|
Tom D
|
To TNT: You tried opening Kafurs links to what he had posted. His was a rather lengthy post, and I can't imagine he would have done that without having seen those videos. Here is some speculation by me, but I believe Obama's campaign monitors everything on the internet including all blogs and all youtube vidoes. I think it was just too much of a coincidence for them not to be available to read, or subscriptions canceled, or one of them said we didn't have the authority to read that news. WHAT? Are you kidding me? His campaign team, in my opinion, is working overtime to censure the news made available to the public, even to the point as to said, we have no authority to access that news. UNBELIEVABLE!!!!
|
|
Larry
|
Obama is certainly unlike any other politician I've known - He makes John Kerry look like a conservative - He's viewed as the Messiah or the second coming of Christ by the media and liberals - all of this based on the ability to talk and little else. A junior senator from Illinois - less than 3 years in the Senate - two of them running for president - He can chose if he's black or white - and does depending on the crowd - He can flip flop and lie and not be challenged on it - Yep - he's unlike any others!! Only in America!!!
|
|
SNB
|
Sharon wrote: The Bush-Clinton regimes during the last 30 years are responsible for the conditions that we now find ourselves in. The trade agreements that short change Americans; outsourcing jobs and contracts; selling our assets to foreigners; H-1 Visas to take middle class jobs from Americans for everything that can't be out-sourced; for jobs that can't be moved to foreign countries, they have created conditions that allow illegal labor to take over complete industries within the country like construction and other industries that require little training; over-spending and borrowing money from China or anyone else who will loan us money... little wonder there are no jobs here for Americans, the dollar is of little value, and soon the raping of America will be complete. Can Obama stop it? I don't know. but it is clear there is no hope for us with the Republicans. First, you mentioned the Bush, Clinton regimes(thought they were elected)of the last 30 years,HuH? Best as I can tell their terms added up to 16 years. Second, This guy is as much white as he is black. Third, this is not unique. Alot of us are of mixed race, especially here in Kansas. Remember the American natives? Lastly, he can blow smoke with the best of them, making him frightenly un-unique.
|
|
A Sister
|
A-Patriot wrote: He has gotten this far because The Trilateral Commission wants him in office. Then our country will be ripe to become a part of, not lead mind you, a One World Government. Our dollar will devalue more, forcing our hand and Obama will smile while our nation is raped. He has said one thing correctly, we will change, only we will not like the outcome, but by then it will be too late. Our nation is already being raped, Obama has nothing to do with it.
|
|
A Sister
|
Misplaced Texan wrote: <quoted text> You got it! Now if the rest of the population could figure that out... It always comes down to "they" and "them" meaning "black people". That's why the rest of the population is ignoring you. Newsflash: Obama is black man, you cannot rub the color of his skin off, get over it, accept it and move on......Grow up.......
|
|
A Sister
|
Douger wrote: "...how about finding in the Constitution where the Fed is mentioned." You and I both know it's not...just like federal involvement in housing, education, and hell, most everything else they do. But you can find in there, on the first line, where it says "We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal". If that wasnt a bold face lie from the beginning there would be no need for Federal involvement in "everything they do".
|
|
SNB
|
Heh Sister, as I said before, he is as much white as he is black. Get over that. While you are at it, Why don't you take a read on Walter Williams and Bill Cosby, they (OOOps) might change your thought process toward all people.
|
|
“The cat shelter's on to me!”
Joined: Jul 1, 2008
|
A Sister wrote: <quoted text> It always comes down to "they" and "them" meaning "black people". That's why the rest of the population is ignoring you. Newsflash: Obama is black man, you cannot rub the color of his skin off, get over it, accept it and move on......Grow up....... Ummmm, we were referring to the Constitutionality of the Fed (Federal Reserve). Where exactly did you read race into my comments? When I said "the general population," I meant EVERYONE. I have no clue where you got the idea that I was complaining about Obama's skin color. I couldn't care less about his skin color, and I've never said anything otherwise. My guess is that anytime you see a pronoun you assume there is some veiled racial hatred behind it. Get a life.
|
|
|
|
“The cat shelter's on to me!”
