Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1535207 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

John Galt

Temecula, CA

#1018533 Nov 5, 2013
Mr Lib wrote:
<quoted text>
Always funny when conservatives talk about "equality under the law".
The same idiots who have made police a privileged class by virtue that only they can carry concealed weapons. Only they may have a firearm ready at hand while driving. The rest of us get busted for the same act.
Yes, these same conservatives who have now established the standard of having former prosecutors nominated to fill vacancies on the bench in all fifty states.
Think that makes for a more impartial courtroom? Because it doesn't.
When a GOP con man starts yapping about "equality under the law" look for the extra aces in the deck of cards he isn't showing.
most Conservatives are not fans of the police, who are agents of big government...quite the opposite...and certainly do not want police to be the only ones with guns...depending on the state, it is perfectly legal for private citizens with carry permits to be armed while driving...

so, what the fck are you talking about???
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#1018534 Nov 5, 2013
Mr Lib wrote:
<quoted text>
Thinking the poor are all lazy and shiftless is typical of GOP prejudice.
That's how your kind justifies its insensitivity toward the less fortunate.
Very ugly.
so, get a job and prove them wrong...
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#1018535 Nov 5, 2013
Mr Lib wrote:
<quoted text>
Except that your analogy is a poor one.
California is not a corporation. And unlike corporations, governments do not exist for the primary purpose of turning a profit.
...but, unlike the federal government, states are required to balance their budgets, in a business-like manner
Mr Lib

United States

#1018537 Nov 5, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
most Conservatives are not fans of the police, who are agents of big government...quite the opposite...
You are deluded on that point.

The police are often compliant tools of the rightwing wealthy, for example, industrialist Henry Ford, who used them to arrest labor organizers and break up rallies.

The police themselves are rightists, often in the most ugly sense of the word. Their ranks are filled with racists who abuse the rights of Blacks viciously.

They are no fans of longhairs or liberals, nor the Constitutional rights aforded by the 1st and 4th Amendments.

The NYPD crackdown on peaceful Democrat protestors at the GOP convention in 2004 truly shows the degree of alliance between police and the far right.

Do you really think liberals tolerate the idea of "restraint chairs"? They do not. But conservatives have no problem with such sadistic devices.

The idea that a cop can arrest someone for videotaping their actions is a gross violation of 1st Amendment rights. I do no hear the voices of the right rising in protest.

It is the liberals who decry police intrusions of privacy, not the right.

Try to remember it was the conservatives who screamed bloody murder over the landmark decisions of the Warren Court: Mapp, Gideon, Escobedo and Miranda, and the liberals who knew these were necessary to keep police power in check.

And it is the right which has been packing our courts with "law and order" judges sympathetic to police because they were former prosecutors.
and certainly do not want police to be the only ones with guns...
The issue is not whether cops will be the only ones armed with guns, but the degree to which they have been empowered to trample our Constitutional rights.

I hold you "law and order" types responsible for having created an Orwellian frankenstein over the past thirty years.
depending on the state, it is perfectly legal for private citizens with carry permits to be armed while driving...
Oh, I see. So Mr. "Party of Limited Government" has no problem with subordinating our right to bear arms based on the whim of another bulky government bureaucracy. Do you rightists ever sense what hypocrites you can be? Here's a clue. Most of those permits are not approved.

Not only do Republicans not believe in small government, they created a national security nightmare with the Department of Homeland Security. Another sprawling, massive government bureaucracy with overconcentrated power and no accountability.
so, what the fck are you talking about???
The fascism of the far right.
rennisden

Donora, PA

#1018539 Nov 5, 2013
youtube.com/watch... ……… I aint Willing yet
Mr Lib

United States

#1018540 Nov 5, 2013
ah verkligen wrote:
<quoted text>You missed the point. Just let me know if you're interested in getting schooled yet again, little one....
The point is at the top of your head.

And I didn't miss it.

You "school" me?

