Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1262028 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#998841 Oct 9, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>IN 1943??? who the hell had insurance?
Loyts of Americans did in 1943.

If you weren't so dumb, you'd know that.

This is as stupid as your statement that there is no such thing as preventative medicine.

Or your Christian Zionist bullshit.

You spew worthless foam from the mouth 24/7.

El Paso, TX

#998842 Oct 9, 2013
How disgusting to hear Liberals/Democrats calling these Illegals’ Brave!! Every American should be offended and outrage that our Vets were denied while Illegals were given access to the National Mall that’s the Outrage!! These Cowards hiding behind our Constitution protecting their Rights isn’t Bravery!!

Fishers, IN

#998843 Oct 9, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
Obama is just about at the same place with his job approval as Bush was in October 2005.
How quickly the tides turn.
President Bush will leave office as one of the most unpopular departing presidents in history, according to a new CBS News/New York Times poll showing Mr. Bush's final approval rating at 22 percent.

Seventy-three percent say they disapprove of the way Mr. Bush has handled his job as president over the last eight years.

Mr. Bush's final approval rating is the lowest final rating for an outgoing president since Gallup began asking about presidential approval more than 70 years ago.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#998844 Oct 9, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text> you never started, did you? Now that's lame.
Hey Wilhelm (Grey Ghost)!

As Flack just pointed out, you forgot to use your VPN so instead of posting from Hawaii, it showed you posting from San Jose, CA, lame old libtard Socialist.

What's wrong, kids booted you out of Bumpass because they were tired of you mooching off them?


Here's your post:

Are you going to try and weasel out of this like you did when you were busted as Wilhelm from Germany when you screwed up then too?


It's obvious you libtards use several socks each. Lily does the same thing.

There's likely only three of you retards total and the rest are your socks.


New York, NY

#998845 Oct 9, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
Obama is just about at the same place with his job approval as Bush was in October 2005.
How quickly the tides turn.
And that is with many in the media still worshipping Obama. Although, that is changing.

Remarkably, Mediate has reported that, for "the first time in memory," yesterday's presidential press conference contained no questions from a television reporter. Seems press that there's an effort underway to "punish" those who aren't friendly enough toward the White House:

Perhaps coincidentally, the very same Jay Carney has been clashing with some TV reporters recently, and making unsubtle suggestions about their objectivity. A cynical person might think that the decision to skip all of the TV reporters was designed to avoid possible criticism that certain reporters were being snubbed.

Also perhaps coincidentally, the President himself has been outspoken about his displeasure with the media narrative that “both sides” are responsible for the current government shutdown and default crises.

Pretty amazing that this White House throws a snit fit about having to endure the kind of media skepticism that the GOP confronts on a routine basis, isn't it?

In the end, the hand-picked lapdog questions resulted in a media performance that was -- as Brit Hume described it to Hugh Hewitt -- "one of the saddest things I’ve ever seen. It was just pathetic."

It's worth asking: Why is the President so afraid of the tough questions?

Gering, NE

#998846 Oct 9, 2013
23 Democrats voted with Republicans today to begin reopening government.

Rep Stockman


Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#998847 Oct 9, 2013
Voluntarist wrote:
<quoted text>
What is the point of having a debt ceiling if you keep increasing the limit?
Oh hell don't ask him that. He will say we should get rid of the debt ceiling instead of staying under it. That's all those fools in D.C. need is an open end credit line.

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#998848 Oct 9, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
ouch. That's gonna leave a mark.
Who cares what Obama's rating is, he isn't ever going to run for anything again.
On the other hand, your teabaggers and their friends are going to be held accountable by the thousands of lives they have affected. Most of America isn't as gullible as you.
The good news is that morons like you are going to help rid America of teabagger vermin.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#998849 Oct 9, 2013
Mental case is back again. Must have been fired from the last job too.
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Loyts of Americans did in 1943.
If you weren't so dumb, you'd know that.
This is as stupid as your statement that there is no such thing as preventative medicine.
Or your Christian Zionist bullshit.
You spew worthless foam from the mouth 24/7.

Pittsboro, NC

#998850 Oct 9, 2013
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>
Great analogy, retard!! You should hire yourself out to the carnival. "Bobo the dog-faced sheboy" rides again...
Is every republican crazy?

The Nation: Yes!

That's why we voted for OBAMACARE!

Take Ted Cruz back to his mommy's vagggggggg!

Tell those non USA socialized medicine Dr.'s who delivered him, to shove him back up there!





we voted for OBAMACARE!

provided by Blue Cross. On sale now!

The majority has spoken loudly!

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#998851 Oct 9, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>QUOTE who="usasince1680" <quoted text>
I agree and am compelled to add that the problem with the poor today is
"handouts" - both public and private.
I grew up poor. My parents were too proud to accept any public assistance.
Sometimes we had nothing to eat but potatoes and oatmeal. We bought
day-old bread and picked left-over vegetables from the fields after
the harvest.
We made cardboard cutouts to fill the holes in our shoes. We brought out the
kettles when it rained through the roof and every year my Christmas gift was a
pair of warm pajamas that would have to last all year. No one gave us anything,
we did not ask for anything and we appreciated everything we had. And this
was the 50's - not during the recession.
I learned very early on that this was not the life for me and, because
my parents
were poor, it was (and is) extremely easy to get scholarships and
grants for college.
I did not marry until after college and waited until we were
financially secure before starting a family. Financial security was
and is very important to me.
Today's poor are provided with free food, new clothes, new shoes and
toys at Christmas. What incentive do they have to escape their
I guess my husband and I are considered "wealthy" and we happily share that
wealth but we never give to an organization that provides handouts to the poor
(other than homeless shelters). To do so, in my opinion, is to
encourage laziness
and dependency. People have got to stop feeling sorry for the poor!
*AND YET USAsincepoorsville starved but she had insurance. ROTFLMAO.
You fit the profile.

