Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 258471 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

LargeLanguage

Chester, UK

#162490 Mar 26, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove you aren't gay.
I said that line. Lol.

I don't have any attractions to men, I find it incomprehensable how.

I have proof homosexuality is unnatural, and I know how it works, and I also know I don't fit that criteria.
LargeLanguage

Chester, UK

#162491 Mar 26, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
What if I shave off ALL of my pubes?
Will you be my boyfriend then?
Too much detail for someone who is not gay.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#162492 Mar 26, 2013
LargeLanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
I said that line. Lol.
I don't have any attractions to men, I find it incomprehensable how.
I have proof homosexuality is unnatural, and I know how it works, and I also know I don't fit that criteria.
I'm sure you know exactly how it works.....

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#162493 Mar 26, 2013
LargeLanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Too much detail for someone who is not gay.
I'm only bustin your balls because your such a dickhead, Lunger.

Chill out & folks will get off your back.
LargeLanguage

Chester, UK

#162494 Mar 26, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure you know exactly how it works.....
Failure again. I suppose you would want revenge.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#162495 Mar 26, 2013
LargeLanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Failure again. I suppose you would want revenge.
On Lunger?!?

Naaaaw. He's just a wee pest.

Since: Mar 11

Scottsburg, IN

#162496 Mar 26, 2013
Still cowering from my question I see. Surrender?
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>On Lunger?!?

Naaaaw. He's just a wee pest.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#162497 Mar 26, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>The media says they were bombs because they spent more money making them than they drew in at the box office, but I liked the stories they were based on. He wasn't terrible in The Postman. Ok?
Awwww....

It's so cute watching a budding romance.

;)

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#162498 Mar 26, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>Heat is just energy with no where to go. Motion. Vibrating atoms for example. It bounces the space around. Temperature is just how hard it wants to get out of where it is stuck. If it has a material path, it will try to follow it, if not, it emits it as light.

The heat energy, shaky space, of your Big Bang was spread out and then combined to make material to channel it. Bunches of bubbles that combined.

By design.

It isn't just a bunch of numbers.
Or nothing like that.
LargeLanguage

Chester, UK

#162500 Mar 26, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
On Lunger?!?
Naaaaw. He's just a wee pest.
Not a real man, eh?
You're losing too much!
And ya gay, a bit sad you are!

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#162501 Mar 26, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I have planet of math knowledge, just not calculus.
And I know it isn't spelled "maths".....
Actually, it *is* called 'maths' if you are British.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#162502 Mar 26, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
Still cowering from my question I see. Surrender?
<quoted text>
Still cowering from my answer I see. Surrender?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#162503 Mar 26, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, it *is* called 'maths' if you are British.
Oh.

Sorry, Mac!

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#162504 Mar 26, 2013
LargeLanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Not a real man, eh?
You're losing too much!
And ya gay, a bit sad you are!
Ahahaha!!!

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#162505 Mar 26, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
So then we ain't worthy.
You cudda just said that...
Why would I have said that?

You were saying that we, today, are not worthy of knowledge discovered in the distant past... or of the one that discovered it.

I disagreed.

Someone living today in possession of knowledge more advanced than ours is a DIFFERENT argument... a complete one-eighty from the one above.

Pay attention to what you post, RR... and this'll go much easier for both of us.
Rush

Fairbury, NE

#162506 Mar 26, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure you know exactly how it works.....
Ummm, RR. I dont want to be a jerk here or anything, but......Well, I see,um, you said "it" and that is kinda, you know, my word, so, from now on, if you could not use "it" in all future posts, Yeah, that would be great. K? Thanks.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#162508 Mar 26, 2013
Hukt on Fonix wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would I have said that?
You were saying that we, today, are not worthy of knowledge discovered in the distant past... or of the one that discovered it.
I disagreed.
Someone living today in possession of knowledge more advanced than ours is a DIFFERENT argument... a complete one-eighty from the one above.
Pay attention to what you post, RR... and this'll go much easier for both of us.
No man, I'm not saying that at all.

What I'm saying is that there doesn't appear to be anybody right now who is 1800 years ahead of our time.

If you disagree, then tell me who you think that is.

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#162509 Mar 26, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
No man, I'm not saying that at all.
What I'm saying is that there doesn't appear to be anybody right now who is 1800 years ahead of our time.
If you disagree, then tell me who you think that is.
That isn't what you said.

I don't disagree with what you didn't say.

=)

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#162510 Mar 26, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, this isn't quite right. The crucial aspect isn't the delay in the re-emission. It is the *phase shift* between the absorbed photon and the emitted one. In most media, the phase shift depends on the frequency. It turns out that a phase shift is completely equivalent to saying the velocity is different. This is why in anomalous dispersion we get 'speeds' of photons being faster than light in a vaccum. The phase shift is opposite the usual one, so instead of being equivalent to a slower speed, we get a shift equivalent to a faster speed.
In this view, it actually happens that light *always* moves at c, but phase shifts make it *appear* that it moves faster or slower.
Hi, Poly.

Thank you.

My little run-down wasn't completely wrong, though... was it.? It was just incomplete?

Though the delay between absorption and emission isn't the crucial aspect... it is an aspect.(?)

Light's *apparent speed* varies across a medium composed of matter and empty space... as everything we consider as “something” consists of a lot of “nothing”... the speed through the empty space alone remains constant.

Isn't phase shift of a wave of given frequency still dependent upon what it travels into?

Is it okay that my “thinking” is derived from what happens as electrical current flows into a capacitor? Electrons accumulate on the negative plate and are pushed from the positive plate. Potential builds across the plates... but, only after current begins to flow through the device. Thus, current flow is said to lead voltage through a capacitor......

...... in the same way fluid flow “leads” pressure across a tank. Something must flow into the tank before pressure builds. It's the restriction of flow at the tank's exhaust that gives rise to pressure.

I know I'm mixing analogies in that I'm referring to two different *electrical* characteristics as they apply to an electrical device... namely current (electrical flow) and voltage (electrical pressure)... and not sticking with one or the other. Signal phase at the output of a composite circuit can appear to lead that at the input when scoping only current or voltage (ie: dual-trace oscilloscope).

I'm also comparing electrical flow to fluid flow... and trying to extend that to something more fundamental.

Could something *similar* be said for a photon when one encounters an atom?

Not super-specifically... but, just as a general “arm-chair” explanation?

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#162511 Mar 26, 2013
Tide with Beach wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =714-Ioa4XQwXX
Now I think I'm gonna have to watch the Simpsons movie today!
I started watching the Simpsons when it first aired on TV. I've been a loyal fan ever since. I just like Family Guy a little bit better.
I Love that!!

I'm not as old as u so i started halfway or something, but i have seen the REALLY old ones and they just look so raw!

I watched 'In time', it was good, justin ain't that bad as i thought he would be. it was kinda like logan's run, tho!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Julia 1,535,778
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 40 min Hot phart 33,097
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 13 hr silly rabbit 314,353
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) May 16 Patriot 11,170
Penn State University & State College May 12 Truechange 1
I got my loan from [email protected] (Jun '13) Apr '17 GLOBAL FUNDING SO... 43
How to Recover Deleted or lost Contacts from Sa... (Dec '14) Apr '17 DelucaKoehn 11
More from around the web