Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
991,321 - 991,340 of 1,082,025 Comments Last updated 3 min ago

Since: Sep 08

Santa Barbara, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077875
Feb 10, 2014
 

Judged:

4

4

3

nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>I didn't tell anyone to read the FOX article, I suggested, "click on the Federal Register" link inside that article. When I googled "Obama relaxes restrictions on refugees with terrorist links" the fox article was the only one I read that showed the federal register info with a link. I was in a hurry that night and didn't feel like googling anymore the register link was good so I went with it. It was to show the connection with Obama's action to the rules about subversive/treasonous actions in the Constitution. His lenience towards foreigners who have supported terrorists that hate America is clearly "adhering" and "comforting", i.e., treasonous to our citizens and subversive concerning the government's ability to defend us against foreign born terrorists. Terrorist supporters is always a potential threat to us even if they aren't a threat to "your" president. A supporter who only gave "limited" support is just as dangerous as one who gave them millions of dollars in aid. A supporter could give a bomber a place to live (in anonymity) while he/she was putting their plan in order. Every link in a terrorist chain is an evil one.
The rules "had made it impossible for anyone who had provided any support to armed rebel groups to come to the United States, even if the groups themselves receive aid from Washington." Obama did the right thing by correcting this hypocritical practice.

http://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com...
EXPERT

Redding, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077876
Feb 10, 2014
 

Judged:

3

3

3

USAsince1680 wrote:
Occupy Wall Street Question of the day:

Why is there never any discussion of how to pay for wars, tax cuts, and loopholes but when it comes to SNAP and unemployment insurance there's no end to the hand wringing about how we're going to pay for them?
You must not be paying attention, there are plenty of discussions.

“talk to the kitteh”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077877
Feb 10, 2014
 

Judged:

3

3

3

killtaker wrote:
'Obama:'That's the Good Thing as a President, I Can Do Whatever I Want'
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-tha...
Is that his newest edict, "I can do what I want, laws don't apply to me!" ?

“talk to the kitteh”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077878
Feb 11, 2014
 

Judged:

3

3

3

USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
Israel doesn't own any Holy Sites.
Just because it's not holy to you doesn't mean that isn't to them.

" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_Mount&quo... ;

The world does not revolve around your belief or lack thereof.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077879
Feb 11, 2014
 

Judged:

3

3

3

harmonious wrote:
Fail, Barry:
It's 'as if 100,000 service-sector jobs went missing,' Rosenberg says
Reactions continue to flood in on Friday's data showing a worse-than-forecast 113,000 jobs created in January.It's 'as if 100,000 service-sector jobs went missing,' a noted Wall Street economist says of ...
MarketWatchBudget, Tax & Economy
On the bright side, the 1 percenters are doing great.
You want to keep kidding yourself fine, but this is FAILED Reaganism. In the late 50's early 60's or so the total wealth of the USA was owned by 70% of the population. Reganism, the right's icon invented this BS trickle down effect that those with the a$$ out of their pants want to believe in and defend. It's a total sham, the only trickle down with the 1%er's is the local Mercedes dealer and the illegals they employ to keep their home. That's where it stops! When you have a thriving community where wealth is shared across a greater percentage of the population then that is when the trickle effect works. Families buy more products, buy more services & that benefits everyone. When you are in survival mode, the spending stops. The 1%'rs are very hard to get rid of, they are the voice heard by all governments before acting on anything. So if you want that wealth to filter down again, you either start taxing hard or that group will keep on shrinking but always hold the power. After all Capitalism is just one giant pyramid scheme where eventually those at the top own the lot unless governments put in enough checks and balances to prevent it.
EXPERT

Redding, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077880
Feb 11, 2014
 

Judged:

