Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 256555 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#180016 Oct 14, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
...it says with a,“holy” kiss.....
Which hole ?

“The King of R&R”

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#180017 Oct 14, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
You are irrational.
And you are Insane.

Since: Sep 08

Lamar, CO

#180018 Oct 14, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> So Dave which is worse?
Her irrational state or your delusional state ?
When you hit delirious , I gotcha.
Her irrational state, without a doubt. She gets all bitchy.

Hey, Yoda, Jr,, cool avatar you got there. Keep at it, you are almost out to his galaxy. Maybe you two can have lunch and he could teach you how to use that light saber.

“Wrath”

Since: Dec 10

Is revenant

#180019 Oct 14, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Her irrational state, without a doubt. She gets all bitchy.
Hey, Yoda, Jr,, cool avatar you got there. Keep at it, you are almost out to his galaxy. Maybe you two can have lunch and he could teach you how to use that light saber.
I busy with Optimus Prime this week.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#180020 Oct 14, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Belief you are a magical being that popped in out of nowhere is a sign of mental illness.
Turkey brain, if even we, as products of this origination, can identify a beginning of the process of our evolution from such a magic poof, then we have identified a higher force in creative action.
Nothing starts unless something starts it. Nothing can "explode" into a total void and then coalesce into what we call matter. It has to be a bottled up environment for that to happen. Your material world is manufactured. Unfortunately, it appears yours is missing some parts, or has some cold solder joints preventing designed connections and circuitry from being completed.
That makes you a dummy instead of a really animated creature.
Dave, what non-believers think everything came from nothing? I certainly don't. I think the most popular theory of everything coming from nothing is Creationism. I think that the quote "in the beginning God created...." implies that aside from this thing which the Bible calls "God" there was nothing, because I think that the writers at that time assumed that heaven and earth was all that there was. So before there was something there had to have been "nothing", except it leaves a big question as to how was there a god if there was nothing. A god existing would not be nothing, assuming it were true.

I highly suspect that there has always been existence in some form and in some place, but the parts of that which man is now aware of, took their present form and state in more recent billions of years. What that came from was already in existence, but what that existence looked like, we do not yet have a clue.

With the massive amounts of knowledge we have today of the makeup of things that we see, and also forces that we can test for, but do not have a physical appearance, such as gravity, we can explain and understand better how "things" came about, whereas back 2000 to 4000 years ago, man had no knowledge of any of the information that we have tested and proved today, so creating a magical means for things coming into being was a way of filling a gap in their thinking. Better to say that an invisible force, or being, did it than to just never have a clue.
Eagle 12

Edwardsville, IL

#180021 Oct 14, 2013
Imhotep wrote:
Puff piece # 666 - GHS
Christianity cannot erase man's need for pleasure, nor can it eradicate the various sources of pleasure. What it can do, however, and what it has been extremely effective in accomplishing, is to inculcate guilt in connection with pleasure.
The pursuit of pleasure, when accompanied by guilt, becomes a means of perpetuating chronic guilt, and this serves to reinforce one's dependence on God.
Christianity, with some exceptions, has never explicitly advocated human misery; it prefers instead to speak of sacrifices in this life so that benefits may be garnered in the life to come. One invests in this life, so to speak, and collects interest in the next.
Fortunately for Christianity, the dead cannot return for a refund.
Through inculcating the notion that sacrifice is a virtue, Christianity has succeeded in convincing many people that misery incurred through sacrifice is a mark of virtue. Pain becomes the insignia of morality - and conversely, pleasure becomes the insignia of immorality. Christianity, therefore, does not say, "Go forth and be miserable". Rather, it says, "Go forth and practice the virtue of self-sacrifice".
In practical terms, these commands are identical.
In exchange for obedience, Christianity promises salvation in an afterlife; but in order to elicit obedience through this promise,
Christianity must convince men that they need salvation, that there is something to be saved from.
Christianity has nothing to offer a happy man living in a natural, intelligible universe.
If Christianity is to gain a motivational foothold, it must declare war on earthly pleasure and happiness, and this, historically, has been its precise course of action. In the eyes of Christianity, man is sinful and helpless in the face of God, and is potential fuel for the flames of hell. Just as Christianity must destroy reason before it can introduce faith, so it must destroy happiness before it can introduce salvation.
"A man is accepted into a church for what he believes and he is turned out for what he knows." ~Mark Twain
I am Imhotep® and I approve this post.
Please define what you mean by “Pleasure.”
Eagle 12

