Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent. Full Story

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#230641 Jun 12, 2014
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, not free anymore
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/201...
And thatís the whole point, they are free to buy weapons and free you murder children, only after the fact is the freedom to buy weapons curtailed.
But perhaps you need to explain your point of view to the parents, bothers and sisters, grandparents, uncles and aunties, and of course the friends of the victims.
You changed your story.

You did not say they are "free to buy weapons". You said they are free to shoot school children.

You lied. The law prohibits people from shooting school children, so they are not free to do so.

Your reasoning would conclude that persons are free to run over pedestrians with their automobiles and kill them, since they are free to purchase an automobile.

Persons are not free to kill pedestrians with their automobiles, although it sometimes occurs.

Thus, in summary, you lied, then you changed your story to cover your lie, but then your cover story is also a lie.

Look out Darwin's Stepchild - Christine is nipping at your heels!

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#230642 Jun 12, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It does no such thing
Yes it does

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_and...

Just because you donít want to admit it does not make it go away
Thinking

Stockbridge, UK

#230643 Jun 12, 2014
When you think of the sacrifices that many American individuals made, the fact is some of their corporates were betraying them by propping up the Nazi infrastructure.

Coca Cola's Nazi links are well known. Except in Coca Cola's corporate museum!

http://www.newstatesman.com/node/147996
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
I hear that some of those privately owned companies were american
https://libcom.org/library/allied-multination...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#230644 Jun 12, 2014
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, not free anymore
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/201...
And thatís the whole point, they are free to buy weapons and free you murder children, only after the fact is the freedom to buy weapons curtailed.
But perhaps you need to explain your point of view to the parents, bothers and sisters, grandparents, uncles and aunties, and of course the friends of the victims.
My poor, stupid Christine...

You don't understand the difference in being free to commit an act and being capable of committing the act.

Under the law, you are not "free" to rob a jewelry store. But sometimes people rob jewelry stores. It is a violation of law, not a freedom.

When someone shoots school children, they do so because they are "capable", but they are not "free" to do so.

If all guns were outlawed, and someone obtained a gun illegally and shot school children, by your reasoning, you would conclude they are STILL free to shoot school children, simply because they were capable.

I hope this is helpful. I do resent having to tutor you on every issue. Would you please consider curing some of you helpless stupidity without me?
Thinking

Stockbridge, UK

#230645 Jun 12, 2014
Correct. Exhibit A of NT anti semitism:

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/...
Adam wrote:
<quoted text>
You dont know your bible as the gospels of full of vile anti semitism, such as calling jews vipers and the children of the devil. Thats where the germans got their ideas from.

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#230646 Jun 12, 2014
Thinking wrote:
The UK temporarily adopted a socialist centrally planned economy in WW2 in order to defeat Hitler's privately owned military suppliers.
<quoted text>
LOL!

funding an anti-war effort through government policy is MUCH different than developing fascist policies to inhibit freedoms of speech!

fascism will eventually bite everyone in the ass, including the fuhrer so why do you gaytheists sell your souls to promote it in every generation???

ps - i have the answer, but y'all hate hearing it......

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#230647 Jun 12, 2014
Thinking wrote:
When you think of the sacrifices that many American individuals made, the fact is some of their corporates were betraying them by propping up the Nazi infrastructure.
Coca Cola's Nazi links are well known. Except in Coca Cola's corporate museum!
http://www.newstatesman.com/node/147996
<quoted text>
What about the linkage of Nazis with Darwinism?

Evolutionary biology was the whole basis of Nazi mass murder and torture.

Shall we trust Darwinism now?

“The Bible is no science book”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#230648 Jun 12, 2014
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
You seem to think you're smart as Hitler.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =B2jWTyiPcHYXX
He is not even smart enough to stay out of jail, or smart enough to control his own behavior.
So how could he even come close to being as smart as Hitler.
Thinking

Stockbridge, UK

#230649 Jun 12, 2014
No.
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
...i have the answer...