3

3

2

OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>You want to keep kidding yourself fine, but this is FAILED Reaganism. In the late 50's early 60's or so the total wealth of the USA was owned by 70% of the population. Reganism, the right's icon invented this BS trickle down effect that those with the a$$ out of their pants want to believe in and defend. It's a total sham, the only trickle down with the 1%er's is the local Mercedes dealer and the illegals they employ to keep their home. That's where it stops! When you have a thriving community where wealth is shared across a greater percentage of the population then that is when the trickle effect works. Families buy more products, buy more services & that benefits everyone. When you are in survival mode, the spending stops. The 1%'rs are very hard to get rid of, they are the voice heard by all governments before acting on anything. So if you want that wealth to filter down again, you either start taxing hard or that group will keep on shrinking but always hold the power. After all Capitalism is just one giant pyramid scheme where eventually those at the top own the lot unless governments put in enough checks and balances to prevent it.
Can you point to any other system that is better?

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077881
Feb 11, 2014
 

Judged:

2

2

2

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
WTF. Do you think because Bush said it makes it law?
Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11 or Al Qaeda.
When will you fricken morons quit making up excuses for the lies George W Bush told that got over 4000 soldiers killed in a war based on lies.
Iraq had everything to do with 9-11, al qaeda and the war on terror.

How do you expect to get those responsible, including those that support them, when their 7,000+ miles away?

Which friendly country in that region are you going to sacrifice by landing 300,000 Marines and the logistical support that goes with it to secure a base of operations?

Iraq was the best and most strategic choice, being their already was a American Military Presence with the no fly zone.

Those that died under Bush's command are also responsible for destroying most of the leadership that made up al qaeda and in the process freed many Iraqis crushed under saddam's thumb.

But obama gives it up and with it goes an almost instant response to stop Iran from launching a nuke or Syria from gassing it's people or carrying out any other strike to destroy world terrorism.

But your boy sends aid and comfort to the enemy, allows al qaeda to regain power and has done more damage to this Country than anyone in it's history.
PDUPONT

Chicopee, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077882
Feb 11, 2014
 

Judged:

5

5

5

LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Could it possibly be Republicans don't want to help him destroy this country faster?
And could it possibly be because Obama refuses to negotiate policies with them because of his own radical and self-gratifying political whims?
But you never think of things like that though, do you?
Sure dimwit, all of the "radical" policies like health care reform, economic stimulus and even cap and trade that were Republican ideas in the first place. Plus you're completely ignoring the fact that the economy has actually improved since Obama took office.
You're delusional Carol.
Nostrilis Waxman

Windsor, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077883
Feb 11, 2014
 

Judged:

4

4

4

PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure dimwit, all of the "radical" policies like health care reform, economic stimulus and even cap and trade that were Republican ideas in the first place. Plus you're completely ignoring the fact that the economy has actually improved since Obama took office.
You're delusional Carol.
You mean despite him, idiot.

It actually turned into an economy where people have given up hope and simply went on the dole forever.

You are a liar and a GD idiot!

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077884
Feb 11, 2014
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Aphelion wrote:
<quoted text>
Given that you a complete idiot .... I'll type sloooow for you.
"I do" know what an exit poll is ... do you?
I never stated that 98% of blacks voted for Obama. That would be another poster, but then if you had a modicum of reading comprehension you would already know that.
Let me guess you're still trying to pass that GED.
lol
PDUPONT

Chicopee, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077885
Feb 11, 2014
 

Judged:

2

2

2

LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
This is just cause to call for his resignation alone. Richard Nixon was forced to resign for a much lesser offense and ensuring cover up. Why isn't anyone doing this?
Lesser offense STUPID? Nixon was charged with a cover-up of criminal activities that originated in the White house dimwit! Once again let's go to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report on Benghazi;
The Majority concludes that the interagency coordination process on the talking points followed normal, but rushed coordination procedures and that there were no efforts by the White House or any other Executive Branch entities to "cover-up" facts or make alterations for political purposes. Indeed, former CIA Director David Petraeus testified to the Committee on November 16, 2012, "They went through the normal process that talking points-unclassified public talking points-go through." In fact, the purpose of the National Security Council (NSC) is to coordinate the many national security agencies of the government, especially when information about a terrorist attack is flowing in and being analyzed quickly-and the NSC used this role appropriately in the case of the talking points coordination. Furthermore, such coordination processes were also standardized, often at the urging of Congress, following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks with the explicit goal of reducing information "stovepipes" between and among agencies.[Review Of The Terrorist Attacks On U.S. Facilities In Benghazi, Libya, September 11-12, 2012, U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, 1/15/14]
There was no "cover-up" you damned liar!
You're delusional Carol and you're delusions are the product of an irrational hate warped mind.
PDUPONT