Edwardsville, IL

#180022 Oct 14, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Which hole ?
Let me guess, you’re not a comedian by trade. I can tell.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#180023 Oct 14, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
The answers to your questions will vary in accordance to the ambitious person that gains control. Without the moral reflections religions offer, there will be no controlling the corruption of the wealthy abusing the less fortunate. The power of the populist would go unchallenged, and it won't have a moral code.
The Atheist here slay me with this idea, that there would no longer be positions that adults would not be able to exploit youths. You just won't hear about them because the media would not be permitted to report all. Atheist as anti-religion would have safe guards that would control the media, as it does in China.
To answer your question or statement, no I did not like George Bush, either one, but I would unquestionable vote for either of them over any atheist. Your own mind is not a free society, as I previously posted you only regard two possibilities of thoughts amongst the common masses. I see no need to give your sort a try out.
Do you think that all of the Presidents of the USA, for example, who claimed to be believers, actually were, or were some atheists, but were politically astute enough to know that stating they were atheists in a Bible thumping country would not likely win them any elections? Some of these men (so far I guess the USA has had only males in the top role whereas it seems that many other countries with similar backgrounds have ventured into letting females take the wheel) very likely were highly educated men, who could not, if they were being honest believe in much of what a believer is expected to believe, because they would know from their education background that it is not true.

If one were to look at the private lives, and even the public lives, of many, if not most, Presidents, I think that you will find that most of them would not have obeyed the laws of God entirely. One, would however expect, I should think, that a person in the very top leadership of a country claiming to be theistic would be the best example of what that means.

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#180024 Oct 14, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
Part 2
"I didn't know what to say to my friend's father," he says, but he began to pepper him with questions. "I asked him about the Bible. I asked him for answers and he gave me intelligent answers."
Then one rejoinder stopped Cameron in his tracks. "Kirk, there's one question you need to ask God Himself – whether or not He's real."
How am I supposed to do that? he wondered.
Over the next few weeks, Cameron began to read the Bible for the first time. He also went back to church a few more times.
Then he found himself alone in his sports car, parked by the side of the road. An unsettling issue dogged his thoughts. If I get in a car accident and die tonight, will I go to heaven?
He realized the answer was no. He had ignored God his entire life; he put everything else in his life in a more important position than God.
"I sinned against Him, even knowing the thing I had done were wrong because I thought I could get away with it. I knew God saw it all and there was no reason He should let me into heaven."
For the first time in his life, Cameron bowed his head and prayed a brief prayer. "God, if you're there, I need to know. If you're real, would you please show me? Would you please forgive me for my pride and arrogance? Change me into the person you want me to be."
Cameron slowly opened his eyes and felt a newfound sense of hope and expectation. "It wasn't like a gust of wind blew through my window or I saw Jesus on my windshield, but I had a very real sense God heard me. I felt He was listening to me, that He is real."
Cameron felt so good he went home and told a Christian friend about his experience. He began to read the Bible regularly.
"I started learning about this amazing God," Cameron exults. "He's not a big bad cop in the sky waiting to punish people," he says. "He is a holy, just and righteous God who wants us to turn from our sins so we can be forgiven. It's an amazing story of love."
"That's the God I have fallen in love with and live for. Of all the things I've done, nothing compares with the joy of knowing Jesus Christ."
Article link: http://blog.godreports.com/2013/09/actor-kirk...
And to learn more about Kirk Cameron, please go to youtube and search "Kirk Cameron Banana" or "Kirk Cameron Evolution" or "Kirk Cameron Owned"

