Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 313199 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315322 Nov 11, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text> What an angry woman^^^
Okay aged,you are anti-God/anti-bible. We get it. Grow up and stop being such a bigoted angry woman.
There was no anger in that post.

Why must you lie so much?

Oh, yes, that's right, I remember now. You do it because the truth doesn't serve your agenda, and you must attack people instead.
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#315323 Nov 11, 2013
Ocean56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep. More single women with good jobs/careers, and the financial independence that goes along with it, are not willing to give up their freedom to be a guy's UNPAID housekeeper.
That's what some of these religionist guys are still pissed about; the idea that they have to do their OWN housework and cooking when the "little woman" should be doing it all instead.@@
You poor little girl. WHY did you get married Ocean? WHO forced you?

Just because someone wronged you in life doesn't mean that the rest of us married couples give up our "freedom" or become a "guys UNPAID housekeeper".

We as married couples become ONE. We still maintain our individuality but we do things as a couple. When we become moms,our priorities shift but it doesn't mean that we lose our identity. In fact,in a marriage,that love grows.

Again,I am sorry that you got treated life a low life,second class citizen by some man. NOBODY forced you to marry this man,did they?

Well,you are single now for years. Why are you so bitter still?
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#315324 Nov 11, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Most women forced to see an ultrasound still abort.
<quoted text>
No,this is not true. Abortion providers (the abortionist,nurses,staff)have repeatedly said that they have many moms who change their minds when they see the ultrasound pics of their baby. In fact,they have said that they deceive women so that they abortion continues as planned(knowing the mom will have a change of heart).

What you seem to fail to realize is that a good majority of women going in for abortions are crying. They know deep in their hearts what's about to happen. I feel that many are clueless as to the full truth though. Testimonies from post-abortive women prove this over and over. Add that to the ignorant statements coming from post abortive women on here who are still in denial.

Seems the ones that repent of their dirty deed have the guts to admit what they've done to their child.It's part of their healing process. Truth.
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#315325 Nov 11, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
There was no anger in that post.
Why must you lie so much?
Oh, yes, that's right, I remember now. You do it because the truth doesn't serve your agenda, and you must attack people instead.
Your opinion is irrelevent. Can't you disagree with someone without calling them liars?

She is mocking God/Christ. She does it constantly. She is angry as are you.

Bottom line,someone might disagree with God/Christ or be confused,but they don't need to exhibit such disrespect and intolerance towards another beliefs.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315326 Nov 11, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text> No,this is not true. Abortion providers (the abortionist,nurses,staff)have repeatedly said that they have many moms who change their minds when they see the ultrasound pics of their baby. In fact,they have said that they deceive women so that they abortion continues as planned(knowing the mom will have a change of heart).
What you seem to fail to realize is that a good majority of women going in for abortions are crying. They know deep in their hearts what's about to happen. I feel that many are clueless as to the full truth though. Testimonies from post-abortive women prove this over and over. Add that to the ignorant statements coming from post abortive women on here who are still in denial.
Seems the ones that repent of their dirty deed have the guts to admit what they've done to their child.It's part of their healing process. Truth.
Nonsense. Where are they "saying" this? Let's see a link, and we'll see if you know what the word "most" means.
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#315327 Nov 11, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
It is a useless term as far as this debate, because the term can mean fertilization, OR implantation, OR both. It's meaningless here when it can be either point, and everyone will mean something different by it.
Is there some reason you people can't use the specific terms of fertilization or implantation?
No,it is not "useless" as far as this debate is concerned. It is very important in fact.

A human is a human regardless of their stage in their life(embryo,fetus,newborn,todd ler,adolesant,teenager,etc..).

You use proper terms as if it changes the facts that a new,unique life is present in the womb. If someone that you knows talks to you about their child,do you reprimand them and tell them that their 20 or 30 yr old is not a proper term ? No. I bet you don't. If your friends child is an adolesant,do you refer to her "adolesant" or her kid?

