Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent. Full Story

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#159154 Mar 8, 2013
Very Cynical Person wrote:
<quoted text>OK what atheist religious sect do I belong to?

What is the common ground of this atheist religion?

What is the doctrine of this religion?
Posted earlier by derek4

The Atheist's Bible: An Illustrious Collection of Irreverent Thoughts [Hardcover]
Joan Konner (Author)
3.6 out of 5 stars See all reviews (29 customer reviews)

List Price:$16.99
Price:$11.55 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
Deal Price:
You Save:$5.44 (32%)

Only 4 left in stock (more on the way).
http://www.amazon.com/The-Atheists-Bible-Illu...

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#159155 Mar 8, 2013
River Tam wrote:
<quoted text>
Sand and water, Clementia.
That's all it takes to cut.
Sand, water and buoyancy, Clementia.
That's all it takes to raise heavy things.
Sand, water, buoyant material and a lot of slaves.
Yh, but slaves who were from a different planet!

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#159156 Mar 8, 2013
Imhotep wrote:
<quoted text>
Ancient architects
Some of our most impressive structures are actually incredibly old and difficult to determine the precise dates they were built.
We still don't have a clue how the Great Pyramid of Giza was built, or its precise purpose. Despite what you may have heard, no mummy has ever been found in the Egyptian pyramids, they were all found in the Valley of the Kings. So the true meaning of the pyramids is actually a mystery.
As is the technology used and the matter of how multiple cultures in Africa, the Middle East and Central America all built pyramids around roughly the same time. The matter has had archeologists both professional and amateur alike scratching their heads and theorizing why and how this could have happened.
Why do we aspire to such grand heights? Ego perhaps.
In some cases we might not have much choice but to build upwards if the population grows very dense and land close to water and food is scarce.
We thrive in some of the most inhospitable places on the Earth, and always we build upwards.
There is no precise beginning for the history of architecture either. Our earliest buildings date from either the end of the last ice age or during the ice age, which was only 10 to 15 milleniums ago.
Likewise, there was no precise ending of the ice age. We presume it phased out slowly, but it could have changed quite quickly in a matter of decades or years. We really don't know.
That's exactly what i was tryin' to say!:-)

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#159157 Mar 8, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
We tend to frown on 20 year projects involving slave labor today.
lol!

I really don't believe the 20 years thing tho, it don't sound possible!

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#159158 Mar 8, 2013
xyzupurmommass wrote:
<quoted text>6th of whole round pie = 60 degree . qUESTION HOW THEY MANAGE GET THOSE MANY LONG COLUMN UP AT RIGHT ANGLE , EQUI-DISTANCED APART AT A FAR DISTANCE , REMAIN A MYSTERY TOO TODAY
Plumb bob and sighting sticks. And big tripods and travois.

Dig your hole, drag your rock to where you drop the base, and then raise the end of the travois via the big tripods. The travois are much longer and give a mechanical advantage. You keep the rock base close to the back end of the travois.

When you drag a travois, or parallel logs, the friction is on the back ends. Not much surface area hitting the ground, and the wood shears off. Roller logs have to be the same exact diameter, and roght ground and pebbles play hell on them. You lose a lot of scarce wood in one short distance. You trashed all the logs.

Roman, and probably Greek, too, columns were made in small sections stacked on top of each other. Scaffolding and keeping it plumb as you went up.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#159159 Mar 8, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
We could easily build a pyramid today.
We could probably reproduce the pyramid at Giza in less than a year if we wanted to.
Without our modern technology? I'd love to see that!!

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#159161 Mar 8, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
What you stated makes atheism not a religion. So then atheism is not a religion.
Why are you proselytizing it? Along with scientism?

Atheists of the gaps.
xyzupurmommass

United States

#159163 Mar 8, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, the record here is varied. Some used the degrees derived from Babylonian sources. Others used what was essentially radian measures. Hipparchus, as I recall, used a radius for his standard circle so that angular masures came out nicely. Ptolemy used something closer to degrees.
Sumerian astronomers introduced angle measure, using a division of circles into 360 degrees.[4] They and their successors the Babylonians studied the ratios of the sides of similar triangles and discovered some properties of these ratios, but did not turn that into a systematic method for finding sides and angles of triangles. The ancient Nubians used a similar method.[5] The ancient Greeks transformed trigonometry into an ordered science. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trigonometry

And for radians ?

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#159164 Mar 8, 2013
Intelligent design proponet burps something in court. No reaason to read further, KJV is just humiliating himself again.
Langoliers wrote:
John Calvert, a lawyer and intelligent design proponent declared:
.

