Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

Full story: Webbunny tumblelog

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Comments (Page 7,663)

Showing posts 153,241 - 153,260 of216,398
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159383
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

[QUOTE who="2%"]<quoted text>
Atheist are the best at back engineering. Once God builds it they take it apart and clam how nature built it. Trouble is they can never put it back together and make it live again.
In other words their are great at breaking things and claiming "see no need for a God".[/QUOTE]

Topix atheists aren't real bright.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159384
Mar 10, 2013
 
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
No, atheists believe in magical poofs that organize into form. A little smoke, and there we is.
They back engineered the smoke and figured how it formed. Hell, they can still see the smoke out there. Very scientific, eh?
You are confused.

The smoke emanates from the Sistine Chapel during the Papal election.

Black smoke, vote taken but no Pope yet.

White smoke, WE HAVE A WINNER!!

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159385
Mar 10, 2013
 
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are confused.
The smoke emanates from the Sistine Chapel during the Papal election.
Black smoke, vote taken but no Pope yet.
White smoke, WE HAVE A WINNER!!

Does no smoke mean " ask again later" ? heheheh

“The eye has it...”

Since: May 09

Russell's Teapot

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159386
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Dave Nelson wrote:
Find me one material thing that does not follow some sort of organization.
The articulation of your confused musings and thoughts, that you have somehow typed on a keyboard, which end up displayed on my computer monitor.

AHA!
Dave Nelson wrote:
One that does not obey a greater force directing it and causing it to combine or repel or stay separate.
See above.
Dave Nelson wrote:
Find me one self actuating particle, or one that can move because "it wants" to.
No, Dave.

“Today we pray”

Since: Jul 12

"tomorrow we win"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159387
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
No you do ......but wont admit it, this comes from the works in old testament. It is a part of your belief system. Now go read about the Davis temple mount and Moses on the mountain. Care to reiterate?
No, I don't. Christians don't believe in an invisible sky wizard. That's an atheist thing.

Y'all just can't seem to fathom God in any other way than a magical human being...

“Today we pray”

Since: Jul 12

"tomorrow we win"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159388
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
No, atheists believe in magical poofs that organize into form. A little smoke, and there we is.
They back engineered the smoke and figured how it formed. Hell, they can still see the smoke out there. Very scientific, eh?
Maybe they've smoked too many magical poofs and it's f_cked with their minds.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159389
Mar 10, 2013
 
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
So it can decide to decay if it wants to? Nothing makes it decay? It just does?
No 'decision' is made. Yes, the timing of a radioactive decay is porbabilistic. There is nothing that distinguishes a nucleus that is about to decay from any other nucleus of the same sort.
Radioactive nuclei are smart. Gee. Maybe even smarter than Topix atheist science experts.
Lovely scientific approach, mac. Oh! It just happens!!!
Yes, it is a probabilistic event that happens according to the laws of quantum mechanic, which are a-causal. No 'decisions' are made, so no intelligence is implied. But radioactive decays are NOT determined. There is nothing that happens 'just before' a decay that is any different than at any other time. In that sense, they are uncaused.

Sorry if reality doesn't correspond with your intuitions.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159390
Mar 10, 2013
 
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
So radioactive nuclei move because they decide to?
No 'decision' is made.

But their decay is uncaused.
Guess they have more brains than we thought.
Brains are a bit larger than atomic nuclei.
So, they would be the activators of life? The thingies that started assembling life?
No. Life is a chemical process.As you like to point out, it is mediated mostly by the E&M force (subject to quantum effects, though). Nuclear decay is mediated by either the strong or weak nuclear forces (depending on the type of decay)
What created them?
Non-sequitur.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159391
Mar 10, 2013
 
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
No 'decision' is made. Yes, the timing of a radioactive decay is porbabilistic. There is nothing that distinguishes a nucleus that is about to decay from any other nucleus of the same sort.
<quoted text>
Yes, it is a probabilistic event that happens according to the laws of quantum mechanic, which are a-causal. No 'decisions' are made, so no intelligence is implied. But radioactive decays are NOT determined. There is nothing that happens 'just before' a decay that is any different than at any other time. In that sense, they are uncaused.
Sorry if reality doesn't correspond with your intuitions.
That explained it better'n I did.

