Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
Whatever

Gering, NE

#912917 May 27, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Like that's a special gift??:>
All Jason does is come here to lie. He's like Emaam.
All you need do is look for a post from 'whatever','or so it goes', or any of his many names.
I do not know who Jason is -you moron!

You were the idiot that brought up why the Obama admin had a secret mission in Benghazi? Your dull brain somehow thought this would absolve the Obama admin from responsibility and now you want to whine like the little girl you are that no one should question what they were doing.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#912918 May 27, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>Yeah, right, "friendly government"? The Quadhafi regime was public enemy #1 for Ronald Reagan's war on terror. You don't remember or care about Pan Am Flight 103 blown up over Lockerbie, Scotland by Quadhafi's Libyan terrorist murderers.
Absolutely. But Gaddafi renounced terrorism and was no longer a problem for the US.

Sure, Gaddafi was a bad guy, but a tamed tiger.

Now we have a radical Islamist government that murders Americans while Obama...where was Obama?

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#912919 May 27, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
You realize that the attack stated between 3 & 4 PM DC time, right?? I mean, you do know about time zones?
Republicans wanted to spend less on security & then have a fit about not enough security.
Republicans never complained about the lack of funds that made it more difficult to impossible to enhance our embassy security before Benghazi happened , but it sure came crashing down on them later. That's why Republicans had to seek in vain for a 'scapegoat' to hide the brutal consequences of their incompetence.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#912920 May 27, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Another poster was right. All you are wanting is a pissing match no matter how stupid it makes you sound.
You are lacking a link--moron- after you lectured me.
"WASHINGTON (CNN)-- Former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger was sentenced Thursday to community service and probation and fined $50,000 for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroying some of them."
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/08/berger...
That is clear enough for even you!
The National Archive staff stated he took five copies of the document.
Why would he need to take more than one copy of a 15-30 page memo? Why would he find it necessary to take five copies of the same document?
Did you miss the fact that he was charged with destroying classified documents.
He later returned two of the five documents and admitted to destroying three copies of the document.
The reason there was more than one copy of the document was hand written notes etc on the documents that made them unique.
"In April 2005, Berger pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material from the National Archives in Washington. According to the lead prosecutor in the case Berger only took copies of classified information and no original material was destroyed."

Note: That was what the PROSECUTOR said, kind of destroys your and Carol's digging into ancient history.

----------

You said he took ALL copies.

You fail to prove that with any evidence.

I've got a prosecutor saying no original information was destroyed.

You've got nothing but your own conspiracy stupidity.

That makes you a liar, Jason.

Nice try to weasel out of it, but that's all you are, a lying weasel.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#912921 May 27, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
You realize that the attack stated between 3 & 4 PM DC time, right?? I mean, you do know about time zones?
Republicans wanted to spend less on security & then have a fit about not enough security.
You still won't give up on the fact that the Obama admin failed to provide security and it had nothing to do with funding.
What difference does funding make if an admin decides not to provide security?

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#912922 May 27, 2013
Time for a Memorial Day pic-a-nic.

You friendless right wingers can continue to spread stupidity and lies.

Mopst of us will be enjoying the holiday.

Carol can come back out of hiding and continue her Holiday lie-a-thon.

S'long, losers!!

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#912923 May 27, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>Proud of my Country/Ashamed of Republicans https://www.facebook.com/photo.php...
You should be ashamed of those democrats, IMAO

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#912924 May 27, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Another poster was right. All you are wanting is a pissing match no matter how stupid it makes you sound.
You are lacking a link--moron- after you lectured me.
"WASHINGTON (CNN)-- Former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger was sentenced Thursday to community service and probation and fined $50,000 for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroying some of them."
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/08/berger...
That is clear enough for even you!
The National Archive staff stated he took five copies of the document.
Why would he need to take more than one copy of a 15-30 page memo? Why would he find it necessary to take five copies of the same document?
Did you miss the fact that he was charged with destroying classified documents.
He later returned two of the five documents and admitted to destroying three copies of the document.
The reason there was more than one copy of the document was hand written notes etc on the documents that made them unique.
Look at yourself! You're complaining about 'Nucluaroption''lookng for a pizziing match while you are leaking all over yourself from your unzipped pants.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#912925 May 27, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> Republicans never complained about the lack of funds that made it more difficult to impossible to enhance our embassy security before Benghazi happened , but it sure came crashing down on them later. That's why Republicans had to seek in vain for a 'scapegoat' to hide the brutal consequences of their incompetence.
AGAIN, the person in charge of embassy security denied lack of funding was the reason for their failure to provide adequate security.

There is no way that can be twisted to say anything else.

You are looking a little dull for your repeated denials of this.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#912926 May 27, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
"In April 2005, Berger pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material from the National Archives in Washington. According to the lead prosecutor in the case Berger only took copies of classified information and no original material was destroyed."
Note: That was what the PROSECUTOR said, kind of destroys your and Carol's digging into ancient history.
----------
You said he took ALL copies.
You fail to prove that with any evidence.
I've got a prosecutor saying no original information was destroyed.
You've got nothing but your own conspiracy stupidity.
That makes you a liar, Jason.
Nice try to weasel out of it, but that's all you are, a lying weasel.
YOU HAVE GOT SQUAT-where is your link.

