Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 316373 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#323811 Apr 18, 2014
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>I'm not drunk yet, Dewar's is for pus*ies, and if the shoe fits, wear it, Cooty.
You fetus worshipers may think you've got this, but all you've got are your night sweats over women having sex, and your swollen nuts from thinking about it.
Why don't you get some, so you can quit worrying about everyone else's sex life, bud?
Next...
Thrown in the towel huh ? Figures.

Next....

“Troll Be Gone.”

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#323814 Apr 19, 2014
SevenTee wrote:
<quoted text>
They can be charged with Double Murder because two people are dead at the hands of the criminal.
Both people have rights as human beings and need protection under the law against harm.
This fact makes it impossible to defend abortion-murder because the child has a Right to Life and should be protected from an unnecessary killing
Ya know, you can keep repeating this ignorant nonsense over and over again, and it still will nevet be true or factual.

“Troll Be Gone.”

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#323815 Apr 19, 2014
DAVID27 wrote:
<quoted text>
You have to be kidding. This clown really claims he's an attorney ??? And you're buying it ?
Now thats funny coming from a reprobate that what? Mows lawns?

So anyway, since you're such a genius *snicker* with a history of having no effing idea what you're talking about I'm going to point something else out.

Nowhere did Noah say a born person who needed mechanical life support was not a person. That claim is either your dishonest straw man created to cover that you couldn't answer his questions OR you simply did not understand the quesrion because, well, you're just not that bright.

So I am going to reiterate his point to see how you will weasel away from it this time.

You see, per the N. Dakota statute, the born, constitutionally protected pregnant woman is not a person. Per the N. Dakota law, the fetus is also not a person. So if the woman the fetus is located inside of and attached to and without whom a non viable fetus can not exist, per the statute, is NOT a person, the fetus can not be a person. It has NOTHING TO DO WITH whether or not a born person is dependent on machanical life support to exist, ya dummy.

You understand that, right?

And being as you're so smart how could you not understand the fed ex analogy? Perhaps your talent is not logical thinking?

Lol.

“Troll Be Gone.”

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#323818 Apr 19, 2014
DAVID27 wrote:
<quoted text>
WRONG. Whether FHL's or ANY law for that matter, serve as a deterrent at all, is a matter for debate. The primary purpose and undeniable intent of any law is to provide a mechanism by which to punish the perpetrators of crime.
Beyond that, in the case of FHL's YOU above all do not get to determine what the purpose was. For that, before I relied on a partisan dunce like you, I would defer to those who actually wrote and introduced the bill, among those being Senator Lindsey Graham......
"“I believe most Americans want to protect life as much as possible," said Graham.“People who want to turn this into an abortion debate have an irrational view. The purpose of this bill is very simple: Once the woman chooses to have the child and someone takes that child away from her through an assault or an act of violence, WE WANT TO PUT THEM IN JAIL FOR THE DAMAGE DONE TO THE UNBORN CHILD.
ROFLMAO. Lindsey Graham is the perfect example of a partisan dunce.

But his statement proves the law is to protect the woman's choice. How funny a smart guy like you proved Playas & Noahs points for them.

Next.....

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#323819 Apr 19, 2014
DAVID27 wrote:
<quoted text>
Thrown in the towel huh ? Figures.
Next....
You wish we'd just 'throw in the towel', David, but it's not going to happen.

In the face of increasing restrictions on abortions, laws criminalizing miscarriage, State-mandated instrumental rape, comparisons of ladies to livestock, bans on health insurance coverage for contraception, and a dozen other things the right wields against women, we are getting more and more active. We are voting in our own best interests. And we are winning at the judicial level, on dozens of challenges to your so-called 'pro-life' legislation.

If the right-wing religious nuts get their way, women will go back to being a commodity. The 'right' would dearly love to return us to the days when the only currency women had was our virginity and fertility. Get a clue: women are not walking wombs. We are not baby factories. We are not subjects, second-class citizens, or property. We are half the population, and we don't need "daddies" to tell us whether or not to reproduce.

Get over yourself, and crawl back to your cave, Dave.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#323820 Apr 19, 2014
SevenTee wrote:
This is what the Pro-Abortion crowd encourages and wants to happen every single day in this country.
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/philadelphia-abo...
And this is what the so-called 'Pro-life' crowd wants to see in every city, town, and village in America.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_NqhdO5sZ4x4/TO_RZwu...

http://www.worldpopulationbalance.org/sites/d...

http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/C8-uOXVv7nw/hqdefault....

