Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

Full story: Webbunny tumblelog

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.
Comments
159,381 - 159,400 of 224,170 Comments Last updated 11 min ago

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165976
May 25, 2013
 
Thinking wrote:
Why would an all powerful god be concerned about gay sex of a lower species? Is god hoping his mum doesn't see him crack one out?
<quoted text>
God is concerned about gay sex??

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165977
May 25, 2013
 
Givemeliberty wrote:
It says cower... Wow you are really desperate. Or are you seeing things wrong through your tears? No shame in you once again being stumped by your betters.
It happens all the time.
<quoted text>
I meant cower, autocorrect changed it.

Your grasping at straws now, loser.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165978
May 25, 2013
 
Imhotep wrote:
<quoted text>
You are too funny!
Almost as funny as your religion and its Bible!
Here is why! crack open a Gideons and check this out.
Todayís scholars can only use the known, that is historical reigning Roman Emperors as a reference in determining dates.
So, since your Bible clearly and unambiguously claims that Jesus was born during the reign of Herod the King, then he, Jesus, had to have been born no later than 4 B.C.
Irony meter goes boom!
Jesus could only have been born a minimum of four years before the birth of Jesus?
After you stop laughing though, consider the import of this paradox.
I live my life so that when my feet hit the floor in the morning Satan shudders in fear, and says "OH For Christ's sake... he's awake!"
The exact date of Jesus' birth is unknown. It's somewhere between 4BC and 3AD.

No one has birth certificates back then, Jesus was no exception to that.

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165979
May 25, 2013
 
What is this topix atheist that you keep dithering on about.

What you personally believe about Israel is irrelevant, history clearly shows the lay out of nations and powers.

You do realize most of the OT is merely stolen and rewritten folk tales from other religions of the area right? And that the NT was written decades if not centuries after the so called events.

The bible is equal to a work of ancient fiction, not much more.
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>So?

Why do Topix atheists take words of religious texts so literal? They so more than theists.

"Your" history is attempted reconstruction of events from fragments of all that was. It can have errors regarding true events. Be advised works such as the Bible go back a long ways, and were much closer in time to preceding events. They had fresher oraL history along with the artifacts.

BTW, people were people back then. Just as varied in thoughts and actions as we are today. They, too, had to occupy their minds like we do. History stultifies them, they become machines and stick figures. Something remote. They were the same as your Mom, Dad, Uncle Harry, and street vendors.

I believe part of present Israel was at one time part of Egypt proper during one of its eras.

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165980
May 25, 2013
 
No I am factually destroying you as usual. You still cower from my questions like Buck does green leafy vegetables.

Don't feel bad, you do your best but against your betters? You can't be expected to keep up.
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>I meant cower, autocorrect changed it.

Your grasping at straws now, loser.

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165981
May 25, 2013
 
Well since there is no historical evidence for this god man you can assign him any birthday you wish like any work of fiction.
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>The exact date of Jesus' birth is unknown. It's somewhere between 4BC and 3AD.

No one has birth certificates back then, Jesus was no exception to that.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165982
May 25, 2013
 
Imhotep wrote:
<quoted text>
We can see you are still engaged in your courageous battle with literacy and mental health. Perhaps one day, you will gain sufficient education to join the 21st Century.
There are, of course, many sins one can commit in the eyes of religion. Among the greatest is the sin of having an original thought. Religion disapproves of original thought the way Dracula disapproves of sunlight.
So you discard the old testament? But not the new? You can't have it both ways, all or none. You can't pick and choose what to believe in. Well, you can, but then that makes it basically your own religion, and by definition that makes it your own imagination.
Don't get me wrong. Iím not saying religion doesnít have its uses. Personally I turn to it whenever I want my intelligence insulted. And the holy scriptures come in very handy when I need to justify behaviour Iím ashamed of.
You are way too passionate in your non-belief.

Curious. There is way more variety of thought in theism than atheism. Topix atheists all say the same thing.

Give us an original thought of your own regarding existence.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165983
May 25, 2013
 
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
You are way too passionate in your non-belief.
Curious. There is way more variety of thought in theism than atheism. Topix atheists all say the same thing.
Precisely.

Atheists consistently say they do not believe in deities.

Theists on the other hand are all over the place, and can't reach agreement.

Check out the Why Should Jesus Love Me thread.

It's a hoot to watch the Christians fight with one another over scriptural interpretation and other nonsense.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165984
May 25, 2013
 
Givemeliberty wrote:
No I am factually destroying you as usual. You still cower from my questions like Buck does green leafy vegetables.
HA HA HA !!!!!

Typing one-handed again, huh?

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165985
May 25, 2013
 
Givemeliberty wrote:
Well since there is no historical evidence for this god man you can assign him any birthday you wish like any work of fiction.
<quoted text>
There is plenty of historical evidence that Jesus existed.

I'm gonna try to ask you a honest question.....

What evidence of Julius Caesar is there that's different than Jesus?

Alexander the Great?

Nero?

Henry VIII?

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165986
May 25, 2013
 
Catcher1 wrote:

Precisely.
Atheists consistently say they do not believe in deities.
No they don't.

timn claims to he an atheist but also claims to not know of there's a god.

