Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent. Full Story

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#177758 Sep 20, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
This is a good time to remind you that there are more atheist in this world that are atheist because they are forced to be,
Really? You have.... an example of this fantasy-delusion of yours?

No?

Interesting.... you **are** nuck-futz.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#177759 Sep 20, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
I would prefer being a black person in the 1840s in Georgia USA, than to be Chinese at this moment. Better dead than red.
News flash: you already **are** a slave to your insanity.

Sad.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#177760 Sep 20, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
This is a good time to remind you that there are more atheist ... than to be Chinese ...
LOL!

The majority of Chinese worship their ancestors-- which means they are not atheists.

But I bet they would agree that your insane "past life regression" was true...!

LOL!

YOU ARE MORE LIKE THEM THAN YOU THINK.

LOL!

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#177761 Sep 20, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
We are fine, We started a family business in January 13 in the Health related business. My daughter got this business started for us. We started with one employee and the last time I looked we had 850 employees. So the business has grown exponentially.
I was totally not expecting that kind of growth. Now its humming like a boiler stuck on high fire. My daughter is a nurse and my daughter in law sort of do most of the management of the company.
My job is to make sure the company has steady growth and is solid from top to bottom. It has been a lot of fun so far.. Its kind of like surfing which Im sure you are familiar with. You just ride the wave as long as you can.
Exactly. But it seems you already created a pretty big wave, so you'll be able to ride it for quite a while.

Good luck, and treat your employees well, it will bring big dividends in the long run.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#177762 Sep 20, 2013
Thinking wrote:
<quoted text>Where's your proof? "Past" Uranus?
Thinking wrote:
<quoted text>What percentage of the time is that wrong?
Nearly 50%.
So I don't really think you're an authority on "Pluto's place", twart.

50%. LMFAO

What a dolt!

"Is Pluto sometimes closer to us than Neptune?

Because Pluto has an orbit around the sun which is very elliptical, there are times when it crosses Neptune's orbit and is actually closer to the sun than Neptune. This happened recently during a twenty year period from 1979 to 1999. For now, Pluto is back to being farther away from the sun than Neptune. It will be more than 230 years before Pluto and Neptune trade places again. Pluto slips inside of Neptune's orbit once every 248 Earth years for a period of twenty years."

That's less then 10%.

What a nut job.

Oh and it will be 230 more years that I'm right with my comment.

Ya you sure showed me. Bawhahaha

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#177763 Sep 20, 2013
Thinking wrote:
<quoted text>Where's your proof? "Past" Uranus?
What a moron. This guy thinks Neptune is further out then Pluto over 50% of time!

ROTFLMAO.......,bawhahahaha

What a turd!

Thinking wrote:
<quoted text>What percentage of the time is that wrong?
Nearly 50%.
So I don't really think you're an authority on "Pluto's place", twart.

Bawhahahaha Then the dolt keeps posting it LOL. Someone told him to try thinking so he tried thinking as a name.

Bawhahahaha

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#177764 Sep 20, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>Yep. Tzarina is on a spamfest in a couple of groups. He has been posting the same cr*p repeatedly for quite a while, even after being soundly refuted. The posts about the Big Bang and the 'edge' of space show a *complete* lack of understanding of the fundamentals of the BB viewpoint. The others are just as bad.

Once again, there was no 'edge' to the BB expansion. The expansion occurs throughout space.
Poly such a way to talk about the guy that boxed you in.

You're still in that box. Does that piss you off that you and your science fail and can't get out of your box.

So you do the next atheist thing, insult the victor. Nothing new.
christINSANITY is EVIL

Windsor, Canada

#177765 Sep 20, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
Thinking wrote:
<quoted text>What percentage of the time is that wrong?
Nearly 50%.
So I don't really think you're an authority on "Pluto's place", twart.
50%. LMFAO
What a dolt!
"Is Pluto sometimes closer to us than Neptune?
Because Pluto has an orbit around the sun which is very elliptical, there are times when it crosses Neptune's orbit and is actually closer to the sun than Neptune. This happened recently during a twenty year period from 1979 to 1999. For now, Pluto is back to being farther away from the sun than Neptune. It will be more than 230 years before Pluto and Neptune trade places again. Pluto slips inside of Neptune's orbit once every 248 Earth years for a period of twenty years."
That's less then 10%.

What a nut job.
a
YOU sure are
no need to remind us,,
christINSANITY is EVIL

Windsor, Canada

#177766 Sep 20, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
I would rather be a crack street walker than an atheist.
OFF TOPIC little Bobby

losing arguments makes you mad ,yes!

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#177767 Sep 20, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>There is no BB theory problem, where do you get the idea that there is a problem?

1/ Yes – wrong the time on earth is slightly different from the time on the sun.- There is no centre of the universe or rather everywhere is the centre of the universe.– It is now understood that each galaxy is formed around a giant black hole. Astronomers are currently studying the gas cloud reaction to the entity in the centre of our galaxy.

Everywhere science can show the universe is 13.7 billion years old according to the time base used on earth.

2/ Only weird if you don’t understand it, I suggest that you do some research on this topic before making yourself look even more foolish. The universe is around 46 billion light years across. Expansion is independent of the speed of light, space is expanding so nothing has violated the limit imposed by the speed of light

The CMB only needs to work with the age it is.

