Hello? Is Katie home?<quoted text>
What? Your "logic" is definitely flawed.
You need to go inform the entire PLM there's no need to continue trying to overturn RvW since according to you, "...agreeing with RvW makes [one] anti-choice, not pro-choice."
Another thing regarding this claim of yours, "You people make yourselves look foolish when you claim that you support a woman having total control over her body and pregnancy (nobody's business bur hers),then admit that you agree with a law which rrstricts her so called rights and choices." That, right there, shows you have no concept or understanding of what RvW discusses -- and that's how during the 1st trimester the woman has "total control" over her body, during the second some restrictions are allowed, and during the 3rd trimester when viability is a factor, there are more restrictions allowed due to fetus' potential ability to survive outside the womb. The only one who looks foolish here is you since your understanding of RvW is completely and utterly lacking.
I am quite clear on what RvW states. I am talking about YOU Katie and your contradicting stance. You're not alone. You agree with what RvW discusses a nd that makes you anti-choice. A woman must be forced(legally) to gestate against her will when she might want to kill her developing baby. You're okay with THAT but not in the first trimester.
who's being goofy now? You people sound insane.