Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1548884 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

No Surprize

Largo, FL

#1096644 Mar 12, 2014
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>so I will ask again? how much time should the black broad get for selling her tax payer funded food stamps? what is the matter you can't answer? her kids are probably starving so she can buy a bottle of booze or some cigarettes? how much time should she get? and should they take her children away? just spit it out sonic, the world can take a straight answer from you.
If copy and paste were taxed daily sonicmoron would get a rebate making a living off of someone elses work...

sonicmoron makes a living by what he takes or gets. Others make a life by what they give...

It's the culture...

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#1096645 Mar 12, 2014
Nostrils Waxman wrote:
Obama is a weak leader. A joke like Jimmy Carter.
. Maybe next week O'bama will have an infomercial to hock O'bamacare right after the sham wow commercial. Now that would be about as classy as O'bama can get.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#1096646 Mar 12, 2014
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>so I will ask again? how much time should the black broad get for selling her tax payer funded food stamps? what is the matter you can't answer? her kids are probably starving so she can buy a bottle of booze or some cigarettes? how much time should she get? and should they take her children away? just spit it out sonic, the world can take a straight answer from you.
the same amount of time that would be given to a white person for doing the same sort of thing for the same sort of reasons.

It works like this: Once a month, the debit-card accounts of those receiving what we still call food stamps are credited with a few hundred dollars — about $500 for a family of four, on average — which are immediately converted into a unit of exchange, in this case cases of soda. On the day when accounts are credited, local establishments accepting EBT cards — and all across the Big White Ghetto,“We Accept Food Stamps” is the new E pluribus unum – are swamped with locals using their public benefits to buy cases and cases — reports put the number at 30 to 40 cases for some buyers — of soda. Those cases of soda then either go on to another retailer, who buys them at 50 cents on the dollar, in effect laundering those $500 in monthly benefits into $250 in cash — a considerably worse rate than your typical organized-crime money launderer offers — or else they go into the local black-market economy, where they can be used as currency in such ventures as the dealing of unauthorized prescription painkillers — by “pillbillies,” as they are known at the sympathetic establishments in Florida that do so much business with Kentucky and West Virginia that the relevant interstate bus service is nicknamed the “OxyContin Express.” A woman who is intimately familiar with the local drug economy suggests that the exchange rate between sexual favors and cases of pop — some dealers will accept either — is about 1:1, meaning that the value of a woman in the local prescription-drug economy is about $12.99 at Walmart prices.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/367903/...
Olive Magadino

Buffalo, NY

#1096647 Mar 12, 2014
PS You gave up your "hand" with this post.

Should I say Hi dem or Hi leo ... Or fawk it.

LOL .... Funny how it works, isn't it.
Target a decoy, it flushes out the real culprit.
Not that I minded throwing the decoy under the bus you understand...

Make My Day, stoop dawg!

HaHaaaHaaa
fletch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't be such a big baby, new yawk, you're starting to sound like that big white agitator goin' round and round in your laundry.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#1096648 Mar 12, 2014
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
the same amount of time that would be given to a white person for doing the same sort of thing for the same sort of reasons.
It works like this: Once a month, the debit-card accounts of those receiving what we still call food stamps are credited with a few hundred dollars — about $500 for a family of four, on average — which are immediately converted into a unit of exchange, in this case cases of soda. On the day when accounts are credited, local establishments accepting EBT cards — and all across the Big White Ghetto,“We Accept Food Stamps” is the new E pluribus unum – are swamped with locals using their public benefits to buy cases and cases — reports put the number at 30 to 40 cases for some buyers — of soda. Those cases of soda then either go on to another retailer, who buys them at 50 cents on the dollar, in effect laundering those $500 in monthly benefits into $250 in cash — a considerably worse rate than your typical organized-crime money launderer offers — or else they go into the local black-market economy, where they can be used as currency in such ventures as the dealing of unauthorized prescription painkillers — by “pillbillies,” as they are known at the sympathetic establishments in Florida that do so much business with Kentucky and West Virginia that the relevant interstate bus service is nicknamed the “OxyContin Express.” A woman who is intimately familiar with the local drug economy suggests that the exchange rate between sexual favors and cases of pop — some dealers will accept either — is about 1:1, meaning that the value of a woman in the local prescription-drug economy is about $12.99 at Walmart prices.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/367903/...
how much time should the black broad get for selling her food stamps??? that is the question. I was not accosted by a white person. She was black with a blue coat and blue hat. How much should time should she get for stealing?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#1096649 Mar 12, 2014
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>so I will ask again? how much time should the black broad get for selling her tax payer funded food stamps? what is the matter you can't answer? her kids are probably starving so she can buy a bottle of booze or some cigarettes? how much time should she get? and should they take her children away? just spit it out sonic, the world can take a straight answer from you.
whens the last time anyone used food stamps? sounds a tad...ermm...bullshitty, shall we say?

is this your story from 1999?
Olive Magadino

Buffalo, NY

#1096650 Mar 12, 2014
Interesting the fake Olive Magadino posts started after we posted about "the pokey" joke.