Thanks.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159392
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
No 'decision' is made. Yes, the timing of a radioactive decay is porbabilistic. There is nothing that distinguishes a nucleus that is about to decay from any other nucleus of the same sort.
<quoted text>
Yes, it is a probabilistic event that happens according to the laws of quantum mechanic, which are a-causal. No 'decisions' are made, so no intelligence is implied. But radioactive decays are NOT determined. There is nothing that happens 'just before' a decay that is any different than at any other time. In that sense, they are uncaused.
Sorry if reality doesn't correspond with your intuitions.
I don't think you can comprehend how idiotic and space cadetish that sounds.

Probabilistic? That means it can happen or not, or will eventually happen?

Poof!! Things just happen. That takes an extraordinary belief beyond what is considered, or was considered, scientific and objective thought.

The numbers ate your brain.

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159393
Mar 10, 2013
 
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
No 'decision' is made.
But their decay is uncaused.
<quoted text>
Brains are a bit larger than atomic nuclei.
<quoted text>
No. Life is a chemical process.As you like to point out, it is mediated mostly by the E&M force (subject to quantum effects, though). Nuclear decay is mediated by either the strong or weak nuclear forces (depending on the type of decay)
<quoted text>
Non-sequitur.
Decay does have a cause I think, but it
"the cause" is in itself is probabilistic. Or more correctly stated that it is "influenced" by a probabilistic cause . Do you know what I'm talking about?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159394
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

A word about "intuition".

As organisms that grew from the process, there is s certain innate "intuition" to all of us.

That intuition is what has us allowed to survive, and even develop science for all of these years. It has been active for a lot longer than the last several decades of men who had an intuition, turned it into a theory, which then became worshiped, primarily through books, and is now preached as the truth. Poof!!! Here we are!!! Believe in our magical numbers.

Sound familiar?

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159395
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't think you can comprehend how idiotic and space cadetish that sounds.
Probabilistic? That means it can happen or not, or will eventually happen?
Poof!! Things just happen. That takes an extraordinary belief beyond what is considered, or was considered, scientific and objective thought.
The numbers ate your brain.
Yes.

You just don't get ANY of the quantum thing, do you?
Anon

Lakewood, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159396
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Christians don't believe in invisible wizards. That's an atheist thing.
This coming from the man who stated god touched his head.
blacklagoon

Boston, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159397
Mar 10, 2013
 
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I don't. Christians don't believe in an invisible sky wizard. That's an atheist thing.
Y'all just can't seem to fathom God in any other way than a magical human being...
Hummm....lets see here.

1.) It exists, or so they say, but it can't be seen..........equals...INVISAB LE

2.) It supposedly created mankind in HIS IMAGE AND LIKENESS....equals----A HUMAN BEING

3.) It created man, supposedly, by scooping up some dirt and blew on it, out popped a fully formed human......equals.....MAGIC.

4.) He supposedly dwells in heaven, heaven is ALWAYS denoted as UP, up equals......THE SKY.

5.) Can't see it (even though it exists and is active in your everyday life, so they say) performs magic like a wizard, dwells in heaven, always looking skyward hence.....AN INVISIBLE SKY WIZARD WHO LOOKS LIKE A MAN. Now twist and turn, but this is how your God thing is described by Christians.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159398
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Yes.
You just don't get ANY of the quantum thing, do you?
I probably use a version of it in my own thinking, but it is based upon geometry, and not block long formulas.

Now, Mr Devoted Worshiper of mystical science, let me tell you an utter truth. This is in the realm of reality.

This is a fact. Belief in anything else is belief in magic.

