BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 239484 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#101870 Aug 22, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
And this morning, or was it last night, you lectured on people here being uncivil? And you accept unwarranted and untrue claim that Clnton had intercourse with woman while her husband was committing suicide, based on Nazi Ann Coulter's saying? That's civil? Is it really? And you write, of your president "The man should be in prison". May I use Rogue's vocabulary on you, remembering that I did not invent what follows, just copying : flaming hypocrite.
Yes, and Nixon should have gone to prison too. I am an equal opportunity finger-pointer!!!!
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#101871 Aug 22, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
And this morning, or was it last night, you lectured on people here being uncivil? And you accept unwarranted and untrue claim that Clnton had intercourse with woman while her husband was committing suicide, based on Nazi Ann Coulter's saying? That's civil? Is it really? And you write, of your president "The man should be in prison". May I use Rogue's vocabulary on you, remembering that I did not invent what follows, just copying : flaming hypocrite.
Sloop21 wrote:
<quoted text>
You make no sense. At least not to me.
Unless I've got the wrong person, your response shows you did understand but have no real answer. You lecture, and , crash, your glass house comes down.
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#101872 Aug 22, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hmmm, out of the 25 largest cities the only cities that lost population between 1990-210 have have been black majority cities.
Philadelphia has 43.3% blacks but stayed the 5th largest city.
Detroit has 81.5% blacks and went from the 7th largest to the 18th largest.
Baltimore has 64% blacks and they went from 12th to 21st and
Wash DC has 50.7% blacks and they went from 19th to 24th.
Oh, they all have black mayors too.
Hmmmm, whaz up wit dat?
I will take a guess, the greater the percentage of blacks there are, the more Liberal the local government and the more they try and provide for the pooooor and the more they take away from those who are not poor. Sooooo, the none-more move the hell out of the cities.
Toronto, largest city in Canada, 3 million +. 55% of its population was not born in Canada. Murders in 2011 : 45. And we are worried as gangs are better and better-armed, profiting from cross-border gun smuggling. But we do have gun control, and pistols are still well nigh impossible to obtain. Still, 3 million + population, majority of it ethnic, 45 murders. How does that compare?
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#101873 Aug 22, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
And this morning, or was it last night, you lectured on people here being uncivil? And you accept unwarranted and untrue claim that Clnton had intercourse with woman while her husband was committing suicide, based on Nazi Ann Coulter's saying? That's civil? Is it really? And you write, of your president "The man should be in prison". May I use Rogue's vocabulary on you, remembering that I did not invent what follows, just copying : flaming hypocrite.
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>

I never said anything about anyone going to prison. Your birther brother did.
Yes, and Nixon should have gone to prison too. I am an equal opportunity finger-pointer!!!!
Sloop21

Shreveport, LA

#101874 Aug 22, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
And this morning, or was it last night, you lectured on people here being uncivil? And you accept unwarranted and untrue claim that Clnton had intercourse with woman while her husband was committing suicide, based on Nazi Ann Coulter's saying? That's civil? Is it really? And you write, of your president "The man should be in prison". May I use Rogue's vocabulary on you, remembering that I did not invent what follows, just copying : flaming hypocrite.
<quoted text>
Unless I've got the wrong person, your response shows you did understand but have no real answer. You lecture, and , crash, your glass house comes down.
I lectured? I'll go back and check.
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#101875 Aug 22, 2012
Re 101873, attach this to it :

I never said anything about anyone going to prison. Your birther comrade Sloop did.
Sloop21

Shreveport, LA

#101876 Aug 22, 2012
Sloop21 wrote:
<quoted text>
I lectured? I'll go back and check.
I went back and looked at most of my posts (which isn't many) but I don't see any lecture. Perhaps you are mistaken?
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#101877 Aug 22, 2012
Sloop21 wrote:
<quoted text>
Dignity before Dishonor. Clinton lacked this quality.
Dignity before dishonour? At the cost of almost 300,000 dead, ruination of infrastructure, 1.8 billion dollars for no reason at all? Ruination of the USA's economy? You see dignity in that? I see deep dishonour. And you dare compare Clinbton' tryst in the oval office, not a good idea, I grant you, between two consenting adults with GWB's presidency? Clinton and his family paid for that lack of jusgement on his part, NOT the nation. With GWB, who had no sex in the White House, the entire population has paid for that and will keep on paying a long time. Better he had had sex in the oval office. GWB was, is, a pariah outside the USA. Clinton? He re-established friendly diplomatic relations with a host of countries, made American prestige shine abroad, was the proverbial salesman who could sell fridges to eskimoes. Man was loaded with hounour and dignity and no president left his country in better shape than he did, with the exception perhaps of FDR and perhaps Truman.

