THE POPE FINDS IT ODD THATA THE TEA PARTY SO ADAMANT ABOUTA DA RIGHTS FOR "UNBORN CHILDREN" BUT IS MORE THAN WILLING TO LET THE ELDERLY DIE IN THE GUTTER. HERE'S HOW HE FIGURES IT THOUGH, THE OLD, THEY ARE WHAT THEY ARE, THEIR BUYING POWER ISSA LIMITED ANNA THEY BASICALLY A DRAIN ON THE SYSTEM OF COMMERCE. IN OTHER WORDS, OLD PEOPLE ARE NO GOOD FOR BUSINESS, UNLESS YOU A DOCTOR OR AN INSURANCE COMPANY, IN WHICH CASE, THEY ARE YOUR BUSINESS.

THE CUTE LITTLE BABIES, ONNA THE OTHER HAND, THEY GROW UP A LITTLE, THEY SO HAPPY TO GET A JOB SWEEPING FLOORS THEY KISSA YOU ASS, WORK FOR NOTHIN', AND WILL BLOW YOU TO GET A LEG UP. NOT ONLY ARE THEY THE SLAVES OF TODAY BUT THEY'RE THE CONSUMERS OF TOMORROW, AN INTEGRAL PART OF "ECONOMIC GROWTH."

POPE HATE TO BE SO CYNICAL BUT WHAT OTHER REASON COULD THERE BE?(POPE ALREADY KNOW THE ANSWER HERE, SO DONNA BE FOOLISH AN' TRY AND RESPOND, IT'S A TRAP.)(YOU WATCH, THE GUYS'LL RESPOND ANYWAYS.)(POPEA LOVE THESE PEOPLE...)
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#870503 Mar 8, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
Waxturd drunk early in the day - again!!
<quoted text>
Waxman does not drink, nor is he posting as Dem Idiot, idiot.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

Gauley Bridge WV

#870505 Mar 8, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Any cost numbers?
Clearly, any taxpayer who already has insurance as an employee benefit will take a huge hit.
When I asked her what she was going to tax to raise the enormous amounts of money it would take to pay for she couldn't tell me. Libtard pie in the sky feel good bullshit!! Obamacare will cost at least $700 lion just to pay the insurance premium starting next year. Where the hell is that coming from? there is not enough money in the country to pay for it. By 2025 SSI and Medicare will use up every tax dollar the federal government collects. That doesn't include Obamacare. Where is the money coming from to pay for the rest of the government?
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#870507 Mar 8, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you "pissed off" that Obama wants to spend more money than he wants to cut?
Or that he doesn't really give a crap about you or Lily or anyone else despite your desperation to believe otherwise?
It helps to know what "pisses you off" the most.
He cares about me; he told me in his email. Stop lying.
Nuculur octopussy

Pompano Beach, FL

#870508 Mar 8, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
And you're one of the idiots who refuses to raise taxes on Corporations and CEO's!
For years you blame our ills on the poor, the 47%.
Now you change it to blame the rich, who you've defended for years, and the ones who Bush bailed out with TARP.
You're too stupid to keep your arguments straight!!
<quoted text>
You're too stupid to keep your arguments straight!!
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#870509 Mar 8, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
Waxturd drunk early in the day - again!!
<quoted text>
Jeeesh! I just got here nutcracker! Quit humping my leg!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#870510 Mar 8, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Another right whiner who takes a good report & searches for the negative.
Perhaps Galt the loser, would prefer hos party's last report showing a loss of 750,000 jobs.
My God you people are whiners.
When the labor force participation rate declines, jobs are being lost, permanently.
TSM

United States

#870511 Mar 8, 2013
Isnít this Typical of Liberals ďDo as I say, Not as I DoĒ White House Taking No Actions Yet to Cut Back Its Budget!!

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870512 Mar 8, 2013
TSM wrote:
<quoted text>
Nuculur are saying the President does have the Constitutional Authority to kill Americans on Us Soil thatís Non- Combatant?
Nice for a halfwit like you to admit what I said was correct.

Holder did not say "NO", and you just verified it!!

Thanks, your stupidity often works in my favor.

Guess who gets to decide who's a 'combatant'??

BWAHAHAHAHAHA
Jane Says

New York, NY

#870513 Mar 8, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
If it pisses you, Jane and Carol off; I'm for it. It'll give you a reason for living.
now if only you could find a reason for living. judging by how much time you post, your family must have voted you off the island years ago.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#870514 Mar 8, 2013
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>Has Paul changed his stand that Medicare and Medicaid must keep all their high payments to physicians for cataract surgery?
How much is your eyesight worth?

Galt is more interested in the quality of medical care than in the cost. If the most expensive eye surgeon is the best, that is where Galt goes.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870515 Mar 8, 2013
Waxturd drunk early in the day - again!!

He just proved it!!
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
Waxman does not drink, nor is he posting as Dem Idiot, idiot.
Lincoln

United States

#870516 Mar 8, 2013
Homer 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>Well if you think about it, Obama was elected with a lot fewer votes than in 2008 so either the Republican candidate was extremely weak or the Republican Party is in serious decline.
agree... as President Romney was saying the other day...:-)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

2012 Presidential Election Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Election tampering by Russia still without evid... 26 min YouDidntBuildThat 11
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 30 min Jay 289,332
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 3 hr WelbyMD 242,611
News Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 5 hr Edward 37,424
News Mitt Romney surges, leads Obama in polls (Oct '12) Wed Oneryders Daughter 13
News Opinion: The Fatal Flaw for Republicans in Grah... Wed fingers mcgurke 1
News Kid Rock to open Detroit arena amid protest Tue The Truth 17
More from around the web