See, once the fetus is born, it still has to eat. But that's not a concern for the so-called 'pro-life'. Because for you mealy mouthed souls, life begins at conception - and ends at birth.

Keep enjoying your abortion porn. Don't worry about children - just continue to worship fetuses. It'll be ok.

“Troll Be Gone.”

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#323821 Apr 19, 2014
Here is yet another glaring failure of your critical thinking skills and abilities to reason.
DAVID27 wrote:
<quoted text>
Not always. Since abortion, as you and others are quick to point out, is merely the termination of pregnancy,
Are you under the impression the fetus continues to exist after a pregnancy is terminated?? Really? So why, pray tell, is abortion such a problem if the fetus isn't terminated during an abortion?
DAVID27 wrote:
<quoted text>
it is possible that a pregnant woman could be abducted and have a viable pre-term fetus surgically removed,
thereby aborting her pregnancy against her will.
Actually, you poor, deluded, feeb, delivering a viable fetus is called BIRTH. BIRTH against her will. Not abortion.
DAVID27 wrote:
<quoted text>
Fetal homicide laws would have no application in that case since no homicide occurred.
Right. So why would you make such an idiotic, irrelevant, comment?

We are discussing fetal homicide laws and that they were created to protect the womans choice to continue a pregnancy. Like abortion laws protect her choice to terminate a pregnancy. We are not discussing the laws that already exist to prohibit the kidnapping and forced birth of a woman against her will.

Did you forget or just think you could baffle us with bullshit?? Or are you just not that bright?

“Troll Be Gone.”

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#323822 Apr 19, 2014
SevenTee wrote:
<quoted text>
Apparently you are the ignorant one, perhaps you need to do your homework before you engage in your political speech
Currently, at least 38 states have fetal homicide laws. The states include: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin. At least 23 states have fetal homicide laws that apply to the earliest stages of pregnancy
And none of them refer to a fetus as a person while they ALL exempt abortion.

So it still proves none of your nonsense to be factual.

And it appears the person commiting the act has to have known the woman was pregnant to be charged. If they didn't know she was pregnant, no homicide.

Do keep trying.

“Troll Be Gone.”

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#323824 Apr 19, 2014
SevenTee wrote:
This is what the Pro-Abortion crowd encourages and wants to happen every single day in this country.
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/philadelphia-abo...
You are simply a deluded lunatic. GFY.

“Troll Be Gone.”

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#323825 Apr 19, 2014
SevenTee wrote:
<quoted text>
The most mean spirited, inhuman Pro-Abortion person is the RACIST Black and Hispanic Eugenics and Population Control type (like this poster). They will post a picture of a famished, war towrn African country then claim the answer is to wipe them out. Why not just nuke the entire area? The origin of thought from these sickos comes from Planned Parenthood. Here is an exert from the racist bigoted Planned Parenthood founder......
Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as "unfit," a plan she said would be the "salvation of American civilization.: And she also spike of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among whom she included those " whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers." She further contended that "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped." That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered "unfit" cannot be easily refuted.
While Planned Parenthood's current apologists try to place some distance between the eugenics and birth control movements, history definitively says otherwise. The eugenic theme figured prominently in the Birth Control Review, which Sanger founded in 1917. She published such articles as "Some Moral Aspects of Eugenics" (June 1920), "The Eugenic Conscience" (February 1921), "The purpose of Eugenics" (December 1924), "Birth Control and Positive Eugenics" (July 1925), "Birth Control: The True Eugenics" (August 1928), and many others.
^^^^ Complete lies. Anti choice propaganda.

“Troll Be Gone.”

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#323826 Apr 19, 2014

“Troll Be Gone.”

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#323827 Apr 19, 2014
Margaret Sanger was not a racist, an anti-Semite, or a eugenicist. Eugenicists, like the Nazis, were opposed to the use of abortion and contraception by healthy and “fit” women (Grossmann, 1995). In fact, Sanger’s books were among the very first burned by the Nazis in their campaign against family planning (“Sanger on Exhibit,” 1999/2000). Sanger actually helped several Jewish women and men and others escape the Nazi regime in Germany (“Margaret Sanger and the ‘Refugee Department’,” 1993). 

“Troll Be Gone.”

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#323828 Apr 19, 2014
Sanger’s disagreement with the eugenicists of her day is clear from her remarks in The Birth Control Review of February 1919:Eugenists imply or insist that a woman’s first duty is to the state; we contend that her duty to herself is her first duty to the state. We maintain that a woman possessing an adequate knowledge of her reproductive functions is the best judge of the time and conditions under which her child should be brought into the world. We further maintain that it is her right, regardless of all other considerations, to determine whether she shall bear children or not, and how many children she shall bear if she chooses to become a mother (1919a).