Joined: Jul 1, 2008
|
A Sister wrote: <quoted text> But you can find in there, on the first line, where it says "We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal". If that wasnt a bold face lie from the beginning there would be no need for Federal involvement in "everything they do". OK - I see where you are going. Again, the "Fed" to which we were referring is the Federal Reserve. Google it sometime - you might learn something. The "They" that we discussed is the government itself. The things "they" (the government) do would be subsidizing housing, education, and other entitlement programs that the Constitution never mentions. Again, this had nothing to do with race, and race was never mentioned in the discussion. I realize you only saw the tail end of this, and only read what you want to read. It sounds to me like everything is racial to you, and you need to be angry in order to feel like you have a place in the world. Believe me, the last thing I'm concerned about is what color a person's skin is.
|
|
“The cat shelter's on to me!”
Joined: Jul 1, 2008
|
A Sister wrote: <quoted text> But you can find in there, on the first line, where it says "We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal". If that wasnt a bold face lie from the beginning there would be no need for Federal involvement in "everything they do". Also, the quote "We hold these truths..." is NOT from the Constitution. It is from the Declaration of Independence, which, while an important document, is not a legal foundation for our system of government.
|
|
“Getting On Your Nerves ”
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
And Loving IT !
|
Bush Laden wrote: <quoted text> Tell it to Bushco. Bush spent us into more debt than ALL previous US presidents COMBINED. He borrowed the entire war debts on "emergency" supplementals outside the budget -- so he could lie about his spending. Bush took out a subprime mortgage on America. All your stuff and earnings and those of your children and grandchildren are owed to foreigners -- as collateral. Bushco just keeps printing money and making your dollar worth less each day. Dang. We should have a law they can't borrow past the years they were elected for. They act like a babysitter hired for the night -- who sells your children to strangers. go make some butter or something!
|
|
Whitehair
|
WE COME FROM MIXED RACES BACKGROUND.This it not what this is all about.Obama has a voting record in his past which makes him the same as any other politician wanting another shot feeding at the trough.He is definately not conservative.That makes him not one most of us want to vote for.McCain is not much different but he is sometimes conservative, contrast to Obama never is.
|
|
cant resist
|
Judged:
1
oBama oSama the only difference is the BS...
|
|
noneoftheabove
|
cant resist wrote: oBama oSama the only difference is the BS... Best description of Obama yet! I can't wait to see an investigation into where his campaign funds came from - I'd bet half are from the mid east. A billion is chump change for these muslims to buy our presidency.
|
|
NeoLib
|
Larry wrote: The more I see weird-**** and easily debunked conspiracies posted about Obama by people who are generally often pretty rude and hateful, the more I like the guy. Larry, Independent TX voter The more I read about the blind love affair for Obama the more I don't like the guy.
|
|
Surf52
|
Obama unlike any politician, black or white
True enough. Most others go beyond the minimun requirements for the job. Being over 35, 3 years in the Senate and not knowing when to shut up isn't exactly overqualified.
|
|
NeoLib
|
Truth First wrote: There have been many reports of people fainting at rallies for Senator Obama. I have seen this myself on several occasions. For most white Americans, Obama represents the first time they have seen or heard an African man speak to them. Many white Americans are transfixed by Obama because for the first time in their lives they are encountering a leader who speaks the TRUTH and who puts the TRUTH FIRST. That is power and it explains the appeal and power of Obama. http://truthfirstnow.blogspot.com People didn't faint when Christ spoke, nor even on the day of Pentecost when the apostle preached. I don't even recall any fainting during speaches given by Kennedy, Lincoln, or Washington. I've only seen one group of people faint, and they were weak minded cultists that were enamored with their leader. These are the same type of suckers that get taken advantage of by fake prophets and faith healers. I would venture to say that Hitler held the same power of persuasion with the cult he built.
|
|
Tom D
|
WOW!
Subject:
33 Senators Voted Against English as America's Official Language on June 6, 2007. On Wed. 6 June 2007 23:35:23 - 0500 Colonel Harry Riley , USA , Ret. wrote:
Senators:
Your vote against an amendment to the immigration Bill 1348......to make English America's official language is astounding. On D-Day, no less, when we honor those that sacrificed in order to secure the bedrock, character and principles of America, I can only surmise your vote reflects a loyalty to illegal aliens. I don't much care where you come from. What your religion is. Whether you're black, white, or some other color......male or female......Democrat, Republican or Independent...... But I do care when you are a United States Senator representing Citizens of America .......and vote against English as the official language of the United States .
