Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 313703 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#317612 Dec 6, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text> Can you imagine the guilt that mother must feel?
Can you imagine not sitting around imagining the guilt of women, whose lives are completely and totally separate from your own, and whose medical choices have nothing whatever to do with you?

Try it for five minutes, I dare 'ya.

Or do you have video of some botched abortion, that you watch with your kids on long winter nights??

You should really consider getting help for your abortion porn addiction, hon.

JMO

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#317613 Dec 6, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't think she can refute any of what I wrote.
I don't think she knows what 'refute' means.
:)

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#317614 Dec 6, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text>
Mom: Abortion Dr, I am pregnant and I don't want to be. I am here for you to end my pregnancy because I don't want to mother my child.
Dr: Okay Mom,but it will cost you.
Mom: Okay
((A few hours pass))
Dr: Here's your baby Mom
Mom: what?!?!? I paid you to kill her and yet,here she is. I am now forced to mother my unwanted child. WHY did I go to you and pay you?
Dr: What do you mean mom? You paid me to end your pregnancy. I did. Now have a great day while I go golfing. SEE YA SUCKAAA!
Again, call your doctor. You're psycho, and need your meds upped.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#317615 Dec 6, 2013
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
why should there even have to be such a stretch of time ? why should a woman's right to make her own medical decision regarding her own body "ever" be restricted ? why ??? if the right to abortion is based on the premise "her body her decision" and the "fetus has absolutely no rights", then what about that premise changes once you get into the 3rd trimester ?
<quoted text>
that's a relief. you were having me believe it was being done simply because they were women.
<quoted text>
and if they were would it be because they had a choice in the matter?
Okay fine. There should be no restrictions...on anything.
Gtown71

United States

#317616 Dec 6, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
In other words, you were just spouting nonsense in a lame attempt to be insulting. Got it.
No bit . I wasn't doing as you said.
I was being a bit facetious for sue, but mainly was pointing out how perfect you are, and others mentioned.

After all can you remember the last time you admitted being Wrong?

Have you ever ?

Plus we all know some like aka are about as close to perfect as it comes :)

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#317617 Dec 6, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah you hit a nerve with your love of abortion and the admiration of totally irresponsible men and women. Pre-born baby hater.
I think even you know better than that - she doesn't hate fetuses, and if there was such a thing as a 'pre-born baby', she wouldn't hate them either.

Everything you see from the pro-choice side, you see as hate - what's up with that?

Oh, right...who the hell am I posting to....Miss one-track-brain-cell....

My bad.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#317618 Dec 6, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
No bit . I wasn't doing as you said.
I was being a bit facetious for sue, but mainly was pointing out how perfect you are, and others mentioned.
After all can you remember the last time you admitted being Wrong?
Have you ever ?
Plus we all know some like aka are about as close to perfect as it comes :)
Given that I've never claimed to be perfect, and have, in fact, admitted to being wrong many times, I was right the first time....you're just spouting nonsense in a lame attempt to be insulting.

And you continue to fail.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#317619 Dec 6, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>I think even you know better than that - she doesn't hate fetuses, and if there was such a thing as a 'pre-born baby', she wouldn't hate them either.
Everything you see from the pro-choice side, you see as hate - what's up with that?
Oh, right...who the hell am I posting to....Miss one-track-brain-cell....
My bad.
Ah, she's just being pissy because she really IS a fetus worshipper.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#317620 Dec 6, 2013
Oh stop your own bullh*t already Soppy.

sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text> By the grace of God,your children will leave their past behind and seek sanity,morality and common sense.
In your holier-than-thou harridan's club? Where 'sanity' equals a black and white comfort zone, with no gray areas, and the expectation that everyone else must share it; morality equals women's submission to our ability to gestate, and denial of our enjoyment of sex; and common sense is defined as 'worshiping the fetus to the exclusion of the born'?

God, I hope not.
katie

Tacoma, WA

#317621 Dec 6, 2013
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
he added nothing to roe. he quoted it verbatim. do you really believe you can just make things up and get away with it and nobody will call you on it?
His last sentence was his opinion in question form, nothing more. Stop the BS accusations and debate honestly with me or not at all.
Gtown71

United States

#317622 Dec 6, 2013
grumpy wrote:
<quoted text>What others say (the Jury) is its opinion. What NR says is fact.
I'm surprised that you didn't know that only gives the facts.
What's your thoughts about the trials of the past?

Say all white jury trials, where a white man was accused of. Well anything from stealing to murder. Emmett Till comes to mind.
katie

Tacoma, WA

#317623 Dec 6, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text> Psst...your dishonesty is showing again. I didn't say that you were "approving of abortion", What I DID say was "approving of her choice".
Now,kindly answer my question.
Kthanks.
This question? "So you approve of the choice of a 9 month pregnant woman electively aborting her unwanted child? A simple yes or no will suffice."