Chicopee, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077886
Feb 11, 2014
 

Judged:

2

2

2

LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course it was true. Every bit of it was true.
But I'm now done with you too.
Carol, you wouldn't know the truth if it bit you in the butt. Everything you post is a product of your hate warped mind.

Since: May 11

Woodbury, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077887
Feb 11, 2014
 

Judged:

2

2

2

R12 Freon wrote:
<quoted text>
Iraq had everything to do with 9-11, al qaeda and the war on terror.
How do you expect to get those responsible, including those that support them, when their 7,000+ miles away?
Which friendly country in that region are you going to sacrifice by landing 300,000 Marines and the logistical support that goes with it to secure a base of operations?
Iraq was the best and most strategic choice, being their already was a American Military Presence with the no fly zone.
Those that died under Bush's command are also responsible for destroying most of the leadership that made up al qaeda and in the process freed many Iraqis crushed under saddam's thumb.
But obama gives it up and with it goes an almost instant response to stop Iran from launching a nuke or Syria from gassing it's people or carrying out any other strike to destroy world terrorism.
But your boy sends aid and comfort to the enemy, allows al qaeda to regain power and has done more damage to this Country than anyone in it's history.
Nice sur you racist f*ck,. Wy can't you people post about President Obama without using slurs?? Is you racism so inbred into the rabid right that it just flows out of your pathetic ignorant brains?

Also, you do realize that by claiming this ridiculous idea thatBush invaded Iraq for strategic position, you are calling George W Bush, dick Cheney into liars. So instead of wmds, instead of links to Al Qa, Instead of spreading Democracy, we invaded for strategic positioning.

Besides, what good would Iraq do for positioning for Afghanistan. They don't border each other.

My God you people are dumber than sh*t.

Since: May 11

Woodbury, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077888
Feb 11, 2014
 

Judged:

2

2

2

harmonious wrote:
Another Ostuopidakare failure, Dopey dave's excuse will follow shortly:
Millions Trapped in Health-Law Coverage Gap
Earning Too Little for Health-Law Subsidies but Ineligible for Benefits Under Existing Medicaid Programs
.
The Wall Street Journal
By Christopher Weaver
13 hours ago
BIRMINGHAM, Ala.—Ernest Maiden was dumbfounded to learn that he falls through the cracks of the health-care law because in a typical week he earns about $200 from the Happiness and Hair Beauty and Barber Salon.
Related Stories
Johnson wants politics out of expanding Medicaid Associated Press
Medicaid Expansion Could Cost Some Lower-income Families TheStreet.com
3 Weaknesses of Obamacare’s Individual Mandate Wall St. Cheat Sheet
Model Arkansas way of expanding Medicaid at risk Associated Press
Health law's employer requirement will phase in Associated Press
Like millions of other Americans caught in a mismatch of state and federal rules, the 57-year-old hair stylist doesn't make enough money to qualify for federal subsidies to buy health insurance. If he earned another $1,300 a year, the government would pay the full cost. Instead, coverage would cost about what he earns.
The problem is not with the ACA, it is with State's medicaid rules.

Why should you care? You didn't give sh*t when he was uninsured before.