Your vote reflects Betrayal. Political Surrender. Violates Your Pledge of Allegiance. Dishonors historical principle. Rejects Patriotism. Borders on traitorous action and, in my opinion, makes you unfit to serve as a United States Senator........ Impeachment.......Recall...... .Or other appropriate action is warranted or worse.
Four of you voting against English as America's Official Language are Presidential Candidates: Senator Biden, Senator Clinton, Senator Dodd, and Senator Obama. Four Senators vying to lead America, but won't or don't have the courage to cast a vote in favor of 'English' as America's Official Language when 91% of American Citizens want English officially designated as our language. This is the second time in the last several months this list of Senators have disgraced themselves as 'political hacks'...... Unworthy as Senators and certainly unqualified to serve as President of the United States . If America is as angry as I am, you will realize a backlash so stunning it will literally 'rock you out of your panties'......... and preferably totally out of the United States Senate. The entire immigration bill is a farce.... your action only confirms this really isn't about America .....it is about self-serving politics.....despicable at best. It has been said:
'Never Argue with an Idiot.... They'll drag you down to their level!' The following Senators voted against making English the official language of America :
Akaka (D-HI) Bayh (D-IN) Biden (D-DE) Wants to be President? Bingaman (D-NM) Boxer (D-CA) Cantwell (D-WA) Clinton (D-NY) Wants to be President?(God forbid!) dayton (d-MN) dodd (d- MN) wants to be president domenici ( R-NM) coward. protecting his senate seat durbin (d-IL) feingold (d-WI)- not unusual for him feinstein (d-CA) Harkin (d-IA) inouye (d-HI) jeffords (I-VT) kennedy -(d-MA) kerry (d-MA) wanted to be president
kohl (d-WI)) lautenberg (d-NJ) Leahy (D-VT) Levin (D-MI) Lieberman (D-CT) Disappointment here..... Menendez (D-NJ) mikulski (D-MD) Murray (D-WA) Obama (D-IL) Wants to be President? god forbid!
Reed (D-RI) Reid (D-NV) Senate Majority Leader Salazar (D-CO) Sarbanes (D-MD) Schumer (D-NY) Stabenow (D-MI)
'...congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage morale, and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested, exiled or hanged!!! President Abraham Lincoln
|
|
Tom D
|
"Does the Constitution permit a president to detain US citizens without charges as unlawful enemy combatants?" Obama's answer: "No. I reject the Bush Administration's claim that the President has plenary authority under the Constitution to detain US citizens without charges as unlawful enemy combatants." Memo to Obama: It is not the Bush administration's position. The Supreme Court held in 2004 -- this is the famous case, Hamdi v. Rumsfeld. The president has the power to detain American citizens without charges as enemy combatants. Now, I just have to think here -- I don't know what to think. He's either ignorant or he's saying something far more dangerous. If he is saying that he's not bound by the Supreme Court's interpretation of the law, liberals would have a stroke if Bush claimed the kind of authority that Obama is claiming in this -- and ignorance.
Liberals are out there going bonkers every day over how stupid Bush is. This Obama interview is just scary. Let's see. Find another one here. He gets it wrong on who ratifies treaties and who consents to them. He says the president doesn't have the authority to abolish treaties. And the president does! Bush abolished the ABM Treaty shortly after taking office because Bush said it's irrelevant. The Soviets are gone. I'm getting rid of this. The liberals went nuts, but they couldn't stop him because the president does have the authority to get rid of treaties. Obama says here that the president does not have the authority to undermine Congress, the Senate here, which ratifies treaties. The Senate doesn't ratify, they consent to them. The president makes treaties, negotiates them, comes up with them. When's the last time you saw Gorbachev meeting with some senator at Reykjavik or anywhere else? Gorbachev met with Reagan, for crying out loud
|
|
Tom D
|
Now, I realize that this smacks of political propaganda, but since I am vehemently opposed to Osama Barack Hussein Obama as the next president of these United States, I am passing this on. Do with it what you want, but I hope you keep it going. God help us!! ----- Original Message ----- Thttp://www.eyeblast.tv/Public /Video.aspx?rsrcID=2036 Somebody spent a lot of money putting this video together. Not sure what parts are accurate, but there are a lot of questions there. The news media doesn't go there, though. You decide.
|