Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 258512 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

IPSEC

Arlington, TX

#225319 Apr 17, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
It is falsifiable. I said no such thing.
You prove my point. You know nothing about the subject.
Falsify it.

“Credulity is not a virtue”

Since: Apr 09

San Francisco

#225320 Apr 17, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't "believe in" Intelligent Design.
I am convinced the science of it has merits. There is ample proof to that effect.
You are not even bright enough to be a good scoffer.
There is no proof, it's all an argument from ignorance. "This is too complex for anyone to figure out, therefore god". To me the most laughable part is the jump from deism to Christianity. Not that I'm saying you make that leap yourself, but your friends at the Discovery Institute do.
IPSEC

Arlington, TX

#225321 Apr 17, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't propose that I was providing evidence.
I asked a question about the nature of evidence and objectivity.
Thanks for pointing out my failure to do something I didn't attempt to do.
Moron.
You're a child. You claimed to have evidence. I am challenging you to provide it. You can't so you won't. Look at your Tucker backpedal.

“Credulity is not a virtue”

Since: Apr 09

San Francisco

#225322 Apr 17, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Stalin was motivated by atheism. He murdered millions to achieve state atheism.
This is settled history.
Even if that were the case, how do you pin the blame on atheism then? Does atheism insist that religious people be executed? I must have missed that memo.
IPSEC

Arlington, TX

#225324 Apr 17, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Who the hell is Tucker?
I never heard of him.
Boy, you look stupid, huh?
You know why you look stupid?
Because you are stupid.
Sure, you never heard of Tucker. Bwahahahahaha. You are a fool who tries to win by playing baby games. You never have one iota, one jot, or one tittle of relevant evidence for any of your ludicrous assertions.

Okay, so you blithely omitted the name of your vaunted reincarnation researcher so you could pull this nonsense. So, then it was his forebear, Stevenson. In any case, there is no credible evidence for reincarnation, no unbiased studies, no peer review, nada, nix, nothing.

If there were, you would be shouting it from the rooftops. There is no scam you won't believe. I can get you a good bridge in Brooklyn very cheaply or I can hook you up with a Nigerian looking to give away money. Bwahahahahaha.

I can beat you in a fair fight, an unfair fight, and an IQ test. You'd just rather make anonymous threats on the internet like some pusillanimous child. Here kitty, kitty. Come to Texas.

Catcher1

Since: Sep 10

Fremont, CA

#225325 Apr 17, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh ok.
Did they let you out already, or is this the afternoon break?
IPSEC

Arlington, TX

#225326 Apr 17, 2014
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
*affects look of shock and amazement*
Look up Jim Tucker and Ian Stevenson.

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#225327 Apr 17, 2014
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no proof, it's all an argument from ignorance. "This is too complex for anyone to figure out, therefore god". To me the most laughable part is the jump from deism to Christianity. Not that I'm saying you make that leap yourself, but your friends at the Discovery Institute do.
The intelligent design hypothesis is not based on complexity.

Stick to cartoons. You have no grasp of this subject.

“Credulity is not a virtue”

Since: Apr 09

San Francisco

#225328 Apr 17, 2014
IPSEC wrote:
<quoted text>Look up Jim Tucker and Ian Stevenson.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_B._Tucker

LOL! Thanks for that tip. I should have known: quantum mechanics explains it all! Amazing.

“Credulity is not a virtue”

Since: Apr 09

San Francisco

#225329 Apr 17, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
The intelligent design hypothesis is not based on complexity.
Of course not. It's based on Jesus.
IPSEC

Arlington, TX

#225330 Apr 17, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Stalin was motivated by atheism. He murdered millions to achieve state atheism.
This is settled history.
No he wasn't and no, it's not. Conservipedia, Apologetics, Inc, and Christianity, LLC are never reliable sources for any information, especially history. Stalin was a mass murderer who killed for political reasons. Stalin killed millions of people for Stalin. The people he killed included both Christians, Jews, Muslims, and atheists. Stalin was a Georgian. Stalin killed more Russians than Hitler did. He was a Pharaoh, no less a god than Invisble Dear a leader in the Sky or whatever nonsense you believe. Killing in Stalin's name is no different than killing in Yahweh's name.