You nave no idea, obviously, what dignity and dihonour are, your definition of the former being petty and tunnel-like and the latter
attributed to the wrong person. Sad.
Dale

Wichita, KS

#101878 Aug 22, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
If you knew who John Paul Jones was, you would not put him in the same league as birfoons.
Thank you for recognizing us as a league! Unlike Obama, we are legitimate.
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#101879 Aug 22, 2012
Sloop21 wrote:
<quoted text>
I went back and looked at most of my posts (which isn't many) but I don't see any lecture. Perhaps you are mistaken?
Could be
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#101880 Aug 22, 2012
Sloop21 wrote:
I'm taken aback by the rude, nasty behavior of a few of these posters. What is the point? Trying to ruin the thread or what?
See above
Sloop21

Shreveport, LA

#101881 Aug 22, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Dignity before dishonour? At the cost of almost 300,000 dead, ruination of infrastructure, 1.8 billion dollars for no reason at all? Ruination of the USA's economy? You see dignity in that? I see deep dishonour. And you dare compare Clinbton' tryst in the oval office, not a good idea, I grant you, between two consenting adults with GWB's presidency? Clinton and his family paid for that lack of jusgement on his part, NOT the nation. With GWB, who had no sex in the White House, the entire population has paid for that and will keep on paying a long time. Better he had had sex in the oval office. GWB was, is, a pariah outside the USA. Clinton? He re-established friendly diplomatic relations with a host of countries, made American prestige shine abroad, was the proverbial salesman who could sell fridges to eskimoes. Man was loaded with hounour and dignity and no president left his country in better shape than he did, with the exception perhaps of FDR and perhaps Truman.
You nave no idea, obviously, what dignity and dihonour are, your definition of the former being petty and tunnel-like and the latter
attributed to the wrong person. Sad.
The Office of the Presidency mandates dignity. I believe it is you that is confused on the term. Dignity before dishonor is one of the principles of our country. I believe you said it best, "the proverbial salesman who could sell fridges to eskimos".

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#101882 Aug 22, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Artur Davis
Residence Birmingham, Alabama
Alma mater Harvard Law School (J.D.)
Harvard University (B.A.)
Religion Lutheran
Oh, he also just happens to be black but the Republicans don't seem to notice as they are color blind. It is you Libtards that see things in shades of black and white and ....shades of grey.
Here’s the problem any jury would have with Davis Rogue. Was he a lying POS in 2008 or is he a lying POS now? Problem is neither the Republicans nor the Democrats could ever trust him. Does Rodney Dangerfield ring a bell?

Unless you’re speaking in the clinical sense no one is color blind Rogue.
Sloop21

Shreveport, LA

#101883 Aug 22, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
See above
Is this the "lecture" you're referring to? You must be pulling my leg.
Dale

Wichita, KS

#101884 Aug 22, 2012
Justus Liebig wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, simply repeating the same erroneous bare assertion, over and over does not make it true.
The alien, while visiting a foreign country is bound by temporary or local allegiance to the host country. This has been a principle understood from before the founding of this nation and throughout its history. State and Federal courts recognize this principle and have taught that the alien as well as the child of aliens is under the jurisdiction of the host country. The judges of the courts in this country and every civilized nation understand the principle as well as the definition of permanent vs local allegiance. UR the one living in an alternate universe.
Grow up.
<quoted text>
In this case repeating the truth is a necessity.
At no-time does a visiting alien come under the jurisdiction of the US Constitution nor owe allegiance to the same, this is why we have treaties.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#101885 Aug 22, 2012
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Here’s the problem any jury would have with Davis Rogue. Was he a lying POS in 2008 or is he a lying POS now? Problem is neither the Republicans nor the Democrats could ever trust him. Does Rodney Dangerfield ring a bell?
Unless you’re speaking in the clinical sense no one is color blind Rogue.
Artur Davis is on the good list of Obama's tenure,that and the Republicans gaining control of The House of Representatives. There isn't a much else on that list that can be credited to Obama,the other list,not quite the same.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#101886 Aug 22, 2012
BO must go wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, pops, ur boy is doomed.
DENVER—Two University of Colorado professors have devised a model to predict who will win the presidential election under current economic circumstances. The victor, they say, will be Republican Mitt Romney.
The model uses economic indicators from all 50 states to predict the race's outcome. The forecast calls for Romney to win 320 electoral votes out of 538. It says Romney will also win virtually every state currently considered a swing state, including Colorado.
The professors who created the model, Ken Bickers from CU-Boulder and Michael Berry from CU-Denver, say it correctly forecast every winner of the electoral since 1980.
They warn the model does not account for sudden changes in the economy or unexpected developments in states split 50-50. Polls in many states, including Colorado, show a virtually deadlocked race.
Read more: CU forecasters predict a Romney presidency - The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/romney/ci_21373080/...
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse
Oh those crazy forecasting models can be tricky can’t they BO?