You're like a mouse going into a wrestling contest with a gorilla.
PDUPONT

Chicopee, MA

#1018542 Nov 5, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
CBS NEWS published an article yesterday stating that the Obama administration knew more than 40% to 67% in the individual market would not be able to keep their plans even if they liked them.
Obama promised us repeatedly that if we liked our health plan, we could keep our health plan. He once emphasized it by adding, "Period."
So if he knew up to 67% of us would not be able to keep our plans, who is the idiot for believing him when he said we would?
Well Carol, that's an example of lazy "journalism" on the part of your so called "liberal" media. The ACA raised standards on policies and many of them no longer conformed to coverage requirements. If you liked your policy simply because it had low premiums then you'd better not get sick because high co pays, high out of pocket costs and deductibles would very soon put you in the hole and eat up whatever you thought you were saving by insuring yourself on the cheap. Here's a real life example;
Deborah Cavallaro was all over the news on Wednesday as an example of someone who lost her existing health insurance thanks to Obamacare. Except one problem -- the plan she qualifies for is better. Under her current plan, she is limited to two doctor visits a year, pays $293 a month with a yearly deductible of $5,000. Cavallaro says she was told by her insurance broker she would be paying $478 a month -- but she didn’t check the website herself. There, she would have found a better plan, with only a $2,000 deductible and all doctor visits covered by a copay...for only $40 more a month.
Jamie Court, the president of Consumer Watchdog, said major health insurance companies are simply taking advantage of the confusion surrounding the new health care law to engage in price gouging.
“This is not the fault of the Affordable Care Act or President Obama. This is the fault of the insurance company. This is a handful of insurance companies that have convinced a very gullible state agency, Covered California, to allow them to drop plans that could very easily…with a few little tweaks… be compliant under the Affordable Care Act, and people wouldn’t have to leave their plans.”
Mr Lib

United States

#1018543 Nov 5, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
...but, unlike the federal government, states are required to balance their budgets, in a business-like manner
You're dreaming, pal.

Try to build rebuttals based on fact, not the whims of your imagination.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#1018544 Nov 5, 2013
Blind follower who can't be intellectually honest (blamer):
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Well Carol, that's an example of lazy "journalism" on the part of your so called "liberal" media. The ACA raised standards on policies and many of them no longer conformed to coverage requirements. If you liked your policy simply because it had low premiums then you'd better not get sick because high co pays, high out of pocket costs and deductibles would very soon put you in the hole and eat up whatever you thought you were saving by insuring yourself on the cheap. Here's a real life example;
Deborah Cavallaro was all over the news on Wednesday as an example of someone who lost her existing health insurance thanks to Obamacare. Except one problem -- the plan she qualifies for is better. Under her current plan, she is limited to two doctor visits a year, pays $293 a month with a yearly deductible of $5,000. Cavallaro says she was told by her insurance broker she would be paying $478 a month -- but she didn’t check the website herself. There, she would have found a better plan, with only a $2,000 deductible and all doctor visits covered by a copay...for only $40 more a month.
Jamie Court, the president of Consumer Watchdog, said major health insurance companies are simply taking advantage of the confusion surrounding the new health care law to engage in price gouging.
“This is not the fault of the Affordable Care Act or President Obama. This is the fault of the insurance company. This is a handful of insurance companies that have convinced a very gullible state agency, Covered California, to allow them to drop plans that could very easily…with a few little tweaks… be compliant under the Affordable Care Act, and people wouldn’t have to leave their plans.”
<clueless>
Mr Lib

United States

#1018545 Nov 5, 2013
ah verkligen wrote:
<quoted text>Mr. Ad-Lib thinks all democrat failures are republicans fault.
People like you are divorced from reality.

In case you forgot, there was a president named GW Bush in office for eight years before Obama came along.

You know, the guy who left behind two unfinished wars, doubled the national deficit to 11.4 trillion and left the country in recession.

But that doesn't register with boneheads like you.

So just sit in the corner with your hands over your eyes while screaming endlessly "Obama did it! Obama did it!"

It's what rightwing cretins do.

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#1018546 Nov 5, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
...but, unlike the federal government, states are required to balance their budgets, in a business-like manner
Many balance that budget by borrowing money.
PDUPONT

