Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1563794 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#906943 May 19, 2013
waxywaxturd wrote:
Well, just finished installing a redundant alarm system under my bed to catch all my sockpuppets. Next step is to put a cheap camera/alarm on my hat to catch the sockpuppet who keeps stealing my name. Already did the cafeteria.
That dumb slimey sockpuppet has no clue I'm getting him next time. He's getting fingerprinted for sure next time. Can't wait until the next election when I can get myself arrested.
That will be fun. Justice.
Let us know if you catch a fenrisfag. They are extremely rare because their head up their ass interferes with breeding.

Since: May 11

Waynesboro, PA

#906944 May 19, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>The commander in chief of the American armed forces obama forced a violation of Marine Corps regulations.. not Army or Air Force you stupid fool...
Marine Corps regulation MCO P1020.34F of the Marine Corps Uniform Regulations chapter 3, a male Marine is not allowed to carry an umbrella while in uniform.
God you idiots are dopes and dumb...
Overruled by the regulation involving the President.

Since: Apr 09

Elmont, Long Island NY

#906945 May 19, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>hypocrisy is a moral sin... A sellout Obama bin Lying Slammed For Signing So-Called 'Monsanto Protection Act' you idiot...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/01/obam...
excuse me, but if President Obama signed an act into law, that means it first had to be passed in both houses of Congress. Isn't the House of Representative controlled by the GOP. Which means its a GOP approved bill
care to see who voted for it???

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#906946 May 19, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> So, why is it you have a tissy fit about Obama & the umbrella but not when it occurred i the past?
Afraid to answer that one?
Show where i had a tissy fit. As far as I'm concernrd this is just another example of obamas elitism.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#906947 May 19, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> So, why is it you have a tissy fit about Obama & the umbrella but not when it occurred i the past?
Afraid to answer that one?
We needed to give Dumbass Dave something suitable for his intellectual level?
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#906948 May 19, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
excuse me, but if President Obama signed an act into law, that means it first had to be passed in both houses of Congress. Isn't the House of Representative controlled by the GOP. Which means its a GOP approved bill
care to see who voted for it???
It has already been established you are in idiot and have no credibility, so why are you still here still making a fool out of yourself?
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#906949 May 19, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
So moocher Eed, why does a serviceman holding an umbrella for President Obama different that when it was done in the past??
Now Dave you should know by now that asking old Eed any question more difficult than what day of the week it is causes an overload. That neo-plasma attached to his neck is not functional.
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#906950 May 19, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
What makes Eed a moocher, moron? I'm surprised you forgot to use the race card, dumbfk.
Eed is an admitted MOOCHER, he was way to dumb to know it but he gave himself away more than once. Between his many lies and repeating himself over and over every day saying the very same thing, if he were not so old and feeble, one almost has to feel sorry for him.
Patriot

Longmont, CO

#906951 May 19, 2013
FYI

Friday, May 17, 2013

US Suspends Constitution in Permanent World War on Terror

Two disturbing developments have occurred in the last couple of days that have gone relatively unnoticed compared to the recent Benghazi, IRS, and AP scandals.

First, the senate is debating an expansion of the already broad powers of the 2001 Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF) so the U.S. can essentially engage any area in the world in the war on terror, including America. Which brings us to the second development: the Pentagon has recently granted itself police powers on American soil.

Assistant Secretary of Defense Michael Sheehan told Congress yesterday that the AUMF authorized the US military to operate on a worldwide battlefield from Boston to Pakistan. Sheehan emphasized that the administration is authorized to put boots on the ground wherever the enemy chooses to base themselves, essentially illegally ignoring the declaration of war clause in the US Constitution.

Senator Angus King said this interpretation of the AUMF is a "nullity" to the Constitution because it ignores Congress' role to declare war. King called it the "most astoundingly disturbing hearing" he's been to in the Senate....


http://www.activistpost.com/2013/05/us-suspen...