Sadly, Kirk Cameron epitomizes everything that is wrong with fundies...
Eagle 12

Edwardsville, IL

#180025 Oct 14, 2013
boooots wrote:
<quoted text>
Dave, what non-believers think everything came from nothing? I certainly don't. I think the most popular theory of everything coming from nothing is Creationism. I think that the quote "in the beginning God created...." implies that aside from this thing which the Bible calls "God" there was nothing, because I think that the writers at that time assumed that heaven and earth was all that there was. So before there was something there had to have been "nothing", except it leaves a big question as to how was there a god if there was nothing. A god existing would not be nothing, assuming it were true.
I highly suspect that there has always been existence in some form and in some place, but the parts of that which man is now aware of, took their present form and state in more recent billions of years. What that came from was already in existence, but what that existence looked like, we do not yet have a clue.
With the massive amounts of knowledge we have today of the makeup of things that we see, and also forces that we can test for, but do not have a physical appearance, such as gravity, we can explain and understand better how "things" came about, whereas back 2000 to 4000 years ago, man had no knowledge of any of the information that we have tested and proved today, so creating a magical means for things coming into being was a way of filling a gap in their thinking. Better to say that an invisible force, or being, did it than to just never have a clue.
Science has some idea’s about how things started but nothing definite. For example there’s nothing definite on how all life started on the Earth. There’s only about 20 different theories. But I do understand what you’re saying.

I just don’t agree with any of it. To accept everything including the stars were self created would be similar saying the Boeing 757 self created. There’s so much complexity in life and the cosmos it couldn’t have just self generated this complexity.

Like for example the bug that was recently found in the UK with gears that contain synchronized teeth in their legs. Gears are a mechanical device which takes an engineer to create. Especially gears that work flawlessly.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#180026 Oct 14, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
She was probably pulling your leg.
Okay, thank you.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#180027 Oct 14, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't recall posting to you at all.
The Carchar fellow perhaps?
Then I humbly apologize.

Clearly, I had confused you with someone else.

I am sorry.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#180028 Oct 14, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
He is such a marsh mellow, he thinks it's cool to insult people that disagree with him, then when you strike back you are a bigot. He seeks the politically correct fairy. Bunk him worm meat are not a minority. We don't agree with their agenda, and we accept them for what they, themselves tell us they are.
Seven Godly Sins

If god destroys people for not obeying him, it is WRATH
If god punishes people for believing in a different god, it is ENVY
If god lets tragedies and disasters happen of which he could have prevented, it is SLOTH
If god allows anyone to hunger unnecessarily while he has enough for himself, it is GLUTTONY
If god expects his followers to dedicate their lives to worshiping and praying to him, it is PRIDE
If god insists his followers pay tithes and offerings for his approval, it is GREED
If god intends on being party to every marriage, it is LUST

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#180029 Oct 14, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Bob just walked into the saloon and started shooting everybody.
Not only that Bob has buried you with a cross on boot hill.
Rest in peace beloved Brother Catcher1, lol…..
Seven Godly Sins

If god destroys people for not obeying him, it is WRATH
If god punishes people for believing in a different god, it is ENVY
If god lets tragedies and disasters happen of which he could have prevented, it is SLOTH
If god allows anyone to hunger unnecessarily while he has enough for himself, it is GLUTTONY
If god expects his followers to dedicate their lives to worshiping and praying to him, it is PRIDE
If god insists his followers pay tithes and offerings for his approval, it is GREED
If god intends on being party to every marriage, it is LUST

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#180030 Oct 14, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you confusing Catcher with Carchar king? Catcher is a rational skeptic.
I must have been... my bad...I've apologized.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#180031 Oct 14, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
My Dear Atheist friend, I do remember, however it says with a,“holy” kiss. But I do not judge or condemn you as you suppose. For Jesus came not to condemn the world but to save it.
John 3:17
King James Version (KJV)
17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
Seven Godly Sins

