Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 257129 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#177101 Sep 11, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
Not only will I tell you it is false. I will also tell you it is a display of how stupid you are when ever you post it. You and Quantum Bob disgrace the American Atheist movement with your blogs of pure stupidity. Prior to posting on this tread I did have a higher respect for Atheist bloggers than I do now. I really do not count out the idea that you and Bob are theist mocking Atheist.
How long have you been reading Bob's comments?

The first one should have been a pretty good hint about his mentality.

>:}

“Robert Stevens”

Since: Dec 08

Jersey City , NJ

#177102 Sep 11, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Once more? You cannot muster up counter-argument.
So you use your "skill" at name-calling instead.
Classic.
he statement is so stupid "Religion has no interest in science" is so stupid it is not worthy of a counter. You should just not be talking about this until you do some serious reading.

“Robert Stevens”

Since: Dec 08

Jersey City , NJ

#177103 Sep 11, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
More personal attack.
More FAILURE to produce an ARGUMENT.
As for your last?
I have already proved your god isn't real.
1) quantum physics and relativity prove that an **omniscient** god is impossible-- such a being would collapse the universe, just by existing.
2) preventable evil in the world proves that there is no **caring** gods of any kind
2a) the existence of evil "holy" books which lead people to commit **great**evil**(bible, quoran, book of mormon, etc) is **also** proof that NO GOD WHO CARES EXISTS-- for allowing such evil to exist
3) the existence of steady human progress and discovery proves that there are no **evil** gods either.
4) all that are left? Are the UNCARING, INDIFFERENT AND UNAWARE gods.
Why bother with these lot? They don't care, they are unaware of humans... so there is no need to even acknowledge them at all.
----------
There you go- summarized JUST FOR YOU.
Let your NO ARGUMENT WHINING commence
If you could spare 1 minute and 50 seconds



While on youtube you may enjoy this one too.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
blacklagoon

Boston, MA

#177104 Sep 11, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
This is what blacklagoon does when he or she has been check mated. It's just an attempt to win a debate.
"Not only will I tell you it is false." This is your statement after I pointed out that the God of the bible murders little babies. I then pointed out to you the PFOOF, and since that time.....no response from you. You said my accusations were false, I proved to you they were true, and this you call "Checkmate." Do you really enjoy making yourself look stupid?.....I guess so!!!!
blacklagoon

Boston, MA

#177105 Sep 11, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
the problem with Bob and other atheists ... they prove nothing.
We can certainly PROVE that the God you worship commits infanticide and genocide, those are easy. We can also prove without much trouble, how immoral your holy book is, and of course since it is supposed to be the world of your God, that your God is also immoral. It would take very like effort to prove how cruel and capricious your God is. So by saying we can prove nothing, makes you a bold faced liar. I thought lying was a sin, shame on you, on your knees now and grovel before your demon God asking for forgiveness. You Christians do love to grovel don't you!!!!
Thinking

Royston, UK

#177106 Sep 11, 2013
Would "religion has no value add for science" be more accurate?
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
he statement is so stupid "Religion has no interest in science" is so stupid it is not worthy of a counter. You should just not be talking about this until you do some serious reading.

“Robert Stevens”

Since: Dec 08

Jersey City , NJ

#177107 Sep 11, 2013
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>"Not only will I tell you it is false." This is your statement after I pointed out that the God of the bible murders little babies. I then pointed out to you the PFOOF, and since that time.....no response from you. You said my accusations were false, I proved to you they were true, and this you call "Checkmate." Do you really enjoy making yourself look stupid?.....I guess so!!!!
I have to admit, paying any attention to your post here did make me look stupid.

“Robert Stevens”

Since: Dec 08

Jersey City , NJ

#177108 Sep 11, 2013
Thinking wrote:
Would "religion has no value add for science" be more accurate?
<quoted text>
I would say no, and suggest you do some reading. I could understand not liking religion, I, myself am a Pagan. You have to stay true to the discussion. Religion itself is a science. Throughout the years well educated people have gathered, and researched for advancement. I find it od to read people post, that have such a scornful hatred for religion. I would say it was blinding them, but I don't have that high of an opinion for these haters. I think they are idiots that think they know everything. The belief in knowing everything is a common cause of being stupid.

“Robert Stevens”

Since: Dec 08

Jersey City , NJ

#177109 Sep 11, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
the problem with Bob and other atheists ... they prove nothing.
These are very stupid Atheist. I think the average atheist would have just left this tread alone. They would understand the ideas of this video below and choose another place to debate the theist.

