Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 316242 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

katie

Tacoma, WA

#317593 Dec 6, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
She would tell you that the women killing their unborn babies really love them. They only love themselves.
I would tell you to stop assuming/presuming to know or understand what these women are feeling/experiencing. And quit judging!

For every finger you point toward others, four more point back to you.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#317594 Dec 6, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, I hit a nerve, huh?
If you can't take the heat, get out of the debate. But in the meantime, do stop whining.
Yeah you hit a nerve with your love of abortion and the admiration of totally irresponsible men and women. Pre-born baby hater.
katie

Tacoma, WA

#317595 Dec 6, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text> Oh cut it out Bitler. The INTENT of a mother going into an abortion clinic and paying the Dr is to kill her unwanted child. Unfortunately for her,many babies survive the "attempt" to kill them. So,Mom paid for a brutal assault on her child for nothing. She CONTINUES to be the biological mother of her child whether that baby lives or dies. Now what?
What unnecessary drama.

Abortion is medically defined as pregnancy ending prior to term. That's it. Is the same for spontaneous and induced. No exaggerations.
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#317596 Dec 6, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, I hit a nerve, huh?
If you can't take the heat, get out of the debate. But in the meantime, do stop whining.
What's the proper definition of worshipper? And how does it apply to someone is who is an advocate for the humans in the womb? Fighting for the rights to life of another is a worshipper of that life?

Methinks that you proaborts need to brush up on your attempts to insult those who are fighting for the life,respect and dignity of YOUR children. Come on,it's the year 2013,hasn't any proabort higher up come up with some better come backs? It's getting old and outdated. Oh,and it isn't insulting to anyone anyway. It sound ridiculous and you people look the fool.
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#317597 Dec 6, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah you hit a nerve with your love of abortion and the admiration of totally irresponsible men and women. Pre-born baby hater.
More like pre-born baby killer/irreponsible men and women apologist.

How strange that strangers are willing to defend her children. We are fighting for the rights to life of her child that might be unwanted. That doesn't say much for her or her kind.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#317598 Dec 6, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text> Hmmm.....so a woman paying to end her unwanted pregnancy is satisfied when her baby survives the abortion attempt because she paid for the pregnancy to end only?
How a woman feels is not the point. The pregnancy is over, the abortion is complete.

What she decides to do then has nothing to do with that fact.
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#317599 Dec 6, 2013
katie wrote:
<quoted text>
I would tell you to stop assuming/presuming to know or understand what these women are feeling/experiencing. And quit judging!
For every finger you point toward others, four more point back to you.
Awww,you are right Katie. We should stop assuming/presuming to know or understand what Susan Smith was feeling/experiencing when she killed her UNWANTED children. I won't judge her. I am SURE that you haven't either,right? Wouldn't want four fingers pointing back atcha now would you ;)

Katie,you go ahead and keep fighting for the right to exterminate UNWANTED humans in the womb. What a loving person you are. You must sleep well at night just knowing that you participate in your proabortion movement cause as their top puppetier.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#317600 Dec 6, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah you hit a nerve with your love of abortion and the admiration of totally irresponsible men and women. Pre-born baby hater.
ROTFLMAOPIMP!

Oh, Witless, that was truly lame. Seriously, you haven't the wit to troll properly.

You're in a mood. Who pissed in your Wheaties this morning?
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#317601 Dec 6, 2013
katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you stop assuming/presuming as well? It's ridiculous your use of presumptions/assumptions to base your false claims.
And show just one of my posts claiming I am against elective abortion after the first trimester. Just one. Especially when I've posted all induced abortion is elective, even those for ectopic pregnancy and other emergencies. Patient/POA still has to sign the dotted line before receiving it.
(just because you can't keep PC posters separate doesn't mean you get away with lumping us all together)
So you approve of the choice of a 9 month pregnant woman electively aborting her unwanted child? A simple yes or no will suffice.
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#317602 Dec 6, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
How a woman feels is not the point. The pregnancy is over, the abortion is complete.
What she decides to do then has nothing to do with that fact.
You can't get any more dishonest than you are right now. The woman PAID to end the life of her developing UNWANTED child/fetus. The child/fetus surviving an abortion attempt, has EVERYTHING to do with it. The abortion attempt was in vain. She ended up with her unwanted child after all. EPIC FAIL! So yeah,the abortio was NOT complete.

Pathelogical liar!
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#317603 Dec 6, 2013
katie wrote:
<quoted text>
What unnecessary drama.
Abortion is medically defined as pregnancy ending prior to term. That's it. Is the same for spontaneous and induced. No exaggerations.
Oh stop your bullh*t already Katie. A woman doesn't want her developing child,so she pays to have the child killed. She payed to have the pregnancy terminated because she didn't want to mother her child.

Dumb and Dumber(you and Bitler). Holy Moly. I can't imagine what you are like IRL besides pathelogical liars and deceitful people. You both scare me just knowing that you are mothers and have influenced your children like the way you do. Generations of misfits. By the grace of God,your children will leave their past behind and seek sanity,morality and common sense.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#317604 Dec 6, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text> You can't get any more dishonest than you are right now. The woman PAID to end the life of her developing UNWANTED child/fetus. The child/fetus surviving an abortion attempt, has EVERYTHING to do with it. The abortion attempt was in vain. She ended up with her unwanted child after all. EPIC FAIL! So yeah,the abortio was NOT complete.
Pathelogical liar!
Nonsense, I haven't lied at all. If she's not pregnant, the abortion was completed.