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#159165 Mar 8, 2013
XYZURMOMMAPASS wrote:
<quoted text>u're confusion is well noted.
diputs er'uoy desufnoc ton mi spil ym daer
xyzupurmommass

United States

#159166 Mar 8, 2013
History

The concept of radian measure, as opposed to the degree of an angle, is normally credited to Roger Cotes in 1714.[1] He had the radian in everything but name, and he recognized its naturalness as a unit of angular measure. The idea of measuring angles by the length of the arc was used already by other mathematicians. For example al-Kashi (c. 1400) used so-called diameter parts as units where one diameter part was 1/60 radian and they also used sexagesimal subunits of the diameter part.[2]

The term radian first appeared in print on 5 June 1873, in examination questions set by James Thomson (brother of Lord Kelvin) at Queen's College, Belfast. He used the term as early as 1871, while in 1869, Thomas Muir, then of the University of St Andrews,

vacillated between rad, radial and radian. In 1874, Muir adopted radian after a consultation with James Thomson.[3][4][5]

I think coined word "Radian goes way further back to Persian ... i could be wrong.

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#159167 Mar 8, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
I am a geniuses you are not.
Carry on...

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#159168 Mar 8, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow!
You are one sharp cookie.
Uh, am I supposed to feel bad or chastised or something?

You are one strange cat Dave, you solicited for sex with underage boys in here before and. But now you want to talk down on gay.
You are as steady as a squiggly line on thinghys. Most folks call people like you "just plain crazy" , no passing go or collecting extra credits for explaining away gravity with a magnet.
Thinking

Gillingham, UK

#159169 Mar 8, 2013
So?

If he's just another id cu*t, he's not trustworthy.
Langoliers wrote:
John Calvert, a lawyer and intelligent designproponent declared:
The Seventh Judicial Circuit of the Court of Appeals of the United States held that ATHEISM IS A RELIGION. Therefore, it cannot be promoted by a public school. Currently, public schools are often unwittingly promoting atheism through a dogmatic and uncritical teaching of materialistic theories of origins.

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#159170 Mar 8, 2013
Nice catch! Often I scroll past his insanity but wow! Just wow!

Enjoy this song with much win.

Just Think wrote:
<quoted text>
Carry on...
xyzupurmommass

United States

#159171 Mar 8, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
diputs er'uoy desufnoc ton mi spil ym daer
reverse it, and it returns to you in many folds~~ BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA MWHAHAAHAHAHAHa END GAME!
reasonableguy2

San Jose, CA

#159172 Mar 8, 2013
What can be proven is that the biblical god, Yahweh, does not and never did exist.l The authority for the existence of the biblical god is the story of Moses in the Book of Exodus. There God is said to have given Moses the Ten Commandments plus a lot of additional advice. But the biblical Moses could not have existed. The story in Exodus tells of how Joshua, Moses' successor, conquered Canaan around 1441 BCE (if you believe I Kings 6:1) or around 1263/2 BCE (if you believe Exodus 1:11).

But that is simply impossible because all of Canaan was under direct and continuous Egyptian control from 1550 BCE (when the Egyptians conquered Canaan) until 1141 BCE when Rameses VI withdrew Egyptian troops from Canaan to put down civil unrest in Egypt. There are numerous Egyptian records (such as the Amarna Letters) that tell about their control of Canaan during that period. If there were no conquest of Canaan, then there could have been no Exodus. And, if there were no Exodus, there would have been no Moses. And, if there were no Moses, there would have been no Yahweh handing out the Ten Commandments on Mount Sinai (or Mount Horeb). I's really very simple.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#159173 Mar 8, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
You are one strange cat Dave, you solicited for sex with underage boys in here before and. But now you want to talk down on gay.
You are as steady as a squiggly line on thinghys. Most folks call people like you "just plain crazy" , no passing go or collecting extra credits for explaining away gravity with a magnet.
Oh? I did?

When was that Oralee?

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#159174 Mar 8, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Posted earlier by derek4
The Atheist's Bible: An Illustrious Collection of Irreverent Thoughts [Hardcover]
Joan Konner (Author)
3.6 out of 5 stars See all reviews (29 customer reviews)
List Price:$16.99
Price:$11.55 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
Deal Price:
You Save:$5.44 (32%)
Only 4 left in stock (more on the way).
http://www.amazon.com/The-Atheists-Bible-Illu...
http://www.amazon.com/Necronomicon-Simon/dp/0...

Even mythical books are made into books, whether in humor or in all seriousness, so your point is basically .... nothing.

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#159175 Mar 8, 2013
xyzupurmommass wrote:
<quoted text>reverse it, and it returns to you in many folds~~ BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA MWHAHAAHAHAHAHa END GAME!
Oh it's not over. The fat lady hasn't even come out yet.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 17 min smfh 1,172,027
What role do you think humans play in global wa... 1 hr SpaceBlues 3,002
Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 1 hr Pearl Jam 307,741
UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 3 hr Bruin For Life 28,702
Should child beauty pageants be banned? 7 hr squeezers 728
I got my loan from stephenloanhelp@hotmail.com (Jun '13) Sat RICK SERVICE 32
San Diego State hoping Dwayne Polee II gets a shot Fri alanparkcity 1
More from around the web