Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 257124 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

Since: Sep 10

San Francisco, CA

#166153 May 27, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, so which is it? "NEVER" or "when it's necessary"??
You said you spanked a six-month-old to discipline him.

Own it.

Since: Sep 10

San Francisco, CA

#166154 May 27, 2013
_-Alice-_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you have a wife anymore?
Hahahahaha.

Just the buttercups.

No pussywillows.

:)

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#166155 May 27, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> NEVER, but there are possible cases that it could be necessary. I pushed the baby out the way of the speeding car.
That'd be a wee tad different...

But Redneck's lost his effing mind.

Since: Sep 10

San Francisco, CA

#166156 May 27, 2013
_-Alice-_ wrote:
<quoted text>
What's the point of gently striking somebody?
Hey, RR is striking a six-month-old.

You don't want to risk killing a baby.

RR is very considerate.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#166157 May 27, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, so which is it? "NEVER" or "when it's necessary"??
Well, absent the speeding car - do you REALLY not get this?

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#166158 May 27, 2013
_-Alice-_ wrote:
<quoted text>
What's the point of gently striking somebody?
Other than pour le sport?
blacklagoon

Brookline, MA

#166159 May 27, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Atheist does to require a belief, the belief that deities don't exist.
Since that is NOT knowledge, it's belief, opinion, faith, trust, confidence, persuasion, credence, whatever you want to call it, it's not a fact that deities don't exist.
Since FACTS are defined as...."A thing that is INDISPUTABLY the case" and since the existence of deities is certainly disputable, the by definition, it is a FACT that deities do not exits.

Since a FACT is......"A piece of information used as EVIDENCE" ( your lest favorite word) And since there is no EVIDENCE for deities, it become a FACT that deities do not exist.

You'd do well to try and really understand the following. I do understand that no amount of logic or reason can penetrate the damage that religion has done to your thought process, but give it a try.

"When considering any matter of philosophy, ask yourself ONLY what are the FACTS and what is the TRUTH that these FACTS bear out. NEVER let yourself be diverted either by what you WISH to believe, or by what you THINK would have been socially acceptable to believe, but look ONLY and SOLELY at what are the FACTS." Bertrand Russell

Since: Mar 11

Scottsburg, IN

#166160 May 27, 2013
His bible would have you stone them to death.
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>No, redneck.

My belief is that it is child abuse to hit a six-month-old baby.

Since: Mar 11

Scottsburg, IN

#166161 May 27, 2013
Please donate your time to people who suffer from head injuries like Dave here.

It's so sad and now dementia is compounding his condition :(
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>The self righteousness you and your fellows exhibit is beyond description.

Since: Mar 11

Scottsburg, IN

#166162 May 27, 2013
Once again ditch digger, atheism is not believing in a god. Show observable proof and we can go from there.
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>Atheist does to require a belief, the belief that deities don't exist.

Since that is NOT knowledge, it's belief, opinion, faith, trust, confidence, persuasion, credence, whatever you want to call it, it's not a fact that deities don't exist.

Since: Mar 11

Scottsburg, IN

#166163 May 27, 2013
I do not believe in a personal god. Albert Einstein.
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>How many religions and sects of them are there? A rather large variety, right? They even fight each other.

How many versions of atheism are there? Including the one claiming "science" as it basis.

"He who joyfully marches in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would suffice."
-Albert Einstein

You keep merrily marching on, now.

Since: Mar 11

Scottsburg, IN

#166164 May 27, 2013
I often wonder if the ditch digger realizes how stupid he makes himself look on here.
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>That'd be a wee tad different...

But Redneck's lost his effing mind.

_-Alice-_

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#166165 May 27, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Other than pour le sport?
I'll have to talk to HL. She never spanks gently.

