Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Full story: Newsday 305,613
Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision. Full Story
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#322616 Mar 3, 2014
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think gay marriage should be illegal, and if so, why should it be illegal?
I'm going to imitate Bitner here and say that my personal opinion isn't important.

My choice would be for the government to get out of the marraige business anyway. I think the government should only be able to offer civil unions to both gays and straights.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#322617 Mar 3, 2014
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
If I may cut in here...because the RCC is, in some fashion, fighting to make abortion illegal, is it not? And in that way imposing the beliefs of the institution and it's members on all of society. You, or any member of the RCC, are not required by law to get an abortion, but if (hypothetically) the RCC were able to influence lawmakers and get abortion made illegal it would then have imposed its will on all people including non-Catholics.
The most the RCC should be doing is making it clear to Catholics that they should not choose to get an abortion because the Catholic beliefs are that to do so is a sin according to the wishes of the Catholic version of God.
The RCC should not at all be trying to impose those beliefs in any way on non-Catholics, especially through laws that pertain to all citizens.
The RCC does not have a body in congress where all laws are created.

Again, you would have to show me where the Church has changed LAW and eliminated abortion.
grumpy

West Haverstraw, NY

#322618 Mar 3, 2014
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>So why did you claim it did affect them, in the post I replied to before this one?
My marriage means a great deal to me, Ink - I just don't see how the marriage of any two OTHER consenting adults could diminish that, whether the other couple is of mixed race, or the same sex, or anything else, as long as they're consenting adults.
Marriage, like pregnancy, is personal. But if I benefit from marriage, and it's legal for me to marry whom I choose, why should same-sex couples be denied those benefits and that legality?
I really don't understand the problem people have with it. To my mind, protesting against 'gay marriage' would be like protesting against the guy behind me in line at Subway, because he ordered a different sandwich than I did.
But if Sheldon Cooper was in front of you and wanted a history of all the ingredients of the sandwich that he ordered, would you protest?

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#322619 Mar 3, 2014
grumpy wrote:
<quoted text>But if Sheldon Cooper was in front of you and wanted a history of all the ingredients of the sandwich that he ordered, would you protest?
I'd probably find somewhere else to eat lunch....I only get thirty minutes.

*wink*

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#322620 Mar 3, 2014
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You would have to remind me where I said that. I don't think I did.
[QUOTE] Ok.
Here you go:

[QUOTE who="Ink"]<quoted text>
They are interest in what the laws are as they are often affected by them and they have a right to free speech .
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I expect it will be legal everywhere eventually. Then gays will have the legality and benefits.
I expect so too. All citizens of marriageable age, should have the right to marry, regardless of which gender to whom they'd like to plight their troth.

It's about damn time.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#322621 Mar 3, 2014
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
I expect so too. All citizens of marriageable age, should have the right to marry, regardless of which gender to whom they'd like to plight their troth.
It's about damn time.
And with as many as they like.
Marraige should also be available to and include brothers and sisters, moms and sons and daughters, dads and daughters and sons. gramps and his whole brood of granddaughters.

Who really cares what someone else does?

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#322623 Mar 3, 2014
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
And with as many as they like.
Marraige should also be available to and include brothers and sisters, moms and sons and daughters, dads and daughters and sons. gramps and his whole brood of granddaughters.
Who really cares what someone else does?
You do, that's who.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#322624 Mar 3, 2014
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm going to imitate Bitner here and say that my personal opinion isn't important.
My choice would be for the government to get out of the marraige business anyway. I think the government should only be able to offer civil unions to both gays and straights.
You might just get your wish.

Apparently the OK legislature has taken the fable of the 'Dog in the Manger' to heart, just like you have.

You're such a Christian.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#322625 Mar 3, 2014

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#322626 Mar 3, 2014
Misogyny isn`t the answer here.
Religion Stinks wrote:
Ink needs to be ridden like an old swayback mare so she stays lubed and stretched. Her vaginal vault is starting to dry up and crack and her mamms are shriveling and sagging.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#322627 Mar 3, 2014
There's a difference between rudeness...even suggesting a person getting laid might help them relax...and the rape-minded vulgarity in question. And this is from someone.she.finds "disgusting."
Fire me wrote:
<quoted text> You have guts chump. You're just as rude to those you don't see eye to eye with. Carry on hypocrite.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#322628 Mar 3, 2014
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>You might just get your wish.
Apparently the OK legislature has taken the fable of the 'Dog in the Manger' to heart, just like you have.
You're such a Christian.
It solves the controversy and everything is fair and equal.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#322630 Mar 3, 2014
NoahRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you really do all that with a 1 incher???
I'm willing to give it the ol' college try....

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#322631 Mar 3, 2014
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
It solves the controversy and everything is fair and equal.
The conservatives are trying to drive home the idea that the gays screwed it up for everybody.

I'm sure you're in agreement.

Next...

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#322632 Mar 3, 2014
It won't pass, btw...any more than the bill about requiring men to have treadmill tests and succumb to a trans-penile exam before obtaining a scrip for Viagra did.
It's a pretty stupid and expensive way to make a point though, and if that's the platform Oklahoma 'conservatives' want to stand on, so be it.
They'll pay for it in the mid-terms, and OK can go back to being the progressive libertarian capitalist State it was in the '20s thru the '70s, rather than the regressive neo-con theocracy it's been turning into for the last 3 decades.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#322633 Mar 3, 2014
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
.
I apologize for my 'hotdog down a hallway' comment.

I have no idea how tight you are, or aren't, and it's none of my business.

I was wrong to say what I said, Ink.

next

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#322634 Mar 3, 2014
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
It solves the controversy and everything is fair and equal.
This solves WHAT again?...

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#322635 Mar 3, 2014
cpeter1313 wrote:
There's a difference between rudeness...even suggesting a person getting laid might help them relax...and the rape-minded vulgarity in question. And this is from someone.she.finds "disgusting."
<quoted text>
Yeah, I effed up, and 'stuff', by sinking
to Ink's level.

My bad.

Next....
Fiona Focklemann

San Antonio, TX

#322636 Mar 4, 2014
what?
Gtown71

Tampa, FL

#322637 Mar 4, 2014
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
I expect so too. All citizens of marriageable age, should have the right to marry, regardless of which gender to whom they'd like to plight their troth.
It's about damn time.
Why can't a thirteen year old marry?
Why discriminate?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 34 min Grey Ghost 1,109,989
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 1 hr Thinking 227,475
Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 2 hr Cali Girl 2014 200,963
UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 3 hr PEE PEE PETE 27,390
Freshman Jonah Bolden declared ineligible for U... Sep 12 Brew In 1
Indiana Basketball: 2015 Forward Juwan Morgan C... Sep 11 Mike Williams 1
ACC Tournament 2014: Biggest Storylines to Watc... (Mar '14) Sep 11 Anonymous 2
•••
•••

NCAA Basketball People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••