You need to tell your doc it's time to up your meds, your hysteria is at an all-time high.
katie

Tacoma, WA

#317605 Dec 6, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text> So you approve of the choice of a 9 month pregnant woman electively aborting her unwanted child? A simple yes or no will suffice.
No, are you brain damaged? Post-viability abortions are only legally done for the life/health of mother or fetal demise. You should know this for the many hundred of times it's been posted. Besides, when have I ever said I was "approving" of abortion?

Clearly, your spoon fed dogma has brainwashed you to the point you cannot separate fact from fiction.

Fact: Women's civil rights of personal privacy and bodily autonomy encompasses all reproductive rights to determine one's own pregnancy outcome. That means antichoicers, like you, will never be mandated to undergo abortion against your will. It also means prochoicers, like me, can undergo abortion if it's determined to be the better outcome based on information and circumstances pertinent to me and offered by my physician; not by the government, the clergy, or nosy parkers like you.
katie

Tacoma, WA

#317606 Dec 6, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text> Oh stop your bullh*t already Katie. A woman doesn't want her developing child,so she pays to have the child killed. She payed to have the pregnancy terminated because she didn't want to mother her child.
Dumb and Dumber(you and Bitler). Holy Moly. I can't imagine what you are like IRL besides pathelogical liars and deceitful people. You both scare me just knowing that you are mothers and have influenced your children like the way you do. Generations of misfits. By the grace of God,your children will leave their past behind and seek sanity,morality and common sense.
Wow. You *are* brainwashed to the point of brain damage. Your post is quite full of delusions. Quick! Get help.
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#317607 Dec 6, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Nonsense, I haven't lied at all. If she's not pregnant, the abortion was completed.
You need to tell your doc it's time to up your meds, your hysteria is at an all-time high.
Mom: Abortion Dr, I am pregnant and I don't want to be. I am here for you to end my pregnancy because I don't want to mother my child.

Dr: Okay Mom,but it will cost you.

Mom: Okay

((A few hours pass))

Dr: Here's your baby Mom

Mom: what?!?!? I paid you to kill her and yet,here she is. I am now forced to mother my unwanted child. WHY did I go to you and pay you?

Dr: What do you mean mom? You paid me to end your pregnancy. I did. Now have a great day while I go golfing. SEE YA SUCKAAA!
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#317608 Dec 6, 2013
katie wrote:
<quoted text>
No, are you brain damaged? Post-viability abortions are only legally done for the life/health of mother or fetal demise. You should know this for the many hundred of times it's been posted. Besides, when have I ever said I was "approving" of abortion?
Clearly, your spoon fed dogma has brainwashed you to the point you cannot separate fact from fiction.
Fact: Women's civil rights of personal privacy and bodily autonomy encompasses all reproductive rights to determine one's own pregnancy outcome. That means antichoicers, like you, will never be mandated to undergo abortion against your will. It also means prochoicers, like me, can undergo abortion if it's determined to be the better outcome based on information and circumstances pertinent to me and offered by my physician; not by the government, the clergy, or nosy parkers like you.
Psst...your dishonesty is showing again. I didn't say that you were "approving of abortion", What I DID say was "approving of her choice".

Now,kindly answer my question.

Kthanks.
worships reality

AOL

#317609 Dec 6, 2013
katie wrote:
<quoted text>
You are adding/subtracting from Roe when you claim Roe's definition is "different" than the medical definition of abortion. It is no different. You added your opinion of fetal demise to it and claimed it was part of Roe. It is not. But you still used it as an example that I am playing word games.
he added nothing to roe. he quoted it verbatim. do you really believe you can just make things up and get away with it and nobody will call you on it?

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#317610 Dec 6, 2013
Grown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
"Try" is the key word here. As we know, there's just nothing anyone can do to make others moral, and many attempts at doing so, are immoral themselves.
Although I do understand why there are such things , as moral clauses.
How are you Lady?:)
I'm well...and you?

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#317611 Dec 6, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Can you provide specific examples of how LNMs post is "wrong on every level", or is that a fact because you say so?
I don't think she can refute any of what I wrote.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#317612 Dec 6, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text> Can you imagine the guilt that mother must feel?
Can you imagine not sitting around imagining the guilt of women, whose lives are completely and totally separate from your own, and whose medical choices have nothing whatever to do with you?

Try it for five minutes, I dare 'ya.

Or do you have video of some botched abortion, that you watch with your kids on long winter nights??

You should really consider getting help for your abortion porn addiction, hon.

JMO

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min Well Well 1,579,368
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 2 hr The phartse 33,645
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) Aug 14 Into The Night 11,335
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) Jul 27 Aerobatty 258,484
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Jul '17 New boy 201,878
News Johnny Brown Added To Coaching Staff (Oct '07) Jul '17 Brown Pharts 3
News Tragedy strikes family members of Leasure (Jul '08) Jun '17 Evidence phart 9
More from around the web