If god destroys people for not obeying him, it is WRATH
If god punishes people for believing in a different god, it is ENVY
If god lets tragedies and disasters happen of which he could have prevented, it is SLOTH
If god allows anyone to hunger unnecessarily while he has enough for himself, it is GLUTTONY
If god expects his followers to dedicate their lives to worshiping and praying to him, it is PRIDE
If god insists his followers pay tithes and offerings for his approval, it is GREED
If god intends on being party to every marriage, it is LUST

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#180032 Oct 14, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Science has some idea’s about how things started but nothing definite. For example there’s nothing definite on how all life started on the Earth. There’s only about 20 different theories. But I do understand what you’re saying.
I just don’t agree with any of it. To accept everything including the stars were self created would be similar saying the Boeing 757 self created. There’s so much complexity in life and the cosmos it couldn’t have just self generated this complexity.
Like for example the bug that was recently found in the UK with gears that contain synchronized teeth in their legs. Gears are a mechanical device which takes an engineer to create. Especially gears that work flawlessly.
So you don't believe in any of that science-y stuff about how earth came to be, but you believe that your god wasn't created by anyone or anything and that your god created man from a a mound of clay and woman from a man's rib.

Um...okay.
Mike

Södertälje, Sweden

#180033 Oct 14, 2013
seems that christarded trolls have been voting down atheists and voting up christarded trolls

“Wrath”

Since: Dec 10

Is revenant

#180034 Oct 14, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Science has some idea’s about how things started but nothing definite. For example there’s nothing definite on how all life started on the Earth. There’s only about 20 different theories. But I do understand what you’re saying.
I just don’t agree with any of it. To accept everything including the stars were self created would be similar saying the Boeing 757 self created. There’s so much complexity in life and the cosmos it couldn’t have just self generated this complexity.
Like for example the bug that was recently found in the UK with gears that contain synchronized teeth in their legs. Gears are a mechanical device which takes an engineer to create. Especially gears that work flawlessly.
Did you find a place to wind up that bug with a key?

Since: Sep 08

Lamar, CO

#180035 Oct 14, 2013
boooots wrote:
<quoted text>
Dave, what non-believers think everything came from nothing? I certainly don't. I think the most popular theory of everything coming from nothing is Creationism. I think that the quote "in the beginning God created...." implies that aside from this thing which the Bible calls "God" there was nothing, because I think that the writers at that time assumed that heaven and earth was all that there was. So before there was something there had to have been "nothing", except it leaves a big question as to how was there a god if there was nothing. A god existing would not be nothing, assuming it were true.
I highly suspect that there has always been existence in some form and in some place, but the parts of that which man is now aware of, took their present form and state in more recent billions of years. What that came from was already in existence, but what that existence looked like, we do not yet have a clue.
With the massive amounts of knowledge we have today of the makeup of things that we see, and also forces that we can test for, but do not have a physical appearance, such as gravity, we can explain and understand better how "things" came about, whereas back 2000 to 4000 years ago, man had no knowledge of any of the information that we have tested and proved today, so creating a magical means for things coming into being was a way of filling a gap in their thinking. Better to say that an invisible force, or being, did it than to just never have a clue.
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

Heaven is what you can see. Our universe.

God was pre-existing.

God created the universe and the earth.

Sounds like the BBT to me.

We can't see past our universe. We are in bottle or balloon, so to speak. God has been known to visit the area, but is unlikely to live in it.

Surely there is something beyond what we can see if it made us.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min OzRitz 1,418,691
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 28 min zef 311,619
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 59 min BFL 32,329
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) 7 hr Earthling-1 10,065
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Aug 19 JustStop 201,888
mark moel loan house is here for you to uptain ... (Sep '13) Aug 14 Alex 17
legitimate loan lender (Oct '13) Aug 11 Ceren 9
More from around the web