BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 207614 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#94194 Jul 27, 2012
American Lady wrote:
Please explain to your readers..how is it possible..a natural born citizen needs 50 pages of argument in a Supreme Court case to prove citizenship.
Please explain how anyone can be as stupid as BirfoonLady?

"In the Wong Kim Ark Case, supra, the whole question of citizenship is traced from its source and the subject is so elaborately considered as to make unnecessary any further reference to this phase of the question."
Perkins v. Elg, 99 F.2d 408, 411 410 (App.D.C. 1938)
modified and affirmed, 307 U.S. 325 (1939).

The court explained in exquisite detail --every aspect-- why UR FOS and you complain about the length of the opinion? It was an effing landmark USSC case. Of course the opinion was thoroughly explained and "elaborately considered." You have a problem with thorough scholarship? And you think you're educated?
Cancer on the pResidency

Louisville, KY

#94195 Jul 27, 2012
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
MR. KESLER: The Constitution of the United States requires certain things.
MR: Does it require a Social Security Number?
MR. KESLER: No, but -- it is a felony to have a Social Security number that is not issued to you by the Social Security Administration, and if you are a felon you should not be the pResident.

Also, if you do not have a Social Security number issued by the Social Security Administration, then you cannot possibly be a legal US citizen if you are over 18 and working in the US.
Otherwise, you would have a legally issued Social Security number.
Any more questions?
American Lady

Danville, KY

#94196 Jul 27, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Please explain how anyone can be as stupid as BirfoonLady?
"In the Wong Kim Ark Case, supra, the whole question of citizenship is traced from its source and the subject is so elaborately considered as to make unnecessary any further reference to this phase of the question."
Perkins v. Elg, 99 F.2d 408, 411 410 (App.D.C. 1938)
modified and affirmed, 307 U.S. 325 (1939).
The court explained in exquisite detail --every aspect-- why UR FOS and you complain about the length of the opinion? It was an effing landmark USSC case. Of course the opinion was thoroughly explained and "elaborately considered." You have a problem with thorough scholarship? And you think you're educated?
mr zorn(woo woo)...before we begin ..Vattel is Swiss...not French the WND is correct when they write Swiss..but you changed it to French.

United States v Wong Kim Ark has >>--->>50 pages of argument..to show citizenship of Ark born jus soli to foreign parents. This is the route Obama gained citizenship if he was born in Hawaii.

Please explain to your readers..how is it possible..

>>>----->>>a natural born citizen needs 50 pages <<---<
of argument in a Supreme Court case to prove citizenship.

A natural born citizen is not made by law...it requires no law...born on the soil to citizen parents.

Posted by: e.vattel | Saturday, November 27, 2010 at 01:03 PM

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

#94197 Jul 27, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
And he would let them know it immediately; after deporting every single DIM.
You would be the first then American Lady and some others
American Lady

Danville, KY

#94198 Jul 27, 2012
Cowardly Republicans: Impeach Obama now
Exclusive: Tom Tancredo uses 'John Roberts principle' to argue for immediate action

...

Roberts believes, as we all must, that constitutional imperatives are different and quite separate from political imperatives. In Roberts’ opinion, the political imperative for overturning Obamacare was irrelevant to the constitutional question of whether or not Congress had the authority to enact Obamacare. He concluded that Congress does have that constitutional authority –and that constitutional principles trump political imperatives.

What does that have to do with impeachment? It’s very simple.

That principle means that if there is a constitutionally valid reason to impeach and remove a president, then the election process is irrelevant. If a president should be removed for violating the Constitution, then he should be removed today, not four months from today or four years from today.

To put it another way, the constitutional reasons for removing a president are quite different from the political reasons for voting against an incumbent. And here, some of the critics of impeachment are quite right: a president should never be impeached for political reasons, that is, for disagreements over domestic or foreign policy. That, indeed, is the business of elections.

But in Obama’s case, the arguments for impeachment are not based on policy disagreements but on his actions in violation of the Constitution.

...

http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/cowardly-republica...

