Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1275187 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Yeah

Mililani, HI

#1140905 May 23, 2014
Ah, reich wingers!

Mr Obama is doing the worst job possible if you believe them.

Yet, they can't come up with one name to fill his shoes when he leaves.

I wonder why?

Since: Mar 14

Orlando, FL

#1140906 May 23, 2014
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Okaaaaay. Let's assume Mr Clinton was correct.
So..... where were the massive stores of wmd's that bushie boy and Alan Kay claimed he found?
Answer this question first.

How many times did Saddam thumb his nose at the UN and inspectors and how many years did he have to do that?

But it's been a long day. We'll take this up again tomorrow after you've had some time to do some research.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#1140907 May 23, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
<quoted text>
Answer this question first.
How many times did Saddam thumb his nose at the UN and inspectors and how many years did he have to do that?
But it's been a long day. We'll take this up again tomorrow after you've had some time to do some research.
WHO CARES? China thumbs it's nose at the US. So does North Korea.

And so does the reich wing supported Putin over the US no less!

Hans Blix said there were no wmd's. The French also said so. And the CIA in Europe was suspicious of the claims.

Bottom line is there weren't any found despite what bushie said, which was:

"We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories ... And we'll find more weapons as time goes on. But for those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong, we found them." --George Bush Washington, D.C., May 30, 2003
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#1140908 May 23, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
<quoted text>
Answer this question first.
How many times did Saddam thumb his nose at the UN and inspectors and how many years did he have to do that?
But it's been a long day. We'll take this up again tomorrow after you've had some time to do some research.
"Those weapons of mass destruction have got to be somewhere!" - George Bush joking about his administration's failure to find WMDs in Iraq as he narrated a comic slideshow during the Radio & TV Correspondents' Association dinner, Washington, D.C., March 24, 2004
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#1140909 May 23, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
<quoted text>
Answer this question first.
How many times did Saddam thumb his nose at the UN and inspectors and how many years did he have to do that?
But it's been a long day. We'll take this up again tomorrow after you've had some time to do some research.
Seems my research is done.

You haven't even started in reality mode yet....

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#1140910 May 24, 2014
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>But here's a really, really, REALLY good question for you.....
... if Al Qawada attacked the US, why did bushie boy attack Iraq?
LOL, you still haven't figured out why it was Iraq?

Which do you think would be the best answer. 1 oil , 2 help the Iraqi people , 3 profit of war , 4 strategic advantage?

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#1140911 May 24, 2014
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>WHO CARES? China thumbs it's nose at the US. So does North Korea.
And so does the reich wing supported Putin over the US no less!
Hans Blix said there were no wmd's. The French also said so. And the CIA in Europe was suspicious of the claims.
Bottom line is there weren't any found despite what bushie said, which was:
"We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories ... And we'll find more weapons as time goes on. But for those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong, we found them." --George Bush Washington, D.C., May 30, 2003
Well biological and chemical research sites were found. Do you really think saddam hussein didn't have those types of programs working or trying to obtain them? Don't be stupid. He just didn't have anything significant. Besides that's all top secret anyways.

Iraq was a beachhead. It's strategy I doubt you can comprehend.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#1140912 May 24, 2014
R12 Freon wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, you still haven't figured out why it was Iraq?
Which do you think would be the best answer. 1 oil , 2 help the Iraqi people , 3 profit of war , 4 strategic advantage?
1 and 3.

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#1140913 May 24, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
<quoted text>
Because 111 Democrats gave him the authority.
Just like 157 Democrats voted to pass the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 as well.
I would hope so. After all America was attacked. The last time that happened was 1941. Bush did exactly like he should have, Establishing a foothold (Iraq) and taking out the worlds worst terrorists, which he did.

Too bad drones were still in the development stage and he was at the end of his 2 year term.
He did some damage to worldwide terrorism.

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#1140914 May 24, 2014
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
1 and 3.
So being attacked and retaliation for it doesn't factor in at all?

