GOP eyes new election laws

Jan 18, 2013 Full story: KCTV5 213

After back-to-back presidential losses, Republicans in key states want to change the rules to make it easier for them to win.

Full Story
First Prev
of 11
Next Last
conservative crapola

Reading, PA

#1 Jan 18, 2013
If teapussy can't win, teapussy wants to change the rules.

hahahahahahahahahaha
BS IS Called

Irving, TX

#2 Jan 18, 2013
conservative crapola wrote:
If teapussy can't win, teapussy wants to change the rules.
hahahahahahahahahaha
They are not proposing a rules change, they are proposing a procedural change.
conservative crapola

Reading, PA

#3 Jan 18, 2013
"After back-to-back presidential losses, Republicans in key states want to change "the rules" to make it easier for them to win."

desperate times in teapussyland.

hahahahahahahahaha
BS IS Called

Irving, TX

#4 Jan 18, 2013
conservative crapola wrote:
"After back-to-back presidential losses, Republicans in key states want to change "the rules" to make it easier for them to win."
desperate times in teapussyland.
hahahahahahahahaha
Some states already split their electoral votes.

It is a discussion regarding a procedural change, not a rules change, or don't you get the difference?
conservative crapola

Reading, PA

#5 Jan 18, 2013
BS IS Called wrote:
<quoted text>
You insist procedure. The story states rules.

teapussydesperationland.
BS IS Called

Irving, TX

#6 Jan 18, 2013
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
You insist procedure. The story states rules.
teapussydesperationland.
That's because it is a procedural change, just because the author uses the word "rules" does not make it so.
conservative crapola

Reading, PA

#7 Jan 18, 2013
So when assault weapons are banned, that will be a procedural change? Gotcha.

hahahahahahahahahaha
BS IS Called

Irving, TX

#8 Jan 18, 2013
conservative crapola wrote:
So when assault weapons are banned, that will be a procedural change? Gotcha.
hahahahahahahahahaha
If it is in the best interests of the Senate, yes, since they are allowed to define a change in the rules as a change in procedure.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#9 Jan 18, 2013
BS IS Called wrote:
<quoted text>
Some states already split their electoral votes.
It is a discussion regarding a procedural change, not a rules change, or don't you get the difference?
Why do you suppose Republicans want a "procedural" change? Are you being deliberately naive?

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#10 Jan 18, 2013
How about gettingb rid of the electoral college altogether? Most Americans favor its elimination.
Just think. Popular vote, no George W. Bush.
hgfdgchv

Seattle, WA

#11 Jan 18, 2013
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
How about gettingb rid of the electoral college altogether? Most Americans favor its elimination.
Just think. Popular vote, no George W. Bush.
and no obama
BS IS Called

Irving, TX

#12 Jan 18, 2013
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>Why do you suppose Republicans want a "procedural" change? Are you being deliberately naive?
Negative on being naive, and of course they want "procedural" change, to better their odds of winning, just like the Senate and Obamacare a few years ago.
Your Ex

United States

#13 Jan 18, 2013
When
Voter suppression
Fails.....

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#14 Jan 18, 2013
LOL! Is this a surprise to anyone? Republicans can't win on a level playing field where all Americans are allowed to vote, so naturally they'll keep trying to "reform" their way into office - reform black people out of the booth, "reform" Chicanos out of the booth, "reform" students out of the booth, etc. etc.

Hell, the only reason they got as close as they did LAST election was through gerrymandering! Watch out for Republican chicanery!

“Obama Shames the USA”

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#15 Jan 18, 2013
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
How about gettingb rid of the electoral college altogether? Most Americans favor its elimination.
Just think. Popular vote, no George W. Bush.
President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application. A “Voluntary Surrender” is not something where you decide “Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?” and forget to renew your license. No, a “Voluntary Surrender” is something you do when you’ve been accused of something, and you ‘voluntarily surrender” your license five seconds before the state suspends you.
.
Trust a democrat? Get thrown onto the train tracks like that poor lady in Philadelphia yesterday? She should have been carrying a gun if you ask me. Getting attacked by ACORN is no fun. No SIRREE.
Your Ex

United States

#16 Jan 18, 2013
hgfdgchv wrote:
<quoted text>
and no obama
Not so good with the numbers?

Barack Obama
65,899,625
Willard Mitt Romney
60,928,981

Home schooling should be outlawed....l
hgfdgchv

Seattle, WA

#17 Jan 18, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
LOL! Is this a surprise to anyone? Republicans can't win on a level playing field where all Americans are allowed to vote, so naturally they'll keep trying to "reform" their way into office - reform black people out of the booth, "reform" Chicanos out of the booth, "reform" students out of the booth, etc. etc.
Hell, the only reason they got as close as they did LAST election was through gerrymandering! Watch out for Republican chicanery!
Lol it's surprising you still have a job!!
conservative crapola

Whitehall, PA

#18 Jan 18, 2013
Ninthman wrote:
<quoted text>
Your period will be over in 5 days, rube. Until then, borrow le au fraud's midol.

hahahahahahahaha
hgfdgchv

Seattle, WA

#19 Jan 18, 2013
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
You insist procedure. The story states rules.
teapussydesperationland.
Forest Gump had a saying for you:
Stupid is as stupid does.

Don't worry, you will grow up soon enough.
conservative crapola

Whitehall, PA

#20 Jan 18, 2013
hgfdgchv wrote:
<quoted text>
You spell your name like forest.

hahahahahahahahaha

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 11
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

2012 Presidential Election Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min woodtick57 1,155,824
'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 9 min Low Plains Sodbus... 165,815
Parties assess variables looking at 2016 map 20 min Le Jimbo 1
The uncomfortable truth about racism in America 59 min spud 305
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr Jacques Ottawa 182,087
Who is the worst president since WWII ? 5 hr Zeppelin 1,110
Can GOP shatter 'Obama coalition' in 2016? 5 hr Zeppelin 1
More from around the web