Either "somebody's" being hateful, obsessive < because you're the enemy, well so am I, also a threat > or jealous.

What were you saying about "Topix standards" ...? How about peoples' standards ...?
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
obsess much?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#1096651 Mar 12, 2014
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>how much time should the black broad get for selling her food stamps??? that is the question. I was not accosted by a white person. She was black with a blue coat and blue hat. How much should time should she get for stealing?
how much time should you get for your bullshit story?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#1096652 Mar 12, 2014
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>how much time should the black broad get for selling her food stamps??? that is the question. I was not accosted by a white person. She was black with a blue coat and blue hat. How much should time should she get for stealing?
the same amount of time as a white person who did the same.

it's the only answer you're going to get. it's the only answer you should need unless you're a racist POS.
No Surprize

Largo, FL

#1096653 Mar 12, 2014
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>how much time should the black broad get for selling her food stamps??? that is the question. I was not accosted by a white person. She was black with a blue coat and blue hat. How much should time should she get for stealing?
Lazy hands like sonicmoron make for more poverty, unlike diligent hands with brains that bring wealth... That being said, the only thing sonicmoron caught was a case of dumbass at birth and has lost ground now 59 years ever since..

It's the culture..
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#1096654 Mar 12, 2014
Scott Walker Will Push Wisconsin State Legislature To Modify Voter ID Requirements

In a press release sent Tuesday, Wisconsin Democratic Party Chairman Mike Tate called Walker's efforts "an unconstitutional attack" that would disproportionately impact racial minorities, veterans, students and seniors.

"Now, Scott Walker and Republicans in the legislature want to change the rules of the game with a special legislative session," Tate wrote. "That's because, without real support for his failed economic policies or his radical social agenda, Scott Walker knows that the only way he can win is by keeping more people at home on Election Day."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/12/scot...
new yawk

Brooklyn, NY

#1096655 Mar 12, 2014
Olive Magadino wrote:
PS You gave up your "hand" with this post.
Should I say Hi dem or Hi leo ... Or fawk it.
LOL .... Funny how it works, isn't it.
Target a decoy, it flushes out the real culprit.
Not that I minded throwing the decoy under the bus you understand...
Make My Day, stoop dawg!
HaHaaaHaaa
<quoted text>
Wrong, mooslime lover.
forks_make_us_fa t

Newcastle, OK

#1096656 Mar 12, 2014
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
whatever jif.
When I entered the ECP of the JIF...

They took my LMR away....

You know what a 'LMR' is?

“you know i know”

Since: Oct 07

denver

#1096657 Mar 12, 2014
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
Scientist deal in "FACTS" and 98% of them say you are wrong. Now do I believe the facts or a programmed puppet.
Check this out, limpdikk

Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical - Forbes
www.forbes.com/.../peer-reviewed-survey-finds ... ;
Forbes
Feb 13, 2013 - They are skeptical that the scientific debate is settled regarding the IPCC .... Just like calling AGW “deniers” instead of skeptics, of which is what ...

It is becoming clear that not only do many scientists dispute the asserted global warming crisis, but these skeptical scientists may indeed form a scientific consensus.

Don’t look now, but maybe a scientific consensus exists concerning global warming after all. Only 36 percent of geoscientists and engineers believe that humans are creating a global warming crisis, according to a survey reported in the peer-reviewed Organization Studies. By contrast, a strong majority of the 1,077 respondents believe that nature is the primary cause of recent global warming and/or that future global warming will not be a very serious problem.

The survey results show geoscientists (also known as earth scientists) and engineers hold similar views as meteorologists. Two recent surveys of meteorologists (summarized here and here) revealed similar skepticism of alarmist global warming claims.

According to the newly published survey of geoscientists and engineers, merely 36 percent of respondents fit the “Comply with Kyoto” model. The scientists in this group “express the strong belief that climate change is happening, that it is not a normal cycle of nature, and humans are the main or central cause.”
new yawk

Brooklyn, NY

#1096658 Mar 12, 2014
O'bama is a liar

“you know i know”

Since: Oct 07

denver

#1096659 Mar 12, 2014
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
None? You are a liar.
Did you read them all, imbecilic one?

No

Where's the jobs Il Douche promised?

“you know i know”

Since: Oct 07

denver

#1096661 Mar 12, 2014
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I fixed it for you.
If you people are going to try to blame Democrats starting in 2007, then certainly you can list the legislation Congress passed in the firt 9 months of 2007 that created the worst recession in 80 years.
You are exceptionally stupid and ignorant, even by Topix standards, here's your recession:

The Government-Created Subprime Mortgage Meltdown

by Thomas J. DiLorenzo

The thousands of mortgage defaults and foreclosures in the "subprime" housing market (i.e., mortgage holders with poor credit ratings) is the direct result of thirty years of government policy that has forced banks to make bad loans to un-creditworthy borrowers. The policy in question is the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), which compels banks to make loans to low-income borrowers and in what the supporters of the Act call "communities of color" that they might not otherwise make based on purely economic criteria.