Thinking

Royston, UK

#177111 Sep 11, 2013
Religitards are most likely to think they have all the answers, which is a common cause of being stupid.
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
I would say no, and suggest you do some reading. I could understand not liking religion, I, myself am a Pagan. You have to stay true to the discussion. Religion itself is a science. Throughout the years well educated people have gathered, and researched for advancement. I find it od to read people post, that have such a scornful hatred for religion. I would say it was blinding them, but I don't have that high of an opinion for these haters. I think they are idiots that think they know everything. The belief in knowing everything is a common cause of being stupid.
Thinking

Royston, UK

#177112 Sep 11, 2013
Never mix crossplys with radials.
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
I think the average atheist would have just left this tread alone.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#177113 Sep 11, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>I've seen some of your gang, Muttonchops, and I'd rather hang with attractive freaks than the so-called "normal" dogs you sniff butts with.
Oh looky! My stalker is attempting to make a comment...

... as if anyone gives a rat's fart **what** she pretends to think.

How cute.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#177114 Sep 11, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
This is what blacklagoon does when he or she has been check mated. It's just an attempt to win a debate.
The above? Is not an argument, fact or point.

Just whining and belittling of the poster instead.

It's your only move, it seems.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#177115 Sep 11, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
he statement is so stupid "Religion has no interest in science" is so stupid it is not worthy of a counter. You should just not be talking about this until you do some serious reading.
Yes... we know you have zero counter-argument here.

My point is valid: religion is the **opposite** of science.

Science seeks to **understand** the universe.

Religion seeks to re-fabricate it in it's wish-fulfillment image-- and will **deny** any and all facts that contradict religion's claims.

The two cannot co-exist peacefully-- religion will **always** be forced to **deny** science, as science proves over and over, that religion is just a big lie.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#177116 Sep 11, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
If you could spare 1 minute and 50 seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =1YvWaLSOOIQXX
The above video is not in any way, shape or form, an argument.

Nor does it support you in any way. Naturally.
Robert Stevens wrote:
While on youtube you may enjoy this one too.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
That is so YOU! At least you admit it when you are being an azzhole.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#177117 Sep 11, 2013
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>"Not only will I tell you it is false." This is your statement after I pointed out that the God of the bible murders little babies. I then pointed out to you the PFOOF, and since that time.....no response from you. You said my accusations were false, I proved to you they were true, and this you call "Checkmate." Do you really enjoy making yourself look stupid?.....I guess so!!!!
Yes... he does not "do" arguments.

The entirety of his posting-style is to belittle, name-call and scream "IS NOT" over and over.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#177118 Sep 11, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
I have to admit, paying any attention to your post here did make me look stupid.
Silly boy!

You look stupid **regardless** of who you reply to!

LOL!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#177119 Sep 11, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
I would say no, and suggest you do some reading. I could understand not liking religion, I, myself am a Pagan. You have to stay true to the discussion. Religion itself is a science. Throughout the years well educated people have gathered, and researched for advancement. I find it od to read people post, that have such a scornful hatred for religion. I would say it was blinding them, but I don't have that high of an opinion for these haters. I think they are idiots that think they know everything. The belief in knowing everything is a common cause of being stupid.
Is anything in the above provable or an actual... argument?

No?

Interesting.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#177120 Sep 11, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
These are very stupid Atheist. I think the average atheist would have just left this tread alone. They would understand the ideas of this video below and choose another place to debate the theist.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =1YvWaLSOOIQXX
The video is bullshit.

It's very first point? Wrong-- it's the same bullshit "you cannot create something from nothing" non-argument.

The Big Bang does not **claim** "something from nothing".

That is a strawman religious bullshit ploy-- and it IGNORES a fatal flaw:

From whence came their god, if you cannot make something from nothing?

If they can excuse their god as "always was" then so can we-- the universe always was in one shape or another.

The video it bullshit-- just like you.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#177121 Sep 11, 2013
Thinking wrote:
Never mix crossplys with radials.
<quoted text>
Nor do you want mud tread on one side, and highway tread on the other-- weird steering and wonky braking performance.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 7 min RoxLo 1,432,720
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 1 hr zef 311,882
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) 2 hr IB DaMann 10,102
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) Mon Les Miles 32,402
News Western Michigan heads to Illinois as a favorite Sep 18 Go Blue Forever 1
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Sep 10 yess 201,881
News UCLA Basketball: Grad Transfer Octeus to Bruins (Jun '14) Aug 31 Trojan 2
More from around the web