Since: May 11

Woodbury, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077889
Feb 11, 2014
 

Judged:

2

2

2

fetch almighty wrote:
Iranian Warships Headed Toward U.S. Maritime Borders to Send ‘A Message’
This will mark the first time warships from Iran have come close to U.S. maritime borders.
Why you ask? because O'bama and his side kick Lurch are stupid, weak morons-GW Bush would have blown them out of the water-even Bill Clinton, the rapist would have blown them.
But O'bama--Maritime line, red line --nothing.
International waters. If you are so afraid of a few Iranian ships perhaps you should just stay hidden under your bed.

The US Navy occupies waters near Iran to make sure shipping lanes are not blocked.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077890
Feb 11, 2014
 

Judged:

2

2

2

flack wrote:
<quoted text>lol
There are roughly 40 million blacks (AA's) in the US, roughly 12 million voted in the 2012 election. Does that look like 98% to you? 93%?

Aphelion jumped on a post he hadn't bothered to read__he's a clueless Tea Party schmuck..

Since: May 11

Woodbury, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077891
Feb 11, 2014
 

Judged:

2

2

2

EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"real dumb
A local food service company I am familiar with, the owner boss used to be a competitor of mine recently had a situation. An employee, advised him he only wanted to work part time. He advised the employee that was not acceptable as others on the staff would have to pick up the slack and thanked him for his service to his company.
His solution he had sales meeting and advised the remaining employees of two things;
1 - One an employee had left the company
2 - His position would not be filled. Instead the work load would be allotted to the remaining employees and, All employees would receive a pay raise of $1.00 per hour.
Peace
KMA
Let me get this straight. His remaining employees had not been working as hard as they should all those years.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077892
Feb 11, 2014
 

Judged:

2

2

2

John Galt wrote:
Let them eat cake.....
WASHINGTON (AP)— A slab of dry-aged rib eye beef, American caviar and salad representing the first lady's garden will be on the four-course menu for the elegant state dinner being given by President Barack Obama for French President Francois Hollande on Tuesday.
Related Stories
The French president traveled to the U.S. alone on the heels of his very public break-up with Valerie Trierweiler, his longtime companion and de facto first lady. The seating arrangements weren't finalized and there was no word on who will occupy the seat that would have gone to Trierweiler, who once had been expected to attend.
Tuesday night's bash, inside a huge white tent on the South Lawn, is the first state dinner of Obama's second term.
The wine list is strictly American, with selections from California, Washington state and Virginia.
So is the entertainment. Mary J. Blige, a nine-time Grammy award-winning singer-songwriter, producer and actress born in the Bronx, N.Y., will perform for some 350 guests who will be seated at a modern-looking assortment of round, square and oblong tables inside the tent.
White House social secretary Jeremy Bernard, who on Monday helped preview the dinner for U.S. and French media, explained the choice of Blige by saying she's an internationally known singer who can help celebrate someone like the first-term French president. Blige is an Obama supporter who performed at the 2012 Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C.
Who is the idiot that decided to have a party in a tent in February in D.C.?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077893
Feb 11, 2014
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Homer wrote:
"80% of Republican marriages are devoid of love and hot, steamy sex" - Homer
There's a law against peeping, dupe.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1077894
Feb 11, 2014
 

Judged:

2

2

2

John Galt wrote:
Pan icked by fear of huge election losses, White House delays health insurance mandate for medium-sized employers until 2016
By Juliet Eilperin and Amy Goldstein, Monday, February 10, 1:15 PM
The Obama administration announced Monday it would give medium-sized employers an extra year, until 2016, before they must offer health insurance to their full-time workers.
By offering an unexpected grace period to businesses with between 50 and 99 employees, administration officials are hoping to defuse another potential controversy involving the 2010 health-care law, which has become central to Republicans’ campaign to make political gains in this year’s midterm election.
Even the nation’s largest employers got a significant concession: They can avoid a fine by offering coverage to 70 percent of their full-time employees in 2015 and 95 percent starting in 2016. Under an earlier proposal, employers with at least 50 employees would have been required to offer insurance, beginning 2015, to 95 percent of those who work 30 hours or more a week, along with their dependents.
Is the President violatin gthe Constitution and writing his own laws an impeachable offense?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••