Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 256551 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#222022 Mar 28, 2014
IPSEC wrote:
Wait, what?
"You keep this on your finger and as of this point you are married to the Lord and your father is your boyfriend," the father says as he hands his daughter the ring."
Married and a boyfriend? Why, the little slut is already an adulteress.
Her father will so have to stone her to death, on her wedding day...

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#222023 Mar 28, 2014
IPSEC wrote:
This one bears repeating:
"Having sex with, kissing or touching a man (other than their fathers) before marriage is strictly prohibited."
Christians are creepy!
Very creepy...

... Electra, anyone?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#222024 Mar 28, 2014
IPSEC wrote:
Oh, and those "Purity Balls" don't work and are further evidence of the harm of a Christian dogma.
"The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health data supports the conclusion that teenagers making virginity pledges, including those promulgated through purity balls, usually do not adhere to the required standard of chastity, and are less prepared to utilize safer sex precautions in mitigating the risks of sexual activity when it does occur. The percentage of teenagers in a given area who have made virginity pledges is positively correlated with the frequency with which sexually transmitted diseases occur."
http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth
Stupid Christians.
Trying to deny actual reality (that teens are raging balls of hormones) is only going to get them into more trouble than normal...

“Credulity is not a virtue”

Since: Apr 09

San Francisco

#222025 Mar 28, 2014
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
here we have wilderide's statement of faith in a nutshell: "Homosexuality is in fact alot more honorable than Christianity"
yet wildride asserts that he's trying to challenge us with critical-thinking on a moral level without bias!
folks - make no mistake about it- THE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA IS MALCIOUS AND PERVERSE AND ITS OBJECTIVE IS TO CHANGE THE ENTIRE WORLD'S IDEA OF MORALITY!
Gays and lesbians more popular than evangelical Christians:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/28/gays...

:D

BTW, the only place a homosexual agenda exists is in the mind of the ignorant and paranoid like yourself.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#222026 Mar 28, 2014
IPSEC wrote:
Ugh, it's worse than I thought. Look at this photo of a "Purity Ball" father kissing his daughter (trigger warning for incest survivors).
http://progressivepopulist.org/2014/03/21/pur...
Christians are creepy!
Disgusting.

“Credulity is not a virtue”

Since: Apr 09

San Francisco

#222027 Mar 28, 2014
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Hell is not real, you silly buffoon.
Neither is your ugly torturer-god.
Bob, it's not torture, it's love. Don't you find slavery, genocide, ethnic-cleansing, misogyny, homophobia, racism, and infanticide loving behavior? Because if not, I'm afraid I know a deity which will love you to death for all eternity.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#222028 Mar 28, 2014
IPSEC wrote:
Look what Billy Graham's son had to say:
Evangelical Sex Abuse Record ‘Worse’ Than Catholic, Says Billy Graham’s Grandson Boz Tchividijian Religion News Service | By Sarah Pulliam Bailey Posted: 10/01/2013 10:11 am EDT | Updated: 10/02/2013 11:48 am EDT
AUSTIN, Texas (RNS) The Christian mission field is a “magnet” for sexual abusers, Boz Tchividjian, a Liberty University law professor who investigates abuse said Thursday (Sept. 26) to a room of journalists.
While comparing evangelicals to Catholics on abuse response,”I think we are worse,” he said at the Religion Newswriters Association conference, saying too many evangelicals had “sacrificed the souls” of young victims.
“Protestants can be very arrogant when pointing to Catholics,” said Tchividjian, a grandson of evangelist Billy Graham and executive director of Godly Response to Abuse in the Christian Environment (GRACE), which has investigated sex abuse allegations. etc.
Even he gets it.
Of course!

Those poor brainwashed Genuine Christian™ girls are taught to be SUBMISSIVE to all MEN.

It stands to reason they'd be the most abused group.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#222029 Mar 28, 2014
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. Magic is just when people don't understand how something works. If you took an iPad back in time even just 50 years people would think it was magic too.
Or, perhaps had a little deamon inside?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#222030 Mar 28, 2014
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>You may have misread or that is incorrect about the ten percent of the brain. I said in unison. People used to believe man only uses 10% of his brain while the other 90% is never used. They looked at us as capacity. That is what people got wrong. What it is rather is that we only use 10% of our brain at any particular time. Some actions access some parts of our brain. Others from different parts. We have much higher than 10% brain capacity. But we don't use more than 10% at the same time
If you find anything disputing that please let me know as that has been my finding
I think the whole 10% thing was a gross mistake and misunderstanding of a single observation , back in the day.