Those probabilities and nuclear wild hairs are the result of a wrong theory. You can't make up fantasy particles and use lady luck as props for a real theory. That simple. You missed something along the way. In the case of quantum physics it is likely the theory was based upon a model that was assembled incorrectly.

But instead of doing real science, these theorists keep putting bandaids on a bleeding horse.

Oh, and the science corrects itself routine. It only will if you let it.

Go back and worship your bandaged idol, sorry, meant model.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159399
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>Hummm....lets see here.
1.) It exists, or so they say, but it can't be seen..........equals...INVISAB LE
2.) It supposedly created mankind in HIS IMAGE AND LIKENESS....equals----A HUMAN BEING
3.) It created man, supposedly, by scooping up some dirt and blew on it, out popped a fully formed human......equals.....MAGIC.
4.) He supposedly dwells in heaven, heaven is ALWAYS denoted as UP, up equals......THE SKY.
5.) Can't see it (even though it exists and is active in your everyday life, so they say) performs magic like a wizard, dwells in heaven, always looking skyward hence.....AN INVISIBLE SKY WIZARD WHO LOOKS LIKE A MAN. Now twist and turn, but this is how your God thing is described by Christians.
If you were a hemorrhoid, which you may be, would you see your creator or host?

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159401
Mar 10, 2013
 
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
I probably use a version of it in my own thinking, but it is based upon geometry, and not block long formulas.
Now, Mr Devoted Worshiper of mystical science, let me tell you an utter truth. This is in the realm of reality.
This is a fact. Belief in anything else is belief in magic.
Those probabilities and nuclear wild hairs are the result of a wrong theory. You can't make up fantasy particles and use lady luck as props for a real theory. That simple. You missed something along the way. In the case of quantum physics it is likely the theory was based upon a model that was assembled incorrectly.
But instead of doing real science, these theorists keep putting bandaids on a bleeding horse.
Oh, and the science corrects itself routine. It only will if you let it.
Go back and worship your bandaged idol, sorry, meant model.
Ah, we need to chuck all of modern physics, and follow you.

Gottit.

Wait, that sounds vaguely familiar...

Never mind.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159402
Mar 10, 2013
 
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>Hummm....lets see here.
1.) It exists, or so they say, but it can't be seen..........equals...INVISAB LE
2.) It supposedly created mankind in HIS IMAGE AND LIKENESS....equals----A HUMAN BEING
3.) It created man, supposedly, by scooping up some dirt and blew on it, out popped a fully formed human......equals.....MAGIC.
4.) He supposedly dwells in heaven, heaven is ALWAYS denoted as UP, up equals......THE SKY.
5.) Can't see it (even though it exists and is active in your everyday life, so they say) performs magic like a wizard, dwells in heaven, always looking skyward hence.....AN INVISIBLE SKY WIZARD WHO LOOKS LIKE A MAN. Now twist and turn, but this is how your God thing is described by Christians.
BTW, Buckethead do blues.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Jazz and other stuff, too. Even a trumpet is included in some of those.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#159403
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Ah, we need to chuck all of modern physics, and follow you.
Gottit.
Wait, that sounds vaguely familiar...
Never mind.
No need to follow me. Just quit following others blindly because of what you read in a book. They can make misinterpretations and mistakes, too.

But that would leave you all alone.

Don't forget the donation box on your way out.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 153,241 - 153,260 of216,398
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

10 Users are viewing the NCAA Basketball Forum right now

Search the NCAA Basketball Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 hr ritedownthemiddle 1,033,719
Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 2 hr cpeter1313 303,190
UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 5 hr Fight On 26,078
Syracuse basketball: Jim Boeheim tells ESPN Tyl... Apr 14 Lenox Da Kid 2
loan offer (Jun '13) Apr 14 Bryan Cranston 81
Burke Calls Shots With The Best (Feb '08) Apr 12 maryann 19
Do you hate UK Wildcats, we DO :-) (Apr '11) Apr 12 plenty 49
•••
•••
•••
•••
•••
•••