Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 310958 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#319040 Dec 24, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I think if she was any kind of a mother and it ppears she was, she wouldn't want to kill her chld unneccessarily. How come you can't understand th when circumstances change, so do your ideas. Her husband didn't say that she requested that a potential child die with her.
She may have told her husband that she wouldn't want to be kept alive no matter what. Who are YOU to say what she would want, when you wish to deny that her HUSBAND knew? You arrogant thing.

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON,JESUS Christ

#319041 Dec 24, 2013
For Christmas..NOT a hymn
..for every family that has ever enjoyed a,Christmas together .

http://m.youtube.com/watch...

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#319043 Dec 24, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I think if she was any kind of a mother and it ppears she was, she wouldn't want to kill her chld unneccessarily. How come you can't understand th when circumstances change, so do your ideas. Her husband didn't say that she requested that a potential child die with her.
You don't give a crap about HER personal sovereignty either....you'd rather flog her otherwise dead body against her stated wishes, coerce it to produce a child whose brain may ALSO be compromised, and ignore not only the woman's personal sovereignty, but her husband's as well....for the sake of a fetus.

You're such a bag of hair.
No Relativism

Belleville, IL

#319044 Dec 24, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Why ask me? It's not my business. It's the husband's business.
Still, this has nothing to do with the fact that YOU people are using her to debate abortion when it has nothing to DO with abortion?
Ink: "No it isn't about abortion but the woman is pregnant with a live child who will die if she does. Why lose two lives."

bHitler: "It's not my business. It's the husband's business."
_______

bHitler's mantra is "It's not the man's uterus!"....unless his involvement includes killing a baby.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#319045 Dec 24, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I think if she was any kind of a mother and it ppears she was, she wouldn't want to kill her chld unneccessarily. How come you can't understand th when circumstances change, so do your ideas. Her husband didn't say that she requested that a potential child die with her.
So your basic premise, is that a woman should only have 'personal sovereignty' while pregnant, if she elects to carry to term - otherwise, screw her personal sovereignty, and LITERALLY force her to gestate, for the sake of your views.

Your morality sucks.
No Relativism

Belleville, IL

#319046 Dec 24, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>You don't give a crap about HER personal sovereignty either....you'd rather flog her otherwise dead body against her stated wishes, coerce it to produce a child whose brain may ALSO be compromised, and ignore not only the woman's personal sovereignty, but her husband's as well....for the sake of a fetus.
You're such a bag of hair.
Playa: "You don't give a crap about HER personal sovereignty either"

What about the baby girl's sovereignty?
__________

"It's A Girl!"
www.TellMePinkOrBlue.com

Morgana 9

“And the Horse You Rode in On”

Since: Sep 08

Minneapolis

#319047 Dec 24, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Ink: "No it isn't about abortion but the woman is pregnant with a live child who will die if she does. Why lose two lives."
bHitler: "It's not my business. It's the husband's business."
_______
bHitler's mantra is "It's not the man's uterus!"....unless his involvement includes killing a baby.
No Relatives: Force a woman dead or alive to gestate. That is the sum of Her worth.
No Relativism

Belleville, IL

#319048 Dec 24, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>So your basic premise, is that a woman should only have 'personal sovereignty' while pregnant, if she elects to carry to term - otherwise, screw her personal sovereignty, and LITERALLY force her to gestate, for the sake of your views.
Your morality sucks.
Playa: "So your basic premise, is that a woman should only have 'personal sovereignty' while pregnant, if she elects to carry to term - otherwise, screw her personal sovereignty, and LITERALLY force her to gestate, for the sake of your views.
Your morality sucks."

A woman's right to convenience ends where another's body begins.

Write it down on a sticky note and place it where you often visit: your refrigerator.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#319049 Dec 24, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Playa: "You don't give a crap about HER personal sovereignty either"
What about the baby girl's sovereignty?
__________
"It's A Girl!"
www.TellMePinkOrBlue.com
Personal sovereignty for an entity entirely dependent on another's body for survival, is a contradiction in terms, dear. We'll discuss 'the baby girl's personal sovereignty' when she's born.

Next....
No Relativism

Belleville, IL

#319050 Dec 24, 2013
Morgana 9 wrote:
<quoted text>
No Relatives: Force a woman dead or alive to gestate. That is the sum of Her worth.
Morana: "Force a woman dead or alive to gestate. That is the sum of Her worth."

For a "feminist" you sure don't stand up for females in the womb. In fact, you seek to kill them.

^^^ Fake Feminist ^^^
__________

"It's A Girl!"
www.TellMePinkOrBlue.com

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#319051 Dec 24, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Playa: "So your basic premise, is that a woman should only have 'personal sovereignty' while pregnant, if she elects to carry to term - otherwise, screw her personal sovereignty, and LITERALLY force her to gestate, for the sake of your views.
Your morality sucks."
A woman's right to convenience ends where another's body begins.
Write it down on a sticky note and place it where you often visit: your refrigerator.
You really didn't like that one, didja.....

Your morality sucks even harder than Ink's.

Next...

