Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Full story: Newsday

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.
Comments
295,501 - 295,520 of 305,467 Comments Last updated 1 hr ago
Ink

Levittown, PA

#315833 Nov 15, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, playing dumb again, huh?
What was stopping him from divorcing her?
Nothing I assume. It wouldn't occur to me to asked him. Why are you asking?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315834 Nov 15, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe some one will speak up for you and maybe not.
You can come out of your pickle jar now.
You're babbling.

The fact that others responded in a way that showed they understood the point means I don't need anyone to speak up for me.

Could be your projecting a desire for someone to speak up for you. After all YOU are the one with a "friend" you consider a self-centered multiple baby murderer, whose husband clearly was also a self-centered baby murder in your eyes, and yet you allowed him to "borrow" your 6 year old daughter for playdates at MacDonald's.

Would ANY sane parent allow their child to go with someone they consider a "baby murderer"?

And the answer to THAT question, is no.

So, either you made the whole thing up, or you DON'T consider abortion to be "baby murder".

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315835 Nov 15, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing I assume. It wouldn't occur to me to asked him. Why are you asking?
Too late. I already made my point. And, I already explained why I asked.

Breathe in.....and breathe out.

Oh, by the way, that means actually INHALING and EXHALING air, not just having your blood pump in your veins. Hope that helps clear up your confusion. Get that brain cell some much needed oxygen, it's clearly the only one you have left.
Ink

Levittown, PA

#315836 Nov 15, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Too late. I already made my point. And, I already explained why I asked.
The only point you have is on your little bitty head.
feces for jesus

Westbury, NY

#315837 Nov 15, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You think I shouldn't have euthanized him?
How does any prolife person justify euthanizing their pet?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315838 Nov 15, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
The only point you have is on your little bitty head.
That was a lame attempt, Witless.

I made my point, and others got it. You didn't, because you're stupid. I mean, it's either that, or you're just PRETENDING to be too stupid to get it. Which one it is doesn't really matter.
Ink

Levittown, PA

#315839 Nov 15, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
"Did you view their personal choices as a loving mom or a simply evil?"
I think they are mentally ill. I know Andrea Yates is. It's documented. Was documented before she had more children after the first. As I recall, her psychologist? recommended she not have more children. Told her husband that.
Yeah, I know you think abortion is murder. I don't. That's been settled for a good long while.
But can you really tell me Andrea Yates' kids were better off having been drowned in terror than aborted at 8 weeks?
Of course you do. Why am I asking. Notice there's no question mark.
You didn't mention if you thought Susan Smith was mentally ill. The court said she wasn't.

If you want to protect children from mothers like Yates you would have to exterminate all unborn children just in case their mothers snapped at some point. Do you think that is practical or do you just use a case like Yates to further promote abortion?
Ink

Levittown, PA

#315840 Nov 15, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
That was a lame attempt, Witless.
I made my point, and others got it. You didn't, because you're stupid. I mean, it's either that, or you're just PRETENDING to be too stupid to get it. Which one it is doesn't really matter.
Who got it?
Ink

Levittown, PA

#315841 Nov 15, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
How does any prolife person justify euthanizing their pet?
Is this a serious question?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315842 Nov 15, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Who got it?
At least two other posters. Scroll back and see. It's been since I posted made that post last night, so it should even tax your own remaining brain cell.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315843 Nov 15, 2013
Ah, sorry, editing error. That should read "...so it SHOULDN'T even tax....".

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315844 Nov 15, 2013
Make that three posters, and it only took me 30 seconds to find them.
Ink

Levittown, PA

#315845 Nov 15, 2013
katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Imo, it seems Ink has devolved women's independence to the level of the blame game. Her attitude toward women's civil rights leans heavily into misogynistic territory. Her friend with common interests shares she's had more than one abortion because of selfishness. Perhaps Ink was unaware of family histories including medical issues and the woman simply didn't want any children. Most likely, if her pattern here is as true in her real life, Ink misunderstood what was said to her and she jumped to wrong conclusions; negative judgment calls.
Her story sounds plausible, but farfetched. I could be the same doubting Thomas she is or just let it go. Letting it go seems more peaceful.
Happy Friday, Bitner :)
Katie what is so hard for you to understand? You go round and round about human/ human being and put all kinds of efforts to say they aren't the same and yet you can't get that the girl I was talking about DIDN'T WANT CHILDREN SO SHE HAD THEM ABORTED. End of story. No medical issues. Simply a good job and hobbies that didn't include children. Isn't that what you and your promote. A wonderful life without children and if you get pregnant, there is only one way to fix it. You sound like nobody has ever had abortions. What is farfetched or misogynist about a woman having an abortion because she didn't want the kid?
Ink

Levittown, PA

#315846 Nov 15, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
At least two other posters. Scroll back and see. It's been since I posted made that post last night, so it should even tax your own remaining brain cell.
Yeah who?
katie

Seattle, WA

#315847 Nov 15, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You could tell me. I am sure you read the book or you wouldn't be using it's stats. I do not intend to read a book about the history of abortion. It isn't one of my main interests.
I can see that the history and future of abortion is a personal
concern of yours, so how do you feel about the numbers dropping by more than half since the Victorian Era? How many women were not having abortions? One in four pregnant women get rid of the baby [25%] today. What percentage does 2,000,000 abortions represent of pregnant women back in the day? Was anybody having children?
Why bother to debate the abortion issues if you don't read about or understand the history of abortion beyond knowing there's death of embryos/fetuses?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315848 Nov 15, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah who?
How lazy are you? Is there something wrong with your computer?

You're fooling no one, you know.
Ink

Levittown, PA

#315849 Nov 15, 2013
katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Why bother to debate the abortion issues if you don't read about or understand the history of abortion beyond knowing there's death of embryos/fetuses?
Where is the debate on the history? It's law. It's legal. Done deal.All that's left is the morality of it and you won't get that from some writings of a biased abortion advocate. That comes from inside each of us. From our hearts and souls.
feces for jesus

Westbury, NY

#315850 Nov 15, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Is this a serious question?
Absolutely! It is a life that you literally escorted to it's death.

I honestly do not want or need your response. It will just serve as a springboard for you To blab about more of your self centered interests.
Ink

Levittown, PA

#315851 Nov 15, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
How lazy are you? Is there something wrong with your computer?
You're fooling no one, you know.
I'm too busy to spend time looking for something that isn't there.
Ink

Levittown, PA

#315852 Nov 15, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
Absolutely! It is a life that you literally escorted to it's death.
I honestly do not want or need your response. It will just serve as a springboard for you To blab about more of your self centered interests.
LOL I didn't think you were serious and you weren't.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 9 min Yeah 1,100,625
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 1 hr macumazahn 226,394
UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 4 hr Bruin Nation 27,092
I got my loan from stephenloanhelp@hotmail.com (May '13) Aug 26 RICK SERVICE 29
offer Aug 23 Peter 1
Addition of Emmitt Holt is "Big" for Indiana Aug 23 Mike Williams 1
Ex-Hoosier Zeller embraces NBA learning Aug 23 Mike Williams 1
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

NCAA Basketball People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••