No but that is a problem unique the Africa. Lets say the ratio of MSM to the female population is 5 females to every one MSM. Naturally the numbers are going to be larger in the female population than the MSM category. MSM in Africa also have sex with female sex workers and other females. The origin of HIV in that areas was alleged to be from meat. That means it spread in both male and female proportionally. In the United States the circumstances are not exactly the same. The origin being MSM. From there it has spread to the general population.1. People without access to economic and food resources have sex for those. Because they have no power themselves, they are unable to bargain for condom use.
(Is the above too complex for you? I don't think I can simplify it more.)
The infection rate in the Hispanic community is in the MSM category according to this.3. If we're just looking at the USA, your statements backed me up entirely. Blacks and MSM. You're forgetting Hispanics, but I'm not worried. I'm sure your source will catch up to reality in a few dozen years.
MSM is the highest in both blacks and Hispanics. From there it is spread to women. Blaming poverty for HIV treats both blacks and Hispanics as victims but they know the risks and do it anyway. That is here in the United States. It is you who under the guise of some mis guided form of compassion effectually treats them as sub humans. They can't help themselves. There is so much injustice. No wonder they are riddled with HIV. It is simply making lame excuses for risky sexual behavior which spreads incurable disease. That is the root of the problem.Blacks and MSM, my dear ignorant Lightbeamer, are, as I wrote, suffering from structural inequalities. It's no surprise whatsoever that they have higher rates of HIV.
Once again, for the slow of mind, HIV travels along lines of social inequalities. Those groups under discrimination are going to be the hardest hit by the disease. MSM and blacks - no surprise there.