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#319052 Dec 24, 2013
Networks see shows rise and fall all the time. They must enforce their own policies consistently or open themselves up to discrimination suits when they don't.
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
I understand peter , but have you been at any stores lately? Duck stuff is everywhere. Gay stuff? Not so much.
[email protected] had every right to fire the man, but they may be wishing they hadn't. I'm not a fan, since i've not seen much dd but even I can see how popular they are.
They even have a chia pet of Phil for crying out loud! Lol

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#319053 Dec 24, 2013
There are well over a thousand christian sects, plus many unaffiliated believers...because y`all can't agree on what is and is not your god`s word. They're ALL "true christians" because there is no provable model for all to follow.
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong cp. All Christians do believe Gods word.
You're confusing religious folks with true Christians. Happens all the time .
When people see a priest, they automaticly think man of God.
He may be, but he may not be as well.
No Relativism

Belleville, IL

#319054 Dec 24, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
The doctors and the hospital aren't saying anything about her condition. We only hear from the husband who doesn't want the child. I'm sure he is under tremendous emotional strife but it is out of his hands and he is going to have to trust the Lord now.
Ink: "We only hear from the husband who doesn't want the child"

Daddy BabyKiller has some 'splaining to do when his daughter discovers he pushed hard to rip her arms & legs off and execute her.

He's a proabort's hero! A father wanting to kill his daughter.

Feminists are so classy.
No Relativism

Belleville, IL

#319055 Dec 24, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Personal sovereignty for an entity entirely dependent on another's body for survival, is a contradiction in terms, dear. We'll discuss 'the baby girl's personal sovereignty' when she's born.
Next....
Playa: "We'll discuss 'the baby girl's personal sovereignty' when she's born."

Boy, you sure are a selective feminisit. You discriminate to death an entire group of females based on their temporary living arangement, size and age.

You're a mess.
__________

"It's A Girl!"
www.TellMePinkOrBlue.com

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#319056 Dec 24, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Ink: "No it isn't about abortion but the woman is pregnant with a live child who will die if she does. Why lose two lives."
bHitler: "It's not my business. It's the husband's business."
_______
bHitler's mantra is "It's not the man's uterus!"....unless his involvement includes killing a baby.
There is no baby.

Again, this isn't about abortion, despite the fact that you people keep USING this poor woman and her situation to whine about your agenda.

It most certainly isn't any of YOUR business.
No Relativism

Belleville, IL

#319057 Dec 24, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
They're fighting a lost battle; there's no reward forthcoming, and what began as a genuine protection of life has degenerated into an obsession with everyone's morality. And if THEY are obsessed, then in their minds, so is everyone else. What choice do they have, really? There can be no dissension in the ranks...and when they back up some of NR`s more vile posts, they've given up any pretense of morality.
<quoted text>
cPeterPout: "...when they back up some of NR`s more vile posts, they've given up any pretense of morality."

{{{ NR wipes away a tear }}}

Awwwww........poor lil' fella.

You can dish it out, but you can't take it?

Why so sensitive?

Boo-hoo.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#319058 Dec 24, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Ink: "We only hear from the husband who doesn't want the child"
Daddy BabyKiller has some 'splaining to do when his daughter discovers he pushed hard to rip her arms & legs off and execute her.
He's a proabort's hero! A father wanting to kill his daughter.
Feminists are so classy.
Given that there is no plan on the part of the father to ABORT the fetus, but to allow it to die of natural causes along with the body of it's mother, who is already dead, there will be no arms and legs ripped off, or execution.
There will just no longer be a body to be flogged by the courts, and the slimy proboscis of those who want to force a corpse to gestate an (overwhelmingly likely brain-damaged) fetus.

Puddles, you've outdone yourself.
No Relativism

Belleville, IL

#319059 Dec 24, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
Hi Everyone..
May the Peace and Joy ,And Joy of this Season touch each heart and Home of every one here .
May the ONE , Jesus Christ, whose birth we Christians commemorate at
The Christmas SEASON.....be with you all..
Enjoy your families ..God watch over you all and make His,Face to shine on you AND GIVE YOU PEACE ..No matter what your belief ....
Amen in Jesus name .
Kisses and hugs to all and most especially the CHILDREN.
Rose: "May the ONE , Jesus Christ, whose birth we Christians commemorate at
The Christmas SEASON.....be with you all.."

Ut-Oh. You did it this time! You mentioned the "B" word and RUINED proaborts' Christmas.

You see, "Birth" is a bad word in proabort circles. Mary was nothing but chattel and Jesus was just a useless clump of cells until born. The proaborts and King Herrod let one slip by...
_______

Rose: "Kisses and hugs to all and most especially the CHILDREN"

There you go again....

It's NOT about the children...EVER! It's about women and their "uncivil" rights to kill children in utero!

Pay attention.

Geesh.
No Relativism

Belleville, IL

#319060 Dec 24, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Given that there is no plan on the part of the father to ABORT the fetus, but to allow it to die of natural causes along with the body of it's mother, who is already dead, there will be no arms and legs ripped off, or execution.
There will just no longer be a body to be flogged by the courts, and the slimy proboscis of those who want to force a corpse to gestate an (overwhelmingly likely brain-damaged) fetus.
Puddles, you've outdone yourself.
Junket: "There will just no longer be a body to be flogged by the courts"

You tell that to the girl in about 10 years that the courts were "flogging" as they stood up for her life. Even at age 10, she'll call you a moron.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) 11 min Earthling-1 9,539
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 8 hr Rosa_Winkel 254,885
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) Fri Papi Chulo 32,247
I got my loan from [email protected] (Jun '13) Apr 28 Ela 39
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Apr 27 Jesse 201,845
News Kenny Drummond's Prep School Thingy (Jan '08) Apr 23 Bret Link 21
News LA Tech's Tyler Summitt resigns because of inap... Apr 9 binaries 1
More from around the web