Ever time this type of question is asked, I respond the same way. With that said, it's a mystery you have no clue and are asking again.<quoted text>
Now......here it comes so pay attention.... do you agree with the level of legal significance RvW and certain States accord the fetus ? Or do you believe the fetus should be accorded MORE significance ? Or do you believe the fetus should be accorded NO significance at all at ANY time.
There, simple question and you can select any of the 3 choices. I am not tying you down to any pre conceived response.
I agree with Roe v Wade's restrictions at viability where the physician and woman determine her pregnancy's outcome if something unforeseen happens late in the game. That is a reasonable restriction based on good faith and the good judgments of those involved.
I do not agree with some of the states' restrictions that are only unnecessary hoops for women to jump through. These backfire and cause unnecessary delays which in turn cause later abortions. Terminations of unwanted pregnancies should be completed within the first trimester, imo, preferably in the embryonic stage. Much safer for the woman/girl experiencing it.
Now, let's see how you twist this around and accuse me of lying some more. Should be fun.