A box of rocked called mocking your stupidity and a lawyer called and noticed your abject dishonesty. It's not a good day for you.
IPSEC

Arlington, TX

#225331 Apr 17, 2014
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_B._Tucker
LOL! Thanks for that tip. I should have known: quantum mechanics explains it all! Amazing.
Yeah, they're adorable.
IPSEC

Arlington, TX

#225332 Apr 17, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
The intelligent design hypothesis is not based on complexity.
Stick to cartoons. You have no grasp of this subject.
Yeah, and Behe never once mentions irreducible complexity. Bwahahahahaha.
IPSEC

Arlington, TX

#225333 Apr 17, 2014
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
Even if that were the case, how do you pin the blame on atheism then? Does atheism insist that religious people be executed? I must have missed that memo.
It's on the page right after baby eating. Babies are just sooooo delicious, though.
IPSEC

Arlington, TX

#225334 Apr 17, 2014
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course not. It's based on Jesus.
Haha. Yep. I love that you can plug anything into the designer's spot and it changes it not one iota.

I asked Crick to explain what a non-designed universe would look like. He said he couldn't as he had never seen one. He admitted, right there, that ID is not falsifiable. He is just too steeped in delusion to admit it. The Great Reincarnating Energy of Piscataway designed the universe! You can't prove it's not true! My hypothesis is grand!
IPSEC

Arlington, TX

#225335 Apr 17, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
The intelligent design hypothesis is not based on complexity.
Stick to cartoons. You have no grasp of this subject.
Hey, Widdle Kitty, you're too scared to even reveal your location. Is it Rikers, Folsom, or Leavenworth? Does your cell ate leave a bad taste in your mouth? Do you find him hard to swallow? Do you need a donut pillow after a long night on the bottom?
Clearwater

Safety Harbor, FL

#225336 Apr 17, 2014
IPSEC wrote:
<quoted text>No he wasn't and no, it's not. Conservipedia, Apologetics, Inc, and Christianity, LLC are never reliable sources for any information, especially history. Stalin was a mass murderer who killed for political reasons. Stalin killed millions of people for Stalin. The people he killed included both Christians, Jews, Muslims, and atheists. Stalin was a Georgian. Stalin killed more Russians than Hitler did. He was a Pharaoh, no less a god than Invisble Dear a leader in the Sky or whatever nonsense you believe. Killing in Stalin's name is no different than killing in Yahweh's name.
A box of rocked called mocking your stupidity and a lawyer called and noticed your abject dishonesty. It's not a good day for you.
Thank you again for showing all what the superior humanism looks like. What a tool.

“Credulity is not a virtue”

Since: Apr 09

San Francisco

#225337 Apr 17, 2014
IPSEC wrote:
<quoted text>It's on the page right after baby eating. Babies are just sooooo delicious, though.
Not to mention it's a sustainable resource. Baby burgers for everyone!

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#225338 Apr 17, 2014
IPSEC wrote:
<quoted text>Sure, you never heard of Tucker. Bwahahahahaha. You are a fool who tries to win by playing baby games. You never have one iota, one jot, or one tittle of relevant evidence for any of your ludicrous assertions.
Okay, so you blithely omitted the name of your vaunted reincarnation researcher so you could pull this nonsense. So, then it was his forebear, Stevenson. In any case, there is no credible evidence for reincarnation, no unbiased studies, no peer review, nada, nix, nothing.
If there were, you would be shouting it from the rooftops. There is no scam you won't believe. I can get you a good bridge in Brooklyn very cheaply or I can hook you up with a Nigerian looking to give away money. Bwahahahahaha.
I can beat you in a fair fight, an unfair fight, and an IQ test. You'd just rather make anonymous threats on the internet like some pusillanimous child. Here kitty, kitty. Come to Texas.
No, you were right. It was Euripedes. Dr. Euripedes.

You stupid sonuvabitch. I can run you down on foot (as I would have to) and then whip your ass without breaking a sweat.
IPSEC

Arlington, TX

#225339 Apr 17, 2014
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course not. It's based on Jesus.
Praise Jesus. His design was so intelligent he put on foreskins so mohels would have to perform non-consensual mutilations on infants while suckling the blood from their newly shorn phalluses. It's such an intelligent design. Whoops, wait, not that flap of skin! What was I thinking? Cut it off! Ewwwwww!

Speaking of which. Who was Jesus' mohel? After all, Rabbis are scrupulous record keepers and you'd think after having that bright star light up your work space and being able to smoke all that myrrh, the old nebbish would have written something down about the condition of the Royal Peen.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min Tuffet 1,762,043
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 3 hr Bruddah Z 341,051
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 10 hr Trojan 35,946
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) May 19 hojo 12,405
News Carlisle's Fitzgerald signs to play at Norfolk ... May 16 Go phartse 4
News PBA: Columbian parades new import vs Aces May 4 AndPhartse 2
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Mar '18 Lonnie Peters 201,480