Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 314711 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#318067 Dec 11, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
bHitler: "The fact is that I don't support abortion at all."
________
If this is true, then your views would be those of group one below, not group two:
Group One: Support a mother's right to choose from the following choices:
1. Grant the little human in her womb life and keep him/her upon birth.
2. Grant the little human in her womb life, and give him/her up for adoption.
Group Two: Support a mother's right to choose from the following choices:
1. Grant the little human in her womb life and keep him/her upon birth.
2. Grant the little human in her womb life, and give him/her up for adoption.
3. Intentionally KILL the little human in her womb.
_________
Out of one side of your mouth you support including the option of pregnant mother intentionally ending the life of her preborn baby.
Out of the other side of your mouth: "The fact is that I don't support abortion at all."
You're a mess.
I support the woman's civil right to make her own medical decisions regarding her own uterus and pregnancy.

That is not support of the choices, but the right of a person to make one's own reproductive choices.

I don't have to be part of a "group". My position is my own, and strong enough to do without "validation" by others.

Unlike you, I can think for myself.

By the way, adoption, at least to me, is not a reproductive choice, it is a parenting choice. As such, it forms no part of my position.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#318068 Dec 11, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you support a country's right to choose a course of action that includes "Terrorism" as one of its options?
Why do you keep trying to change the subject?

We're not talking about countries, but US citizens with civil rights here. And we're not talking about every possible choice under the sun, but reproductive choice FOR those citizens.

The term pro-choice is about reproductive choices, not every choice one could possibly make.

Again, your lame attempt to deflect is duly noted.

“lightly burnt,but still smokin”

Since: Dec 06

in the corner of your mind,

#318070 Dec 11, 2013
"Ink" brayed

Pope Francis, the left wing TIME'S person of the year. Liberals are going to have a stroke.

actually its the conservatives that don't like the new pope...didn't faux news tell you that?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#318071 Dec 11, 2013
No, and I don't babysit either.
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you a shutin?
Ink

Havertown, PA

#318072 Dec 11, 2013
katie wrote:
<quoted text>
The distinction is your belief the embryo/fetus trumps woman/girl's civil rights regardless of outcome. If both die because the woman/girl can't carry to term, she's just another martyr for your "cause". If both live in poverty, maybe they'll turn to the church for help. And then you have more members. It's a win/win for you, but to hell with the pregnant woman/girl if she chooses to terminate her pregnancy against your will.
In that sense, it is all the same. To *you*.
Wrong Katie.
Nobody has the trump card. No life is more valuable than another. You have decided that the adult woman's life is more valuable and maybe to her it is but in most cases there is no choice of one life over the other. The 'choice' is whether or not she can tolerate the inconvenience of a child being born. I don't expect any woman to be a martyr and die for the cause nor have I ever suggested such.

BTW if one child causes a woman to live in poverty, chances are she would live there anyway.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#318073 Dec 11, 2013
godless by choice wrote:
"Ink" brayed
Pope Francis, the left wing TIME'S person of the year. Liberals are going to have a stroke.
actually its the conservatives that don't like the new pope...didn't faux news tell you that?
Why not? I think you misread something.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#318074 Dec 11, 2013
You probably should not use a source that doesn't know what a contraction is. What you describe is a diminution or foreshortening. Wiktionary isn't a recognized authority.

The PLM`s mania for raping the language is well-known.
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Katie V.: "Proabortion is an adjective and a proabortionist is the noun. I am proabortion, but not a 'proabort' which is the faulty label being applied by your side."
_________
Proabort is contraction of proabortion/proabortionist.[So urce: Wiktionary http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pro-abort ]
Does "proabort" make you feel naked because the "abort" part isn't hidden enough when "ionist" is left off?
Proabort: A person with pro-choice views. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pro-abort
You are the superlative of proabort => "most pro-abort."
Synonyms for proabort:
antilifer (derogatory)
proabortionist
pro-choicer
pro-deather (derogatory)
Retrieved from " http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php... ;

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#318075 Dec 11, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not? I think you misread something.
LOL, no, YOU are the one who is missing things.

Take your head out of your ass, and look around you.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#318076 Dec 11, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, no, YOU are the one who is missing things.
Take your head out of your ass, and look around you.
No I believe you have jumped to conclusions that aren't there. Conservatives like myself love Pope Francis and have prayed and waited a long time for him.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#318078 Dec 11, 2013
This isn't about our terrorism in Iraq.
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Someone can be prochoice on school vouchers, etc. Abortion industry doesn't own "prochoice."
Do you support a country's right to choose a course of action that includes "Terrorism" as one of its options?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#318079 Dec 11, 2013
I don't suppose you've ever heard the term "neutral", as in neither supporting nor condemning?
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
bHitler: "The fact is that I don't support abortion at all."
________
If this is true, then your views would be those of group one below, not group two:
Group One: Support a mother's right to choose from the following choices:
1. Grant the little human in her womb life and keep him/her upon birth.
2. Grant the little human in her womb life, and give him/her up for adoption.
Group Two: Support a mother's right to choose from the following choices:
1. Grant the little human in her womb life and keep him/her upon birth.
2. Grant the little human in her womb life, and give him/her up for adoption.
3. Intentionally KILL the little human in her womb.
_________
Out of one side of your mouth you support including the option of pregnant mother intentionally ending the life of her preborn baby.
Out of the other side of your mouth: "The fact is that I don't support abortion at all."
You're a mess.

