Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 309765 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315843 Nov 15, 2013
Ah, sorry, editing error. That should read "...so it SHOULDN'T even tax....".

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315844 Nov 15, 2013
Make that three posters, and it only took me 30 seconds to find them.
Ink

Levittown, PA

#315845 Nov 15, 2013
katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Imo, it seems Ink has devolved women's independence to the level of the blame game. Her attitude toward women's civil rights leans heavily into misogynistic territory. Her friend with common interests shares she's had more than one abortion because of selfishness. Perhaps Ink was unaware of family histories including medical issues and the woman simply didn't want any children. Most likely, if her pattern here is as true in her real life, Ink misunderstood what was said to her and she jumped to wrong conclusions; negative judgment calls.
Her story sounds plausible, but farfetched. I could be the same doubting Thomas she is or just let it go. Letting it go seems more peaceful.
Happy Friday, Bitner :)
Katie what is so hard for you to understand? You go round and round about human/ human being and put all kinds of efforts to say they aren't the same and yet you can't get that the girl I was talking about DIDN'T WANT CHILDREN SO SHE HAD THEM ABORTED. End of story. No medical issues. Simply a good job and hobbies that didn't include children. Isn't that what you and your promote. A wonderful life without children and if you get pregnant, there is only one way to fix it. You sound like nobody has ever had abortions. What is farfetched or misogynist about a woman having an abortion because she didn't want the kid?
Ink

Levittown, PA

#315846 Nov 15, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
At least two other posters. Scroll back and see. It's been since I posted made that post last night, so it should even tax your own remaining brain cell.
Yeah who?
katie

Seattle, WA

#315847 Nov 15, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You could tell me. I am sure you read the book or you wouldn't be using it's stats. I do not intend to read a book about the history of abortion. It isn't one of my main interests.
I can see that the history and future of abortion is a personal
concern of yours, so how do you feel about the numbers dropping by more than half since the Victorian Era? How many women were not having abortions? One in four pregnant women get rid of the baby [25%] today. What percentage does 2,000,000 abortions represent of pregnant women back in the day? Was anybody having children?
Why bother to debate the abortion issues if you don't read about or understand the history of abortion beyond knowing there's death of embryos/fetuses?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315848 Nov 15, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah who?
How lazy are you? Is there something wrong with your computer?

You're fooling no one, you know.
Ink

Levittown, PA

#315849 Nov 15, 2013
katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Why bother to debate the abortion issues if you don't read about or understand the history of abortion beyond knowing there's death of embryos/fetuses?
Where is the debate on the history? It's law. It's legal. Done deal.All that's left is the morality of it and you won't get that from some writings of a biased abortion advocate. That comes from inside each of us. From our hearts and souls.
feces for jesus

Westbury, NY

#315850 Nov 15, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Is this a serious question?
Absolutely! It is a life that you literally escorted to it's death.

I honestly do not want or need your response. It will just serve as a springboard for you To blab about more of your self centered interests.
Ink

Levittown, PA

#315851 Nov 15, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
How lazy are you? Is there something wrong with your computer?
You're fooling no one, you know.
I'm too busy to spend time looking for something that isn't there.
Ink

Levittown, PA

#315852 Nov 15, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
Absolutely! It is a life that you literally escorted to it's death.
I honestly do not want or need your response. It will just serve as a springboard for you To blab about more of your self centered interests.
LOL I didn't think you were serious and you weren't.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315853 Nov 15, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm too busy to spend time looking for something that isn't there.
Oh, but they are there. My guess is you already know that.

Again, you're fooling no one.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#315854 Nov 15, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Your question was "what was stopping him from getting a divorce"
I assume nothing was stopping him. I never asked him such a question. It wouldn't have occured to me to ask. Why did you ask?
Just lie and bed tonite and think up your next bs story. We can't wait.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#315855 Nov 15, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Where did she claim to be ex-gay?
Chaz is a f-to-m transgender. Having a male identity means his attraction to women makes him hetero.
<quoted text>
She didn't......His kind is a mess @@.
VoteVets Org

AOL

#315856 Nov 15, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Childbirth can be lethal, you clueless moron.
So can taking a shower...or performing liposuction you ignorant horse's ass of a fucwit. But when the risks of abortion relative to childbirth are discussed, it is normal childbirth that is the reference point, not the worst case scenario. Even Roe v Wade, when discussing relative risks of abortion compared to childbirth, specifically indicates "normal" childbirth.

You said you agreed with restrictions on abortion at that point ONLY because the risk of abortion was "roughly the same" as childbirth.
You agreed with removing a woman's right to personal risk assessment because the risk of the procedure she was requestiong was roughly the same as the risk of proceeding with gestation.

You agreed with this restriction despite the fact that the woman would always have the option of not choosing to abort based on her assessment of the risks involved.

You facked up chief. But keep spinning.
unut

Centralia, IL

#315857 Nov 15, 2013
Obama care will help us all !!!

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#315858 Nov 15, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You didn't mention if you thought Susan Smith was mentally ill. The court said she wasn't.
If you want to protect children from mothers like Yates you would have to exterminate all unborn children just in case their mothers snapped at some point. Do you think that is practical or do you just use a case like Yates to further promote abortion?
Andrea Yates didn't just snap, she had a history of mental illness, depression and suicide attempts since the age of 17, long before she had 5 children.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#315859 Nov 15, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Katie what is so hard for you to understand? You go round and round about human/ human being and put all kinds of efforts to say they aren't the same and yet you can't get that the girl I was talking about DIDN'T WANT CHILDREN SO SHE HAD THEM ABORTED. End of story. No medical issues. Simply a good job and hobbies that didn't include children. Isn't that what you and your promote. A wonderful life without children and if you get pregnant, there is only one way to fix it. You sound like nobody has ever had abortions. What is farfetched or misogynist about a woman having an abortion because she didn't want the kid?
Not the point, the point is your story is fake. There is no way in hell you would let your 6 year old go to McDonalds with anyone who supported abortion. And the husband would have to be a supporter since he didn't divorce the woman who had killed his babies correct? You actually let a 6 year old hold the hand of an abortion supporter!!!!!! Holy crap what were you thinking?

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#315860 Nov 15, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm too busy to spend time looking for something that isn't there.
Me is one.
Ink

Levittown, PA

#315862 Nov 15, 2013
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>Not the point, the point is your story is fake. There is no way in hell you would let your 6 year old go to McDonalds with anyone who supported abortion. And the husband would have to be a supporter since he didn't divorce the woman who had killed his babies correct? You actually let a 6 year old hold the hand of an abortion supporter!!!!!! Holy crap what were you thinking?
My story was real and accurate. What you guys turned it into was far different than what I said. But that's the way it goes on here.
Ink

Levittown, PA

#315863 Nov 15, 2013
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>Andrea Yates didn't just snap, she had a history of mental illness, depression and suicide attempts since the age of 17, long before she had 5 children.
Is that Susan Smith's history too. You would have protected her children with abortion just in case she decided one day that she didn't want them anymore?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min THE DEVIL 1,224,894
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 47 min Uncle Sam 238,463
mark moel loan house is here for you to uptain ... (Sep '13) 21 hr robert walker 6
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) Mon tom wingo 29,725
How to Recover Deleted or lost Contacts from Sa... Apr 29 Sauck freedom 6
News Freshman Jonah Bolden declared ineligible for U... (Sep '14) Apr 29 tom wingo 4
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) Apr 27 TerryE 5,306
More from around the web