Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent. Full Story

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#213263 Feb 19, 2014
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Google "DIVORCE RATE RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION"
You will see, that among the Genuine Christians™, it is the **highest** in the world, as compared to any other demographic.
This is well known.
Your ugly religion actually PROMOTES DIVORCE.
Likely because it's based on bullshit, and you cannot have a **working** life, based on bullshit....


http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/...

Here's the truth...

People who seriously practice a traditional religious faith---whether Christian or other---have a divorce rate markedly lower than the general population.

----------

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#213264 Feb 19, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
That is not a reliable source of facts.

It is 100% lies, all lies, all the time.

The name gives it away, you see.

You people cannot bear to tell the unvarnished facts.

And the FACTS ARE:

Your religion makes people UNHAPPY.

And UNHAPPY people tend to DIVORCE.

Which is why your religion's people hold the world record of divorces, per 1000 marriages.

Judged:

19

19

16

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#213265 Feb 19, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's the truth...
People who
Did your Jesus command you to call me "quaalude bob"?

Is this another fine example of your Christian Love™?

(psst: most people call this hate speech, just so you know)

Who would your Jesus Hate?

Judged:

14

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#213266 Feb 19, 2014

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Sep 10

San Francisco, CA

#213267 Feb 19, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text>
http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/...
Here's the truth...
People who seriously practice a traditional religious faith---whether Christian or other---have a divorce rate markedly lower than the general population.
----------
What about Marines?

What's their record?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#213268 Feb 19, 2014
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
What about Marines?
What's their record?
Unfortunately, they remain among the highest...

" http://www.military.com/daily-news/2013/01/23... ;

" http://www.veteransunited.com/spouse/military... ;

Judged:

11

11

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#213269 Feb 19, 2014

Since: Sep 10

San Francisco, CA

#213270 Feb 19, 2014
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Unfortunately, they remain among the highest...
" http://www.military.com/daily-news/2013/01/23... ;
" http://www.veteransunited.com/spouse/military... ;
Hey, Brother Lightbeamrider.

How do you account for these statistics?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#213271 Feb 19, 2014
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
I do not talk to wife beaters or pedophiles (that would be you--both times)
I'm neither of those, Blob.

(that's why you posted to me)

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#213272 Feb 19, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
A 1995 piece of lyingshyt page?

What The EFF?

You are seriously a lying douchenozzle.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#213273 Feb 19, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm neither of those, Blob.
(that's why you posted to me)
I do not talk to wife beaters or pedophiles (that would be you--both times)

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#213274 Feb 19, 2014
http://www.whale.to/a/shelton_sy.html

Syphilis sounds a lot like AIDS arguments today.
400 years ago, before there was any real science behind it (no microscopes, no Petri dishes, no germ theory, no antibody or for that matter any other scientific medical tests, etc.,) syphilis was known as "The Great Masquerader" because it supposedly had no specific symptoms of its own, but instead was claimed to have the ability to exactly mimic the symptoms of any of a list of over 400 other diseases.

Needless to say, in such a situation, a physician can only make a diagnosis by considering the patient's sexual history (not to mention his race, social class, etc.) If he's considered to be in a "risk group" then it was syphilis, but if not, it was diagnosed as just one of the 400 diseases that syphilis could mimic.

Then, once doctors started using mercury to treat syphilis, syphilis did develop its own specific symptoms, but curiously, they were identical to what are now known as the symptoms of mercury poisoning. Later, arsenic was added to the treatment regimen, and syphilis similarly developed the curious ability to mimic the symptoms of arsenic poisoning.

...Is any of this starting to sound a tad too familiar?

A physician named Herbert M. Shelton wrote a book about syphilis in 1962 called "Syphilis: Is it a Myschievous Myth or a Malignant Monster?" Today it is available for free online. Of particular note is the fact that if you read it, it's like reading Duesberg on AIDS. There is virtually nothing that we HIV/AIDS critics could say about AIDS that Dr. Shelton wasn't saying about syphilis 50 years ago. Their arguments and criticisms are so similar that after reading it, I was convinced that either Duesberg is dead wrong.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#213275 Feb 19, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
http://www.whale.to/a/shelton_ sy.html
Syphilis sounds a lot like AIDS arguments today.
<quoted text>
1962???