There nothing consistent about atheism.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165987
May 25, 2013
 
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Precisely.
Atheists consistently say they do not believe in deities.
Theists on the other hand are all over the place, and can't reach agreement.
Check out the Why Should Jesus Love Me thread.
It's a hoot to watch the Christians fight with one another over scriptural interpretation and other nonsense.
Topix Atheists are stamped from a mould.

Wouldn't be much variation in thought there due to cponstruction. In fact, such was already done for them.

Of course, that small minority of people believes they are the ones "in the know", you know.

You are missing soomething and don't know it, Catcher.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165988
May 25, 2013
 
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Topix Atheists are stamped from a mould.
Wouldn't be much variation in thought there due to cponstruction. In fact, such was already done for them.
Of course, that small minority of people believes they are the ones "in the know", you know.
You are missing soomething and don't know it, Catcher.
Looks like RR disagrees with you.

You guys take it from here.

But as I said, the Jesus thread is an excellent place to watch a Christian cockfight.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165989
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks like RR disagrees with you.
You guys take it from here.
But as I said, the Jesus thread is an excellent place to watch a Christian cockfight.
Seeking "the truth" requires different perspectives, and a fleshing out of them. A sort of "scientific approach".

You clowns just recite from a book someone recently wrote for you. No questioning of it.

Hardly "original" thinking.

BTW, "science" does not disprove a Creator. It is just an analysis of how something presently works. Yet you clowns say it does. Only in your own little and constrained minds.

Try thinking more deeply about thinking and existence. On your own.
Imhotep

Thomasville, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165990
May 25, 2013
 
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
The exact date of Jesus' birth is unknown. It's somewhere between 4BC and 3AD.
No one has birth certificates back then, Jesus was no exception to that.
The simple fact remains there's no evidence to support the existence of Jesus.

There is more than ample evidence of this in practically any library and it's all over the Internet.

Seek out the true origin your faith.
There's nothing to fear from seeking this knowledge.
You will find that all the desert religions are loosely based on the Egyptian. Christianity itself is "borrowed" From older cultures.

The Egyptian god Horus, Jesus and another God Mithras, all share more or less the same legend.

There are entirely too many coincidences between these three.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165991
May 25, 2013
 
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Seeking "the truth" requires different perspectives, and a fleshing out of them. A sort of "scientific approach".
You clowns just recite from a book someone recently wrote for you. No questioning of it.
Hardly "original" thinking.
BTW, "science" does not disprove a Creator. It is just an analysis of how something presently works. Yet you clowns say it does. Only in your own little and constrained minds.
Try thinking more deeply about thinking and existence. On your own.
I am not a clown.

Nor do I recite from any book.

Nor do I have a "little and constrained" mind.

I do my own thinking, and I draw my own conclusions.

I'm also careful not to chop my fingers off.
xianity is EVIL

Halifax, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165992
May 25, 2013
 
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
But if he was the son of god, he knew it would not produce when the season came.
HairyBetty, what strikes me as comical is that atheists insist on more biblical literalism than theists.
Always looking for those technicalities.
Both atheists and christians are obsessed with God.
It is an ego trip - in both cases.
Christianity developed from taking the wisdom of a special man, Jesus, and weaving it into yarns that require material, like blood, sin, hell, a man-like god on a throne, etc.
That's material faith. Entirely egoic.
The atheist thinks there is nothing but material. Material is his god. What he thinks he knows, what he holds in his hand, these are god
when have you become atheist,Joe?

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165993
May 25, 2013
 
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not a clown.
Nor do I recite from any book.
Nor do I have a "little and constrained" mind.
I do my own thinking, and I draw my own conclusions.
I'm also careful not to chop my fingers off.
I think DN had a cut price lobotomy.... with a circular saw.
Bongo

Bayport, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165994
May 25, 2013
 
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not a clown.
Nor do I recite from any book.
Nor do I have a "little and constrained" mind.
I do my own thinking, and I draw my own conclusions.
I'm also careful not to chop my fingers off.
Youre just a witty buffoon , with a law license.
xianity is EVIL

Halifax, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165995
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Seeking "the truth" requires different perspectives, and a fleshing out of them. A sort of "scientific approach".
You clowns just recite from a book someone recently wrote for you. No questioning of it.
Hardly "original" thinking.
BTW, "science" does not disprove a Creator. It is just an analysis of how something presently works. Yet you clowns say it does. Only in your own little and constrained minds.
Try thinking more deeply about thinking and existence. On your own.
youre always good for a laugh,DeludedOne

not much else,but hey at least Jebus lovs ya!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent NCAA Basketball Discussions

Search the NCAA Basketball Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min USAsince1680 1,080,307
UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 1 hr Fight On 26,672
Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 12 hr The_Box 305,088
How to recover lost data from iPhone/iPad/iPod- (Jan '14) 22 hr jessirinneyswift 9
UMES Basketball Forward Ishaq Pitt Named to NAB... Thu Dana McCarty 1
I got my loan from stephenloanhelp@hotmail.com (May '13) Thu RICK SERVICE 26
urgent loan needed apply now (Sep '13) Jul 20 Danny 2
•••
•••
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••