Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1710462 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

“no one told me”

Since: Dec 07

Denver

#1065132 Jan 18, 2014
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Ain't life grand?
Galt thought the toe tapper who took a plea was set up.
Those kind can't help themselves__their desire to misbehave rules their lives.
Oblamer flip flopped his flip flops in the Chicago bath houses.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#1065133 Jan 18, 2014
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
Look, you phony non taxpaying bitch, what you and yur ilk want is OTHERS to pay more taxes.
http://www.ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income ...
Who Pays Income Taxes and How Much?
Top 1%
$343,927
36.73% of all federal taxes paid
Top 5%
$154,643
58.66%
Top 10%
$112,124
70.47%
op 25%
$66,193
87.30%
Top 50%
$32,396
97.75%
Bottom 50%
<$32,396
2.25%
What ObamaCare is Really About: http://amac.us/obamacare-really

“no one told me”

Since: Dec 07

Denver

#1065134 Jan 18, 2014
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
Hang on Al Jazerra makes Fox news look like a cartoon show. Remember the Gulf war all those surgical strikes Bush and Rumsfield were making in Iraq and the Al Jazerra network showed something else. They have more reporters than any other network on the planet and because they tell you what really happens Rumsfield wanted to target their headquarters. Same as Eygpt right now the military are locking up their reporters just on suspicion of talking to the MB. But i guess it depends on how you like your news, do you want the truth or be always told you're winning the war!
We've given up on Woodddikk telling us where Ostupida was for 4 1/2 hours the night his ambassador was butchered, maybe a clever kangaroo humper like you can tell us?

“no one told me”

Since: Dec 07

Denver

#1065135 Jan 18, 2014
Bonnie wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO
you sure are an as shole.
why's that? because I posted the truth?
TheIndependentMa jority

Mount Vernon, KY

#1065136 Jan 18, 2014
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet they manage to get you your welfare check every month.
Interesting.
WRONG.

You LOSE.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#1065137 Jan 18, 2014
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
We've given up on Woodddikk telling us where Ostupida was for 4 1/2 hours the night his ambassador was butchered, maybe a clever kangaroo humper like you can tell us?
At least we know where Bush was during 9/11 , reading fairytales to Kindys. His State dept took that threat seriously didn't they ?

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#1065138 Jan 18, 2014
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
What ObamaCare is Really About: http://amac.us/obamacare-really
I read it but don't think the poster you replied to did. He'd rather not know the bad news.

But the writer of that article asked the golden question. "Do you think anyone who can insure himself with a premium policy for $4 a month will vote for anyone but the political party that provides him such a deal?"

(Wonder if anyone on the left even thinks about the implications of that.)

The writer then accurately summized, "ObamaCare is about enabling, subsidizing, and expanding the Left’s political power base, at taxpayer expense."

And then the obvious question. "Why would I vote for anyone but a Democrat if I can have babies for $4 a month?"

This administration is so power hungry, they'd starve the middle class to feed those who will satiate their hunger for power at the voting booths.

And around and around we go....
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#1065139 Jan 18, 2014
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO. Typical republican. Never willing to accept blame:
Former U.S. District Judge Richard Cebull's "emails showed disdain and disrespect for liberal political leaders. A significant number of emails were race related. Whether cast as jokes or serious commentary, the emails showed disdain and disrespect for African Americans, Native Americans and Hispanics, especially those who are not in the United States legally. A similarly significant number of emails related to religion and showed disdain for certain faiths. Approximately the same number of emails concerned women and/or sexual topics and were disparaging of women. A few emails contained inappropriate jokes relating to sexual orientation.”
The 9th Circuit investigative panel also found that “a large number of emails related to pending legislation or an issue that could come before the court, such as immigration, gun control, civil rights, health care or environmental matters.”
Couldn't get more conservative if he tried.
"those who are not in the United States legally" are criminals who deserve disdain and disrespect.....

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#1065140 Jan 18, 2014
Shinning, should have said the liberals won't read the article - not the poster you responded to. It's been a long day.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#1065141 Jan 18, 2014
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
Look, you phony non taxpaying bitch, what you and yur ilk want is OTHERS to pay more taxes.
http://www.ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income ...
Who Pays Income Taxes and How Much?
Top 1%
$343,927
36.73% of all federal taxes paid
Top 5%
$154,643
58.66%
Top 10%
$112,124
70.47%
op 25%
$66,193
87.30%
Top 50%
$32,396
97.75%
Bottom 50%
<$32,396
2.25%
Please forgive me for confusing you with a liberal poster in my response to shinning.
Todd Martin

Lindenhurst, NY

#1065142 Jan 18, 2014
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
At least we know where Bush was during 9/11 , reading fairytales to Kindys. His State dept took that threat seriously didn't they ?
O'Blamer would have more likely been out on the golf course.
Todd Martin

