Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 258515 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#178421 Sep 25, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
<quoted text>funny are atheists in denial
and off topic
Yoda!!!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#178422 Sep 25, 2013
Redoran wrote:
<quoted text>
Very interesting. I posted over a year ago and some rotten Topix administrators with a moniker "Silent Assassins" sent viruses to me. Fortunately, I have excellent protection. I tell you, watch out for the rats in here. They learned my IP address. That is the only way they could have attacked me. I know it was them because it occurred about 5 min after my post that upset them. I am a freethinker and they could not handle it. Another free thinker I know that was attacked was Pomona Atheist. Remember him? Many christians hated him and they shut him down. I am only here to correct irrational thinking, which to me is scarey. I believe in Freedom of Expression, but religious folk abhor us. Just sayin'.
I remember Pomona Atheist. I wondered what had happened.

I, too, and behind a hardware firewall that is ironclad. I have a secondary line of defense as well. And finally? I have inhibited all scripts in Topix, save the ones that allow me to comment-- and none others.

Those tools keep me relatively safe.

I see, from your post, that I'm glad I was careful.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#178423 Sep 25, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
You said they were "atheists".
"Not religious" is NOT atheism.
I am not religious. I am not an atheist.
Is not possible to slam the Fundies without stooping to their deceitful practices ?
80%-90% of modern scientists do not believe in gods.

That makes them atheists, no matter how people like to spin things.

Anyone who does not have faith in god(s) is also an atheist, in the context I was writing.

I was being factual, even if some folk do not like the label "atheist".

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#178424 Sep 25, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Is your reasoning infallible?
You seem to be avoiding answering this simple question.
Which reveals that you suppressing the truth on this.
The above?

Is neither an argument in support of, nor evidence for, a god.

You lose by default: your god is still not real.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#178425 Sep 25, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Think about it, if God was never real to you then that means you never were a Christian.
Jesus refused to teach the Pharisees because their hearts were closed.
Did you seek for God with your whole heart, if you did you would have found Him.
The above?

Is neither an argument in support of, nor evidence for, a god.

You lose by default: your god is still not real.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#178426 Sep 25, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
So the bible cant be true because different people have translated older texts at different times?
No--the bible can't be true because it contains a multiplicity of mistakes, errors, lies, falsehoods, fairy-tales, misconceptions, lies, fiction, myths and so on.

In fact?

If something in the bible turns out to be factual?

That is **also** a mistake-- for it was never the **intent** of it's authors...

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#178427 Sep 25, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Read carefully, as an atheist you have no basis for morality.
You have no absolute standard if right and wrong.
If you do, share what it is.
The above?

Is neither an argument in support of, nor evidence for, a god.

You lose by default: your god is still not real.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#178428 Sep 25, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
You are missing the point.
Why do you get to define what atheism is?
Because **we** are **atheists**.

You are not.

You do not get to define the word we use to describe ourselves.

For one thing?

You clearly have no clue what "atheist" means...

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#178429 Sep 25, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
A lack of belief is a knowledge claim. You are claiming there is no evidence, which is a position.
You are not neutral.
If there **is** evidence?

PRESENT IT, AND WIN THE NOBEL PRIZE.

Can you do it?

No?

Hmmmmm....

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#178430 Sep 25, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
And you know that absolutely how?
You are **not** special.

For one thing?

You are quite hateful in your attitude.

That right there? Pretty much means that any god you claim to represent is also hateful...

.... hmmmm.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#178431 Sep 25, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice try.
The burden of proof is on the person making the claim.
Negative or positive is irrelevant.
Correct: that would be YOU.

Do you have **ANY** evidence to prove your god-claim?

No?

Interesting. By **default**?

Your claim is therefore false.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#178432 Sep 25, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Who decided your moral standards?
The above?

Is neither an argument in support of, nor evidence for, a god.

You lose by default: your god is still not real.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#178433 Sep 25, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
So you cannot have parents if free will us real?
Parents are not Ultimate Creators of the Universe.

Parents are not omniscient.

Parents are not omnipowerful.

So, yes-- you can have parents and free will.

But you cannot have a **god** who is omni-X.

Such a being would eliminate all possibility of choice-- who can go against an omnipowerful god, who has already seen **the** future?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#178434 Sep 25, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice try.
Are your unicorns omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent and have actually engaged with man throughout recorded history?
Nice try.

Do you have **facts** showing your god is real?

No?

Interesting. By **default**, your god-claim is therefore false.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#178435 Sep 25, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
And you think you have a deep knowledge of the bible?
I think you confuse intentional skepticism with actual knowledge.
Far deeper than you, obviously.

Proof?

You still **believe** the bible...

...!!!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#178436 Sep 25, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Anger at God does not mean He does not exist.
Fear of god does not make him any more real.

Just as fear of the "boogyman" does not make that real, either.

Your fear is showing.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#178437 Sep 25, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
How can morality predate God?
Because your god-claim is fiction, invented by very lazy people who were deeply afraid of the Out There, beyond the campfire's light.

So these cowardly, lazy first-priests fabricated a god-beast to "explain" things, and to give them dubious "comfort" when they cowered under the animal skins someone gave them out of pity.

For these first-priests were too lazy, too cowardly, to fend for themselves-- they had to coerce people to do it **for** them.

And the racket known as "religion" was invented--it's been stealing money, goods and services from humanity ever since.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#178438 Sep 25, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
The old Santa Claus argument.
Correct.

Santa Claus is **exactly** as likely as your god-claim.

The two are **exactly** the same sort of belief:

100%**not** supported by **anything**.

If you **had** proof?

YOU WOULD HAVE PRESENTED IT BY NOW, AND WON THE NOBEL PRIZE.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#178439 Sep 25, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
The name is right. 1
The town is right. 2
The lineage is right. 3
Nope. The word "jesus" is nowhere to be found in the OT.

Nope. Jesus was born in the **wrong** town according to the OT. More to the point? The name "Jesus of Nazareth" is impossible; Nazareth did not exist until well after the Jesus-myth supposedly happened.

Nope. Jesus was not descended from David-- his "dad" was god, not David. And in Hebrew, the **male** lineage is paramount-- why do you think all those *begats* were of **men**?
LCNLin

United States

#178440 Sep 25, 2013
Amusing OCD atheism?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 hr USAsince1680 1,744,862
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 7 hr June VanDerMark 336,709
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 18 hr Chosen Traveler 35,800
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Mar 28 Lonnie Peters 201,480
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) Mar 24 Wisdom of Ages 12,331
News Purdue and IU? On Valentine's day? Not anymore (Feb '07) Mar '18 Painter Phartse 73
News Walker IV hits 5 3s, scores 19, Miami beats Not... Feb '18 ScoresPhartse 2