And the populist media grabbed it as a "cute thing to say and sell newspapers" to the general public.

Even while deeply asleep most of your brain is busy doing it's thing-- far more than just 10%. The brain is responsible for a great many bodily functions, including heartbeat, breathing, digestion, movement of the intestines, etc. Sure, these are not *conscious* activities, but a person with a broken neck?*Will* have issues with all of the above, without external help.

Here's a fairly lengthy discussion on the subject:

" http://psychology.about.com/od/biopsychology/... ;

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#222031 Mar 28, 2014
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>As for the senses I don't if we disagree more on a semantic or fundamental level. Maybe both. Maybe neither.
Let me explain what I believe a "sixth" sense to be. I agree our senses are sharper when we are not distracted. But I also believe we have the ability but not the knowledge on how to use out senses to do much more with them then we do now.
It doesn't even necessarily have to be a "sense". Is perception or intuition a "sense"? I don't know how you would define either. But I believe there exists a disconnect between man and his perceptions due to the lack of developing the ability to use it or learning how to be more in tune with it.
Maybe that is what you would define as a sixth sense. If so then we would disagree. But I believe some people has the ability to perceive things most people never have and probably never will be able to as they don't even know its something they are lacking. That is why I mentioned even small things we take for granted like animals knowing when someone is sick or when danger is around. It's a perception that transcends just normal observation. Or I should say what we know to observe. I think out perceptions have the ability to be so much greater than they are, but we just don't know how.
I think I see what you are saying, here-- it's not that you are claiming some magical "other sense" that is unknown, it's that you are saying some folk pay better attention to the senses they do have, than other people.

And I whole-heartedly agree.

For example, your average person can glance at a chess board, with a game-in-progress, and just see a jumble of pieces.

But for a chess master? That same glance, will tell the master who's winning, who's losing, who has the advantage, and so on-- in fact? He(she) will likely be able to replicate that game-in-progress, on another board, without looking back to the first game, all from a casual glance.

The chess master's glance is more **perceptive** of the various nuances of chess, than an untrained observer would be.

So, certainly-- some folk are more perceptive than others, given specific conditions.

Another example, is the fictional character Sherlock Holmes-- based on real-world people, of course. Holmes, has trained himself to observe every little detail in a given scene. This is possible to do, as real-world crime scene detectives can be so trained (maybe not as incredible as the fictional Holmes, but certainly well above a casual observer).

There is much about human perception that we still do not understand--that much is certain.

The future can be a very bright one, as we unlock more of these secrets about ourselves.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#222032 Mar 28, 2014
Phantom2010 wrote:
<quoted text> Well you're an atheist. How were you indoctrinated?
I was indoctrinated against my will, as a baby, to belong to the cult that is Genuine Christianity™.

I remained brainwashed in that cult for most of my life, finally able to set myself free from the brain-damage that is faith, by simply reading the **whole** bible, and not just the pretty bits (as you no doubt do).

Once I realized how incredibly ugly and evil the bible is? I also realized that no god who GAVE A DAMN would have permitted the ugly bible to even exist at all.

So, clearly, there is no such being.

If god exists? God does not care one bit about the collective fate of humanity.

The proof is the very existence of the bible, the quoran, the book of mormon, the <insert religious book here> ...

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#222033 Mar 28, 2014
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
Gays and lesbians more popular than evangelical Christians:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/28/gays...
:D
BTW, the only place a homosexual agenda exists is in the mind of the ignorant and paranoid like yourself.
They use Mein Kampf replacing "Jew" with "gay".

The Christ-Stains are the ones with an agenda.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#222034 Mar 28, 2014
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Or, perhaps had a little deamon inside?
Maxwell's ?

LOL

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#222035 Mar 28, 2014
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
You, RR, Buck, etc.
It seems to be requirement to be a "Real Christian".
Indeed.