Second time you failed to post one!
proud2bwhite

Addison, IL

#912927 May 27, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Spreading more old lies again, you racist puke.
That is rated a 'pants on fire' lie.
""Obama's Law License Revoked
The hoax that Barack and Michelle Obama had their law license revoked has been around for several years. It usually entails a claim that it was revoked due to disciplinary proceedings and gives a link to some obscure blog as proof and for good measure a link to the front page of the Illinois Attorney Registration And Disciplinary Committee.
This has been making the rounds again all over Facebook, Twitter and E-mail.
The truth of the matter is this:
Neither Obamas have an active license, they were voluntarily retired. Despite the claim that Michelle was forced to surrender her license due to "insurance fraud", neither Michelle nor Barack were ever suspected of any wrongdoing and have not undergone any disciplinary action.
Obama placed his license in "inactive" status when he decided to run for president and after he won he had it retired. According the ARDC it is a fairly common practice to retire your licence if you no longer intend to practice law. A 2011 ARDC report shows that 12% of the states registered attorneys were placed in "inactive" status.
So please, stop spreading this lie. Even if you don't like Obama it is still no reason to propagate such a blatant lie."
----------
Still following Rmoney's 'we don't need facts' campaign.
We see how it worked for him.
You racist Pieces of Dung can always be relied on to spread lies.
You've done it for the 4+ years Obama has been President.
you're correct on one point the rest is your normal ignorance showing. Obamas license has not yet been revoked and is only being held inactive by a court which she did surrender it to. I would wonder why someone who did nothing wrong would give up what thay work so long to achieve. Maybe its that she didn't think she would need it any longer seeing she believes she is above the law or maybe its just a law licenes is not required to tell people what they are allowed to eat.

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#912928 May 27, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Absolutely. But Gaddafi renounced terrorism and was no longer a problem for the US.
Sure, Gaddafi was a bad guy, but a tamed tiger.
Now we have a radical Islamist government that murders Americans while Obama...where was Obama?
Quadhafi never 'renounced' terrorism. He was forced to turn from attacks on the world to attacks on his own people. Turning your attention to another object of your hatred is not renouncing it.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#912929 May 27, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
You again prove your stupidity. Here's some reality to prove your fantasies are nothing but that.
----------
"Dawn Nguyen was arrested Friday and faces federal charge of knowingly making a false statement for signing a form indicating she would be the legal owner of the gun she allegedly purchased for William Spengler, who murdered two firefighters during a shooting spree in Webster, N.Y.
U.S. Attorney William Hochul said Nguyen bought the two guns on June 6, 2010, on behalf of Spengler. Police used the serial numbers on the guns to trace them to Nguyen.
"She told the seller of these guns, Gander Mountain in Henrietta, N.Y., that she was to be the true owner and buyer of the guns instead of William Spengler," Hochul said. "It is absolutely against federal law to provide any materially false information related to the acquisition of firearms."
During an interview late on Christmas Eve, she told police she had bought the guns for personal protection and that they were stolen from her vehicle, though she never reported the guns stolen. The day after the shootings, Nguyen texted an off-duty Monroe County Sheriff's deputy with references to the killings. She later called the deputy and admitted she bought the guns for Spengler, police said Friday."
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/straw-buy...
----------
Background checks like NY uses would catch criminals who buy guns and sell them to other criminals.
Congrats. Once again you've proven what an idiot you are.
We all knew it all along.
So you know dawn well enough to know a background check would have prevented the sale? Lmao!
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#912931 May 27, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Like that's a special gift??:>
All Jason does is come here to lie. He's like Emaam.
All you need do is look for a post from 'whatever','or so it goes', or any of his many names.
The turd is going all day and all night with troll games lately__so is Carol and a few others.

Eman's a jurgoff__always has been.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#912932 May 27, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> Quadhafi never 'renounced' terrorism. He was forced to turn from attacks on the world to attacks on his own people. Turning your attention to another object of your hatred is not renouncing it.
Obama had no business interfering in a civil war in Libya by arming radical Islamist terrorists.

Four Americans paid the price in Benghazi while Obama did...whatever he was doing.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#912933 May 27, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> Look at yourself! You're complaining about 'Nucluaroption''lookng for a pizziing match while you are leaking all over yourself from your unzipped pants.
You supporting Nuk's idiocy and rants does not speak well of you.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#912934 May 27, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
As already stated by another poster, one of the individuals involved stated it was their mission to gather these weapons.
But carry on with your beer induced denials.
What was that fellers name???
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#912935 May 27, 2013
When Lois Lerner is back before Congress, will she squeal or go to jail?

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#912936 May 27, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
AGAIN, the person in charge of embassy security denied lack of funding was the reason for their failure to provide adequate security.
There is no way that can be twisted to say anything else.
You are looking a little dull for your repeated denials of this.
How daffy are you. If you don't have the money--the embassy security accounts were defunded by the republicans as part of the deal to agree to raise the debt ceiling --you don't have it to deliver . Under Ronald Reagan , a Democrat-controlled Congress voted to raise the debt ceiling 17 times to fund Reagan's programs, but a republican controlled Congress can't raise the deby ceiling ONCE without demanding cuts to embassy security accounts that could have saved our Ambassador and other consulate officials the night of the Benghazi attacks.
proud2bwhite

Addison, IL

#912937 May 27, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> The N.R.A. doesn't care either when they block enforcement of those gun control laws so the N.R.A. are criminal too. Ban them and lock them away in jail too!
ok I have a simple question for you.please try to think befor you answer. What law did the NRA block that woud keep criminals from being criminals?? Please note: criminals are people that don't follow the law.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 22 min Brian_G 307,068
UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 56 min Bruin For Life 28,455
What role do you think humans play in global wa... 1 hr Sgt Prepper 2,736
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 5 hr Rosa_Winkel 233,058
UConn vs. Duke Monday night 9pm ESPN2 10 hr ivyawe 1
Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 16 hr Bently 201,187
How to recover lost data from iPhone/iPad/iPod- (Jan '14) Wed Lora_14 10
More from around the web