Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 258451 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“Exit Stage Right”

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#176034 Sep 1, 2013
Khatru wrote:
<quoted text>
Einstein got this one right so I'll use his words.....
"Strange is our situation here on Earth. Each of us comes for a short visit, not knowing why, yet sometimes seeming to divine a purpose.
From the standpoint of daily life, however, there is one thing we do know: that man is here for the sake of other men - above all for those whose smiles and well-being our own happiness depends"
Just saying
http://www.christianpost.com/news/book-confir...

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#176035 Sep 1, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
That could be the most stupid post I ever read. But I'll treat it as a theory. A THEORY!!!!! Not proven. A THEORY!!!! OMG, it really is not worthy of being called that but, for the sake of argument. you can't prove that, therefore... be lucky I call it that. And that is a THEORY. theory.
Actually, it is one distinct possibility that is consistent with everything we know about the universe at this point. It is even a prediction of those theories that merge quantum mechanics and general relativity, such as string thoery and loop quantum gravity.

Do you care to give an alternative theory that incorporates both QM and GR? If so, please present it and we can discuss it.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#176036 Sep 1, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
http://freepages.genealogy.roo tsweb.ancestry.com/~heddins/Ad am-Eve-Desc.htm
Pure mythology. No connection to reality.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#176037 Sep 1, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text>
In the Beginning (Time)
God created the heavens (Space)
And the Earth (Matter)
Gen.1:1 presupposes God outside time space and matter.
Pure mythology. No connection to reality.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#176038 Sep 1, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
I really love this. Instead of admitting you can't prove how The Universe started. You claim The Universe has not started. I hope I am awake when it does.
If matter and energy have existed for all time, then the universe did not start. It has always been going. Is that so hard for you to understand?

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#176039 Sep 1, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =nZiROWO6iVsXX&feature=you tu.be
Above is a link to Dr M. Kaku deliver one of his latest THEORIES. For all that watch they will feel as it reinforces his or her beliefs in their faith. Please note that he never claims what he offers is the final answer. With each item he learns he has further THEORIES. In which he looks forward to attempting to prove. This is why Dr Kaku is on the top shelf, and the people that teach you to be close minded do what those that can't do. And that is teach. The highest level does not jump the gun.
And you notice that Kaku's positions are based on actual data. That is the difference between science and religion: science adjusts based on actual evidence and facts, while religion tells us to ignore the facts and maintain faith.
Atheist can not prove their claims because they do not have enough knowledge to claim proof that there was and is no creator. That day will never come. Especially if humanity is to become an atheist society. Which is a day that should be avoided, by all means.
Nobody has given any way of even defining the concept of a God to the extent it can be tested. Until a specific test can be given, it isn't even a question about reality: it is only a matter of opinion and imagination.

Since: Sep 08

Lamar, CO

#176040 Sep 1, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. The *mainstream* of science understands that quantum events are uncaused. The *mainstream* knows that quantum mechanics is a very good description of reality, but is an acausal theory: you do not get causality of specific events, but instead probabilities of those events happening. Further, these *are* the laws of science, so they definitely do not violate the laws of science. Finally, they are mathematical descriptions, so math does not disprove them.
In other words, you are wrong about ewvery single point of your post.
Poly, you don't seem to grasp that quantum physics is just a measuring system. That is why it acausal system you say it is.

Things just are, and this is how we measure it. That is quantum physics as you described.

OF COURSE YOU WON'T SEE ANY CAUSALITY.

You are stuck worshiping a measuring system instead of the causations of what you are measuring. This will also give rise to your belief in random generation because you aren't looking beyond the material you are measuring.

Question, is their design of some sort in those quantum actions that makes for coherent interactions of them? You can translate that to are there laws governing their actions.

Good God, man, you believe in these "virtual particles" appearing out of nowhere and not in a higher force or intelligence at work? There is a disconnect there in your logic of reality.

Since: Sep 08

Lamar, CO

#176041 Sep 1, 2013
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
Dave, baby, neurons don't misfire and produce thought. Neurons fire properly and produce thought.
Unless of course the person in question is certifiably insane or has brain damage. Then neurons misfire all the time - and the thought that regular neurons are producing gets jumbled. So...no, once again.
Turn up the O2 and try again. Breathe deeply. Inhale, slowly. Exhale slowly. And again. And repeat. Ok, good.
Sweetie love, you have a few misfiring in your logic and understanding of what is being discussed.

I said if you are having a dream you are having coherent thoughts. Those "misfiring" neurons are doing so to make a movie.

The lady said she was dreaming while dying. Something triggered that dream process. That dream process is done in your higher "human" brain circuitry. If that level is not functioning, then a lower or deeper level is.

This is a program written into you to exit this existence. This could not have been written by the strictly materialistic evolution you proclaim. There is just not any damned reason for "nature" to give a shit about the pain and suffering you go through upon expiration. Your materialistic function is over. For such a program to be written and entered into the human genome some ancestor would have to survive the experience, have it written to their genes, and then passed on to their babies, and their descendants then became modern man.

There is no imperative for nature to put you to sleep before you physically die. Why would she care?