They are proof that no god who cares can possibly exist-- for what god would suffer such as they, to represent it?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#222037 Mar 28, 2014
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
Gays and lesbians more popular than evangelical Christians:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/28/gays...
:D
BTW, the only place a homosexual agenda exists is in the mind of the ignorant and paranoid like yourself.
Progress!

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#222036 Mar 28, 2014
Still asking questions - good - you should be, because most of what you seem to know, isn't all accurate. Let's take another look at these "questions"....

tricki wrote:
Oranges
TEST THREE
A. From the atom to the universe, is there order?
___ YES ___ NO
- Well based upon mutations that occur - which is not "order" I would have to say, NO there isn't.

B. Did it happen by accident?
___ YES ___ NO
- Possibly - but that isn't one of the choices, huh? Why isn't it? I know for sure that you have no proof on how the universe was created, so again, you are looking at all of this through your own world goggles and not taking into consideration the facts - which is - THAT YOU DON"T KNOW EITHER.

C. Or, must there have been an intelligent mind?
___ YES ___ NO
- Again - there is no proof that a specific being created the universe. Why can't you understand this? Why do you promote something you have no clue or knowledge of?

D. What are the chances of 50 oranges falling by chance
into ten rows of five oranges?_________
If you answered "YES" for any of the above, give details.
- None - except only with HUMAN INTERVENTION.

Another set of your questions that really have no bearing upon the world.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#222038 Mar 28, 2014
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
Bob, it's not torture, it's love. Don't you find slavery, genocide, ethnic-cleansing, misogyny, homophobia, racism, and infanticide loving behavior? Because if not, I'm afraid I know a deity which will love you to death for all eternity.
<raises one eyebrow in response>

<and then chuckles at the above wit>

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#222039 Mar 28, 2014
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>you are COMPLETELY off in your doctrine and are NOT at all represetning the Truth of God!

allow me to break this down:

skom - "Salvation is not based solely on obedience. It also requires faith"

salvation is based soley on our faith in the obedience of Christ!

skom "Man could live a sinless life and still not be saved according to Christian ideology"

man is born a sinner and therefore cannot be sinless before God unless he gets regenerated in spirit/nature through the new birth!

now - either embrace these very basic tenants of the Christian faith or i'll continue to expose you as a wolf in sheeps clothing!
Were you as slimy on your rebirth as your first one?

You still seem pretty slimy to me.

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#222040 Mar 28, 2014
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
I think I see what you are saying, here-- it's not that you are claiming some magical "other sense" that is unknown, it's that you are saying some folk pay better attention to the senses they do have, than other people.
And I whole-heartedly agree.
For example, your average person can glance at a chess board, with a game-in-progress, and just see a jumble of pieces.
But for a chess master? That same glance, will tell the master who's winning, who's losing, who has the advantage, and so on-- in fact? He(she) will likely be able to replicate that game-in-progress, on another board, without looking back to the first game, all from a casual glance.
The chess master's glance is more **perceptive** of the various nuances of chess, than an untrained observer would be.
So, certainly-- some folk are more perceptive than others, given specific conditions.
Another example, is the fictional character Sherlock Holmes-- based on real-world people, of course. Holmes, has trained himself to observe every little detail in a given scene. This is possible to do, as real-world crime scene detectives can be so trained (maybe not as incredible as the fictional Holmes, but certainly well above a casual observer).
There is much about human perception that we still do not understand--that much is certain.
The future can be a very bright one, as we unlock more of these secrets about ourselves.
Hey Bob - another good and helpful post by you.

Thanks!

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#222041 Mar 28, 2014
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>do you realize how ridiculous you sound?

the heavens of heavens cannot completely contain the Person of Jesus/God so how on earth could He possibly be contained in a Book, glorious as the Bible is?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Oh...

You were being serious.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min RoxLo 1,418,004
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 7 min ThomasA 311,606
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 7 hr Trojan 32,325
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) 13 hr OzRitz 10,064
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Aug 19 JustStop 201,888
mark moel loan house is here for you to uptain ... (Sep '13) Aug 14 Alex 17
legitimate loan lender (Oct '13) Aug 11 Ceren 9
More from around the web