Lindenhurst, NY

#1065143 Jan 18, 2014
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
At least we know where Bush was during 9/11 , reading fairytales to Kindys. His State dept took that threat seriously didn't they ?
O'Blamer would have headed off to a campaign fundraiser instead of dealing with a terrorist attack.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#1065144 Jan 18, 2014
Todd Martin wrote:
<quoted text>O'Blamer would have headed off to a campaign fundraiser instead of dealing with a terrorist attack.
Why not say he was eating doughnuts with Oprah.If you ringers are going to throw stones don't be surprised when you got boulders thrown back at you. For each failure you like to point out about Obama, Republican failures out do any of them 10 fold.
Nostrilis Waxman

Windsor, CT

#1065145 Jan 19, 2014
Good morning idiots DumbDave & P-Duh-Pont!

Here's yet another bumbling of Obamacare by the retard & chief!

"The Obama administration is reportedly delaying enforcement of another aspect of ObamaCare, one that prohibits employers from providing better health benefits to top executives than those being offered to regular employees."

Isn't socialism & corruption great? Why have laws that can't be carried out? Your joke of a government just enforces what it wants regarding old laws and new ones, then makes laws that can't be carried out so what the heck, no big deal right, weasels?
angel

Boise, ID

#1065146 Jan 19, 2014
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
Oblamer flip flopped his flip flops in the Chicago bath houses.
Boy your really Squealing like a Piggy tonight arent you raving Teabagging fruitcake?
Benghazi,Butchered Diplomats,Bath Houses LMAO!
Doesnt take much to make you loose your shit and be reduced to incoherancy.
Of course with the garbage you choose to invest so much toxic negative passion into you cant be too tightly wrapped to begin with!
angel

Boise, ID

#1065147 Jan 19, 2014
Nostrilis Waxman wrote:
Good morning idiots DumbDave & P-Duh-Pont!
Here's yet another bumbling of Obamacare by the retard & chief!
"The Obama administration is reportedly delaying enforcement of another aspect of ObamaCare, one that prohibits employers from providing better health benefits to top executives than those being offered to regular employees."
Isn't socialism & corruption great? Why have laws that can't be carried out? Your joke of a government just enforces what it wants regarding old laws and new ones, then makes laws that can't be carried out so what the heck, no big deal right, weasels?
Ah... The Sniveling of Teabaggers ....its like rain on the roof lulling me to sleep.
Im sure Obama never meant to turn you into a pack of whiney little bitch boys.LMAO!
angel

Boise, ID

#1065148 Jan 19, 2014
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
Look, you phony non taxpaying bitch, what you and yur ilk want is OTHERS to pay more taxes.
http://www.ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income ...
Who Pays Income Taxes and How Much?
Top 1%
$343,927
36.73% of all federal taxes paid
Top 5%
$154,643
58.66%
Top 10%
$112,124
70.47%
op 25%
$66,193
87.30%
Top 50%
$32,396
97.75%
Bottom 50%
<$32,396
2.25%
There is a plan for everyone.
A destiny.
Are you CERTAIN yours is to be a Boot Licker to the Wealthiest 1%?
A Slave to Fox News and Finger Nuzzling Lap Dog to the Koch Brothers?
I have a News Flash for you:None of those people give a Sh*t about you.
Surely there must be something that you would find more fullfilling on a Personal Level?
Just sayin.
angel

Boise, ID

#1065149 Jan 19, 2014
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"real dumb"
I would guess most posters who respond to your drivel would call you a boy. You sure as hell are not a man. Your retorts are those of grade school kid. You refuse to accept facts you prefer the BS that liberal loons spew.
Peace
KMA
Happy MLK Day
Hah! Yeah we need a Teabagging Lemming to lecture on 'Facts'.
The only ones you would recognize if it smacked you in the face is if it happend to correspond with your Wishful Thinking.
You lap up the opinions that are spoon fed to you those who have a financial interest in you beleiving their lies.
But hey! a long as the lies are something you WANT to hear it all good isnt it Fox Slave?
PDUPONT