A few weeks ago, we were starting to see a gap between the popular vote and the Electoral College. Generally speaking, our model was giving Mr. Obama about a two-in-three chance (67 percent) of winning the popular vote, but slightly better than a 70 percent chance of winning the Electoral College.

Now? Our popular vote forecast really hasn’t changed very much. As of Tuesday night, our model gave Mr. Obama a 66.9 percent chance of winning the popular vote.
But the gap between the Electoral College and the popular vote has pretty much dissipated. Mr. Obama was given a 67 percent chance of winning the Electoral College in Tuesday’s model — almost exactly the same odds as in the popular vote forecast.
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

You haven’t begun to be sorry. LOL

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#101889 Aug 22, 2012
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>They do not give any information that would validate your statement. Barry Soeotro was not a senator when he attended Occidental. "Neither Obama’s image nor name appear in any Occidental yearbooks or weekly student newspaper for the years he attended."
"Obama did not play basketball on any official team at Occidental, as has been reported."
Sorry Frank, the press release said “BARACK OBAMA ATTENDED OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE” from fall 1979 through spring 1981. Don’t think he was a senator then.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#101890 Aug 22, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
And this morning, or was it last night, you lectured on people here being uncivil? And you accept unwarranted and untrue claim that Clnton had intercourse with woman while her husband was committing suicide, based on Nazi Ann Coulter's saying? That's civil? Is it really? And you write, of your president "The man should be in prison". May I use Rogue's vocabulary on you, remembering that I did not invent what follows, just copying : flaming hypocrite.
Sloop21 wrote:
<quoted text>
You make no sense. At least not to me.
I think it funny that Jacques continues to think Conservatives at NAZIs. NAZIs are for large, controlling governments and if you do not do what they want you to do, of to a concentration camp you go. Now Conservatives want smaller government, less controls over the people (civil rights) and if you do not agree with them they will no beat you up, make false criminal complaints, etc.
Jacques does not realize that Nazism is just another for of .... Socialism and that's is what Progressives want. Total control of the people from cradle to grave.
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#101892 Aug 22, 2012
Sloop21 wrote:
<quoted text>
The Office of the Presidency mandates dignity. I believe it is you that is confused on the term. Dignity before dishonor is one of the principles of our country. I believe you said it best, "the proverbial salesman who could sell fridges to eskimos".
Funny how you can delve at an oval office indiscretion, and not a smart one at that, I agree, which cost the country nothing, but no comment on GWB's disastrous stewaradship. Let me add, that disastrous stewardship, like it or not, has impacted the entire world. The oval office thing did not, it impacted Clinton and his family. His reputation at home and abroad has remained sterling as we can all witness.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

2012 Presidential Election Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min OBAMA the GENIUS 1,509,235
News Trump to GOP: Pass health care bill or seal you... 4 min Dee Dee Dee 146
News Trump's repeated claim that he won a 'landslide... 8 min swampmudd 7,510
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 19 min AMERICAN SUNSHINE 262,169
News Comey: FBI probing links between Russia, Trump ... 36 min swampmudd 437
News Trump supporters cheer his combative stance wit... 45 min jonjedi 1,272
News Gray Matters: Be healthy, avoid geezer jokes (Feb '09) 2 hr Geezer Files 77
More from around the web