A very old person, collecting Social Security and Medicare, your socialism is ok. Cardboard in your shoes in th e1950's??

Did you just finish reading "The Grapes of Wrath"?? Wrong era.

But to hell with the rest of America.

You're a liar and a traitor. Move to your Zionist heaven.

I hear they have socialized medicine there!! LOL

Or is that why you won't move to Israel, because it is a socialist form of Government??

Either way, you're a loser.

El Paso, TX

#998852 Oct 9, 2013
Another Liberal Stunt ‘Eight Democrats arrested at pro-amnesty rally on ‘closed’ National Mall pretty pathetic!!

Gering, NE

#998853 Oct 9, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Loyts of Americans did in 1943.
If you weren't so dumb, you'd know that.
This is as stupid as your statement that there is no such thing as preventative medicine.
Or your Christian Zionist bullshit.
You spew worthless foam from the mouth 24/7.
Including families who failed to provide their kids with adequate food and clothing.


Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#998855 Oct 9, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> Actually, the highest handicap for men is 36.4. Or about two strokes per hole.
How many strokes you would get would depend on your handicap & Course rating.
To calculate your handicap you take your last twenty 18 hole scores (noting the maximum stroke per hole rules) & take the top ten. You then average those scores & your handicap is 80% of that average.
Years ago I wrote a program for the local CC to keep tabs of members' handicaps.
The golf pros around here will not do a handicap for a golfer until/unless they can shoot under 54 over par repeatedly. That's 3 strokes over par per hole.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#998856 Oct 9, 2013
Republicans ..."it's not about the people. It's about winning."


Fishers, IN

#998857 Oct 9, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, really?
Then why did you cry cite a source when I posted Obama approval at 37% from the article?
It is time for you to stop trying to justify this. What was petty nonsense on your part now has inflated into total idiocy on your part. A self-inflicted wound.
did i not say 'no matter'?

you're not going to catch me out on this. give it up. i knew full well what i was posting. you're just whining because i took the shine off of 37%.

but let's put that 37% in perspective....

48% approve. 46% disapprove.

and yes, i meant to post that.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#998858 Oct 9, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
but you will admit that that poll shows that republicans are taking most of the blame?
or if not, then why pay attention to any of it?
I just think its funny how you guys pick and choose when polls are important.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#998859 Oct 9, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
This was predicted by Glen Beck immediately after the 2008 election.
October 8, 2013
A highly troubling “urgent bulletin” issued earlier today by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) states that it has received information from the Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) warning to expect a“radical change” in the government of the United States, possibly within the next fortnight, based on information they have received from “highly placed” sources within the Pentagon.
According to this MoFA bulletin, GRU intelligence assests were notified by their Pentagon counterparts this past week that President Barack Obama is preparing to invoke the powers given to him under 50 USC Chapter 13 to hold that various American States are now in a “state of insurrection” thus allowing him to invoke the National Emergencies Act under 50 USC § 1621 and invoke the highly controversial“continuity of government” plan for the United States allowing him, in essence, to rule with supreme powers.
Specifically, this bulletin says, Obama will invoke 50 USC § 212 that states:“ the President shall have declared by proclamation that the laws of the United States are opposed, and the execution thereof obstructed, by combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings”
The specific laws being opposed by these “combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings,” that Obama will outline in his reasoning’s for declaring a state of emergency, this bulletin continues, are the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), otherwise known as Obamacare...
Glenn Beck!!

He's as batshyt crazy as are you.

How are the ghosts in your TV doing today?? Still talking to them??

They tell you any more good ghost stories??

Fishers, IN

#998860 Oct 9, 2013
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Obama's job performance. Forty-nine percent (49%) disapprove.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#998861 Oct 9, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
http://truthchannel.wordpress. com/2013/10/08/urgent-warning- pentagon-warns-to-expect-radic al-change-in-us-government-soo n/
"The NDAA is opposed by many US States, this bulletin says, with California joining Alaska and Virginia this past week in passing a law making it illegal to be enforced in their territory, and with many other States, also, preparing to do the same.
"The specific portions of the NDAA law being opposed by these US States allows for the indefinite detention without charges or trial of all American citizens and allows for their assassination should Obama order it.
"The PPACA (Obamacare) law is, likewise, opposed by over half of the US States and has led to an American “shutdown” this past week that has closed 15% of their government, but has left fully 85% of it still open."
Here's the bottom line:
The Democrats demand government control of everything. For this, they need to eliminate any controls (the Constitution) on their government. This requires unlimited spending, which Congress is an obstacle to that.
The government is obviously too large.
85 percent of the Obama government isn't enough to satisfy the Democrats. It's all or nothing.
The Democrats intend to destroy this country if they can't get what they want... which is actually the elimination of the constitutional republic.
In short, the Democrats are about to declare war on the American people, and slaughter them wholesale.
This has always been the plan. The massive arms buildup in the DHS whould have made that obvious. Putting the Muslim Brotherhood in top level positions in the DHS whould have made this doubly obvious.
"Wordpress" Home of the right wingnut lunatics.

You folks are all batshyt crazy.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 42 min stewart scott 29,846
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 43 min John-K 310,312
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 3 hr Eagle 12 244,720
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 11 hr RiccardoFire 201,851
News San Diego State basketball: Four-star prospect ... Jul 25 Fart news 2
The Email Address Debacle: Did Hillary Do Somet... Jul 25 xxxrayted 1,714
News 3 Arkansas players arrested on forgery complaint Jul 23 Fart news 2
More from around the web