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#94199 Jul 27, 2012
Old Goat wrote:
<quoted text>Very weak!
Very MORONIC.
Grow up!
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
It wasn't from the imaginary Kapiolani Gynecological and Maternity Hospital in Kenya.
Hee hee hee.
Grow up.
Cancer on the pResidency

Louisville, KY

#94200 Jul 27, 2012
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Rodney’s dead now GB, can’t we just all get along? LOL
You make me laugh long time GB.
You may still be laughing, but not as hard as I am, because again that was not me, Poopoo stain.
Glad to know that I am ingrained in your psyche.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#94201 Jul 27, 2012
IF 0 is like you guys SAY he iS......
he NEEDS "impeached NOW!!!!!!!!!!
American Lady

Danville, KY

#94202 Jul 27, 2012
Show Obama U.S. flag doesn't embarrass you
Exclusive: Joseph Farah has way for Americans to defy BHO with true patriotism

http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/show-obama-u-s-fla...

Lawsuit demands bin Laden burial records
'I suspect the Obama administration is embarrassed by the ceremony'

http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/lawsuit-demands-bi...
American Lady

Danville, KY

#94203 Jul 27, 2012
SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT
The real story of Judicial Watch
Exclusive: Larry Klayman rebuts new book meant to chronicle organization he founded

The first case I brought was against then-President Bill Clinton’s so-called legal defense fund, where he laundered money from Communist China to pay his legal fees in the burgeoning scandal over Whitewater, a scam run by his wife, Hillary, to defraud real estate investors in Arkansas. Later, the Clintons would receive millions of dollars in Chinese cash to wage legal defenses against a myriad of other scandals that engulfed them during their administration – scandals ranging from Filegate, to Travelgate, to Paula Jones and Lewinsky and, yes, Chinagate, which I was instrumental in uncovering during my years at Judicial Watch. In this regard, I am the only lawyer ever to have a court rule that an American president committed a crime. This ruling was made by Judge Royce C. Lamberth in the famous Filegate case, which I had filed in federal court in Washington, D.C.

...

“Larry Klayman is a prickly troublemaker uncongenial to party and ideological establishment.” The late Robert Novak, columnist

“… through the challenge of secrecy rules, Larry Klayman has become a force in Washington.” Louis Jacobson, National Journal

“…. Nobody ever accused Larry Klayman of thinking small, but his latest suit may be outsized by even his standards. The former head of of conservative watchdog Judicial Watch who now runs Freedom Watch has filed a $10 trillion class action against Iran at the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.” The National Law Journal

“That Time magazine has yet to name Larry Klayman ‘Man of the Year’ is a failure of Time, not Klayman’s. The work he and Judicial Watch did on the Brown (Chinagate) case is stunning.” Jack Cashill, author of “Ron Brown’s Body”

...

http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/the-real-story-of-...

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#94205 Jul 27, 2012
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
mr zorn(woo woo)...before we begin ..Vattel is Swiss...not French the WND is correct when they write Swiss..but you changed it to French.
United States v Wong Kim Ark has >>--->>50 pages of argument..to show citizenship of Ark born jus soli to foreign parents. This is the route Obama gained citizenship if he was born in Hawaii.
Please explain to your readers..how is it possible..
>>>----->>>a natural born citizen needs 50 pages <<---<
of argument in a Supreme Court case to prove citizenship.
A natural born citizen is not made by law...it requires no law...born on the soil to citizen parents.
Posted by: e.vattel | Saturday, November 27, 2010 at 01:03 PM
BirfoonLady: "before we begin ..Vattel is Swiss...not French"

Can U read BirfoonLady? Where did I even mention Vattel? RU retarded?

Please explain BirfoonLady why so many Supreme Court opinions exceed 50 pages and how that invalidates them?

RU completely NUTS? Would you have preferred cert denied? One page.

BTW, the USSC granted your wish, no 50 page opinion, Kerchner v. Obama, cert. denied.(Not worth the court's time.)

FECKING MORON.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Please explain how anyone can be as stupid as BirfoonLady?
"In the Wong Kim Ark Case, supra, the whole question of citizenship is traced from its source and the subject is so elaborately considered as to make unnecessary any further reference to this phase of the question."
Perkins v. Elg, 99 F.2d 408, 411 410 (App.D.C. 1938)
modified and affirmed, 307 U.S. 325 (1939).
The court explained in exquisite detail --every aspect-- why UR FOS and you complain about the length of the opinion? It was an effing landmark USSC case. Of course the opinion was thoroughly explained and "elaborately considered." You have a problem with thorough scholarship? And you think you're educated?
Cancer on the pResidency

Louisville, KY

#94206 Jul 27, 2012
FAKE Birther wrote:
This is coming from Rogue Moron?
You realize you spend 12 hours a day name-calling, don't you?
Why do you steal my moniker?
Can't think for yourself, huh?