You're a valuable player in the abortion movements deception game,that's for sure. You're quite the deceitful one Bitler.
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#315328 Nov 11, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Well, if it's not breathing, it's not alive...
Some nights, life begins at last call.
<quoted text>
My child was in a car accident. He stopped breathing. He needed to be resusitated.He's not alive? He sure looks like he is to me. Sure,he needed help from a machine,but nevertheless,he still is a human who's alive.

The child in the womb needs assistence for a short period of time in her/his life while in moms body. Many need assistance after birth as well from a machine.

You pro-aborts need to brush up on your anti-life tactics. It's getting old already.
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#315329 Nov 11, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Nonsense. Where are they "saying" this? Let's see a link, and we'll see if you know what the word "most" means.
Hmmmm...how interesting that you didn't give this response to Cpeter who made the claim that "Most women forced to see an ultrasound still abort".

I take the word from the women who have aborted pre-ultrasound vs those who aborted post-ultrasound. I also take the word of the pre-cold,heartless abortion providers and their staff who share their testimonies.

Links to it have been provided throughout the years and don't DARE try to deny it Bitler. You people didn't want to hear about those who've spoken the truth.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#315330 Nov 11, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text>MOST abortion supporters(so called PRO-CHOICE)think that abortion is wrong after first trimester. They are ANTI-CHOICE after viability. They are ANTI-ABORTION after the first trimester. They agree with restricting a womans rights to kill her child.
Abortion DELIBERATELY kills a humans life because mom doesn't want to mother her child. If you think that killing your own was not evil,I am not surprised. It's your coping mechanism.
Okey dokey. I said you are welcome to your opinion and I mean it.
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#315331 Nov 11, 2013
Ocean56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. And yet the militant religionists can't seem to figure out why so many women have REJECTED the toxic baggage of gods, religions and churches. Go figure, right?:-)
Nobody is shocked to hear that people like you have rejected God. Jesus walked the earth,ate with his friends,performed miracles for them,and they still rejected him at the end of the day.

What I do think is sad is people like you who blame God for your hurts from other people. It's typical and predictable. It's like people embrace their free-will choices,but don't care about the consequences that evil or just bad choices create. THEN,they blame God when all hell breaks loose. That's not fair.

Also,what I find sad is when people like you or,aged or Bitler(etc)reject God/the RCC/etc.. when they didn't truly understand it. They were misled or just brought up with a wishy wash version(if that)of it. Then,when none of it makes sense,they reject it. Can't say that I blame them at that point. I've seen ALOT of that scenerio. It's tragic really.
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#315332 Nov 11, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>Okey dokey. I said you are welcome to your opinion and I mean it.
In other words,....no response about your side being against abortion too?

Okey Dokey!
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#315333 Nov 11, 2013
Elises words" Even you must understand that many, many people do not believe that abortion is wrong, much less evil, which is a concept flung around by fundies for anything that they don't happen to agree with."

Elise? Are your fellow pro-aborts fundies because they don't agree with you?

yes or no?

<cue insults and name calling>

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315334 Nov 11, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text>Your opinion is irrelevent. Can't you disagree with someone without calling them liars?
She is mocking God/Christ. She does it constantly. She is angry as are you.
Bottom line,someone might disagree with God/Christ or be confused,but they don't need to exhibit such disrespect and intolerance towards another beliefs.
It's not my disagreement that causes me to call you a liar. It's you lies.

Again, there was no anger in that post. Nor is there any in mine.

I'm sorry, but you are simply not important enough to make me angry.

Any disrespect shown, if there was any, was shown to the POSTER, not the religion itself. That you can't separate the two is not Junket's problem, it's yours.
katie

Spanaway, WA

#315335 Nov 11, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
Elises words" Even you must understand that many, many people do not believe that abortion is wrong, much less evil, which is a concept flung around by fundies for anything that they don't happen to agree with."
Elise? Are your fellow pro-aborts fundies because they don't agree with you?
yes or no?
<cue insults and name calling>
Are you innocent of insulting and name calling, JM?