The original lobbyists for the CRA were the hardcore leftists who supported the Carter administration and were often rewarded for their support with government grants and programs like the CRA that they benefited from. These included various "neighborhood organizations," as they like to call themselves, such as "ACORN" (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now). These organizations claim that over $1 trillion in CRA loans have been made, although no one seems to know the magnitude with much certainty. A U.S. Senate Banking Committee staffer told me about ten years ago that at least $100 billion in such loans had been made in the first twenty years of the Act.

So-called "community groups" like ACORN benefit themselves from the CRA through a process that sounds like legalized extortion. The CRA is enforced by four federal government bureaucracies: the Fed, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Office of Thrift Supervision, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The law is set up so that any bank merger, branch expansion, or new branch creation can be postponed or prohibited by any of these four bureaucracies if a CRA "protest" is issued by a "community group." This can cost banks great sums of money, and the "community groups" understand this perfectly well. It is their leverage. They use this leverage to get the banks to give them millions of dollars as well as promising to make a certain amount of bad loans in their communities.

Bush had nothing to do with it, prove he did, imbecile
forks_make_us_fa t

Newcastle, OK

#1096662 Mar 12, 2014
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>how much time should you get for your bullshit story?
Dance bitchh...dance...

“you know i know”

Since: Oct 07

denver

#1096663 Mar 12, 2014
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I fixed it for you.
If you people are going to try to blame Democrats starting in 2007, then certainly you can list the legislation Congress passed in the firt 9 months of 2007 that created the worst recession in 80 years.
List your proof Bush, all by himself caused the recession or shut your fat yap.

Gunner wrote:
<quoted text>
At President Clinton’s direction, no fewer than 10 federal agencies issued a chilling ultimatum to banks and mortgage lenders to ease credit for lower-income minorities or face investigations for lending discrimination and suffer the related adverse publicity. They also were threatened with denial of access to the all-important secondary mortgage market and stiff fines, along with other penalties.
The threat was codified in a 20-page “Policy Statement on Discrimination in Lending” and entered into the Federal Register on April 15, 1994, by the Interagency Task Force on Fair Lending. Clinton set up the little-known body to coordinate an unprecedented crackdown on alleged bank redlining.
The edict — completely overlooked by the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission and the mainstream media — was signed by then-HUD Secretary Henry Cisneros, Attorney General Janet Reno, Comptroller of the Currency Eugene Ludwig and Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, along with the heads of six other financial regulatory agencies.

“you know i know”

Since: Oct 07

denver

#1096664 Mar 12, 2014
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I fixed it for you.
If you people are going to try to blame Democrats starting in 2007, then certainly you can list the legislation Congress passed in the firt 9 months of 2007 that created the worst recession in 80 years.
More proof of your transparent lies and willful ignorance, a typical demorat:

The Bush economy:

"Democrats like to claim the 1990s were a golden age while the Bush years have been disastrous. But as the nearby chart shows, Mr. Bush inherited a recession. The dot-com bubble had burst in 2000, and the economy was sinking even before the shock of 9/11, the corporate scandals and Sarbanes-Oxley. Mr. Bush's original tax-cut proposal was designed in part as insurance against such a downturn."

"However, to win over Senate Democrats, Mr. Bush both phased in the tax rate reductions and settled for politically popular but economically feckless tax rebate checks. Those checks provided a short-term lift to consumer spending but no real boost to risk-taking or business investment, which was still recovering from the tech implosion. By late 2002, the economy was struggling again -- which is when Mr. Bush proposed his second round of tax cuts."

"This time the tax rate reductions were immediate, and they included cuts in capital gains and dividends designed to spur business incentives. As the tax cuts became law in late May 2003, the recovery began in earnest. Growth averaged nearly 4% over the next three years, the jobless rate fell from 6.3% in June 2003 to 4.4% in October 2006, and real wages began to grow despite rising food and energy prices. The 2003 tax cut was the high point of Bush economic policy."

"Nonetheless, the budget deficit did fall mid-decade, as tax revenues soared with the expansion. In fiscal 2007, the deficit hit $161 billion, or an economically trivial 1.2% of GDP. That seems like a distant memory after the bailout blowout of the last few months, but the point is that the Bush tax cuts aren't responsible for the deficits. Before the recession hit, federal tax revenues had climbed above their postwar average of 18.3% of GDP."

The WSJ

Where's the jobs, dingus?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 2 hr John-K 314,711
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 5 hr TooPharts 33,190
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) Jun 13 Patriot 11,181
News Tragedy strikes family members of Leasure (Jul '08) Jun 9 Evidence phart 9
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) May 29 Into The Night 258,476
Penn State University & State College May '17 Truechange 1
I got my loan from [email protected] (Jun '13) Apr '17 GLOBAL FUNDING SO... 43
More from around the web