Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 258512 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#221029 Mar 24, 2014
IPSEC wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
The ID is non-falsifiable, and therefore, useless.
You Darwinists have told me it is both non-falsifiable and falsified.

Seems you have it covered.

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#221030 Mar 24, 2014
Darwins Stepchild wrote:
<quoted text>
We see this a lot with our theist posters. Not all, but most. RR, KiMare, Buck etal.
We do see it also with some of our non-believer fellows as well, sadly. It is a human trait to vilify "the other". But we see much more civility among the non-believers. At least, that's the way I see it.
I like the civility of you non-believers, like here, when you totally made up a lie:

Darwin's Stepchild wrote:

"And, yes, Behe admitted that ID is not science"
__________

Kitzmiller, Day 10, Trial Transcript:

Q. Sir, do you have an opinion as to whether intelligent design is science?

Behe: Yes, I do.

Q. And what is that opinion?

Behe: Yes, it is.

Q. Do you have an opinion as to whether intelligent design makes testable scientific claims?

Behe: Yes, I do.

Q. What is that opinion?

Behe: Yes, it does.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#221031 Mar 24, 2014
Based on the 'science' of ID, crystal formation can only be accomplish with divine intervention.

"Complex and orderly structures can only be the result of an intelligent creator." - Prime assumption of ID Cosmology.

That assumption had been proven incorrect by the formation of crystals.

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#221032 Mar 24, 2014
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Agreed. Atheism is the belief that deities do not exist.
Now, where do you see atheists imposing this belief with intimidation or laws ?
“As scientists, we must toil and labor and toil again to silence God.”

-BSU honors course textbook (taxpayer subsidized)
Thinking

Cupar, UK

#221033 Mar 24, 2014
7 dumb posts in a row gets Puck Frick a "cuntard of the day" award.

Way to go, cuntard.

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#221034 Mar 24, 2014
BenAdam wrote:
Based on the 'science' of ID, crystal formation can only be accomplish with divine intervention.
"Complex and orderly structures can only be the result of an intelligent creator." - Prime assumption of ID Cosmology.
That assumption had been proven incorrect by the formation of crystals.
That is not an ID assumption. You made it up.

The lattice structure of crystals is determined by the chemical ionic attraction among elements. No specified information is required.

The same force cannot be invoked to explain the combinations of amino acids and bases in DNA or RNA., so the self-organizational model fails as an analogy.

I can link you to thorough refutations of your claim if interested.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#221035 Mar 24, 2014
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
We know how big the observable universe is , and most calculations are based on this figure.
But with with the WMAP sat. The curvature of the universe was calculated to within 1% of being flat.Surprisingly they have also been able to map the entire observable universe, so you see the amount of stars and matter is only a calculation using this information.
While it may not be 100% accurate it has to be with a reasonable tolerance.
Fame is elusive here as you don't hear the names of those who do these things in a quest for knowledge. Fame has nothing to do with it.
I think fame has a lot to do with it. I think many scientists want to be the next Brian Green, Stephen Hawking, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Albert Einstein, Galileo or Hubble. They want their name plastered in history.
Thinking

Cupar, UK

#221036 Mar 24, 2014
intelligent design is far from intelligent.
BenAdam wrote:
Based on the 'science' of ID, crystal formation can only be accomplish with divine intervention.
"Complex and orderly structures can only be the result of an intelligent creator." - Prime assumption of ID Cosmology.
That assumption had been proven incorrect by the formation of crystals.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#221037 Mar 24, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
.....
The lattice structure of crystals is determined by the chemical ionic attraction among elements. No specified information is required.....
Exactly like DNA.

Thank you for disproving ID.

You may now stick your head back up your ass.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#221038 Mar 24, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
That is not an ID assumption.....
Nope. Read your own Discovery Institutes website, moron.

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#221039 Mar 24, 2014
Thinking wrote:
intelligent design is far from intelligent.
<quoted text>
You don't know what it is.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#221040 Mar 24, 2014
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
I must have missed them.
No, you simply scoffed at them.

You have no excuse.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#221041 Mar 24, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I think fame has a lot to do with it. I think many scientists want to be the next Brian Green, Stephen Hawking, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Albert Einstein, Galileo or Hubble. They want their name plastered in history.
Yet you who can't even combine velocities think you are smarter than everyone on Earth.

You are a disgrace to humanity.

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#221042 Mar 24, 2014
Thinking wrote:
7 dumb posts in a row gets Puck Frick a "cuntard of the day" award.
Way to go, cuntard.
Are you the Duck of Windsor?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#221043 Mar 24, 2014
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Science: "We don't know but we have a few logical thoughts on the matter based on what we know and have observed."
Religion: "We know it is God because our magic book says so!"
Note the difference please.
What are the logical thoughts specifically?

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#221044 Mar 24, 2014
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly like DNA.
Thank you for disproving ID.
That hypothesis has been abandoned.

Stephen Meyer explains why you are wrong:

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#221045 Mar 24, 2014
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope. Read your own Discovery Institutes website, moron.
Paste a link to that quote. Or admit you made it up.

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#221046 Mar 24, 2014
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly like DNA.
Thank you for disproving ID.
You may now stick your head back up your ass.
As per usual, you don't know what you're talking about.

You should not try to come up with arguments. Stick to gratuitous insults. It suits you.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#221047 Mar 24, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
As per usual, you don't know what you're talking about.
You should not try to come up with arguments. Stick to gratuitous insults. It suits you.
You disproved ID yourself in that post and either too stupid to realize it or to deceitful to admit it.

You know nothing and are nothing, just like all the religitards here.

God is all around you and all you can do is babble about your magic book.

God is not in your Bible, Buck.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#221049 Mar 24, 2014
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet you who can't even combine velocities think you are smarter than everyone on Earth.
You are a disgrace to humanity.
I can hang sheet wall, or whatever.

Combining velocities is a waste of my time.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min VetnorsGate 1,781,223
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 3 min Susanm 346,072
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 11 min Chosen Traveler 36,091
News Racers' Stark opting for NBA opportunity 6 hr Opting phartse 2
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) Jun 10 hojo 12,419
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Jun 5 Public Accommodation 201,480
do you need a loan (Sep '13) May 30 zan 5