“lightly burnt,but still smokin”

Since: Dec 06

in the corner of your mind,

#318080 Dec 11, 2013
"Ink"
No I believe you have jumped to conclusions that aren't there. Conservatives like myself love Pope Francis and have prayed and waited a long time for him.

that's not what faux news(a dog whistle for mental midgets) says

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/12/10/pope-...
Ink

Havertown, PA

#318081 Dec 11, 2013
godless by choice wrote:
"Ink"
No I believe you have jumped to conclusions that aren't there. Conservatives like myself love Pope Francis and have prayed and waited a long time for him.
that's not what faux news(a dog whistle for mental midgets) says
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/12/10/pope-...
LOL I don't know who the hell Adam Shaw is but he doesn't speak for me or any other person. He is an idiot.

Speaking of idiots why do you believe some hack?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#318082 Dec 11, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
No I believe you have jumped to conclusions that aren't there. Conservatives like myself love Pope Francis and have prayed and waited a long time for him.
No, you're just hiding behind your rose colored glasses again.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#318083 Dec 11, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you're just hiding behind your rose colored glasses again.
You wish. You are such a hater that you can't believe in the goodness of people.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#318084 Dec 11, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you keep trying to change the subject?
We're not talking about countries, but US citizens with civil rights here. And we're not talking about every possible choice under the sun, but reproductive choice FOR those citizens.
The term pro-choice is about reproductive choices, not every choice one could possibly make.
Again, your lame attempt to deflect is duly noted.
I'm interested whether you support a country's right to choose a course of action that includes "Terrorism" as one of its options?

Why are you being so reluctant to answer my question?
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#318086 Dec 11, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you're just hiding behind your rose colored glasses again.
bHitler: "No, you're just hiding behind your rose colored glasses again."

You leave Rose (and her color) out of this!
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#318087 Dec 11, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
I support the woman's civil right to make her own medical decisions regarding her own uterus and pregnancy.
That is not support of the choices, but the right of a person to make one's own reproductive choices.
I don't have to be part of a "group". My position is my own, and strong enough to do without "validation" by others.
Unlike you, I can think for myself.
By the way, adoption, at least to me, is not a reproductive choice, it is a parenting choice. As such, it forms no part of my position.
bHitler: "The fact is that I don't support abortion at all."

bHitler: "I support the woman's civil right to make her own medical decisions regarding her own uterus and pregnancy.
That is not support of the choices. I don't have to be part of a "group". My position is my own."
_________

^^^ This view mimics your view re Russian Military raping women ^^^

You & Playa personally do not support rape, but you support Russian Military having the right to include raping women as part of a its war strategy.

You and Playa were clear that if the Russian Military believed rape was morally okay during war, then it was okay in that situation.

Moral Relativism much?

bHitler: "I don't support abortion at all"

Yet, you have no problem INCLUDING abortion as one of the options a pregnant mother has to "choose" from. You posted today that you don't consider adoption a reproductive choice. You exclude adoption, but are fine leaving the abortion option...which you "don't support abortion at all."

You're a mess.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#318088 Dec 11, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You wish. You are such a hater that you can't believe in the goodness of people.
Oh, you mean like Rush calling the Pope a "marxist"? THAT kind of "goodness"?

Palin saying he sounds "liberal" as though it's a curse? THAT kind of "goodness"?

Bishop Tobin's various comments of criticism? THAT kind of "goodness"?

Who is hating? Me? Really? Kindly explain how, exactly, I'm being a hater?

Again, take off those rose colored glasses. This is just beginning.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#318089 Dec 11, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm interested whether you support a country's right to choose a course of action that includes "Terrorism" as one of its options?
Why are you being so reluctant to answer my question?
Why do you keep trying to deflect?

Your question has nothing to do with this issue. It's irrelevant, as you are.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Ms Sassy 1,548,892
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 7 hr TooPharts 33,190
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) Jun 13 Patriot 11,181
News Tragedy strikes family members of Leasure (Jul '08) Jun 9 Evidence phart 9
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) May 29 Into The Night 258,476
Penn State University & State College May '17 Truechange 1
I got my loan from [email protected] (Jun '13) Apr '17 GLOBAL FUNDING SO... 43
More from around the web