Since: May 13

Trenton, NJ

#166166 May 27, 2013
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>Since FACTS are defined as...."A thing that is INDISPUTABLY the case" and since the existence of deities is certainly disputable, the by definition, it is a FACT that deities do not exits.
Since a FACT is......"A piece of information used as EVIDENCE" ( your lest favorite word) And since there is no EVIDENCE for deities, it become a FACT that deities do not exist.
You'd do well to try and really understand the following. I do understand that no amount of logic or reason can penetrate the damage that religion has done to your thought process, but give it a try.
"When considering any matter of philosophy, ask yourself ONLY what are the FACTS and what is the TRUTH that these FACTS bear out. NEVER let yourself be diverted either by what you WISH to believe, or by what you THINK would have been socially acceptable to believe, but look ONLY and SOLELY at what are the FACTS." Bertrand Russell
well, instead of quibbling over definitions, id say that absence of evidence is only evidence of absence when you should have more evidence tan what you have available. that being said, any argument for the existance of God makes the idea of his non existance anything but a fact. for example, if i arguend that moraals prove Gods existance, then the idea that there is no God is under despute, making his non existance anthing but a face by your terms. the term fact is used too loosely in this case.
blacklagoon

Brookline, MA

#166167 May 27, 2013
Ray puelerico wrote:
<quoted text>
well, instead of quibbling over definitions, id say that absence of evidence is only evidence of absence when you should have more evidence tan what you have available. that being said, any argument for the existance of God makes the idea of his non existance anything but a fact. for example, if i arguend that moraals prove Gods existance, then the idea that there is no God is under despute, making his non existance anthing but a face by your terms. the term fact is used too loosely in this case.
There is no quibbling over definitions here. The definitions I gave for FACTS is not up for debate, those are simply what facts are.

Something is either true or it isn't, there is no third choice. What methodology do we use to determine wether something is true of not? Isn't it extremely important to ascertain whether something is true or not? Is not evidence one of the most important aspects of making that determination? Without evidence you have NOTHING. Without demonstrable facts, you have NOTHING. Until someone can produce evidence for the existence of God, until someone can produce anything factual about God, then all that is left is because of absents of evidence it is a fact that no God exists. Personal experiences, anecdotal testimony, the words in holy books, the belief by millions, none of these can be used as evidence. You are simply left with a belief, not a fact.

And morals do NOT prove the existence of God, morals are governed by man and the various societies of man.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#166168 May 28, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>The self righteousness you and your fellows exhibit is beyond description.
Yours isn't.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#166169 May 28, 2013
_-Alice-_ wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll have to talk to HL. She never spanks gently.
Well, if that's how ya like it, nihil obstat...

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#166170 May 28, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>How many religions and sects of them are there? A rather large variety, right? They even fight each other.

How many versions of atheism are there? Including the one claiming "science" as it basis.

"He who joyfully marches in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would suffice."
-Albert Einstein

You keep merrily marching on, now.
Trying to organize atheists is like trying to herd cats.
Bongo

Bronx, NY

#166171 May 28, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Trying to organize atheists is like trying to herd cats.
pee wee and the stray cat shuffle bwhahahahahahahaha
Imhotep

Concord, NC

#166172 May 28, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
How many religions and sects of them are there? A rather large variety, right? They even fight each other.
How many versions of atheism are there? Including the one claiming "science" as it basis.
"He who joyfully marches in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would suffice."
-Albert Einstein
You keep merrily marching on, now.
Once again you're too stupid to understand the context. Too bad you can't twist Einstein's thoughts. We do understand your religion has taught you to lie.

The inspiration of the bible depends on the ignorance of the person who reads it.

We should be agnostic about those things for which there is no evidence. We should not hold beliefs merely because they gratify our desires for afterlife or immortality.

If you really believe that death leads to eternal bliss then why are you wearing a seat belt?

You belong to the church - stay there

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 8 min Grey Ghost 1,432,296
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 47 min Brian_G 311,875
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) 6 hr donaldtrump 10,099
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 22 hr Les Miles 32,402
News Western Michigan heads to Illinois as a favorite Sep 18 Go Blue Forever 1
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Sep 10 yess 201,881
News UCLA Basketball: Grad Transfer Octeus to Bruins (Jun '14) Aug 31 Trojan 2
More from around the web