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#176042 Sep 1, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Pure mythology. No connection to reality.
LOL! Ancestry.com is a neutral site which does a type of historical investigation. Naturally someone like you who despises truth and clings to modern myth would reject these finding based on actual evidence! Actual investigation!

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#176043 Sep 1, 2013
Murgatroyd wrote:
Read that book.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#176044 Sep 1, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Poly, you don't seem to grasp that quantum physics is just a measuring system. That is why it acausal system you say it is.
Things just are, and this is how we measure it. That is quantum physics as you described.
OF COURSE YOU WON'T SEE ANY CAUSALITY.
You are stuck worshiping a measuring system instead of the causations of what you are measuring. This will also give rise to your belief in random generation because you aren't looking beyond the material you are measuring.
Question, is their design of some sort in those quantum actions that makes for coherent interactions of them? You can translate that to are there laws governing their actions.
Good God, man, you believe in these "virtual particles" appearing out of nowhere and not in a higher force or intelligence at work? There is a disconnect there in your logic of reality.
When you're able to prove the god you're ranting about, you will be regarded with less suspicion and mistrust

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#176045 Sep 1, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> LOL! Ancestry.com is a neutral site which does a type of historical investigation. Naturally someone like you who despises truth and clings to modern myth would reject these finding based on actual evidence! Actual investigation!
When you're able to prove your the god of your creationist cult, you will look less stupid than everyone before you.
Denis

Harar, Ethiopia

#176046 Sep 1, 2013
appleboy wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you are right, mooze. Not much at all was really said. But I do have some thoughts on the subject.
Those who value science are people who have faith in verifiable data and observed results of experiments. Religion is something they judge on their own, regardless of what they were taught.
Those who value faith above science are people who have faith in parents, teachers and other authority figures who taught them their religion.
There are high and low IQs in both groups, though there is a greater tendency towards high IQs in the science related group.
The core value for each is faith: faith in data & observation; or faith in some trusted members of society.
This is what I do not understand atheists who most likey believe science which says there is some POWER, in the universe. Instead of saying power what holds you back to call Him God? God is a person who is the creator of everything.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#176047 Sep 1, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> LOL! Ancestry.com is a neutral site which does a type of historical investigation. Naturally someone like you who despises truth and clings to modern myth would reject these finding based on actual evidence! Actual investigation!
Preposterous assertion, considering the bones of the hominids have no definition in this attempt to establish an ancestry without explaining them and the hundreds of thousands of years of men before the alleged Adam.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#176048 Sep 1, 2013
I just clicked on to ancestry.com for the first time and entered information on my mother's side for free. The site brought up accurate information going back to the beginning of the 1900s in a matter of seconds. Actual recorded documents which goes back to the parents of my grandparents! In a matter of seconds! Damm impressive!

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#176049 Sep 1, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
Preposterous assertion, considering the bones of the hominids have no definition in this attempt to establish an ancestry without explaining them and the hundreds of thousands of years of men before the alleged Adam.
Your not into an exact science. Subject to modern assumptions and interpretation.

“Sweden more democratic thanUSA”

Since: Jun 12

Södertälje, Sweden

#176050 Sep 1, 2013
Murgatroyd wrote:
The christian post is spreading lies

“Sweden more democratic thanUSA”

Since: Jun 12

Södertälje, Sweden

#176051 Sep 1, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> LOL! Ancestry.com is a neutral site which does a type of historical investigation. Naturally someone like you who despises truth and clings to modern myth would reject these finding based on actual evidence! Actual investigation!
No truth found in that mythology

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#176052 Sep 1, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> Your not into an exact science. Subject to modern assumptions and interpretation.
Archeology isn't exact , but exacting enough that the bones speak for themselves.
When we can definitively measure the age of human bones to be 200,000 years old, we can effectively dismiss the idea of a 6,000 year lineage. That much is exact enough and not assumption like your assumption that you troglodyte science book trumps modern empirical science based on physical evidence. I find your belief to be at best laughable, and at worst ...you the subject of pity. For being so willfully ignorant to dismiss the evidence in front of your face, to cling to a proven tract of religious ignorance, that turns men into mindless morons with the beliefs born of ancient stupidity.

Since: Sep 08

Lamar, CO

#176053 Sep 1, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
I just clicked on to ancestry.com for the first time and entered information on my mother's side for free. The site brought up accurate information going back to the beginning of the 1900s in a matter of seconds. Actual recorded documents which goes back to the parents of my grandparents! In a matter of seconds! Damm impressive!
I would love to check Quantum Bob's ancestry and see which hatchery he came from.

Then they can quarantine it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Injudgement 1,524,036
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 1 hr John-K 314,012
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 12 hr MidPhartz 32,924
I got my loan from [email protected] (Jun '13) Apr 20 GLOBAL FUNDING SO... 43
How to Recover Deleted or lost Contacts from Sa... (Dec '14) Apr 20 DelucaKoehn 11
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) Apr 18 RNC 11,137
Conn's Appliances (Nov '07) Apr 8 Allycat1999 290
More from around the web