What. The. EFF, man!

This is 2014. Get with the program, you ignorant moron.

“The who whating how...”

Since: Dec 12

"...with huh?"

#213276 Feb 19, 2014
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>1962???

What. The. EFF, man!

This is 2014. Get with the program, you ignorant moron.
It seems to be a phenomenon online, godbots are retreating further and further into the past.

Awwww, they can't kill people who oppose them anymore, boo hoo.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#213277 Feb 19, 2014
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
I do not talk to wife beaters or pedophiles (that would be you--both times)
Pedophile?!

That's a new development of the Topix Atheist! Against the Mighty RR.
blacklagoon

Hyde Park, MA

#213278 Feb 19, 2014
Cvvl wrote:
<quoted text>
I imagine a similar sort of debate occurring when Kodak first made photography accessible to the general public by releasing easy-load push-button cameras and doing the post processing. There will have been those who exclaimed that all of the artistry and creativity was being stripped away in favour of mass-produced imagery.
Of course, today the vast majority of photos taken are dismissable snapshots, but there is also an unquestionable photographic art - appreciated alongside other visual media, but never in competition or comparison.
I agree that the accessibility of electronic devices allows (even encourages) anyone to produce unsophisticated electronic burps and farts, but isn't it possible that electronic music will develop as its own distinct acoustic art form with its own masters of the medium? Perhaps it already has - though none come to mind.
The artistry in photography was choosing the right subject, capturing a special moment, focusing on the values of light and dark, capturing just the right shadings, not in the actually processing of the film, that was "grunt" work made easier through technology.

You can't use electronic music and the word acoustics in the same breath, in music there is a clear distinction between electronically produced sounds and sound generated by "acoustic" instruments.

It seem's I'm being painted into the position of reject all technological advancements, and nothing could be further from the truth. I fully realize electronic music as a viable medium, the college I teach at has an electronic music department, and I know many of the professors, so I understand the medium.I might add that this major is not well attended, and most of the students that take these courses do so in conjunction with film scoring.

It may well develope into an art form, it hasn't as yet, and the "masters" will most likely be computer programers with an interest in music. The sounds will be there own, and any attempt to duplicate the sounds of real acoustic instruments will always fail.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#213279 Feb 19, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
Ah yes. Catcher's "civilized" people.
Not anyone in "dusty" Riverside....
Not anyone in black neighborhoods.
Not anyone who sweats for a living.
Not mechanics.
Not farmers.
Just wine drinking, vacationing, sports car driving "civilized" people.
No thanks.
Catcher1 wrote:
You left out reading and writing, and avoiding violence.
Oh shit, I'm sorry.

I forgot that you're bigoted against illiterate people, too.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#213280 Feb 19, 2014
KiMare wrote:
Are you talking about the gay pedophiles desecrating the Priesthood?
I think he's talking about a pedophilic priesthood desecrating children.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#213281 Feb 19, 2014
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<
And even one from YOUR camp agrees with ME:
" http://www.christianpost.com/news/divorce-rat... ;
No it doesn't.

"The group reports that 33 percent of all born-again Christians who have been married have gone through divorce compared to 34 percent of non-born-again adults."

Instead of posting news blogs, try posting some actual data.

What percentage of the US is Christian? How many people is that?

What percentage of the US is atheist? How many people is that?

How many atheist marriages are there in the US?

How many Christian marriages are there in the US?

How many of either end up in divorce?

Figure out those numbers, then you might have some ground to stand on.

“I Am *All* Of You!”

Since: Jan 14

And I Live In Your Sock Drawer

#213282 Feb 19, 2014
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
I think he's talking about a pedophilic priesthood desecrating children.
It's the fault of all those sexy children, you know, who keep seducing those poor priests and pastors.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 5 min Chosen Traveler 28,462
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 8 min Nostrilis Waxmoron 1,155,895
Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 2 hr Phil Donahue 307,086
What role do you think humans play in global wa... 2 hr litesong 2,740
How to Recover Deleted or lost Contacts from Sa... 7 hr best bet 2
UConn vs. Duke Monday night 9pm ESPN2 21 hr ivyawe 1
Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Thu Bently 201,187
More from around the web