BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 225439 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

United States

#117182 Oct 13, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
1) I have NEVER entered into the Obama NBC discussions....go find a post from me.
2) NO WAY!!! I have claimed that George Romney was a dual citizen. NEVER said Willard was not a NBC.
3) Senate res...14th amend....NEVER entered into any discussions
4) I have now proven YOU to be the LIAR...Don't think you are....go find ANY comment I made concerning the first three point.
I say you cannot do it.
Put up or shut up.
According to the laws of BirfoonWorld you must prove the negative or else they are right.

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#117183 Oct 13, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
the Canadian man who said that to your husband is in the minority. Last poll taken was 80% in favour of keeping medicare, and most of those people also added that they would like to see it as a 100% universal health care plan, dentistry, drugs and all. Oh,l forgot drugs , eye care, all free after 65. And no forms to fill, just present your health card.
LMAO!
You just keep posting and showing off that stupidity of yours, ok Sherlock?

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#117184 Oct 13, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
There was no lie.
Your response just didn't agree with Anita's preconceived views.
Wow that's really an interesting analogy.
So in other words, we are wrong because we don't all agree with each other.
What logic, moron.
Oh and am I supposed to feel intimidated because you used my real name?
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#117185 Oct 13, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
All free? LMAO what a dolt!
Illiterate birfoon. Did I not suggest you take remedial reading classes? I just wrote that taxes pay for universal health care, but as everyone pays, the cost is better spread out. But that is too complicated for you. Couontiresd with universal health care fare as well as yours that does not have it. And everyone's covered. It's practiced in 33 OECD nations, and it works well, better than what you have and much much cheaper and ensures better health. Look at the statistics, longevity, natal deaths, etc. Then come back to me.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#117186 Oct 13, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
That's all you can do isn't it jacqazz, criticize. What pathetic waste of oxygen you are.
Criticize? He, a Canadian, supposedly her horse's mouth, told her we had I.D. cards. We don't. Never did. I like the idea, but we don't have them.

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#117187 Oct 13, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
According to the laws of BirfoonWorld you must prove the negative or else they are right.
Why don't you just stop beating around the bush and tell Jock that you want his body, already?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

United States

#117188 Oct 13, 2012
Goodnight birfoons.

Hope you can explain why the birfoon doctrine "if you can't prove my fantasy wrong, I'm right," is valid.

If you believe that you also believe in Bertrand Russell's celestial teapot.

Good night. Don't let the Illuminati/Soros bugs bite.
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#117189 Oct 13, 2012
Siouxweety wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow that's really an interesting analogy.
So in other words, we are wrong because we don't all agree with each other.
What logic, moron.
Oh and am I supposed to feel intimidated because you used my real name?
In YOUR world, EVERYBODY who does not agree with YOU is wrong.

DUH!!!

MORON!!!!
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#117190 Oct 13, 2012
Siouxweety wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you just stop beating around the bush and tell Jock that you want his body, already?
...proving once again that birthers are unable to think for themselves and ALWAYS resort to some crap...

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#117191 Oct 13, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
In YOUR world, EVERYBODY who does not agree with YOU is wrong.
DUH!!!
MORON!!!!
I never said that.
You did.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117193 Oct 13, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Either you can effectively rebut the statement or UR impotent.
Case closed.
<quoted text>
How many times do you have to see the words in front of your face before you finally go....oh, I get it now? Your argument fails and you know it. I guess keep telling yourself this over and over, maybe someday even you'll believe it. Now, the case is closed. You lose!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117195 Oct 13, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
...and you are a pump.
A pump? WTH Ah, down at the pool hall again are ya?

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#117196 Oct 13, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
...proving once again that birthers are unable to think for themselves and ALWAYS resort to some crap...
All you've posted on here is insults, crap and nothing else.
None of you can even hold a conversation with anyone not on your side without resorting to insults.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117197 Oct 13, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Illiterate birfoon. Did I not suggest you take remedial reading classes? I just wrote that taxes pay for universal health care, but as everyone pays, the cost is better spread out. But that is too complicated for you. Couontiresd with universal health care fare as well as yours that does not have it. And everyone's covered. It's practiced in 33 OECD nations, and it works well, better than what you have and much much cheaper and ensures better health. Look at the statistics, longevity, natal deaths, etc. Then come back to me.
Funny, I've read quite a few posts in a Canadian forum where they say the uni healthcare sux. Leave it to none other than you to differ.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117198 Oct 13, 2012
wojar wrote:
Goodnight birfoons.
Hope you can explain why the birfoon doctrine "if you can't prove my fantasy wrong, I'm right," is valid.
If you believe that you also believe in Bertrand Russell's celestial teapot.
Good night. Don't let the Illuminati/Soros bugs bite.
Nite Mobarf, nite lil Mobarf, nite momma Mobarf.....Nite JohnBoy!
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#117199 Oct 13, 2012
Siouxweety wrote:
<quoted text>
All you've posted on here is insults, crap and nothing else.
None of you can even hold a conversation with anyone not on your side without resorting to insults.
Now, now Anita,

All you've posted on here is insults, crap and nothing else.
None of you can even hold a conversation with anyone not on your side without resorting to insults.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#117201 Oct 13, 2012
ehancock wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama was born in the USA, in Hawaii, and hence under the Wong Kim Ark ruling of the US Supreme Court, he is a Natural Born US Citizen.
No where in Wong Kim Ark ruling is there a mention of the term Natural Born Citizen.
Rush

Ã…kersberga, Sweden

#117202 Oct 13, 2012
How are the Obama buttsurfers doing tonight? 23 days and a wakeup.... LOL

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#117204 Oct 13, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
That's news?
You forgot to mention that the person who wrote that believed that persons born in the US (other than children of foreign ambassadors and foreign hostile occupying troops) were born as natural born citizens and were not born "foreigners, aliens".
Duh! Your crap is tired, old, and tedious. Long dispensed with.
Get a grip!
<quoted text>
It's only tired because you can't formulate a logical rebuttal. But that's nothing new for you puppet.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117208 Oct 13, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
That all children, born within the dominion of the United States, of foreign parents holding no diplomatic office, became citizens at the time of their birth, does not appear to have been contested or doubted until more than fifty years after the adoption of the Constitution, when the matter was elaborately argued in the Court of Chancery of New York, and decided upon full consideration by Vice Chancellor Sandford in favor of their citizenship. Lynch v. Clarke,(1844) 1 Sandf. Ch. 583.
You have to move on to 1866! LMAO Give it up you morons.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

2012 Presidential Election Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 1 min Cornelius Scudmister 244,107
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Injudgement 1,433,566
News Why it Matters: Russia 5 min RUSSIA is NOTHING 2
News Post-debate poll: Clinton takes round one 11 min deplorable spud 297
News FBI releases notes from Clinton email investiga... 23 min Lawrence Wolf 178
News Anticipating debate, Trump says he thinks syste... 27 min barefoot2626 172
News Police in riot-hit Charlotte say shooting victi... 1 hr okimar 685
More from around the web