Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent. Full Story

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#159379 Mar 10, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Christians don't believe in invisible wizards. That's an atheist thing.
No you do ......but wont admit it, this comes from the works in old testament. It is a part of your belief system. Now go read about the Davis temple mount and Moses on the mountain. Care to reiterate?

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#159380 Mar 10, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
So radioactive nuclei move because they decide to? Guess they have more brains than we thought.
So, they would be the activators of life? The thingies that started assembling life?
What created them?
No, AGAIN.

A nucleus of a radioactive substance can remain "stable" for millions of years - or decay right now. No reason.

Aren't you tired of being wrong yet?
2%

United States

#159381 Mar 10, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>No, atheists believe in magical poofs that organize into form. A little smoke, and there we is.

They back engineered the smoke and figured how it formed. Hell, they can still see the smoke out there. Very scientific, eh?
Atheist are the best at back engineering. Once God builds it they take it apart and clam how nature built it. Trouble is they can never put it back together and make it live again.
In other words their are great at breaking things and claiming "see no need for a God".

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#159382 Mar 10, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>No, AGAIN.
A nucleus of a radioactive substance can remain "stable" for millions of years - or decay right now. No reason.
Aren't you tired of being wrong yet?
So it can decide to decay if it wants to? Nothing makes it decay? It just does?

Radioactive nuclei are smart. Gee. Maybe even smarter than Topix atheist science experts.

Lovely scientific approach, mac. Oh! It just happens!!!

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#159383 Mar 10, 2013
[QUOTE who="2%"]<quoted text>
Atheist are the best at back engineering. Once God builds it they take it apart and clam how nature built it. Trouble is they can never put it back together and make it live again.
In other words their are great at breaking things and claiming "see no need for a God".[/QUOTE]

Topix atheists aren't real bright.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#159384 Mar 10, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
No, atheists believe in magical poofs that organize into form. A little smoke, and there we is.
They back engineered the smoke and figured how it formed. Hell, they can still see the smoke out there. Very scientific, eh?
You are confused.

The smoke emanates from the Sistine Chapel during the Papal election.

Black smoke, vote taken but no Pope yet.

White smoke, WE HAVE A WINNER!!

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#159385 Mar 10, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are confused.
The smoke emanates from the Sistine Chapel during the Papal election.
Black smoke, vote taken but no Pope yet.
White smoke, WE HAVE A WINNER!!

Does no smoke mean " ask again later" ? heheheh

“The eye has it...”

Since: May 09

Russell's Teapot

#159386 Mar 10, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
Find me one material thing that does not follow some sort of organization.
The articulation of your confused musings and thoughts, that you have somehow typed on a keyboard, which end up displayed on my computer monitor.

AHA!
Dave Nelson wrote:
One that does not obey a greater force directing it and causing it to combine or repel or stay separate.
See above.
Dave Nelson wrote:
Find me one self actuating particle, or one that can move because "it wants" to.
No, Dave.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#159387 Mar 10, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
No you do ......but wont admit it, this comes from the works in old testament. It is a part of your belief system. Now go read about the Davis temple mount and Moses on the mountain. Care to reiterate?
No, I don't. Christians don't believe in an invisible sky wizard. That's an atheist thing.

Y'all just can't seem to fathom God in any other way than a magical human being...

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#159388 Mar 10, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
No, atheists believe in magical poofs that organize into form. A little smoke, and there we is.
They back engineered the smoke and figured how it formed. Hell, they can still see the smoke out there. Very scientific, eh?
Maybe they've smoked too many magical poofs and it's f_cked with their minds.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#159389 Mar 10, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
So it can decide to decay if it wants to? Nothing makes it decay? It just does?
No 'decision' is made. Yes, the timing of a radioactive decay is porbabilistic. There is nothing that distinguishes a nucleus that is about to decay from any other nucleus of the same sort.
Radioactive nuclei are smart. Gee. Maybe even smarter than Topix atheist science experts.
Lovely scientific approach, mac. Oh! It just happens!!!
Yes, it is a probabilistic event that happens according to the laws of quantum mechanic, which are a-causal. No 'decisions' are made, so no intelligence is implied. But radioactive decays are NOT determined. There is nothing that happens 'just before' a decay that is any different than at any other time. In that sense, they are uncaused.

Sorry if reality doesn't correspond with your intuitions.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#159390 Mar 10, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
So radioactive nuclei move because they decide to?
No 'decision' is made.

But their decay is uncaused.
Guess they have more brains than we thought.
Brains are a bit larger than atomic nuclei.
So, they would be the activators of life? The thingies that started assembling life?
No. Life is a chemical process.As you like to point out, it is mediated mostly by the E&M force (subject to quantum effects, though). Nuclear decay is mediated by either the strong or weak nuclear forces (depending on the type of decay)
What created them?
Non-sequitur.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#159391 Mar 10, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
No 'decision' is made. Yes, the timing of a radioactive decay is porbabilistic. There is nothing that distinguishes a nucleus that is about to decay from any other nucleus of the same sort.
<quoted text>
Yes, it is a probabilistic event that happens according to the laws of quantum mechanic, which are a-causal. No 'decisions' are made, so no intelligence is implied. But radioactive decays are NOT determined. There is nothing that happens 'just before' a decay that is any different than at any other time. In that sense, they are uncaused.
Sorry if reality doesn't correspond with your intuitions.
That explained it better'n I did.