Anyone opposing this Satanic One World Government/NWO built on lies and "whatever it takes" is classified as a "terrorist"... leading to this: http://biblehub.com/revelation/13-17.htm

http://niv.scripturetext.com/revelation/11.ht...

Remember, we' ve been told beforehand - http://biblehub.com/john/14-29.htm

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#906952 May 19, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
excuse me, but if President Obama signed an act into law, that means it first had to be passed in both houses of Congress. Isn't the House of Representative controlled by the GOP. Which means its a GOP approved bill
care to see who voted for it???
You expect us to believe that you've never heard of presidential "edicts" before?

http://www.westernjournalism.com/a-comprehens...
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#906953 May 19, 2013
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
Now Dave you should know by now that asking old Eed any question more difficult than what day of the week it is causes an overload. That neo-plasma attached to his neck is not functional.
How is your vacation on the East Coast, idiot?

Quite an extended one in Bumpass! Say hi to pope john and Wilhelm from Germany.

Bawaaaahhhhh!

Since: May 11

Waynesboro, PA

#906954 May 19, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
Show where i had a tissy fit. As far as I'm concernrd this is just another example of obamas elitism.
So it is elitism for Obama but not the other Presidents.
That's been you right whiner's b*tch all along. How dare Obama take part in the pomp & ceremony of the White House. Why is that?
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#906955 May 19, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
How is your vacation on the East Coast, idiot?
Quite an extended one in Bumpass! Say hi to pope john and Wilhelm from Germany.
Bawaaaahhhhh!
Far better than your extended stay in your mom's basement moocher. Sorry that I have a life and all of you whiney azzed crybabies dwell on here like it were the wailing wall. I'll be going to my home in the Jefferson National Forest tomorrow, for maybe a month, then i'll be all over the state, wining and dining having a ball. See you in a month or so, at least I always know where to find you losers.

Since: Apr 13

Orlando, FL

#906956 May 19, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> You're daffy. Both the President and Eric Holder have said that the investigation of the intelligence agency that involved getting a warrant to look at AP phone calls to that agency was because the leaks endangered agents in the field and the people responsible for those leaks should be held accountable. "Holder defended the move to collect AP phone records in an effort to hunt down the sources of information for a May 7, 2012, AP story that disclosed details of a CIA operation in Yemen to stop an airliner bombing plot around the anniversary of the killing of terrorist leader Osama bin Laden."
“Other than press reports, we have no knowledge of any attempt by the Justice Department to seek phone records of the AP,” White House press secretary Jay Carney said in a statement.

Carney said the White House had no involvement in the Justice effort.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/n...

So the President of the United States had no knowledge whatsoever of a "very, very serious leak" involving national security?

Sure makes me feel a lot safer. You?

Obama is stuck between that rock and a hard place liberals can't help but get themselves in between.

He can't win for losing on this one.
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#906957 May 19, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
How is your vacation on the East Coast, idiot?
Quite an extended one in Bumpass! Say hi to pope john and Wilhelm from Germany.
Bawaaaahhhhh!
BWAWAWAWAWAW

Since: May 11

Waynesboro, PA

#906958 May 19, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
We needed to give Dumbass Dave something suitable for his intellectual level?
Showing you, Eman, FloriDUH, & moocher Eed to be dumbasses is much too easy. Is there any right whiners out there that can have an honest discussion?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#906959 May 19, 2013
CBS’s Bob Schieffer is fed up with the White House’s talking points concerning what happened at our consulate in Benghazi, Libya, last September.

His impatience continued on Sunday's Face the Nation when Obama senior advisor Dan Pfeiffer gave stock answers to questions about the three crises facing the President leading Schieffer to first accuse his guest of taking "exactly the approach that the Nixon administration took" and finally scolding him by asking, "Why are you here today? Why isn't the White House Chief of Staff here to tell us what happened?"

DAN PFEIFFER, SENIOR WHITE HOUSE ADVISOR: The point that our Chief of Staff is making is that this is the Republican playbook here which is try, when they don't have a positive agenda, try to drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped up hearings and false allegations. We're not going to let that distract us and the President from actually doing the people's work and fighting for the middle class.