Chicopee, MA

#1018547 Nov 5, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Other studies disagree with you.
Many of us were disciplined with a ruler, switch or flyswatter and knew its distinction from abuse.
Differing on how best to discipline children is one thing. Ignoring discipline altogether is another.
That is what's happening today.
Whether the consequences for bad behavior is a spanking or another effective method, children are fine if they understand they are loved - and each child is different.
There'd have to be proof the child who killed his teacher was raised in an abusive - or a permissive - home.
Both are fringe ends of the discipline spectrum.
The happy medium is somewhere in the middle.
What other studies Carol? How about coming up with some? Or even one? There aren't any that show any positive effects of corporal punishment.
Physical punishment models aggression for children. According to Lynn Namka, EdD, physical punishment engenders more aggression in the child, even if it initially appears to stop the behavior. Children cannot always understand the difference between unacceptable physical aggression for which they get punished, such as hitting and shoving, and the physical aggression they receive as punishment. Corporal punishment can lead to increased aggression for kids in school, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Physical punishment has an impact on cognitive development. A 1998 study by Murray A. Straus and Mallie J. Paschall, titled &quot;Corporal Punishment by Mothers and Child's Cognitive Development,&quot; revealed that children who were spanked were less able to keep up with the cognitive development level expected for their age. It can even lower their IQ, notes Psychology Today. Spanking can reduce a child's brain's grey matter, which is a crucial since it influences learning abilities.
Adolescents who receive physical punishment are three times more likely to grow up to abuse their own children, according to . The study by Straus found that 7 percent of never-spanked adolescents grow up to abuse their children, compared to 24 percent of those who were spanked. Spanking teaches children that it's okay to hurt people and this can lead them to believe you solve problems by hitting. These children may continue this way of thinking into adulthood, causing them to hit their spouse or children. It should be noted, however, that the vast majority of people, whether or not they received physical punishment, are unlikely to abuse their children.

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#1018548 Nov 5, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
very few teachers ever quit the best job they could ever hope to have...
Teaching done properly is hard work with long hours. Most teachers are good teachers.
Mr Lib

United States

#1018549 Nov 5, 2013
ah verkligen wrote:
Typical libtard....your statement gets proven false,
http://www.topix.com/forum/afam/TI79GCO8VK9QA...
<quoted text>
so you change it.
<quoted text>
LOL!!!
You're still wrong,...dopey.
Sorry, Elephant.

Introducing a few hair-splitting exceptions to the argument which do not represent the norm does not refute me.

Surely you must have something in that big bag of tricks besides peanuts.

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#1018550 Nov 5, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>O'bamaliarcare is the greatest intrusion into the private lives of Americans in our history. And you might recall Thomas Jefferson wrote a little document detailing the intrusive nature of government, which established the United States of America.
The only people being assaulted are the Americans that believe the government owes them their life style. Democrats hate personal responsibility, get these losers off their dead asses.
What a crock.

The majority of Americans will continue to get insurance the way they always ave.

Those who buy as individuals will save money in the exchanges.

More people were intruded upon why the economic mess left by your buddy George W Bush.

As you cry about millions losing insurance (to get new policies), million lost their jobs (no new jobs available), lost their life's savings, lost their homes.

You people are just plain dumber than sh*t.
Mr Lib

United States

#1018551 Nov 5, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Many balance that budget by borrowing money.
WHAT?!!!

Republicans borrow money instead of balancing the budget?

Why that's unthinkable!

(choke, choke)

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#1018552 Nov 5, 2013
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
See the great asbestos rip off, the biggest swindle and fraud in American history, the trial lawyers are still milking that.
So, a corporation selling a product they know is harmful without any products warnings s OK?

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#1018553 Nov 5, 2013
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
Food stamps, welfare, section 8 and an Obamaphone.
No food stamps, no welfare, I own my home, no free phone.

Yes, right whiners, it is possible not be on any government programs & not be a selfish f*ck & believe these programs should exit to help those in need.
Mr Lib

United States

#1018554 Nov 5, 2013
All that borrowing under Reagan and the two Bushies.

Wait... it really wasn't borrowing.

My Republican spinsters are working on this.

You know... borrowing can have two meanings.
Grampy

South Windsor, CT

#1018555 Nov 5, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
So, a corporation selling a product they know is harmful without any products warnings s OK?
I didn't see you complaining when the DNC sold you suckers Obama without a warning.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 3 hr duded5 33,093
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 3 hr Truth is might 314,346
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) Tue Eagle 12 258,469
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) May 16 Patriot 11,170
Penn State University & State College May 12 Truechange 1
I got my loan from [email protected] (Jun '13) Apr '17 GLOBAL FUNDING SO... 43
How to Recover Deleted or lost Contacts from Sa... (Dec '14) Apr '17 DelucaKoehn 11
More from around the web