Well, I posted the Berkley study website itself. But you have to use the mouse to click on it to read it. So I'll post what it said for you.<quoted text>why is it you keep posting this lie when you have shown you cannot back it up?
are you really that morally bankrupt that you lie openly and repeatedly without remorse?
sad...very sad for you lois...
"The average income gains from 2011 to 2012 were very uneven. Top 1% incomes grew by 31.4% while bottom 99% incomes grew only by 0.4% from 2009 to 2012. Hence, the top 1% captured 95% of the income gains in the first three years of the recovery. From 2009 to 2010, top 1% grew fast and then stagnated from 2010 to 2011. Bottom 99% stagnated both from 2009 to 2010 and from 2010 to 2011. In 2012, top 1% incomes increased sharply by 19.6% while bottom 99% incomes grew only by 1.0%. In sum, top 1% incomes are close to
full recovery while bottom 99% incomes have hardly started to recover.
(If you left click the site on your mouse you can read the whole thing for yourself.)
Can't do anything more than show you the actual University of California Berkley study itself to "back up" the truth. But you can keep calling it a lie if you want to.