Chicopee, MA

#1065150 Jan 19, 2014
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, try and stay with me. The bombings in the 1980s were the first attacks against the U.S. by radical Islam. We had not been attacked by jihadists before that time. There were no repeated requests by ambassadors for extra security which were repeatedly denied leading up to these attacks.
And, most importantly....now pay attention....President Reagan did not go out in front of America and the rest of the world and lie about a video for weeks afterwards to win an election.
You might not be able to digest the raw truth and common sense, so chew on it slowly.
Don't get cute with me Carol; it's not going to work.
Was the Reagan administration so myopic that they didn't think that there would be no reaction to the slaughter of thousands of men, women and children by naval bombardments of Lebanese villages? Six months had elapsed between the embassy bombing and the attack on the Marine compound. Was anything done to increase protection of our servicemen? No, they were still in the same location, surrounded by high ground which made it a perfect spot for snipers to pick off Marines, preventing them from putting sentries on the roof who could have spotted the truck coming before it was too late. They were also denied the use of heavy weapons like 50 caliber machine guns that could have stopped the bomber. They were even ordered to keep their weapons unloaded to keep up the fiction that they were on a "peace keeping mission".
The additional security requested was for the embassy in Tripoli, not for the consulate in Benghazi so even if it had been granted it would have made no difference. Ambassador Stevens would have gone there with the same security team he chose on that fateful day.
And no Carol, the President didn't lie about the attack or blame it on the anti Muslim video. And if he had it still wouldn't be a lie because recent investigations put the blame on the group Ansar Al Sharia who put the motive for their attack on the consulate as the video.
TheIndependentMa jority

Mount Vernon, KY

#1065151 Jan 19, 2014
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
At least we know where Bush was during 9/11 , reading fairytales to Kindys. His State dept took that threat seriously didn't they ?
That is true, isn't it. In every aspect of the word-WE, the American people, could PLAINLY SEE, with our own eyes, with out one shred of doubt, EXACTLY where the POTUS of the United States WAS that day.
And (you flocking ignorant jackboot licking ozombitTic) We, the People of the United States, then also CLEARLY saw, just exactly WHERE the the POTUS of the USA WENT, directly thereafter,
Right BACK to the WHITE HOUSE-to SERVE this nation-as any red-blooded American Patriot (rather than commie leaning dictator types, riding the shirt tails of bully partisan poliTics) WOULD.
And well..wel..well.. now...that seems to give us an answer to stumbling question of "what difference does it make"...to those who still have the ability to THINK for themselves rather than follow the pack lemmingly-
Because that sure in the hell is a BIG DIFFERENCE from what We the People SAW, plainly and clearly, the day after Benghazi. WTH were we doing in Libya, so POORLY unprotected,-aside from breaching the War Powers Act, and aiding and abetting terrorism and contributing to failed statehoodies?
Foreign Policy FAILURE.
Kind of along the same lines as this picture of obvious FAILING as well-

http://www.nbcnews.com/business/why-customer-...
On Dec. 19, 2009, the Congressional Budget Office, a nonpartisan referee on budget questions, released an analysis of the Senate version of the health care bill that became the basis for the health care law.

The CBO wrote that it had not completed cost estimates for the IRS and other federal agencies responsible for implementing the law. But it did say the IRS "would probably" need to spend "between $5 billion and $10 billion over 10 years."

The CBO suggested nothing about how those costs would translate to jobs, PolitiFact National found.

Republicans with the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee, which handles federal tax legislation, used the high end of the IRS’ rough budget number to estimate 16,500 employees might be hired to implement the bill....
Now the IRS is hiring staff to implement these changes. Price spokesman Ryan Murphy told PolitiFact Georgia that current hiring numbers suggest that the 16,000 estimate is reasonable.

We took a look at the IRS budget requests to check out this assertion.

For the current fiscal year, the IRS requested funding for more than 1,250 employees to prepare for the health care tax changes, according to its budget proposal. Most would fill support roles in areas such as information technology or customer service. Fewer than one-quarter would be agents.

For next fiscal year, the IRS requested funding for nearly 860 employees. Fewer than 10 percent would be agents.

This places the agent tally for fiscal years 2012 and 2013 near 375.

How do we rule?

Price said that 16,000 new "agents" would be empowered to enforce the health care law. His claim carries a kernel of truth. The IRS will have to hire agents to implement these changes.

********IRS budget requests for the 2012 and 2013 fiscal years show they asked for about 375 more agents so far -- far less than 16,000.*********
-----

Yet More-FAILURE in action.
----
Why customer service at the IRS is bad -- and could get worse

If you have a question about your taxes, here’s a tip: Be prepared to be very patient.

The Internal Revenue Service answered a smaller share of taxpayer calls and kept taxpayers on hold longer last year than in other recent years, a new report finds. What’s more, budget cuts could make it hard for taxpayers to get help this year as well.

The IRS could only answer 61 percent of the calls it received from taxpayers during the 2013 fiscal year, the taxpayer advocate said in a report released to Congress earlier this month.
(NBCNews.1/19/2014)

Disgusting!

T.E.A. 2016!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 21 min unborn lives matter 331,026
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) 48 min Into The Night 12,236
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 1 hr Chosen Traveler 35,590
News Walker IV hits 5 3s, scores 19, Miami beats Not... Feb 21 ScoresPhartse 2
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Feb 16 Imprtnrd 201,481
Conn's Appliances (Nov '07) Jan '18 Sweet 293
News Horsechief commits to Pacific (Mar '06) Jan '18 NicePhartts 8
More from around the web