Shouldn't Syracuse Be the No. 1 Overall NCAA Tournament Seed Over Kentucky?

Feb 14, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: The Big Lead

I'm passing no judgment on whether or not the following metrics are fair or make sense when it comes to seeding the NCAA Tournament.

Comments
1 - 2 of 2 Comments Last updated Feb 15, 2012
Greg Benedick

Bellingham, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Feb 14, 2012
 
When Syracuse first fell out of first place in the poles I thought it was unfair.
Now I am not so upset about it. I think they need to rebound better. secondly They haven't been shooting well in 3 out of four of their last 4 games. I think Syracuse is just as talanted . Maybe even more talanted than Kentucky or any other team .
Go Orange

“Ave Satanas”

Since: Dec 06

Bratislava, Slovakia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Feb 15, 2012
 
Just look at the SOS for the answer...it's obvious who should get the #1 overall seed.

Syracuse

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••