Barack Obama, our next President

TSM wrote:

Obama needed two teleprompter to announce Deal!! I guess Valeria Jarrett kept ‘Obama’ out of the Loop prior to the Deal which would explain the Teleprompters!!

On the flip side, it was one of the few things he knew about without reading a newspaper.

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
correct...one can keep one's doctor by paying cash even if one's forced ObamaKKKare policy does not include the doctor...
what a great deal!!!

It really has become a two tier system.

Whatever wrote:

<quoted text>
I am sure I said Iran but go check; either way IRAN does not need to enrich uranium.
Still not following your logic on why they need to continue to enrich uranium given it is not currently necessary. This leaves the international community wondering what is going on-for good reason.
One professor's opinion is not what international policies should be based on- even the UN agrees that nuclear proliferation needs curtailed.

no one opinion is should never be used to make foreign policy decisions. I never said that, but all aspects should be considered. Did you even read the article and understand his case. as with most educated papers, the author makes his case and provides historical facts/context to support his thesis.

It is actually a good read, and the author makes valid points.

unfortunately too many people make knee jerk decisions without considering any alternative view points.

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
who has paint chips laying around in their house???
and who leaves a small child unattended???
guess who???...

Your dad?

Whatever wrote:

<quoted text>
It really has become a two tier system.

exactly...two-tier system in terms of quality and access....

welfare ObamaKKKare "insurance" will get one delayed care from foreign-trained "physicians" in welfare hospitals...

Whatever wrote:

<quoted text>
It really has become a two tier system.

furthermore, most medical care on ObamaKKKare plans will be by nurses and physician assistants, with a real doctor a rarity...

fine unless you're really ill...but the amateur you see won't know the difference...

Karma is a_______ wrote:

<quoted text>
no one opinion is should never be used to make foreign policy decisions. I never said that, but all aspects should be considered. Did you even read the article and understand his case. as with most educated papers, the author makes his case and provides historical facts/context to support his thesis.
It is actually a good read, and the author makes valid points.
unfortunately too many people make knee jerk decisions without considering any alternative view points.

Iran is dedicated to developing nuclear weapons and cannot be trusted to abide by any agreement....period...

the next President will have a serious problem to deal with...

Naah wrote:

<quoted text> Thanks for attacking me personally. It shows the Obama mentality... or lack of it. You're doing an Obamaliarly job! LOL

lol! Why should I attack you son?

I'm defending against you!

fetch almighty wrote:

<quoted text>how did all those people live so long? practically everything was lead paint--maybe because they had parents who watched them instead of a TV that watched them.

because not everyone was affected, DUH. Why don't you research the child rate of lead poisoning. at one point it was a problem we didn't even know about. It wasn't until we knew about the effects lead has on the nervous system, that we began to understand the problem. and it wasn't just with children. Workers, like those who made car batteries suffered the effects of lead poisoning.

besides, lead poisoning from lead based paint wasn't a problem for the rich. Their houses were pretty well maintained. It was an issue for the poor and lower middle class. Whose houses weren't as well maintained and paint chips were present. Lead based paints were banned long before the dominance of TV

like asbestos, lead based paints, second hand smoke, DDT, ALAR, we don't always recognize the dangers

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_withdraw...

fetch almighty wrote:

<quoted text>your president is a retard. Inept and scared.

Yeah, you're more a putin person!

Whatever wrote:

<quoted text>
Karma argue with the American people on how great he is at a foreign policy...
37% approve and 53% disapprove of Obama's foreign policy.
So what does the self-proclaimed "well educate and Elite" Progressive have to say about that.

lol! I'm still waiting for you to provide those naked pictures of Obama's mother son.

Karma is a_______ wrote:

<quoted text>
no one opinion is should never be used to make foreign policy decisions. I never said that, but all aspects should be considered. Did you even read the article and understand his case. as with most educated papers, the author makes his case and provides historical facts/context to support his thesis.
It is actually a good read, and the author makes valid points.
unfortunately too many people make knee jerk decisions without considering any alternative view points.

Rather complex topic for the nudie photo crowd.

Would they rather the United States attack Iran and have Israel suffer the consequeses? Israel is a very small target. Peace serves the interest of Israel.

Six nations reached the decision with Iran and the trolls choose to misrepresent this as only a US decision?

Whatever wrote:

<quoted text>
Only a few people read Ghost/Yeah's post.
Occasionally when extremely bored someone looks at them but he is on breeze pass for most posters here.

poor baby. i suspect you finally realized how outclassed you are!

