Ann Coulter: "No, I'm not kidding abo...

Ann Coulter: "No, I'm not kidding about backing Hillary. McCain has no honor."

There are 900 comments on the snafu-ed.blogspot.com story from Feb 2, 2008, titled Ann Coulter: "No, I'm not kidding about backing Hillary. McCain has no honor.". In it, snafu-ed.blogspot.com reports that:

Thursday on Hannity & Colmes Ann Coulter said that if McCain gets the GOP nomination she would actually campaign for Hillary. Friday on Your World with Neil Cavuto she repeated that assertion. She also said McCain had "no honor."

Join the discussion below, or Read more at snafu-ed.blogspot.com.

First Prev
of 45
Next Last
Jay

Stockton, CA

#1 Feb 2, 2008
Ann Coulter re-lives her 15 minutes of Fame, again. Maybe somebody cares?
,
Do you want Mormon "Supreme Court Judges"? They are "On The Bench For Life" after being nominated and confirmed. Mutt, if elected, would have 4 years of opportunities to nominate these Supreme Court Judges, along with other Federal Judges? Don't think they could get confirmed, it only takes a little political "trade-offs".
,
Mutt & his (5) sons have "NEVER" served in the military. Could Mutt be "less qualified'' for Commander and Chief.
,
While Mormons share some beliefs, they fervently believe their "book of Mormon" is more "Holy & Reverent" than the "Holy Bible". This Cult Sect has perverted Christian teachings to create a false religion, with false prophecies and false teachings. In their beliefs, they have included (Jewish heritage in their ancestery, call all non-mormons Gentiles, perform the conversion and baptism of other religion's deceased(without their permission), and actually believe all other religions are false, and that all Non-Mormons will go to Hell.
,
If you want a "brain-washed", "mind-controlled", "puppet" President, then by all means, vote for Williard (Mitt) Romney.
Libby McCain

Palm Beach Gardens, FL

#2 Feb 2, 2008
Nice that Romney won big in Maine tonight.

Vote against McCain.
Dumb Blonde

AOL

#3 Feb 2, 2008
Ann Coulter loves herself more than Obama
loves himself.
the indians--alabama

Auburn Hills, MI

#4 Feb 2, 2008
ann you are the one who has no honor---if you think hillary has honor you are blind and can't hear. listen and you may learn something about liberals. mccain served his country while hillary's husband was burning our flag in protest of the vietnam war. think before you open your big mouth.
Rusty Shackleford

Auburn Hills, MI

#5 Feb 2, 2008
Ann Coulter is one crazy flip flopper. Why does anyone pay any attention to her?

“Allergic to BS & liberals”

Since: Dec 07

Somewhere in the foothills...

#6 Feb 2, 2008
Ann Coulter is nuts.
Libby McCain

Palm Beach Gardens, FL

#7 Feb 2, 2008
Coulter's a hottie
and she's right: McCain's a liberal

Still no news on Romney's win in Maine tonight?

Hmmm.... liberal media?

Say NO to Liberal McCain
Glasnos

Apopka, FL

#8 Feb 2, 2008
Ann is right. McAmnesty is no conservative. If we are going to have a liberal for president, let it be a democrat.
Knows Better

United States

#9 Feb 2, 2008
Libby McCain wrote:
Coulter's a hottie
She's a skank.

I hope Clinton supporters take note:

ANN COULTERGEIST IS WILLING TO SUPPORT HILLARY!

Helloooo?? RED flag!!

Matt

Casa Grande, AZ

#10 Feb 2, 2008
Ann is being sarcastic, as usual. She often has good, accurate points...BUT she is mostly a sarcastic humorist and not out to be a "serious pundit". By the way, have you noticed that McCain is supported by Guiliani, Schwarzenegger, the media and the New York Times? And who's against him is Hannity, Limbaugh, the National Review, Coulter, and Hewitt? How DID this guy get so close to the Repub nomination? Does no one remember that there was serious talk of him changing party affiliation not that long ago? You don't see the Democrats nominating Lieberman, do you? And the ONLY issue he doesn't agree with the Dems on is pulling out of Iraq. The problem with current Republicans is that they have lost the point of being a Republican, in the Bush years...don't make the mistake of having McCain as the standard bearer..he's a fringe Republican at best. Smaller government, lower taxes, strong defense, America first- that's the Reagan way. That's what wins. The Bush/McCain way of being a psuedo-Democrat not only is bad for the country, but leads to electoral defeat.
TheTimeIsNow

Bay City, MI

#11 Feb 2, 2008
He should've asked what she would do if Obama wins the Democratic nomination.
Bill R

Mountain Home, AR

#12 Feb 2, 2008
Well, the invitations to appear on the circuit
of cable news commentary had dwindled.