Okay, for the second time. No clue how you missed it the first time.

No, are you brain damaged?

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#317624 Dec 6, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text>What's the proper definition of worshipper?.
Someone who worships.

(A definition relatively free of drama, as the entity worshiped is irrelevant...)
sassyjm wrote:
<Methinks that you proaborts need to brush up on your attempts to insult those who are fighting for the life,respect and dignity of YOUR children..
"Methinks" is it? I think 'fetus worshiper' is a perfect description of your harpy coven's erstwhile members there, missy.
sassyjm wrote:
<Come on,it's the year 2013,hasn't any proabort higher up come up with some better come backs?.
How 'bout 'long-nosed-guilt-and-shame-hu cksters'? I think not. Too wordy for me...I 'll stick with 'fetus worshipers'. I prefer to be concise.

I
sassyjm wrote:
<t's getting old and outdated..
Uh, you said 'methinks' a while back, and that one's from the 1200's. Shove it up yerass.
sassyjm wrote:
<Oh,and it isn't insulting to anyone anyway..
Which must be why you spent an entire post denying your were one.

Fetus worshiper.
katie

Tacoma, WA

#317625 Dec 6, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't think she can refute any of what I wrote.
No, she cannot. It was a well written post, straight to the point. So she ignores it. After adding that false accusation about Reagan and then diverting to his "beautiful speeches".
worships reality

AOL

#317626 Dec 6, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
How can you protect it without giving it some rights?
it already is afforded a level of protection post-viability. like i said before when you must have been out to lunch, it need not be granted rights in order for it to be legally protected.

I'm going by the PL "right to life" stance which refers specifically to the z/e/f. So if we give the z/e/f the any kind of right(s) it would have to be done by usurping the rights of the pregnant woman.

How can we tell women that their rights are being subjugated in favor of a z/e/f? How can such a thing be reconciled?
she's already been told. and the sc already reconciled it. where have you been?

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#317627 Dec 6, 2013
katie wrote:
<quoted text>
This question? "So you approve of the choice of a 9 month pregnant woman electively aborting her unwanted child? A simple yes or no will suffice."
Okay, for the second time. No clue how you missed it the first time.
No, are you brain damaged?
Point is, our approval is completely irrelevant to any given woman's decision...unless we are the pregnant ones...AND WE DON'T EVEN HAVE TO APPROVE of her stupid little scenario FOR OURSELVES!!!

I love how that works.

And it drives her bugfuck. I love how that works too.
:)
worships reality

AOL

#317628 Dec 6, 2013
katie wrote:
<quoted text>
His last sentence was his opinion in question form, nothing more. Stop the BS accusations and debate honestly with me or not at all.
you said he changed roe. he did not. he quoted it verbatim. if you're claiming he did then provide the post where he referenced a definition from roe that was "not" what was written in roe.
find it and then we can debate without the bs accusations as you call them.
worships reality

AOL

#317629 Dec 6, 2013
katie wrote:
<quoted text>
No, are you brain damaged? Post-viability abortions are only legally done for the life/health of mother or fetal demise. You should know this for the many hundred of times it's been posted.
you should talk. you're the one who said legal abortions were not done in the 3rd trimester.

how soon we forget.

katie

Tacoma, WA

#317630 Dec 6, 2013
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
it already is afforded a level of protection post-viability. like i said before when you must have been out to lunch, it need not be granted rights in order for it to be legally protected.
<quoted text>
she's already been told. and the sc already reconciled it. where have you been?
Not if woman's life/health is in jeopardy. Woman doesn't have to subjugate her rights for the fetus under those circumstances. Even post-viability.
katie

Tacoma, WA

#317631 Dec 6, 2013
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
you said he changed roe. he did not. he quoted it verbatim. if you're claiming he did then provide the post where he referenced a definition from roe that was "not" what was written in roe.
find it and then we can debate without the bs accusations as you call them.
No, I said he was adding/subtracting to Roe. And he did. With that last sentence and another post of his regarding something else about Roe.

But it sure is strange having this discussion with you over BA's posts.

What's in it for you?

Or would you just like an ego boost and read "You're right, I'm wrong"? Will that hold you over for all eternity?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min sonicfilter 1,510,469
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 14 hr WherePhart 32,834
News Buzzer-beating shot lifts Florida over Wisconsi... Mar 25 BuzzerPhartss 2
News Western Michigan heads to Illinois as a favorite (Sep '16) Mar 16 MakePhartce 105
News North Carolina Governor Who Signed Bathroom Bil... Mar 15 Bath phart 2
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) Mar 14 superwilly 258,478
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) Mar 14 Into The Night 11,123
More from around the web