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) panned the new nuclear agreement with Iran on Sunday, insisting it “does not seem proportional.”

Schumer, the No. 3 Democrat in the Senate and a strong supporter of Israel, said that Iran got much more than it gave up in the deal.

Some Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill have said that Congress could move forward with further sanctions legislation against Iran, but to delay its implementation for six months to allow time to gauge the deal.

But Schumer would only say Sunday that the agreement makes sanctions more likely, even as he said that he hoped the Obama administration met its goal of hoping to eliminate Iran’s ability to create a nuclear weapon.

“This disproportionality of this agreement makes it more likely that Democrats and Republicans will join together and pass additional sanctions when we return in December,” Schumer said in a statement.“I intend to discuss that possibility with my colleagues.”

Under the deal finalized this weekend, Iran faces relaxed sanctions, at least temporarily. In exchange, Iran agreed to tougher outside inspections and to cap its nuclear stockpile.

“It was strong sanctions, not the goodness of the hearts of the Iranian leaders, that brought Iran to the table, and any reduction relieves the psychological pressure of future sanctions and gives them hope that they will be able to gain nuclear weapon capability while further sanctions are reduced,” Schumer said.

“A fairer agreement would have coupled a reduction in sanctions with a proportionate reduction in Iranian nuclear capability.”

Debt bondage

Quote:
Debt bondage (or bonded labor) is a person's pledge of their labor or services as repayment for a loan or other debt. The services required to repay the debt may be undefined, and the services' duration may be undefined. Debt bondage can be passed on from generation to generation.

Read more: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt_bondage

Wage slavery

Quote:
Wage slavery refers to a situation perceived as quasi-voluntary slavery,[1] where a person's livelihood depends on wages, especially when the dependence is total and immediate.[2][3] It is a negatively connoted term used to draw an analogy between slavery and wage labor by focusing on similarities between owning and renting a person. The term wage slavery has been used to criticize economic exploitation and social stratification, with the former seen primarily as unequal bargaining power between labor and capital (particularly when workers are paid comparatively low wages, e.g. in sweatshops),[4] and the latter as a lack of workers' self-management, fulfilling job choices and leisure in an economy.[5][6][7] The criticism of social stratification covers a wider range of employment choices bound by the pressures of a hierarchical society to perform otherwise unfulfilling work that deprives humans of their "species character"[8] not only under threat of starvation or poverty, but also of social stigma and status diminution.

Read more: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wage_slavery

Karma is a_______ wrote:

<quoted text>
because not everyone was affected, DUH. Why don't you research the child rate of lead poisoning. at one point it was a problem we didn't even know about. It wasn't until we knew about the effects lead has on the nervous system, that we began to understand the problem. and it wasn't just with children. Workers, like those who made car batteries suffered the effects of lead poisoning.
besides, lead poisoning from lead based paint wasn't a problem for the rich. Their houses were pretty well maintained. It was an issue for the poor and lower middle class. Whose houses weren't as well maintained and paint chips were present. Lead based paints were banned long before the dominance of TV
like asbestos, lead based paints, second hand smoke, DDT, ALAR, we don't always recognize the dangers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_withdraw...

poor people can't sweep up paint chips???

fetch almighty wrote:

<quoted text>Yeah and usm1680 post from the same location. Yeah has a blocker to appear that he is in Hawai'i. Funny thing is, yeah has known nothing about Hawai'i as long as he has faked living there. LOL.

Great analysis son!

Whatever wrote:

<quoted text>
I am sure I said Iran but go check; either way IRAN does not need to enrich uranium.
Still not following your logic on why they need to continue to enrich uranium given it is not currently necessary. This leaves the international community wondering what is going on-for good reason.
One professor's opinion is not what international policies should be based on- even the UN agrees that nuclear proliferation needs curtailed.

lol! Psst! You're not as smart as you claim to be son.

Especially since you're countering a source with your opinion!

Trust me.... it doesn't make you look smart! No, not smart at all!

fetch almighty wrote:

<quoted text>Do you know what an O'bama supporter looks like? check their pocket.

lol! Sorry. I don't do what you do son!

fetch almighty wrote:

<quoted text>Frank Marshall took the pictures, they came from his private collection. Surprisingly some were found in a museum in the middle of Illinois. O'bama's mom posed nude like the ho she was-get over it. Hillary may have posed nude too...so I have heard 'on the streets'in Park Ridge, as liberals like realtime say.

I have seen pictures of both of them with cloths on,that is bad enough. I recently had food poisoning,can image that it would be worse if I had to see a picture of either one of them without clothing.