Why do you post as if you were then?

Hypocrite much?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315336 Nov 11, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text>No,it is not "useless" as far as this debate is concerned. It is very important in fact.
A human is a human regardless of their stage in their life(embryo,fetus,newborn,todd ler,adolesant,teenager,etc..).
You use proper terms as if it changes the facts that a new,unique life is present in the womb. If someone that you knows talks to you about their child,do you reprimand them and tell them that their 20 or 30 yr old is not a proper term ? No. I bet you don't. If your friends child is an adolesant,do you refer to her "adolesant" or her kid?
You're a valuable player in the abortion movements deception game,that's for sure. You're quite the deceitful one Bitler.
I am not. I am not being deceitful at all. You are, though.

I use the specific terms to be clear. Again, is there some reason you can't use them? Are you deliberately trying to be obscure?

The term "conception" is useless in this debate, for the very simple reason that the person using it may be talking about some point in the process that is very different from when the other considers "conception" to be. The terms fertilization and implantation don't have the same problem.

The terms have nothing to do with species, by the way.

What are you babbling about....why would I say a 20 year old is not a "proper term"? Have you lost your mind? Stop babbling, and proofread your posts before submitting. Reading them out loud might help.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#315337 Nov 11, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
There was no anger in that post.
Why must you lie so much?
Oh, yes, that's right, I remember now. You do it because the truth doesn't serve your agenda, and you must attack people instead.
These particular "Christians" are dishonest women. They must accuse pro-choicers and non-religious people and especially independent women of being angry, unhappy, blah blah blah, because they can't stand the idea that people who don't share their beliefs can enjoy life, be loved and loving, be rewarded with fulfillment. They must delude themselves into believing that independent, free-thinking women aren't capable of happiness. Ridiculous! They have to think that only they can be happy. They are pretty pathetic. All women are different. What about that fact frightens them so, I wonder.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315338 Nov 11, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text> Hmmmm...how interesting that you didn't give this response to Cpeter who made the claim that "Most women forced to see an ultrasound still abort".
I take the word from the women who have aborted pre-ultrasound vs those who aborted post-ultrasound. I also take the word of the pre-cold,heartless abortion providers and their staff who share their testimonies.
Links to it have been provided throughout the years and don't DARE try to deny it Bitler. You people didn't want to hear about those who've spoken the truth.
I call bull. If anyone here provided anything on this subject, it was from a propaganda site.

Until you prove otherwise, most women who are forced to look at an ultrasound still go through with the abortion.

You DO know what the word "most" means, right?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315339 Nov 11, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>These particular "Christians" are dishonest women. They must accuse pro-choicers and non-religious people and especially independent women of being angry, unhappy, blah blah blah, because they can't stand the idea that people who don't share their beliefs can enjoy life, be loved and loving, be rewarded with fulfillment. They must delude themselves into believing that independent, free-thinking women aren't capable of happiness. Ridiculous! They have to think that only they can be happy. They are pretty pathetic. All women are different. What about that fact frightens them so, I wonder.
Exactly right. Well said.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#315340 Nov 11, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Nonsense. Where are they "saying" this? Let's see a link, and we'll see if you know what the word "most" means.
Oh, she'll be glad to do that. That's what she expects of us, so she surely doesn't mind your request.
grumpy

Hackensack, NJ

#315341 Nov 11, 2013
From NY Times Nov. 10:

"Conservative U.S. Catholics Feel Left Out of the Pope’s Embrace"

Any comments???

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 43 min Cheech the Conser... 1,481,956
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) 7 hr Patriot AKA Bozo 10,776
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 10 hr Trojan 32,716
Conn's Appliances (Nov '07) 13 hr Sue 286
News Western Michigan heads to Illinois as a favorite Jan 17 Go Blue Forever 75
legitimate loan lender (Oct '13) Jan 17 louis 19
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Jan 15 RiccardoFire 201,891
More from around the web