BOB SCHIEFFER, HOST: You know, I don’t want to compare this in any way to Watergate. I do not think this is Watergate by any stretch. But you weren't born then I would guess, but I have to tell you that is exactly the approach that the Nixon administration took. They said,“These are all second-rate things. We don't have time for this. We have to devote our time to the people's business.” You’re taking exactly the same line they did.

After Pfeiffer continued with evasive talking points, Schieffer again scolded:

SCHIEFFER: But Mr. Pfeiffer, and I don't mean to be argumentative here, but the President is in charge of the executive branch of the government. It’s my, I'll just make this as an assertion: when the executive branch does things right, there doesn't seem to be any hesitancy of the White House to take credit for that. When Osama bin Laden was killed, the President didn't waste any time getting out there and telling people about it.

But with all of these things, when these things happen, you seem to send out officials many times who don't even seem to know what has happened. And I use as an example of that Susan Rice who had no connection whatsoever to the events that took place in Benghazi, and yet she was sent out, appeared on this broadcast, and other Sunday broadcasts, five days after it happens, and I'm not here to get in an argument with you about who changed which word in the talking points and all that. The bottom line is what she told the American people that day bore no resemblance to what had happened on the ground in an incident where four Americans were killed.

Pfeiffer once again stuck with the Administration line leading Schieffer to further push back:

But what I'm saying to you is that was just PR. That was just a PR plan to send out somebody who didn't know anything about what had happened. Why did you do that? Why didn't the Secretary of State come and tell us what they knew and if he knew nothing say,“We don't know yet?” Why didn't the White House Chief of Staff come out? I mean I would, and I mean this as no disrespect to you, why are you here today? Why isn't the White House Chief of Staff here to tell us what happened?

Fabulous question.

It's pretty obvious that one of the senior members of the press corps is getting tired of the way this Administration evades serious issues. Let's hope more jump on this bandwagon.

Nice job, Bob! Bravo!

Since: Apr 13

Orlando, FL

#906960 May 19, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>I watched part of the hearing.
The GOP members kept trying to make a political point, but kept getting stymied by the responses. It was comical to watch as they continued to get stonewalled in their political shenanigans by the truth.
Speaking of which, if you're going to say the IRS was used as a political tool, bushie took it to the next level and actually imposed that will on others.
Perhaps the "stymied response" came from Holder. He said "I don't know" in various and different ways at least 54 times.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#906961 May 19, 2013
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
Far better than your extended stay in your mom's basement moocher. Sorry that I have a life and all of you whiney azzed crybabies dwell on here like it were the wailing wall. I'll be going to my home in the Jefferson National Forest tomorrow, for maybe a month, then i'll be all over the state, wining and dining having a ball. See you in a month or so, at least I always know where to find you losers.
Lost the house in Lake Elsinore?

Since: Apr 09

Elmont, Long Island NY

#906962 May 19, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
You fascist sleezebals always defend your fuhrur.
"REGULATIONS!!!!!!! prohibit Marines from using umbrellas while in uniform. One reason: it makes it hard to salute."
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/...
Let me guess, you voted for Obama?
Dude put you big mouth where your cash is...

Here is a link to the Marine Corps regs on Uniforms

now use your pea sized brain and find out where it prohibits Marines from holding an umbrella

heck please show me where it prohibits Marines from using one.

rather than read what someone else thinks...try reading the actual reg

BBBBBBBBut no that would mean using actual facts, something you and your teabaggers are loathe to do

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 1 min susanm 315,187
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 12 min Aerobatty 258,464
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) 1 hr Think 11,287
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) Thu Told Pharts 33,405
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Jul 12 New boy 201,878
News Johnny Brown Added To Coaching Staff (Oct '07) Jul 1 Brown Pharts 3
News Tragedy strikes family members of Leasure (Jul '08) Jun '17 Evidence phart 9
More from around the web