Haven't seen her invited to any of the analyst
shows following any of the debates.

She's been a little slow cranking out another
book.

Her name hasn't been mentioned in weeks, if
not months.

It was time. She had to come up with something.
The career was starting to slip away....
Tenn

Chattanooga, TN

#13 Feb 2, 2008
Man coulter should ask for his money back from that botched sex change operation.

“Don't Blame Me”

Since: Jan 08

New Bern, NC

#14 Feb 3, 2008
Jay wrote:
Ann Coulter re-lives her 15 minutes of Fame, again. Maybe somebody cares?
,
Do you want Mormon "Supreme Court Judges"? They are "On The Bench For Life" after being nominated and confirmed. Mutt, if elected, would have 4 years of opportunities to nominate these Supreme Court Judges, along with other Federal Judges? Don't think they could get confirmed, it only takes a little political "trade-offs".
,
Mutt & his (5) sons have "NEVER" served in the military. Could Mutt be "less qualified'' for Commander and Chief.
,
While Mormons share some beliefs, they fervently believe their "book of Mormon" is more "Holy & Reverent" than the "Holy Bible". This Cult Sect has perverted Christian teachings to create a false religion, with false prophecies and false teachings. In their beliefs, they have included (Jewish heritage in their ancestery, call all non-mormons Gentiles, perform the conversion and baptism of other religion's deceased(without their permission), and actually believe all other religions are false, and that all Non-Mormons will go to Hell.
,
If you want a "brain-washed", "mind-controlled", "puppet" President, then by all means, vote for Williard (Mitt) Romney.
As opposed to George W Bush who was MIA from the reserves .... lmao

also you gave a good description of some other christian sects

that last comment I thought you were talking about Bush again ... my bad
bob53

Auburn Hills, MI

#15 Feb 3, 2008
the indians--alabama wrote:
ann you are the one who has no honor---if you think hillary has honor you are blind and can't hear. listen and you may learn something about liberals. mccain served his country while hillary's husband was burning our flag in protest of the vietnam war. think before you open your big mouth.
Vietnam was an immoral war and those who refused to be part of it were right.

Add to this, the fact that communism has worked for that country and today its people are content.
bob53

Auburn Hills, MI

#16 Feb 3, 2008
Matt wrote:
Ann is being sarcastic, as usual. She often has good, accurate points...BUT she is mostly a sarcastic humorist and not out to be a "serious pundit". By the way, have you noticed that McCain is supported by Guiliani, Schwarzenegger, the media and the New York Times? And who's against him is Hannity, Limbaugh, the National Review, Coulter, and Hewitt? How DID this guy get so close to the Repub nomination? Does no one remember that there was serious talk of him changing party affiliation not that long ago? You don't see the Democrats nominating Lieberman, do you? And the ONLY issue he doesn't agree with the Dems on is pulling out of Iraq. The problem with current Republicans is that they have lost the point of being a Republican, in the Bush years...don't make the mistake of having McCain as the standard bearer..he's a fringe Republican at best. Smaller government, lower taxes, strong defense, America first- that's the Reagan way. That's what wins. The Bush/McCain way of being a psuedo-Democrat not only is bad for the country, but leads to electoral defeat.
Yeah, the "Reagan way". Big tax breaks for the rich, table scraps for the middle class and benefit cuts to the poor.

Big contracts for defense contractors which included $500 hammers and $300 toilet seats. A rip-off by Ronnie's corporate patrons at the taxpayer's expense.

And let's not forget his illegal secret war waged against Nicaragua, which had done nothing to provoke us, except it overthrew a rightwing dictator (Somoza) and had a socialist regime in place.