3/ This is your theory and nothing more, we have been here before and I have explained of the fundamental laws that govern this universe and how they did not exist (certainly as we understand them) at the beginning point of our universe. It seems that you have done the typical fundy and gone round in circles hoping for a different answer. Prior to the resolution of those laws it is unknown if time existed or not therefore how can you make a claim that nothing can exist without time, you make you own paradox without even understanding what you are doing. Oh wait a moment, is this another case of special pleading? Your babble stories don’t work with scientific understanding so you need to make BS up to cover your tracks.

Wrong, time is proof of time and the babble is evidence of folk stories and superstitions created by bronze age goat herders and escaped slaves
"There is no BB theory problem, where do you get the idea that there is a problem?"

Your right no problem with the theory at all. Of course it could never happen because just before the BB you MUST have time. Time existence breaks all the laws of physics. But your BB theory is solid. Except that the BB happened 13.7 billion years ago and it would take about 1 billion years for the universe to fall to the state where it could start producing stars and science has found a 14.8 billion year old star. Bit of a problem there. But the theory is sound as Myths goes.
christINSANITY is EVIL

Windsor, Canada

#177768 Sep 20, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
This is a good time to remind you that there are more atheist in this world that are atheist because they are forced to be, than there are that choose to be so. I would prefer being a black person in the 1840s in Georgia USA, than to be Chinese at this moment. Better dead than red.
chinese arent red you dingbat..theyre yellow..LLL

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#177769 Sep 20, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
Good then don't. Atheism sucks. Thank God it is just ideas of people like yourself instead of the truth.
Not just ideas... it is the complete truth at this point in time.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#177770 Sep 20, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
This is a good time to remind you that there are more atheist in this world that are atheist because they are forced to be, than there are that choose to be so. I would prefer being a black person in the 1840s in Georgia USA, than to be Chinese at this moment. Better dead than red.
lol... incorrect, but I would love to know where you picked up that incorrect snippet of information.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#177771 Sep 20, 2013
I_see_you wrote:
<quoted text>
If you are looking for personal gain then no should not look to atheism.
Atheism a dry well. A dead end road. Enslaved to lies.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#177772 Sep 20, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> Atheism a dry well. A dead end road. Enslaved to lies.
Not at all true.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#177773 Sep 20, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> Atheism a dry well. A dead end road. Enslaved to lies.
Allow me to disagree.

It's fulfilling to live a life without a crutch.

You believers need your god and your Bible the way a drunk needs a lamppost--not for illumination, but something to lean on.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#177774 Sep 20, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
So you are saying that God could not have forbidden slavery at that point, even just for Israel?
You dodged my questions. What is wrong with slavery? I did not say anything about God. I want to know what is wrong with slavery in a world without God? In a world without God it is man who determines these things for their time period based on their circumstances? What is wrong with that?
I thought the whole point of giving the commandments was to say what was allowed and what was not. Clearly, slavery *was* allowed.
So?
And God approved of it, at least under certain proscriptions.
God bashing? Will you blame the tooth fairy for cavities? Slavery was regulated for the benefit of the slave. To limit abuse. The actual institution is neutral. It was universal in the ancient world. Like i keep saying you atheists do not really care about slavery. You only mention it as it relates to Scripture. It is used a a basis to bash God and discredit Scripture. You only mention it in a narrow sense. Ignoring the fact it was universal and far more brutal in pagan cultures. Answer these questions.

1) If God approves of slavery then why did God liberate the Israelites from Egyptian slavery?

2) If God approves of slavery then why did Elisha liberate the children of the widow from debt slavery?
No, we have contempt for the Bible because the Bible is an evil book. We simply point out that evil. It condemns itself with its immorality.
So you admit you have contempt for the Bible and believe it is evil. Under what objective basis do you determine what is and what is not evil? Why is your position any more valid than say Bart Ehrman who considers it probably one of the most important books in the history of the West? For an atheist to suggest evil in an objective sense is hypocritical since you have no real objective basis and your judgements is a valid as your opinion.
<quoted text>
No, we care about slavery in the first place.
And for those who don't? Why is yours more valid then theirs?
We care about humanity in the first place. That is *why* we condemn the Bible and the evil within it.
Moralizing atheists is both sickening and hypocritical. Why don't you just admit you hate a God you do not believe exists.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#177775 Sep 20, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> You dodged my questions. What is wrong with slavery?.
Slavery strips the slave and the slaveowner of human dignity.

If you don't understand that, you are a sad, sorry person.
Eagle 12

Troy, IL

#177776 Sep 20, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
Souls aren't real until you can prove them.
Its a shame that you lie about aboslutely everything you cannot prove.
I have two on my feet.
Eagle 12

Troy, IL

#177777 Sep 20, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Note the hategodbot's obsession with the bum.
This is classic.
And **very** Jesus.
When one is pushed from the front, the "Bum" as you call it. Is the first thing that contacts the ground. That's not a obsession but gravity and the bio mechanics of the human body. You need to try harder Bob at being spiteful.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min shinningelectr0n 1,154,039
UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 41 min Bruin Nation 28,392
Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 1 hr Brian_G 306,984
What role do you think humans play in global wa... 3 hr Patriot AKA Bozo 2,675
Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 5 hr Cali Girl 2014 201,167
Should child beauty pageants be banned? 6 hr Roy The Boy 688
Conn's Appliances (Nov '07) Dec 16 The Real Daniel S... 281
More from around the web