Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 326213 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#324545 May 2, 2014
Drifting to sleep wrote:
Like I said, either paid internet lobbyist or some weird dyke.
weird dyke

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#324546 May 3, 2014
hahahaha so this just happened. hahahah

I'm watching a movie on YouTube "Clan of the Cave Bear", and my door opens. I yell down expecting it to be my son (who is at the pub with some friends) asking him how his night was. This strange voice answers back, and it's this really, really drunk guy asking me who I was. I said I live here who are you? He says Jason, and that he's looking for John. I'm like John's next door. He apologizes profusely, and stumbles down the stairs, and goes next door. He fell like twice. The next door neighbor and I have a good laugh. That guy was totally hammered. hahahahahhaha

Someone's waking up with a hangover.

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#324547 May 3, 2014
Dang, I thought for sure that if I made fun of stupid's math, he would have pointed out that I used the wrong 'there'.

I'm slipping in the I have em pegged department.

Damn

I really am bored

“Crybaby men are such a bore”

Since: Mar 14

The wild wild north

#324548 May 3, 2014
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Correct. He doesn't see the correlation between the convenience of a woman having an abortion to avoid a lifetime of the horror of an unwanted pregnancy, conceived by rape, with the convenience of a woman having an abortion to avoid a lifetime of the horror of an unwanted pregnancy conceived due to a broken rubber.
As if one, somehow was less of an unwanted pregnancy than the other.
The anti choice crowd cannot keep a consistent debate intact. Brian proves that his debate is centered around how conception took place and not about the unborn child which he pretends such concern. Those that would deny abortion under any circumstance provides an entire lack of concern for the woman/girl and toss away her rights in the blink of an eye. They cannot win one way or the other, their foundation is shaky.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#324550 May 3, 2014
Drifting to sleep wrote:
What if the woman threatens the boyfriend with abortion, or uses it as a bargaining chip.
Gee, then I guess Mr. "boyfriend" should have kept it in HIS pants -- eh?

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#324551 May 3, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Or, with the same logic - ask any woman who dies during a botched abortion, but what's the point? Right and wrong aren't defined by who you ask.
Best of all, ask your mother; good thing she didn't abort you!
In answer to your first question,'botched abortions' are what you people are clamoring for, since you advocate criminalizing the procedure, and turning qualified personnel who perform them into criminals, leaving the field wide open for back-alley and kitchen table-practitioners. You'd dance in the streets if EVERY abortion killed the woman obtaining one.

In answer to your second, my mother is avidly pro-choice.

Try again?

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#324552 May 3, 2014
Morgana9Rules wrote:
So a clean safe abortion under these circumstances would not be a convenience? You think the rapist is responsible for ""evildoing" " and in effect the women/girl would be granted the right to choose abortion under these circumstances, therefore leaving us to believe that you put no value or give no rights to the "unborn child" considering how it was CONCEIVED....correct??
Life has infinite value; adoption is freedom and abortion is death.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#324553 May 3, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Life has infinite value; adoption is freedom and abortion is death.
We are already free to gestate for the benefit of the infertile, Brian - it's just that we are ALSO free NOT TO.

If adoption is so wonderful, why are there 300,000 UNADOPTABLE kids in state-run facilities, and millions of kids in foster care who aren't getting adopted?

I'll tell you: because picky people don't want to adopt anything but newborns.

Fuck them.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#324554 May 3, 2014
There are waiting lines to adopt newborns. Profanity is no replacement for reason.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#324555 May 3, 2014
I don't think she can abort her boyfriend.
Drifting to sleep wrote:
What if the woman threatens the boyfriend with abortion, or uses it as a bargaining chip.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#324556 May 3, 2014
If you qualify, you can adopt. What you can do is adopt kids who are NOT newborns--or don't they matter? They can fu**ing well WAIT if they want a neonate, or not get one at all.
Brian_G wrote:
There are waiting lines to adopt newborns. Profanity is no replacement for reason.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#324557 May 3, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
There are waiting lines to adopt newborns. Profanity is no replacement for reason.
"There are waiting lines to adopt newborns..."

Yes....as long as they're 'the right color', and have no 'abnormalities', or post-natal drug problems, or biological relatives who might challenge the adoption........those newborns are just SOL....

Profanity is the most appropriate way to deal with idiots like you, who don't understand that women are people...and that a fetus is not a citizen with Constitutional rights.

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#324558 May 3, 2014
Morgana9Rules wrote:
<quoted text>The anti choice crowd cannot keep a consistent debate intact. Brian proves that his debate is centered around how conception took place and not about the unborn child which he pretends such concern. Those that would deny abortion under any circumstance provides an entire lack of concern for the woman/girl and toss away her rights in the blink of an eye. They cannot win one way or the other, their foundation is shaky.
They're all grasping at straws. The undisputable fact is, abortion is legal, and women have choices regarding their pregnancies.

And, because they would like for abortion to be illegal and can do nothing about it, they're pissed.

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#324559 May 3, 2014
Drifting to sleep wrote:
What if the woman threatens the boyfriend with abortion, or uses it as a bargaining chip.
First, learn proper punctuation. Second what about it?

Do endeavor to ask a question with some meaning.
Drifting to sleep

Fairfield, CA

#324560 May 3, 2014
What happens to the milk in a womans tits once she has an abortion?. I heard it causes breast cancer.

“lightly burnt,but still smokin”

Since: Dec 06

in the corner of your mind,

#324561 May 3, 2014
"Brian_G" whined like a little girl
Murdering your unborn child isn't freedom.
==========
well you do have the freedom to MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS!!!!

“Crybaby men are such a bore”

Since: Mar 14

The wild wild north

#324562 May 3, 2014
Drifting to sleep wrote:
What happens to the milk in a womans tits once she has an abortion?. I heard it causes breast cancer.
Really?

Then miscarriage would do the same....don't ya think?

Of course you don't.
NewsYTube

Marietta, GA

#324563 May 3, 2014
.

ANTICHRIST WORLD STAGE ---(News)

http://youtu.be/-SsOwMGssNI

.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#324565 May 3, 2014
Drifting to sleep wrote:
What happens to the milk in a womans tits once she has an abortion?. I heard it causes breast cancer.
Uh, the same thing that happens wheh she has a miscarriage....it dries up, and goes away...if she had ever started lactating in the first place. Most women don't lactate until the fetus is a baby - you know, a BORN one.

Unused milk SO doesn't cause breast cancer. It's supposed to be in there. You do know what the function of breasts is, right?

You really need to stop believing everything you hear - in fact, go look it up in a medical journal.(I'd stay away from so-called 'pro-life' sources, if you want the facts, rather than some bullshit propaganda used to scare women into gestating for your convenience.)

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#324566 May 3, 2014
The vast majority of abortions happen in the 1st trimester, before lactation begins. Nor does breast milk cause cancer.
Drifting to sleep wrote:
What happens to the milk in a womans tits once she has an abortion?. I heard it causes breast cancer.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 24 min VetnorsGate 1,681,964
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 4 hr You are delicious 35,349
Conn's Appliances (Nov '07) 12 hr Sweet 293
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) Tue hojo 12,044
News Horsechief commits to Pacific (Mar '06) Jan 4 NicePhartts 8
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Dec 24 Randy from Wooster 201,884
News Girl Charged After Sending Explicit Selfie: 'I'... Dec 23 Ink Pharted 4
More from around the web