In violation of the Constitution, which grants only Congress the right to declare war, Reagan snuck behind the back of the American public.

Why?

Because he never could have sold his point of view based on honest presentation of the facts.
So like Nixon and W. Bush, he did things the dirty, underhanded way.

And had Pointdexter and North take the fall when caught.

Surely you GOPers jest when suggesting small government and a large military go hand-in-hand. Because it requires a massive support system to maintain large numbers of troops, tanks, ships and aircraft.

GOP talk of downsizing government is usually just that. Talk. The only agencies they downsize are those which prevent GOP-friendly corporations from polluting the air and water. Or those which regulate against manipulation of the marketplace. This is how Enrons get started. During Reagan's time, it was Michael Milken, the junk bond king.

Reagan was as crooked as they come. But his flag-waving, Hollywood-style patriotism, typically punctuated by clouds of red, white and blue balloons released in the background had everyone teary-eyed and looking the wrong way.
EASY MONEY

Bangkok, Thailand

#17 Feb 3, 2008
bob53 wrote:
<quoted text>
Vietnam was an immoral war and those who refused to be part of it were right.
Add to this, the fact that communism has worked for that country and today its people are content.
Well, your back with that immoral war crap again. By who's standards do you base that observation on? Also, what makes you an expert on what is moral or not? When was the last time you visited Vietnam to draw your conclusion of contentment? If you did visit, were you north or south?
bob53

Auburn Hills, MI

#18 Feb 3, 2008
Matt wrote:
The Bush/McCain way of being a psuedo-Democrat not only is bad for the country, but leads to electoral defeat.
Matt,

Both Bush and McCain represent the pure-bred fascism of your party which has been in full swing since Nixon.

Our party opposed Bush almost from the beginning when he cut funding for one of the most promising fields in medical science: stem cell research.

McCain used to be moderate until someone cranked his right arm up behind his back and got him to brown-nose Mr. Chimp.

They're your problem and your legacy. A legacy that will be replete with massive corporate fraud of the treasury, a dubious war in Iraq, the widespread use of torture, the exposure of a covert CIA agent as political revenge, and massive electronic surveilance of the public, in violation of FISA and the 4th Amendment. Live with it.
bob53

Auburn Hills, MI

#19 Feb 3, 2008
bob53 wrote:
<quoted text>
Vietnam was an immoral war and those who refused to be part of it were right.
Add to this, the fact that communism has worked for that country and today its people are content.
EASY MONEY wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, your back with that immoral war crap again. By who's standards do you base that observation on? Also, what makes you an expert on what is moral or not? When was the last time you visited Vietnam to draw your conclusion of contentment? If you did visit, were you north or south?
LOL, and people like you who promote government torture would have us believe you're shining beacons of morality? Please...

Read about the CIA's "Operation Phoenix". Or review the transcripts of testimony from veterans who testified before the Dellums committe. Vietnam was a dirty war. LBJ manipulated and lied us into it, just as GW has done in Iraq.

Vietnam has recovered from the war years and the people appear content under communist rule. The Republican party is eager to open up more and more trade with that country. Or are you suggesting Republicans are a bunch of hypocrites? You can't have it both ways.
Tenn

Chattanooga, TN

#20 Feb 3, 2008
GreenEyedLady wrote:
Ann Coulter is nuts.
Perhaps at one time she had them but after the sex change and botched face transplant, I doubt she does now.

They forgot the Adams apple. I thought they make that less noticeable after a sex change.

I must say that Man coulter looks no better as female as he did as a male. I often wonder if he is a straight man in an ugly woman's body or just an ugly lesbian LOL

Hillary doesn’t need his vote to win in November.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 45
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

2012 Presidential Election Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Incognito4Ever 1,520,844
News Trump's repeated claim that he won a 'landslide... 17 min WHINNY LIBTARDS 8,409
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 19 min Trump The Liar 265,037
News Trump supporters cheer his combative stance wit... 55 min Not Working Already 1,480
News FBI used controversial dossier in Russia-Trump ... 1 hr swampmudd 107
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 7 hr Cleo 240,294
News Ron Paul on the Verge of Going Third Party? (Jan '08) Sun UidiotRaceMakeWOR... 29,313
More from around the web