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#1140915 May 24, 2014
All answers were correct. With so many reasons when you think you have the only right answer is when to fall back and give it some more thought. It's what paints a persons character

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#1140916 May 24, 2014
R12 Freon wrote:
<quoted text>
Well biological and chemical research sites were found. Do you really think saddam hussein didn't have those types of programs working or trying to obtain them? Don't be stupid. He just didn't have anything significant. Besides that's all top secret anyways.
Iraq was a beachhead. It's strategy I doubt you can comprehend.
Are you so fcking dumb that you believe that USA should invade every country that has a "biological and chemical research site"?
concerned American

Stanton, KY

#1140917 May 24, 2014
Impeach the man !!!!!
He has went against the everything American !!!
PDUPONT

Belchertown, MA

#1140918 May 24, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
<quoted text>
So you think we should have ignored a clear and imminent threat to civilization in lieu of another threat?
Shouldn't we focus on the other threat? And be concerned Iran is hoodwinking everyone including our president while hiding their nuclear weapons program in plain sight?
Does this president really think a zebra can change its stripes or a despotic country change their history just because of his own grand illusions and naivety?
There was no imminent danger to civilization in Iraq you delusional twit. If George W had let the UN inspectors do their job instead of forcing them to leave prior to his invasion we would have known that and over 4000 American military personnel would still be alive and tens of thousands more wouldn't have returned home physically and emotionally maimed.
You have to be one of the last fools in the world who thinks that Bush's feckless adventure was worth the price we had to pay in blood and treasure.
It was the Iranians that you're now so concerned about who played George W like a fiddle through their agent Ahmed Chalabi and his pack of fabricators, convincing him of WMD that didn't exist.
So who was the na´ve president STUPID?
PDUPONT

Belchertown, MA

#1140919 May 24, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
<quoted text>
You clearly need to do a lot of research about Saddam, chemical weapons and the enemy claiming it to be the frontline of their declared war.
We're still sacrificing men and women in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The sacrifices in Iraq were for nothing because a narcissist in the White House wanted to be right about it instead.
The enemy made Iraq their front line after we invaded you clueless twit. If you did some actual research you'd know that the reports of WMD in Iraq were fabrications that the Bush administration ate up with a spoon.

Since: May 11

Landisburg, PA

#1140921 May 24, 2014
R12 Freon wrote:
<quoted text>
I would hope so. After all America was attacked. The last time that happened was 1941. Bush did exactly like he should have, Establishing a foothold (Iraq) and taking out the worlds worst terrorists, which he did.
Too bad drones were still in the development stage and he was at the end of his 2 year term.
He did some damage to worldwide terrorism.
You right whiners really go to the extreme in making up stupid ex users for Bush's Iraq war.

1) "OMG OMG WMDs WMDs"

2) " OMG OMG OMG Al Qaeda in Iraq"

3) "OMG OMG OMG To spread democracy"

4) "OMG OMG Sadam gassed Kurds 15 years earlier"

Now we can add this whopper

5) A foot hold to fight terrorism. Bases in Turkey, Afghanistan, or Saudi Aranbia or Kuwait were not close enough?

You people are dumber than sh*t
PDUPONT

Belchertown, MA

#1140922 May 24, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
Obama ran away in Iraq and will do the same in Afghanistan.
The man is in way over his head - always has been.
It's really not all about him. Someone should send him a memo.
No he didn't you damned liar! The withdrawal agreement was signed by Bush STUPID!
Only complete idiots like you would think that we should have kept our troops in that hell hole that Bush created one second longer than we had to.

Since: May 11

Landisburg, PA

#1140923 May 24, 2014
R12 Freon wrote:
<quoted text>
Well biological and chemical research sites were found. Do you really think saddam hussein didn't have those types of programs working or trying to obtain them? Don't be stupid. He just didn't have anything significant. Besides that's all top secret anyways.
Iraq was a beachhead. It's strategy I doubt you can comprehend.
Not the rusty out-of-date canister excuse.

Wow, you people are dumber than sh*t.
PDUPONT

Belchertown, MA

#1140924 May 24, 2014
Nostrilis Waxman wrote:
A secretive dark money group backed by George Soros and other liberal mega-donors is looking to steer nearly $40 million to left-wing groups in 2014 to support high-profile political and policy efforts, according to documents obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/05/19/so...
Sure, so what? The Koch brothers and other right wingers have been doing the same thing for years moron. What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
You're an idiot Nosewax; you always have been and always will be!

Since: May 11

Landisburg, PA

#1140925 May 24, 2014
TPRTY wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a liar.
If I'm addressed in a civil manner I will respond in a civil manner.
Telling outright lies is not being civil.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 51 min thetruth 247,283
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) 54 min SpaceBlues 6,835
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 1 hr stewart scott 29,919
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 13 hr _Bad Axe 310,476
Conn's Appliances (Nov '07) Aug 20 Jcrombie67 282
Hoophall Invitational - Miami Aug 17 Hoophall 1
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Aug 16 Doctor Justice_ 201,862
More from around the web