Katie is two-faced. In one breath she claims that no woman should be forced to gestate an unwanted pregnancy and it is nobody's business but hers..., then turns around and agrees with restricting that womans choices, Now if you want to buy into that bullsh*t, go for it. Not me! I embrace honest conversation but have zero patience for double talkers.<quoted text>No, Sassy, I had heard some 8 - 10 years ago, that a woman out of spite had aborted her baby in the 8th month, and she later admitted that it was out of spite. I can't find it. I think Katie is right that she (that lady) had to come up with some elaborate story to get what she wanted. Did she hurt the baby to where the Doctor agreed it was best? I don't know.
This can't be used because I can't find the story, I've been looking, and it happened in Canada. I don't know the Province or circumstances behind that story. I'm not even sure if any charges were laid. This is a completely different story, and Katie may have thought that that story was the one I was talking about. It wasn't. And as you can clearly see, the woman in THIS story was charged. And Katie didn't mention that she was okay with this. This woman in the story that Katie linked clearly broke the law. And I seriously doubt Katie would go to this woman's aide. This woman broke the law.
Why wouldn't katie be okay with this woman making a choice to killl her unwanted child(all of a sudden)?