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#230650 Jun 12, 2014
Thinking wrote:
Poor Puck Frick, the majority protestant Germany followed catholic Hitler willingly.
<quoted text>
YES - kinda like they recently voted a fascist/socialist into office in America!

where do YOU stand - who did YOU vote for???
Thinking

Stockbridge, UK

#230651 Jun 12, 2014
Why should you trust a social construct like Darwinism? Duh, wannabe thugs like you never learn.

However you can trust the Theory of Evolution which originated from Darwin's work because of the depth of peer reviewed evidence for it.
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
What about the linkage of Nazis with Darwinism?
Evolutionary biology was the whole basis of Nazi mass murder and torture.
Shall we trust Darwinism now?

“The Bible is no science book”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#230652 Jun 12, 2014
superwilly wrote:
<quoted text>
What the? I agree with aura on this. British Intel and cooperation with resistance groups was crucial.
It was basically a British operation with cooperation with the Americans. A double whammy if you want to call it that. Two allies coming up with a plan to get as many boots on the ground in France as possible in the shortest amount of time.

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#230653 Jun 12, 2014
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
GD you're stupid as a bag of cat shit! It wasn't Anti anything, it was giving credit well deserved to those who performed tasks, including Americans, but it highlighted an initiative by Churchill and the Captain he assigned a few engineering tasks to get the job done.
The true scope of the operation, the failures and the success.
Described as a massive failure of the third Reich to repel our forces despite 3 years preparation and holding the high ground and home team advantage. Our fathers including mine, at great cost of lives machinery and dollars prevailed, with the help of some brilliant Englishmen.
What's to say anti? We all were anti, we were anti German occupation of France and willed to stop the Nazi war machine. Salute your father and stfu you annoying little peek squeak.
my bad - i misunderstood!

can we drop the "stupids" and "pip-squeaks" from our communications tho? otherwise i'll just continue to assume that you're antichrist/ anti everything that's good and right:-)

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#230654 Jun 12, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
No, Christine. The evidence is not from creation.com .
The material is declassified original documents gathered by Gen. William J. Donovan, who served as special assistant to the U.S. chief of counsel during the International Military Tribunal after World War II.
What I referenced is compiled from that original declassifed material - a 120-page report titled "The Nazi Master Plan: The Persecution of the Christian Churches".
It was prepared by the Office of Strategic Services, a forerunner of the CIA.
That's not a church, Christine.
What is detailed is Hitler's plan to rout the church and install a faith in the Reich itself.
This is settled history. Your argument is knocked out cold.
I was right. You are challenging Darwin's Stepchild for DUMBEST TOPIX POSTER.
If your current posts are any indication, I give you a good chance at succeeding.
Good luck with your future forays into blank stupidity. You are a moron.
You seem to have no comprehension of the insidious nature of the US church, it spreads right from gutter bums and prison godbots like you up to presidency and so many people in between. A lot of state government jobs (less so now than in the 40s/50s) would not consider employing a non christian and so many of the power hungry have launched their career in state government. The christian influence ran and still does run through every tier of your government and itís organisations.

Considering your claim that the Nuremburg documents are not christian influenced then it does seem odd that only christian organisation like creation com consider them so wonderful.

No it is not settled, it may of course be settled to your limited mind but sentiment and historical fact have always been poor bed partners in the long run.

Are you too chicken sh|t scared to admit your own lies or just too delusional to see your own deceptions?

I know you cannot help you aggressive stupidity but if you take your meds as recommended by the doctors it will help to keep it under control

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#230655 Jun 12, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
You changed your story.
You did not say they are "free to buy weapons". You said they are free to shoot school children.
You lied. The law prohibits people from shooting school children, so they are not free to do so.
Your reasoning would conclude that persons are free to run over pedestrians with their automobiles and kill them, since they are free to purchase an automobile.
Persons are not free to kill pedestrians with their automobiles, although it sometimes occurs.
Thus, in summary, you lied, then you changed your story to cover your lie, but then your cover story is also a lie.
Look out Darwin's Stepchild - Christine is nipping at your heels!
Nope, you misrepresented and misinterpreted, There has been a named coined for this abhorrent behaviour, itís called a buckism

And still school children are being shot Ė it seems that the law is worthless when it comes to shooting school children

I provide proof that children are being shot and therefore the perpetrator was obviously free to kill children, now use a bit of logic here, how the fook could such an atrocity have happened if not free to do so?