Thanks.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#159392 Mar 10, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
No 'decision' is made. Yes, the timing of a radioactive decay is porbabilistic. There is nothing that distinguishes a nucleus that is about to decay from any other nucleus of the same sort.
<quoted text>
Yes, it is a probabilistic event that happens according to the laws of quantum mechanic, which are a-causal. No 'decisions' are made, so no intelligence is implied. But radioactive decays are NOT determined. There is nothing that happens 'just before' a decay that is any different than at any other time. In that sense, they are uncaused.
Sorry if reality doesn't correspond with your intuitions.
I don't think you can comprehend how idiotic and space cadetish that sounds.

Probabilistic? That means it can happen or not, or will eventually happen?

Poof!! Things just happen. That takes an extraordinary belief beyond what is considered, or was considered, scientific and objective thought.

The numbers ate your brain.

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#159393 Mar 10, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
No 'decision' is made.
But their decay is uncaused.
<quoted text>
Brains are a bit larger than atomic nuclei.
<quoted text>
No. Life is a chemical process.As you like to point out, it is mediated mostly by the E&M force (subject to quantum effects, though). Nuclear decay is mediated by either the strong or weak nuclear forces (depending on the type of decay)
<quoted text>
Non-sequitur.
Decay does have a cause I think, but it
"the cause" is in itself is probabilistic. Or more correctly stated that it is "influenced" by a probabilistic cause . Do you know what I'm talking about?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#159394 Mar 10, 2013
A word about "intuition".

As organisms that grew from the process, there is s certain innate "intuition" to all of us.

That intuition is what has us allowed to survive, and even develop science for all of these years. It has been active for a lot longer than the last several decades of men who had an intuition, turned it into a theory, which then became worshiped, primarily through books, and is now preached as the truth. Poof!!! Here we are!!! Believe in our magical numbers.

Sound familiar?

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#159395 Mar 10, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't think you can comprehend how idiotic and space cadetish that sounds.
Probabilistic? That means it can happen or not, or will eventually happen?
Poof!! Things just happen. That takes an extraordinary belief beyond what is considered, or was considered, scientific and objective thought.
The numbers ate your brain.
Yes.

You just don't get ANY of the quantum thing, do you?
Anon

Lakewood, OH

#159396 Mar 10, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Christians don't believe in invisible wizards. That's an atheist thing.
This coming from the man who stated god touched his head.
blacklagoon

Revere, MA

#159397 Mar 10, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I don't. Christians don't believe in an invisible sky wizard. That's an atheist thing.
Y'all just can't seem to fathom God in any other way than a magical human being...
Hummm....lets see here.

1.) It exists, or so they say, but it can't be seen..........equals...INVISAB LE

2.) It supposedly created mankind in HIS IMAGE AND LIKENESS....equals----A HUMAN BEING

3.) It created man, supposedly, by scooping up some dirt and blew on it, out popped a fully formed human......equals.....MAGIC.

4.) He supposedly dwells in heaven, heaven is ALWAYS denoted as UP, up equals......THE SKY.

5.) Can't see it (even though it exists and is active in your everyday life, so they say) performs magic like a wizard, dwells in heaven, always looking skyward hence.....AN INVISIBLE SKY WIZARD WHO LOOKS LIKE A MAN. Now twist and turn, but this is how your God thing is described by Christians.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#159398 Mar 10, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Yes.
You just don't get ANY of the quantum thing, do you?
I probably use a version of it in my own thinking, but it is based upon geometry, and not block long formulas.

Now, Mr Devoted Worshiper of mystical science, let me tell you an utter truth. This is in the realm of reality.

This is a fact. Belief in anything else is belief in magic.

Those probabilities and nuclear wild hairs are the result of a wrong theory. You can't make up fantasy particles and use lady luck as props for a real theory. That simple. You missed something along the way. In the case of quantum physics it is likely the theory was based upon a model that was assembled incorrectly.

But instead of doing real science, these theorists keep putting bandaids on a bleeding horse.

Oh, and the science corrects itself routine. It only will if you let it.

Go back and worship your bandaged idol, sorry, meant model.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min Bluestater 1,154,089
Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 1 hr Truth is might 306,993
Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 2 hr KiMare 201,172
What role do you think humans play in global wa... 8 hr IBdaMann 2,682
UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 9 hr Trojan 28,400
Should child beauty pageants be banned? 10 hr Roy the Boy 691
Conn's Appliances (Nov '07) Dec 16 The Real Daniel S... 281
More from around the web