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

#94207 Jul 27, 2012
American Lady wrote:
Lady Justice Has Died – Paul Hollrah
Historians might have viewed the events of Thursday, January 26, 2012 in Atlanta, Georgia, as one of the singular events of American history, along with landmark events such as Lincoln’s signing of the Emancipation Proclamation; Lee’s surrender at Appomattox; the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor; and the Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education decision.
On that day, a trial was held in an Atlanta courtroom that would have a longstanding impact on state-federal relations, reversing the long downward trend toward the accumulation of power at the federal level, at the expense of the states. It was a trial in which ordinary citizens once again defended the concept that, in the United States, it is the people who rule, not the political elites.
The Atlanta trial became an event of major national significance on January 3, 2012, when The Hon. Michael M. Malihi, Deputy Chief Judge of the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings, issued a ruling denying Barack Obama’s motion to dismiss four cases alleging that he is not eligible to serve as President of the United States.
Since 2008, nearly 90 court cases have been filed, challenging Obama’s eligibility. All have fallen victim to either political correctness or political chicanery; none have been successful.
...
http://theydontfoolme.com/1292/lady-justice-h...
Doesn't that tell you that the birthers are looked at as kooks and flakes. This Paul Hollrah must be a bigot for saying events such as Lincoln’s signing of the Emancipation Proclamation; Lee’s surrender at Appomattox; and the Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education decision were wrong this shows the mindset of thoes nuts
American Lady

Danville, KY

#94209 Jul 27, 2012
MOLOTOV: Socialism is not Christian
Exclusive: Molotov Mitchell cites words of 'the sage from Monticello'

http://www.wnd.com/author/mmitchell-2/
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#94211 Jul 27, 2012
nebka wrote:
<quoted text>
You would be the first then American Lady and some others
All women are Dims huh? Brilliant!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#94212 Jul 27, 2012
Cancer on the pResidency wrote:
<quoted text>
MR. KESLER: No, but -- it is a felony to have a Social Security number that is not issued to you by the Social Security Administration, and if you are a felon you should not be the pResident.
Also, if you do not have a Social Security number issued by the Social Security Administration, then you cannot possibly be a legal US citizen if you are over 18 and working in the US.
Otherwise, you would have a legally issued Social Security number.
Any more questions?
Birfoon fantasy: If you have a Social Security number with a prefix normally issued to persons from another state, it cannot be due to clerical error, and it must be due to an elaborate hoax. Indeed the hoax is very convoluted. If Wiley Grannie really did pull off the BC hoax in 1961, duping DOH into giving him a BC, why the F would he need to get a fake SSN to work in an ice cream shop?

UR fantasy house of cards falls.

Get a life.
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
MR. KESLER: The Constitution of the United States requires certain things.
MR: Does it require a Social Security Number?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#94213 Jul 27, 2012
American Lady wrote:
Show Obama U.S. flag doesn't embarrass you
Exclusive: Joseph Farah has way for Americans to defy BHO with true patriotism
http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/show-obama-u-s-fla...
Lawsuit demands bin Laden burial records
'I suspect the Obama administration is embarrassed by the ceremony'
http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/lawsuit-demands-bi...
Two American flags are flying in my frontyard as I type.

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

#94215 Jul 27, 2012
mr right ness wrote:
<quoted text>
If LIncoln was alive he'd be tried for the deaths of 500,000 Americans. By the liberals.
You must be the dumbest being on any of the dimensional planes.
Lincoln is one of the greatest Presidents ever. To say that a Liberal would do such a thing just proves how dumb you are.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#94216 Jul 27, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Two American flags are flying in my frontyard as I type.
That IS very 'patriotic' of you!....
There is one on the front of my house, too.

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

#94217 Jul 27, 2012
mr right ness wrote:
<quoted text>
The dead thug Martin said you're a "pussass cracka". You're pretty ignorant, aren't you?
Bet you got one of those white sheets hid in your home that you and your friends wear out in the woods. If so your kind is no longer wanted in the 21h century.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

2012 Presidential Election Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min Nostrilis Waxmoron 1,347,746
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 20 min American Lady 213,980
News White House distances from Clinton's paid speeches 27 min Ritual Habitual 1
News Obama lays out 2017 spending priorities in fina... 1 hr goonsquad 8
News The Latest: Sanders says US can't be global police 4 hr Ritual Habitual 1
News Donald Trump Says Criticism of Bill Clinton Is ... 4 hr vote trump 257
News Race and Beyond: Let's Talk About Race and Poverty (Oct '12) 8 hr Blessed Bee 89
More from around the web