And as usual, in the true buck way you deliberately misrepresent so you can big up your own egotestical (correct spelling) delusion

And still you refuse to provide evidence that I lied. And continue spouting your lies in the face of your lies. Remember you do not get god points for lying... how pathetic you are.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#230656 Jun 12, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
My poor, stupid Christine...
You don't understand the difference in being free to commit an act and being capable of committing the act.
Under the law, you are not "free" to rob a jewelry store. But sometimes people rob jewelry stores. It is a violation of law, not a freedom.
When someone shoots school children, they do so because they are "capable", but they are not "free" to do so.
If all guns were outlawed, and someone obtained a gun illegally and shot school children, by your reasoning, you would conclude they are STILL free to shoot school children, simply because they were capable.
I hope this is helpful. I do resent having to tutor you on every issue. Would you please consider curing some of you helpless stupidity without me?
Ahh so freedom and capability are mutually exclusive?

More buck delusion.

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#230657 Jun 12, 2014
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Most of the German and Austrian Christians did.
let's take a simple test to see where YOU would have stood in germany circa 30-40's:

how do you usually vote on NOV 11th in the States;

a) conservative; i.e., to conserve the heritage of our constitution and associated freedoms?

b) for 'change'; i.e., to undermine our constitution, giving the government and associated leader more executive control?

i think we all really know who the fascists are on every continent and in every generation;-)

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#230658 Jun 12, 2014
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
You seem to have no comprehension of the insidious nature of the US church, it spreads right from gutter bums and prison godbots like you up to presidency and so many people in between. A lot of state government jobs (less so now than in the 40s/50s) would not consider employing a non christian and so many of the power hungry have launched their career in state government. The christian influence ran and still does run through every tier of your government and itís organisations.
Considering your claim that the Nuremburg documents are not christian influenced then it does seem odd that only christian organisation like creation com consider them so wonderful.
No it is not settled, it may of course be settled to your limited mind but sentiment and historical fact have always been poor bed partners in the long run.
Are you too chicken sh|t scared to admit your own lies or just too delusional to see your own deceptions?
I know you cannot help you aggressive stupidity but if you take your meds as recommended by the doctors it will help to keep it under control
Let's see...

I have declassified original documentation gathered by government intelligence for the military tribunal at Nuremberg following WWII, including original Nazi directives in their own writing on their own paper.

You have....

An illusory charge you dreamed up that christianity is a giant conspiracy that affected all the investigative proceedings, rendering the exact opposite conclusion - that Hitler acted on Christian sentiments.

I think I'll rest my case.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#230659 Jun 12, 2014
Thinking wrote:
Why should you trust a social construct like Darwinism? Duh, wannabe thugs like you never learn.
However you can trust the Theory of Evolution which originated from Darwin's work because of the depth of peer reviewed evidence for it.
<quoted text>
No, the theory of evolution did not "originate from Darwin's work".

Check history. Then you might not say ignorant things.

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#230660 Jun 12, 2014
oh geez - did i say "nov 11th" vs the 2nd?

watch how the hypocrite fascists will use this as an excuse to throw out the baby with the bathwater!

i kinda wonder if these mistakes sometimes happen just so that they'll continue to get the deception they so aptly deserve!:-)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min sonicfilter 1,156,699
Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 9 min Pearl Jam 307,143
UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 7 hr Bruin For Life 28,515
Should child beauty pageants be banned? 8 hr Christian Atheism 694
What role do you think humans play in global wa... 12 hr IBdaMann 2,745
How to Recover Deleted or lost Contacts from Sa... Sat yinefsfgd 3
UConn vs. Duke Monday night 9pm ESPN2 Dec 25 ivyawe 1
More from around the web