“Troll Be Gone.”

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#323829 Apr 19, 2014
Sanger’s Outreach to the African-American CommunityIn 1930, Sanger opened a family planning clinic in Harlem that sought to enlist support for contraceptive use and to bring the benefits of family planning to women who were denied access to their city’s health and social services. Staffed by a black physician and black social worker, the clinic was endorsed by The Amsterdam News (the powerful local newspaper), the Abyssinian Baptist Church, the Urban League, and the black community’s elder statesman, W.E.B. DuBois.Beginning in 1939, DuBois also served on the advisory council for Sanger’s “Negro Project,” which was a “unique experiment in race-building and humanitarian service to a race subjected to discrimination, hardship, and segregation”(Chesler, 1992). The Negro Project served African-Americans in the rural South. Other leaders of the African-American community who were involved in the project included Mary McLeod Bethune, founder of the National Council of Negro Women, and Adam Clayton Powell Jr., pastor of the Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem.
maryann

Ardsley, NY

#323830 Apr 19, 2014
Prodeathers are filled with anger and hate. Satan,their Master,plays them. He is laughing at you because he knows you are allowing him to destroy your soul. He doesnt want you in heaven with your creator who loves you.

Tsk!!! Youve chosen your master of darkness. His true agenda will be exposed when you die. OPEN YOUR HEARTS TO THE TRUTH BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.

“Troll Be Gone.”

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#323831 Apr 19, 2014
SevenTee wrote:
<quoted text>
The most mean spirited, inhuman Pro-Abortion person is the RACIST Black and Hispanic Eugenics and Population Control type (like this poster). They will post a picture of a famished, war towrn African country then claim the answer is to wipe them out. Why not just nuke the entire area? The origin of thought from these sickos comes from Planned Parenthood.
You are absolutely insane. That you make such outrageously moronic posts shows you are just another sick troll who needs to get a life.

You're DISMISSED, ya squirrelly fnck.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#323833 Apr 19, 2014
maryann wrote:
Pro-birthers are filled with anger and hate. Satan,their Master,plays them. He is laughing at you because he knows you are allowing him to destroy your soul. He doesnt want you in heaven with your creator who loves you.
Tsk!!! Youve chosen your master of darkness. His true agenda will be exposed when you die. OPEN YOUR HEARTS TO THE TRUTH BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.
Fixed it for you.

You're welcome.

Next....

“Troll Be Gone.”

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#323834 Apr 19, 2014
SevenTee wrote:
<quoted text>
In Racist Margaret Sanger's own words:
Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12.
We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.
This is a DIRECT QUOTE.....from this point on if you support and defend this Sanger you are by definition a hard core RACIST. I am almost positive from reading your posts that you are a KKK hater without the haloween suit
You are exactly the idiot she was concerned would think that by teaching birth control in black communities she was trying to exterminate the negro population, you freaking loon. Thanks for proving her point still valid in 2014.

Smh.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#323835 Apr 19, 2014
SevenTee wrote:
<quoted text>
The most mean spirited, inhuman Pro-Abortion person is .....
You - apparently.

You have no interest in lessening abortions - you just want to see them criminalized. You just want to see them unregulated, as a result of the fact that they are illegal. You just want millions of women to give birth at YOUR convenience, rather than our own. You just want us to 'keep our legs shut'.

You want just as much control over reproduction, as you claim Margaret Sanger did. Only difference is, which end of the spectrum you prefer.

See, you're not 'pro-life' at all - you're 'pro-what-you-want-for-YOUR-li fe'. And you would rather see the population explode with kids whose PARENTS don't want, or can't afford them, than allow women to make our own individual decisions of whether or not to facilitate that.

I'm ALL FOR population control - ON AN INDIVIDUAL LEVEL.

You want to see all the children on earth covered with flies...at least they'll be alive, eh?

Next....

“Troll Be Gone.”

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#323836 Apr 19, 2014
http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/

Margaret Sangers writings and speeches in their original context. Not cherry picked by misogynistic lunatics for their anti American propaganda.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 10 min Homer 1,582,159
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 20 hr Nice Phartez 33,676
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) Aug 14 Into The Night 11,335
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) Jul 27 Aerobatty 258,484
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Jul '17 New boy 201,878
News Johnny Brown Added To Coaching Staff (Oct '07) Jul '17 Brown Pharts 3
News Tragedy strikes family members of Leasure (Jul '08) Jun '17 Evidence phart 9
More from around the web